[openstack-dev] [keystone] Could keystone to keystone federation be deployed on Centos?

2018-04-03 Thread 何健乐
Hi all, Could keystone to keystone federation be deployed on Centos. I have notice all the document was deployment on Ubuntu. If could, is there some documents that is about deploying k2k on centos.__ OpenStack Development M

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] [heat-dashboard] Horizon plugin settings for new xstatic modules

2018-04-03 Thread Akihiro Motoki
Hi Xinni, There is no need that you push a tag manually for official deliverables. You can propose a patch to openstack/releases repository. Horizon PTL or release liaison (at now both Ivan) can confirm it and the release team will approve it. Once it is approved, a release tag will be added and a

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] [heat-dashboard] Horizon plugin settings for new xstatic modules

2018-04-03 Thread Ivan Kolodyazhny
Hi Xinni, Please, send me a list of packages which should be released. In general, release-* groups are different from core-*. We should discuss how to go forward with it Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, http://blog.e0ne.info/ On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:34 AM, Xinni Ge wrote: > Hi Ivan and other Hori

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] [heat-dashboard] Horizon plugin settings for new xstatic modules

2018-04-03 Thread Xinni Ge
Hi Ivan and other Horizon team member, Thanks for adding us into xstatic-core group. But I still need your opinion and help to release the newly-added xstatic packages to pypi index. Current `xstatic-core` group doesn't have the permission to PUSH SIGNED TAG, and I cannot release the first non-tr

[openstack-dev] [cyborg] High Precision Time Synchronization Card Use Case Summary

2018-04-03 Thread yumeng bao
Hi team, In our last weekly meeting, High Precision Time Synchronization Card Use Case  was firstly introduced. In the following link is a summary/description about this use case. Please take a look and don't hesitate to ask any question.  :) https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/clock-driver Regards,

[openstack-dev] [cyborg] High Precision Time Synchronization Card Use Case Summary

2018-04-03 Thread yumeng bao
Hi team, In our last weekly meeting, High Precision Time Synchronization Card Use Case  was firstly introduced. In the following link is a summary/description about this use case. Please take a look and don't hesitate to ask any question.  :) https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/clock-driver Regards,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] pep8 failures on master

2018-04-03 Thread melanie witt
On Tue, 03 Apr 2018 18:53:33 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from melanie witt's message of 2018-04-03 15:30:07 -0700: On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:26:17 -0700, Melanie Witt wrote: On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 07:54:59 +1000, Michael Still wrote: Thanks to jichenjc for fixing the pep8 failures I was seein

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] The Weekly Owl - 15th Edition

2018-04-03 Thread Emilien Macchi
Note: this is the fifteenth edition of a weekly update of what happens in TripleO. The goal is to provide a short reading (less than 5 minutes) to learn where we are and what we're doing. Any contributions and feedback are welcome. Link to the previous version: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] pep8 failures on master

2018-04-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from melanie witt's message of 2018-04-03 15:30:07 -0700: > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:26:17 -0700, Melanie Witt wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 07:54:59 +1000, Michael Still wrote: > >> Thanks to jichenjc for fixing the pep8 failures I was seeing on master. > >> I'd decided they were specific to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] pep8 failures on master

2018-04-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Michael Still's message of 2018-04-03 22:23:10 +: > I think the bit I am lost on is the concept of running pep8 "under" a > version of python. Is this an artifact of what version of pep8 I have > installed somehow? > > If the py3 pep8 is stricter, couldn't we just move to only th

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] pep8 failures on master

2018-04-03 Thread melanie witt
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:26:17 -0700, Melanie Witt wrote: On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 07:54:59 +1000, Michael Still wrote: Thanks to jichenjc for fixing the pep8 failures I was seeing on master. I'd decided they were specific to my local dev environment given no one else was seeing them. As I said in the p

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] pep8 failures on master

2018-04-03 Thread melanie witt
On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 07:54:59 +1000, Michael Still wrote: Thanks to jichenjc for fixing the pep8 failures I was seeing on master. I'd decided they were specific to my local dev environment given no one else was seeing them. As I said in the patch that fixed the issue [1], I think its worth expl

