I have seen several people request that their users be members of two
"projects" and that they be allow to publish objects that are "Shared" by
multiple "projects".
For some reason the people who request these complex data constructions
always prefer to call the enclosing entity a "project". I
On November 23, 2013 4:09:49 AM Christopher Yeoh wrote:
Hi,
So in the past we've used both tenant and project to refer to the same
thing and I think its been a source of confusion for people new to
OpenStack. In the Nova code we use both, but at least for the API we've
been trying to consiste
On 11/18/2013 11:35 AM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
There were some concerns expressed at the summit about scheduler
scalability in Nova, and a little recollection of Boris' proposal to
keep the needed state in memory. I also heard one guy say that he
thinks Nova does not really need a general SQL dat
On 11/14/2013 5:12 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
I think that we have recently reached critical mass for the
openstack-dev mailing-list, with 2267 messages posted in October, and
November well on its way to pass 2000 again. Some of those are just
off-topic (and I've been regularly fight
On 11/12/2013 10:42 AM, John Griffith wrote:
Sorry, but I'm not seeing where you're going with this in relation to
the question being asked? The question is how to deal with creating a
new bootable volume from nova boot command and be able to tell whether
it's timed out, or errored while waiti
On 11/12/2013 8:09 AM, John Griffith wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Solly Ross wrote:
I'd like to get some sort of consensus on this before I start working on it.
Now that people are back from Summit, what would you propose?
Best Regards,
Solly Ross
- Original Message -
Fro
Replication of snapshots is one solution to this.
You create a Cinder Volume once. snapshot it. Then replicate to the hosts
that need it (this is the piece currently missing). Then you clone there.
I will be giving an in an hour in conference session on this and other uses
of snapshots in the las
On 10/21/2013 2:34 AM, Avishay Traeger wrote:
Hi all,
We (IBM and Red Hat) have begun discussions on enabling Disaster Recovery
(DR) in OpenStack.
We have created a wiki page with our initial thoughts:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/DisasterRecovery
We encourage others to contribute to this wi
On 10/14/2013 8:37 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
I agree that this needs to be fixed. It's very counterintuitive, if
nothing else (which is also my argument against requiring all-tenants
for admin users in the first place). The only question for me is
whether to fix it in novaclient or in Nova itself.
On 10/9/2013 12:55 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Your example sounds a lot like what taskflow is build for doing.
https://github.com/stackforge/taskflow/blob/master/taskflow/examples/calculate_in_parallel.py
is
a decent example.
In that one, tasks are created and input/output dependencies are
speci
On 10/9/2013 12:55 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Your example sounds a lot like what taskflow is build for doing.
I'm not that familiar with Heat, so I wanted to bounce this off of
you before doing a public foot-in-mouth on the mailing list.
Is the real issue here the difference between *building*
On 10/4/2013 7:33 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 10/04/2013 04:11 AM, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
>
> On Oct 3, 2013 1:45 PM, "Chris Friesen" <mailto:chris.frie...@windriver.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 10/03/2013 02:02 PM, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
> >>
On Oct 3, 2013 1:45 PM, "Chris Friesen" wrote:
>
> On 10/03/2013 02:02 PM, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On October 3, 2013 12:44:50 PM Chris Friesen
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I was wondering if there is any interest in a
On October 3, 2013 12:44:50 PM Chris Friesen
wrote:
I was wondering if there is any interest in adding an "on_shared_storage"
field to the Instance class. This would be set once at instance creation
time and we would then be able to avoid having the admin manually pass it
in for the vari
On September 4, 2013 12:28:19 PM "Coffman, Joel M."
wrote:
The following change provides a key manager implementation that reads a
static key from the project's configuration:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/45103/
This key manager implementation naturally does not provide the same
confiden
On 8/30/2013 12:49 PM, Murali Balcha wrote:
Hi Caitlin,
Did you get a chance to look at the wiki? It describes the raksha functionality
in detail.
> It includes more than volume backup. It includes vm images, all
> volumes and network configurations associated with vms and it
> supports increme
On 8/29/2013 5:36 PM, Murali Balcha wrote:
Hi Kat,
Consider the following use cases that Raksha will addresses. I will discuss
from simple to complex use case and then address your specific questions with
inline comments.
1.VM1 that is created on the local file system with a cinder volume
On 8/28/2013 3:12 PM, Murali Balcha wrote:
Hello Stackers,
We would like to introduce a new project Raksha, a Data Protection As a
Service (DPaaS) for OpenStack Cloud.
Raksha’s primary goal is to provide a comprehensive Data Protection for
OpenStack by leveraging Nova, Swift, Glance and Cinder.
On 8/13/2013 11:42 PM, Greg Poirier wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Caitlin Bestler
mailto:caitlin.best...@nexenta.com>> wrote:
I'm not following something here. What is the point at dictating a
specific FS format when the compute node will be the one apply
On 8/12/2013 9:37 AM, Greg Poirier wrote:
Oh, we don't want to get super fancy with it. We would probably only
support one filesystem type and not partitions. E.g. You request a 120GB
volume and you get a 120GB Ext4 FS mountable by label.
I'm not following something here. What is the point
20 matches
Mail list logo
