hat make sense? Would this be valuable at all? Or should the opposite
> be tested where we upgrade nova to N and leave all of the dependent services
> at N-1?
>
> Really looking for operator community feedback here.
I'd def like to see something like this.
Thanks,
Curtis.
>
tooling for
> deployers to build these); while the project can’t distribute operating
> systems and database software, the current deployment model merely impedes
> adoption
>
> - Clusters spanning OpenStack deployments are a real thing that must be
> supported
>
I'm cur
p, say if
you only had a couple or three clouds, but more than that maybe this
starts to make sense. Also running Galera has gotten easier but still
not that easy.
I had thought that the OpenStack community was deprecating Postgres
support though, so that could make things a bit harder here (I
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Saverio Proto wrote:
> Hello Armando,
>
> I managed to implement the L2GW setup purely in software, without an
> hardware appliance.
Nice! That is very interesting. I will take a look at the work you've done here.
Thanks,
Curtis.
>
> I d
nd do it at very high speeds. Interesting use case, real world.
Thanks,
Curtis.
[1]:
http://etherealmind.com/help-wanted-stitching-a-federated-sdn-on-openstack-with-evpn/
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
a 8 hour conference call with a
telecom; they love their conference calls. ;)
Thanks,
Curtis.
>
> 2) According to the wiki page, only companies that are "Multi-Cloud
> Operator[s] and/or Network Service Provider[s]" are welcome in this team.
> Why is the team called "Large C
t;VPS" like interface, ala Digital Ocean (and now somewhat mimicked by
AWS with uh, LightSail I think). I've always thought it would perhaps
be a nice project in OpenStack to do a simple VPS style interface.
Thanks,
Curtis.
> One of the obvious ones is nova and glance, and the API and us
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Curtis wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:27 PM, gordon chung wrote:
>>>
>>> just to clarify, what 'innovation' do you believe is required to enable
>>> you
>>> to
e other unknown but smaller IoTs...uh thing,
does that make more sense from a OpenStack + vCPE context? Or do some
think that is out of scope for OpenStack's mission as well?
Thanks,
Curtis.
>
> * actually you'll get 100 answers and the rest will say: "i don't know.&qu
ooking forward to what test results you get when you start turning
some knobs.
Thanks,
Curtis.
>
> cheers,
>
> --
> gord
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Truman, Travis
wrote:
> Curtis,
>
> Please take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/298765/ as its
> probably a good place to start digging into OVS.
>
Perfect, thanks, am looking into it now. :)
Thanks,
Curtis.
> Travis Truman
&g
OK thanks everyone. I will put on my learnening hat and start digging into this.
Thanks,
Curtis.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Truman, Travis
wrote:
> Michael Gugino and I were going to work on OVS and I believe we both got
> sidetracked. I¹ll echo Kevin¹s offer to help out where po
7;s desirable by
the community to add OpenVSwitch support, and potentially other OPNFV
related features, I have time to contribute to work on them (as best I
can, at any rate).
Let me know what you think,
Curtis.
[1]: https://www.opnfv.org/
[2]: https://etherpad.openstack.o
FYI it looks like Ansible Fest London is Feb 18th.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Amy Marrich wrote:
> I'd be game to join in if it's in San Antonio. While I'd love to go to
> London I don't think I'd make.
>
> Like Major I'd like to see some doc work.
>
> Amy Marrich
>
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Jesse Pretorius
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> At the Mitaka design summit in Tokyo we had some corridor discussions about
> doing a mid-cycle meetup for the purpose of continuing some design
> discussions and doing some specific sprint work.
>
> ***
> I'd like indicatio
15 matches
Mail list logo