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] pep8 failures on master

2018-04-03 Thread Michael Still
I think the bit I am lost on is the concept of running pep8 "under" a version of python. Is this an artifact of what version of pep8 I have installed somehow? If the py3 pep8 is stricter, couldn't we just move to only that one? Michael On Wed., 4 Apr. 2018, 8:19 am Kevin L. Mitchell, wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] pep8 failures on master

2018-04-03 Thread Kevin L. Mitchell
On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 07:54 +1000, Michael Still wrote: > Thanks to jichenjc for fixing the pep8 failures I was seeing on > master. I'd decided they were specific to my local dev environment > given no one else was seeing them. > > As I said in the patch that fixed the issue [1], I think its worth

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] python-glanceclient release status

2018-04-03 Thread Brian Rosmaita
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > These need to be reviewed in master: > - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/50/ > - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/556292/ Thanks for the reviews. The requested changes have been made and Zuul has given a +1, so ready for reviews again!

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] pep8 failures on master

2018-04-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Michael Still's message of 2018-04-04 07:54:59 +1000: > Thanks to jichenjc for fixing the pep8 failures I was seeing on master. I'd > decided they were specific to my local dev environment given no one else > was seeing them. > > As I said in the patch that fixed the issue [1], I thi

[openstack-dev] [First Contact] Meeting tonight/tomorrow/today (Depends on your perspective)

2018-04-03 Thread Kendall Nelson
Hello! Another meeting tonight late/tomorrow depending on where in the world you live :) 0800 UTC Wednesday. Here is the agenda if you have anything to add [1]. Or if you want to add your name to the ping list it is there as well! See you all soon! -Kendall (diablo_rojo) [1] https://wiki.opens

[openstack-dev] [nova] pep8 failures on master

2018-04-03 Thread Michael Still
Thanks to jichenjc for fixing the pep8 failures I was seeing on master. I'd decided they were specific to my local dev environment given no one else was seeing them. As I said in the patch that fixed the issue [1], I think its worth exploring how these got through the gate in the first place. Ther

[openstack-dev] [all] A quick note on recent IRC trolling/vandalism

2018-04-03 Thread Clark Boylan
Hello everyone, During the recent holiday weekend some of our channels experienced some IRC trolling/vandalism. In particular the meetbot was used to start meetings titled 'maintenance' which updated the channel topic to 'maintenance'. The individual or bot doing this then used this as the pret

[openstack-dev] [cyborg] Cyborg/Nova scheduling spec

2018-04-03 Thread Nadathur, Sundar
Thanks to everybody who has commented on the Cyborg/Nova scheduling spec (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/554717/). As you may have noted, some issues were raised (*1), discussed (*2) and a potential solution was offered (*3). I have tried to synthesize the new solution from Nova team here:

[openstack-dev] Gerrit server replacement scheduled for May 2nd 2018

2018-04-03 Thread Paul Belanger
Hello from Infra. It's that time again... on Wednesday, May 02, 2018 20:00 UTC, the OpenStack Project Infrastructure team is upgrading the server which runs review.openstack.org to Ubuntu Xenial, and that means a new virtual machine instance with new IP addresses assigned by our service provider.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap

2018-04-03 Thread Wesley Hayutin
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 at 13:53 Dan Prince wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Javier Pena wrote: > > > >> Greeting folks, > >> > >> During the last PTG we spent time discussing some ideas around an > All-In-One > >> installer, using 100% of the TripleO bits to deploy a single node > OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposing Eric Fried for nova-core

2018-04-03 Thread Eric Fried
Thank you Melanie for the complimentary nomination, to the cores for welcoming me into the fold, and especially to all (cores and non, Nova and otherwise) who have mentored me along the way thus far. I hope to live up to your example and continue to pay it forward. -efried On 04/03/2018 02:20 PM

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposing Eric Fried for nova-core

2018-04-03 Thread melanie witt
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 19:00:06 -0700, Melanie Witt wrote: Howdy everyone, I'd like to propose that we add Eric Fried to the nova-core team. Eric has been instrumental to the placement effort with his work on nested resource providers and has been actively contributing to many other areas of opens

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap

2018-04-03 Thread Dan Prince
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Javier Pena wrote: > >> Greeting folks, >> >> During the last PTG we spent time discussing some ideas around an All-In-One >> installer, using 100% of the TripleO bits to deploy a single node OpenStack >> very similar with what we have today with the containerized

