_____
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Cédric Jeanneret
Software Engineer
DFG:DF
al impact of adding new ones to projects is. Especially
>> in the container world where this might be duplicated N times
>> depending on the number of services deployed. With the move to
>> containers, much of the sharedness that being on a single host
>> provided has been
_
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Cédric Jeanneret
Software Eng
________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Cédric Je
On 08/17/2018 12:25 AM, Steve Baker wrote:
>
>
> On 15/08/18 21:32, Cédric Jeanneret wrote:
>> Dear Community,
>>
>> As you may know, a move toward Podman as replacement of Docker is starting.
>>
>> One of the issues with podman is the lack of daemon, pre
ic.io/blog/2018/05/podman-varlink/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __
>>
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@
On 08/16/2018 12:10 AM, Jason E. Rist wrote:
> On 08/15/2018 03:32 AM, Cédric Jeanneret wrote:
>> Dear Community,
>>
>> As you may know, a move toward Podman as replacement of Docker is starting.
>>
>> One of the issues with podman is the lack of daemon,
;))!
C.
¹ https://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2018/05/podman-varlink/
--
Cédric Jeanneret
Software Engineer
DFG:DF
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (n
nested stack for each
> docker based service.
>
> Then I'd suggest doing an "mv docker/services services" and moving any
> remaining files in the puppet directory into that. This is basically the
> naming that James suggested, except we wouldn't have to suffix the files
>
ak with
> the Ansible Core devs about these things as well.
And I also have the "Because" linked to my "why" :). big thanks!
Bests,
C.
>
> ---
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Sam Doran
> Senior Software Engineer
> Ansible by Red Hat
> sdo...@redhat.com <mailto:sdo...@redhat.c
mail: jaosor...@gmail.com <mailto:jaosor...@gmail.com>
>
>
>
> ______
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubsc
gt; 'inject_facts_as_vars' option in ansible.cfg.
>
> Hope this helps,
> --
> Emilien Macchi
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subjec
On 07/20/2018 09:49 AM, Cédric Jeanneret wrote:
>
>
> On 07/19/2018 06:55 PM, Paul Belanger wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 05:30:27PM +0200, Cédric Jeanneret wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> While trying to get a new validation¹ in the undercloud prefligh
On 07/19/2018 06:55 PM, Paul Belanger wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 05:30:27PM +0200, Cédric Jeanneret wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> While trying to get a new validation¹ in the undercloud preflight
>> checks, I hit an (not so) unexpected issue with the CI:
>> it
nchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/validation-framework
³
http://tripleo.org/install/environments/baremetal.html#minimum-system-requirements
--
Cédric Jeanneret
Software Engineer
DFG:DF
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
ave:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/583475/
Please, feel free to comment the spec and add your thoughts - this is a
really great opportunity to get a proper validation framework in
tripleoclient directly.
Thank you for your feedback and attention.
Cheers,
C.
On 07/16/2018 05:27 PM, Cédric
the full scope :).
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Udi Kalifon; Senior QE; RHOS-UIAutomation
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 6:32 PM, Dan Prince <mailto:dpri...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:27 AM Cédric Jeanneret
> mailto:c
bilities, if we extend the "validation"
scope outside the "undercloud" (like, tripleo, allinone, even overcloud).
What do you think? Any pros/cons/thoughts?
Cheers,
C.
¹
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/python-tripleoclient/tree/tripleoclient/v1/undercloud_preflight
On 07/16/2018 12:18 PM, Sergii Golovatiuk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Cédric Jeanneret wrote:
>> Dear Stackers,
>>
>> I'm currently looking for some inputs in order to get a new validation,
>> ran as a "preflight check"
few details on this public trello card:
https://trello.com/c/QqBsMmP9/89-implement-storage-space-checks
What do you think? Care to provide some hints and tips for the correct
implementation?
Thank you!
Bests,
C.
--
Cédric Jeanneret
Software Engineer
DFG:DF
signatu
to cross reference with the resource-registry.
+42 for a way to get the default implem - a template that just consume
the right one should be enough and self-explanatory.
Having a tree based on services instead of implem will allow that in an
easy way.
