Hi,
@Robert: I was successful to update the kernel without change the image.
It seems Kolla is quite unstable.
Tutj
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 5:43 AM, Hui Kang wrote:
> Robert,
> Thanks for you reply. Is there any way to change the VM image on the gate?
>
> BTW, I do see some kolla deploy gate jo
Robert,
Thanks for you reply. Is there any way to change the VM image on the gate?
BTW, I do see some kolla deploy gate job successes on kernel 3.13 [1].
Is there any reason kolla needs to check 4.2 on ubuntu 14.04?
- Hui
[1]
http://logs.openstack.org/38/313838/1/check/gate-kolla-dsvm-deploy-ub
That won't get you running the new kernel; for that you need to change
the image itself.
-Rob
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsu
Hi,
I see that the minimum kernel version required for ubuntu 14.04 is 4.2
[1]. The precheck job failed on gate because those ubuntu VMs have
kernel version 3.13.
Shall we add kernel upgrade command (i.e., apt-get install
linux-image-generic-lts-wily) in the precheck role?
- Hui
[1]
http://docs
Hi Team,
Since there was no tag [tricircle] in subject, I'm emailing you again.
Sorry for spam -;
We are trying to describe specification [1] regarding to ""cross
OpenStack L2 networking"" [0] as Chaoyi mentioned in previous message.
Honestly that description [0] does not accurately describe what
Hi Team,
We are trying to describe specification [1] regarding to ""cross
OpenStack L2 networking"" [0] as Chaoyi mentioned in previous message.
Honestly that description [0] does not accurately describe what this
project is trying to do. And it's hard to be described by few words as
well.
And he
On 5/7/16 4:26 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> On 05/07/2016 10:06 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> Thank you for your email.
>>
>> I got input from a helpful soul that the generated sample configs should
>> also be moved to somewhere publishable? Is that effort in progress as
>> well
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> On 05/07/2016 06:09 PM, Ildikó Váncsa wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > I'm open to discuss what would be the best way forward in this topic.
> First of all I would like to understand the intention with document
> structures long term to see how w
On 05/07/2016 10:06 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> I got input from a helpful soul that the generated sample configs should
> also be moved to somewhere publishable? Is that effort in progress as
> well and any links to share (if so)?
Nikhil,
look at t
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:a...@suse.com]
> Sent: May 07, 2016 20:51
> To: Ildikó Váncsa; 'Matt Kassawara'
> Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List; enstack.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenStack-docs] What's Up, Doc? 6 May 2016
>
> On 05/07/2016 06:09 PM, Ildikó Váncsa w
Hi Andreas,
Thank you for your email.
I got input from a helpful soul that the generated sample configs should
also be moved to somewhere publishable? Is that effort in progress as
well and any links to share (if so)?
On 5/7/16 4:45 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Instead of storing the generated s
Hi all,
I've been wanting to recognize the efforts of glance-cores for a while
and send this & alike emails for a while. Found a good time to do so.
Currently, there are 12 (human) core reviewers in the Glance program
(same for all concerned repos) and they have been providing excellent
input to t
On 05/07/2016 06:09 PM, Ildikó Váncsa wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> I'm open to discuss what would be the best way forward in this topic. First
> of all I would like to understand the intention with document structures long
> term to see how we can have a scalable and maintainable process.
>
> My exper
Hi Matt,
I'm open to discuss what would be the best way forward in this topic. First of
all I would like to understand the intention with document structures long term
to see how we can have a scalable and maintainable process.
My experience is that keeping the documentation up to date separate
Dirk, Haïkel, Igor, Alan, Tony, Ghe,
Please see brain dump here - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/requirements-tasks
Looking at time overlap, it seems that most of you are in one time
range and Tony and I are outliers
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20160506&p1=43&p2=2
Recently, the centos binary and source gate failed due to the rabbitmq
container
existed. After making some debug. I do not found the root cause.
does anyone has any idea for this?
see this PS gate result[0]
centos binary gate failed[1]
CentOS source gate failed[2]
[0] https://review.openstack.o
Akihiro Motoki wrote on 05/06/2016 08:20:45 PM:
> From: Akihiro Motoki
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> Date: 05/06/2016 08:23 PM
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron][osc] Austin Design summit summary
> on the future of Neutron client
>
> n Austin we had a session on the future of n
Instead of storing the generated source translation files
(*/locale/*.pot) in git and proposing them as part of the translation
import, we publish these files now whenever we push to the translation
server also to http://tarballs.openstack.org/translation-source/
Therefore, the source files are no
18 matches
Mail list logo