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][oslo] what to do with problematic mocking in nova unit tests

2018-04-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Eric Fried's message of 2018-03-31 16:12:22 -0500: > Hi Doug, I made this [2] for you. I tested it locally with oslo.config > master, and whereas I started off with a slightly different set of > errors than you show at [1], they were in the same suites. Since I > didn't want to tox

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] New PBR release coming soon

2018-04-03 Thread Ben Nemec
The new pbr version is now in upper-constraints, so it should be getting exercised in ci going forward. Please report any issues to #openstack-oslo. On 03/26/2018 11:56 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: Hi, Since this will potentially affect the majority of OpenStack projects, I wanted to give everyone s

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap

2018-04-03 Thread Dan Prince
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:23 AM, James Slagle wrote: > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Dan Prince wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >>> Greeting folks, >>> >>> During the last PTG we spent time discussing some ideas around an All-In-One >>> installer, using 100% of

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] Upcoming changes in ARA Zuul job reports

2018-04-03 Thread David Moreau Simard
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > cool. kolla will try to implement it. Cool ! For reference, openstack-ansible already retooled their log collection to copy the database instead of generating the report [1]. [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/557921/ David Moreau Simar

[openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 18-14

2018-04-03 Thread Chris Dent
html: https://anticdent.org/tc-report-18-14.html If the [logs of #openstack-tc](http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/index.html) are any indicator of reality (they are not), then the only things that happened in the past week are that the next OpenStack release got a name, and

Re: [openstack-dev] Replacing pbr's autodoc feature with sphinxcontrib-apidoc

2018-04-03 Thread Stephen Finucane
On Tue, 2018-04-03 at 12:04 -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 03/04/18 06:28, Stephen Finucane wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 19:41 -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > > > On 28/03/18 10:31, Stephen Finucane wrote: > > > > As noted last week [1], we're trying to move away from pbr's autodoc > > > > feature

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.db] innodb OPTIMIZE TABLE ?

2018-04-03 Thread Jay Pipes
On 04/03/2018 11:51 AM, Michael Bayer wrote: On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:41 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 04/03/2018 11:07 AM, Michael Bayer wrote: Yes. b. oslo.db script to run generically, yes or no? No. Just have Triple-O install galera_innoptimizer and run it in a cron job. OK, here are

Re: [openstack-dev] Replacing pbr's autodoc feature with sphinxcontrib-apidoc

2018-04-03 Thread Zane Bitter
On 03/04/18 06:28, Stephen Finucane wrote: On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 19:41 -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: On 28/03/18 10:31, Stephen Finucane wrote: As noted last week [1], we're trying to move away from pbr's autodoc feature as part of the new docs PTI. To that end, I've created sphinxcontrib-apidoc, w

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.db] innodb OPTIMIZE TABLE ?

2018-04-03 Thread Michael Bayer
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:41 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 04/03/2018 11:07 AM, Michael Bayer wrote: >> > > Yes. > >> b. oslo.db script to run generically, yes or no? > > > No. Just have Triple-O install galera_innoptimizer and run it in a cron job. OK, here are the issues I have with galera_innoptim

Re: [openstack-dev] [novaclient] invoking methods on the same client object in different theads caused malformed requests

2018-04-03 Thread Chris Friesen
On 04/03/2018 04:25 AM, Xiong, Huan wrote: Hi, I'm using a cloud benchmarking tool [1], which creates a *single* nova client object in main thread and invoke methods on that object in different worker threads. I find it generated malformed requests at random (my system has python-novaclient 10.1

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.db] innodb OPTIMIZE TABLE ?