>
>
--
Cédric Jeanneret
Softwa
Thank you for your time and feedback.
Cheers,
C.
--
Cédric Jeanneret
Software Engineer
DFG:DF
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubs
___
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-d
pment Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Cédric Jeanneret
Software Engineer
DFG:DF
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signatu
On 06/05/2018 06:08 PM, Luke Hinds wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Cédric Jeanneret <mailto:cjean...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello guys!
>
> I'm currently working on python-tripleoclient in order to squash the
> dreadful &quo
shortly, as a Work In Progress (I don't think it will be
mergeable before some time, due to all the constraints we have regarding
version portability, new sudoer integration and so on).
I'll post the relevant review link as an answer of this thread when I
have something I can show.
Cheer
enstack-dev
>>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.o
oposed a change to our principles[1] in governance that attempts to
>>>>> capture the essence and spirit of the nitpicking topic as a first
>>>>> step.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Julia
>>>>> -
>>>>> [1]: https://review.openstack.org/570940
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>&
t; you can figure it out! A random contributor has no chance of parachuting
> into the middle of that dynamic and walking out unscathed, and they
> should never be asked to.
>
> cheers,
> Zane.
>
>
On 05/22/2018 09:24 AM, Cédric Jeanneret wrote:
>
>
> On 05/22/2018 09:08 AM, Luke Hinds wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 5:27 AM, Cédric Jeanneret > <mailto:cjean...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 05/21/2018 03:49 P
On 05/22/2018 09:08 AM, Luke Hinds wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 5:27 AM, Cédric Jeanneret <mailto:cjean...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 05/21/2018 03:49 PM, Luke Hinds wrote:
> > A few operators have requested if its possible to limit
oper should work out an entry is needed when
> testing their patch, but wanted to open this up to others who know
> testing at gate better much better than myself. Also encourage any
> thoughts on the topic to be introduced to the etherpad [0]
>
> [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tr
aks, having
ardcoded passwords in files and so on (although, yeah, you'll need
something to access barbican ;)).
>>
>> 2/ some projects (was it Designate ? Octavia ?) were relying on
>> advanced functions of Barbican not generally found in other secrets
>> store, li
here should I push that doc? Probably somewhere in "advanced
deployment" or something like that.
Unfortunately, I don't think I'll be able to open the ansible code soon,
but at least the concepts can be explained, and configuration example
provided.
Cheers,
C.
--
Cédric J
On 12/07/2017 05:23 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Cédric Jeanneret
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> While trying to add some unit tests for some resources in the
>> puppet-tripleo repository, I stumbled on a not-so-nice case: the
>> tripleo
eeded, especially in such a huge piece of
software ;).
Thank you for your historical knowledge and its sharing :).
Cheers,
C.
--
Cédric Jeanneret
Senior Linux System Administrator
Infrastructure Solutions
Camptocamp SA
PSE-A / EPFL, 1015 Lausanne
Phone: +41 21 619 10 32
Office: +41 21 619 10 02
for that coming change!
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Juan Antonio Osorio
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Cédric Jeanneret <
>> cedric.jeanne...@camptocamp.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/04/2017 07:08 AM,
On 11/04/2017 07:08 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Juan Antonio Osorio's message of 2017-11-04 00:11:47 +0200:
>>> On 3 Nov 2017 19:59, "Doug Hellmann" wrote:
>>>
>>> Excerpts from Cédric Jeanneret's message of 2017-11-01 14:54:34 +0100:
Dear Stackers,
While working on my
On 11/02/2017 05:18 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> Adding tags for the relevant projects. I _think_ this is mostly
> directed at Puppet/TripleO, but Oslo is obviously relevant as well.
Thank you! First mail in there, wasn't really sure how to do that.
>
> On 11/01/2017 08:54 AM, Cédri
ty happy :).
Any thoughts?
Thank you for your attention, feedback and wonderful support for that
monster project :).
Cheers,
C.
¹
https://github.com/openstack/oslo.log/blob/master/oslo_log/formatters.py#L166-L235
²
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-oslo/%23openstack-oslo.201
40 matches
Mail list logo
