On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Dmitry Guryanov
wrote:
>
> I have no objections against clearing bios boot partition, but could
> you describe scenario, how non-efi system will boot with valid
> BIOS_grub and wiped boot code in MBR
>
I thoroughly agree that it's impossible to boot without stag
Hello Dmitry,
First of all, thanks for recovering the thread.
Please read my comments inline.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Dmitry Guryanov
wrote:
>
> The first problem could be solved with zeroing first 512 bytes of each
> disk (not partition). Even 446 to be precise, because last 66 bytes
Hi,
Apparently, nailgun assumes that lvm metadata size is always set to 64M [1]
It seems that it was defined here since the early beginning of nailgun as a
project, therefore it's impossible to figure out for what purposes that was
done as early commit messages are not so informative.
According
Hello fuelers,
My question is related to shotgun tool[1] which will be invoked in
order to generate the diagnostic snapshot.
It has possibilities to substitute particular sensitive data such as
credentials/hostnames/IPs/etc with meaningless values. It's done by
Subs [2] object driver.
However, i
Hi,
Mike, fuel-agent is missing here too.
http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/fuel-agent/180
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subj
Hello Fuelers,
I'm kindly insisting on merging the following 2 patches into 6.0
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/161721/
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/161722/
These patches are going to implement IBP-reconnect [3].
Additionally, it closes one of customer-found bug [4] related to that.
Hello Vladimir,
totally +1 for separating Fuel Agent out of fuel-web.
what will happen with fuel_agent_ci ?
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov
wrote:
> Fuelers,
>
> As most of you might know we have a bunch of projects inside fuel-web repo
> which are not directly related to F
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Andrey Danin wrote:
> Adding Mellanox team explicitly.
>
> Gil, Nurit, Aviram, can you confirm that you tested that feature? It can be
> enabled on every fresh ISO. You just need to enable the Experimental mode
> (please, see the documentation for instructions).
Hello,
Andrew, thank you for pointing out all the issues. I left more
detailed comments inlined
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:51 AM, Andrew Woodward wrote:
> Here is a list of the issues I ran into using IBP before the 23rd. 5
> appears to not be merged yet and must be resolved prior to making IBP
>
Hi,
You may want to take a look at:
https://github.com/openstack/ironic-python-agent/blob/master/imagebuild/coreos/README.md
https://github.com/openstack/ironic-python-agent/blob/master/imagebuild/coreos/oem/run.sh#L5-L10
It uses its own build scripts and builds image based on coreos
https://core
Hi,
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IronicAndDevstackAgain might help you.
Should flawlessly work on Ubuntu 12.04. Latest devstack creates baremetal
flavor by itself, so you don't need to create it manually.
Let me know if you need any additional help. Or it could be better to ask
in IRC #openst
Hi, Devananda
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Devananda van der Veen <
devananda@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Alexander Gordeev
> wrote:
>
>>
>>- Secondly, virsh has some performance issues if you deal with >30
>>
Hello,
We (agordeev and vkozhukalov) had a discussion about functional testing
flow described here
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IronicDevstackTesting.From our
perspective it has some non-critical, but still notable flaws. If
you ask me, it looks a bit strange to create testing networks and VMs
13 matches
Mail list logo