2018-04-03 Thread Jay Pipes
On 04/03/2018 11:07 AM, Michael Bayer wrote: The MySQL / MariaDB variants we use nowadays default to innodb_file_per_table=ON and we also set this flag to ON in installer tools like TripleO. The reason we like file per table is so that we don't grow an enormous ibdata file that can't be shrun

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap

2018-04-03 Thread Javier Pena
- Original Message - > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 at 10:00 Javier Pena < jp...@redhat.com > wrote: > > > Greeting folks, > > > > > > > > During the last PTG we spent time discussing some ideas around an > > > All-In-One > > > > installer, using 100% of the TripleO bits to deploy a single node

[openstack-dev] [nova][placement] Consumer generations (allowing multiple clients to allocate for an instance)

2018-04-03 Thread Jay Pipes
Stackers, Today, a few of us had a chat to discuss changes to the Placement REST API [1] that will allow multiple clients to safely update a single consumer's set of resource allocations. This email is to summarize the decisions coming out of that chat. Note that Ed is currently updating the

[openstack-dev] [oslo.db] innodb OPTIMIZE TABLE ?

2018-04-03 Thread Michael Bayer
The MySQL / MariaDB variants we use nowadays default to innodb_file_per_table=ON and we also set this flag to ON in installer tools like TripleO. The reason we like file per table is so that we don't grow an enormous ibdata file that can't be shrunk without rebuilding the database. Instead, we

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap

2018-04-03 Thread Wesley Hayutin
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 at 10:00 Javier Pena wrote: > > > Greeting folks, > > > > During the last PTG we spent time discussing some ideas around an > All-In-One > > installer, using 100% of the TripleO bits to deploy a single node > OpenStack > > very similar with what we have today with the container

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap

2018-04-03 Thread Telles Nobrega
I'd really love to this going forward, I fit perfectly on the category that I usually don't test stuff on tripleO because it can get too complex and it will take a lot of time to deploy, so this seems like a perfect solution for that. Thanks for putting this forward. On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:00

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap

2018-04-03 Thread Javier Pena
> Greeting folks, > > During the last PTG we spent time discussing some ideas around an All-In-One > installer, using 100% of the TripleO bits to deploy a single node OpenStack > very similar with what we have today with the containerized undercloud and > what we also have with other tools like Pa

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap

2018-04-03 Thread James Slagle
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> Greeting folks, >> >> During the last PTG we spent time discussing some ideas around an All-In-One >> installer, using 100% of the TripleO bits to deploy a single node OpenStack >> very s

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/networking-midonet failed

2018-04-03 Thread Elõd Illés
Hi, These patches probably solve the issue, if someone could review them: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/557005/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/557006/ Thanks, Előd On 2018-04-01 05:55, Tony Breeds wrote: On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 06:17:41AM +, A mailing list for the OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Vitrage] New proposal for analysis.

2018-04-03 Thread Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL/Kfar Sava)
Hi Minwook, Thanks for the explanation, I understand the reasons for not running these checks on a regular basis in Zabbix or other monitoring tools. It makes sense. However, I don’t want to re-invent the wheel and add to Vitrage functionality that already exists in other projects. How about u

Re: [openstack-dev] Replacing pbr's autodoc feature with sphinxcontrib-apidoc

2018-04-03 Thread Stephen Finucane
On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 19:41 -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 28/03/18 10:31, Stephen Finucane wrote: > > As noted last week [1], we're trying to move away from pbr's autodoc > > feature as part of the new docs PTI. To that end, I've created > > sphinxcontrib-apidoc, which should do what pbr was previ

[openstack-dev] [novaclient] invoking methods on the same client object in different theads caused malformed requests

2018-04-03 Thread Xiong, Huan
Hi, I'm using a cloud benchmarking tool [1], which creates a *single* nova client object in main thread and invoke methods on that object in different worker threads. I find it generated malformed requests at random (my system has python-novaclient 10.1.0 installed). The root cause was because som

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Solar" release

2018-04-03 Thread Thomas Bechtold
Hey, On 30.03.2018 16:26, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: [...] Taking the DistroSupportMatrix into picture, for the sake of discussion, how about the following NEXT_MIN versions for "Solar" release: (a) libvirt: 3.2.0 (released on 23-Feb-2017) [...] (b) QEMU: 2.9.0 (released on 20-Apr-2017) [..

[openstack-dev] [os-upstream-institute] Call before the Vancouver training - ACTION NEEDED

2018-04-03 Thread Ildiko Vancsa
Hi Training Team, Our next training in Vancouver[1] is quickly approaching and we still have a lot of work to do. In order to sync up I created a Doodle poll[2] with hours that are somewhat inconvenient, but can work around the globe. Please respond to the poll so we can setup a call to check