Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] SR-IOV subteam

2015-11-03 Thread Moshe Levi
Maybe we can you use the pci- passthrough meeting slot http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#PCI_Passthrough_Meeting It been a long time since we had a meeting. > -Original Message- > From: Nikola Đipanov [mailto:ndipa...@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 6:53 AM > To: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

2015-11-03 Thread Boris Pavlovic
John, The main point here is to reduce amount of data that we request from DB and that is process by API services and sent via network and make SQL requests simpler (remove joins from SELECT). So like if you fetch 10 bytes instead of 1000 bytes you will process 100 times less and it will scale 1

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Role for Fuel Master Node

2015-11-03 Thread Aleksandr Didenko
Hi, please note that such tasks are executed inside 'mcollective' docker container, not on the Fuel master host system. Regards, Alex On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: > Hi Javeria, > > Try to use 'master' in 'role' field. Example: > > - role: 'master' > stage: p

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

2015-11-03 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2015-11-03 17:32:43 -0800: > Clint, Morgan, > > I totally agree that the pub/sub model is better approach. > > However, there are 2 great things about polling: > 1) it's simpler to use than pub/sub (especially in shell) I envision something like this:

[openstack-dev] [Neutron]L2/L3 switching between SR-IOV ports

2015-11-03 Thread daya kamath
all,i would like to check if there is a Neutron driver or agent supporting switching between SR-IOV ports on the same server.the wiki mentions 802.1Qbg for switching in the server NIC (VEB), or by hairpinning the pkts in the nexthop physical TOR (VEPA). i wanted to check if this is a supported t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Migration state machine proposal.

2015-11-03 Thread Tang Chen
Hi all, Just FYI, the WIP patch-set is now available here: https://review.openstack.org/241476 https://review.openstack.org/241477 https://review.openstack.org/241478 https://review.openstack.org/241479 https://review.openstack.org/241480 Thanks. On 10/14/2015 10:05 AM, Tang Chen wrote: Hi, a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

2015-11-03 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from John Griffith's message of 2015-11-03 21:45:12 -0800: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > > > Hi stackers, > > > > Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool > > that works with OpenStack are working with resources (e.g. VM, Volumes

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

2015-11-03 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > Hi stackers, > > Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool > that works with OpenStack are working with resources (e.g. VM, Volumes, > Images, ..) in the next way: > > >>> resource = api.resouce_do_some_stuff()

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

2015-11-03 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:57 PM, michael mccune wrote: > On 11/03/2015 05:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > >> What if we add new API method that will just resturn resource status by >> UUID? Or even just extend get request with the new argument that returns >> only status? >> >> Thoughts? >> > > not

[openstack-dev] [all][ironic] How to proceed about deprecation of untagged code?

2015-11-03 Thread Gabriel Bezerra
Hi, The change in https://review.openstack.org/237122 touches a feature from ironic that has not been released in any tag yet. At first, we from the team who has written the patch thought that, as it has not been part of any release, we could do backwards incompatible changes on that part of

Re: [openstack-dev] updating upper-constraints for stable branches

2015-11-03 Thread Robert Collins
On 4 November 2015 at 09:28, Doug Hellmann wrote: > lifeless had some proposals about managing stable requirements and > constraints that he presented during the summit. We should get those > written down before we start approving any changes. The tl;dr is that we'd make a copy of upper-constrain

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Mesos orchestration as discussed at mid cycle (action required from core reviewers)

2015-11-03 Thread Jay Lau
+1 to Georgy, we may need a framework on top of Mesos to enable Mesos manage long running services and have the capability of scaling, ha etc and Marathon is a good choice. Thanks. On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov < gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Thank y

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [networking-powervm] Please create networking-powervm on PyPI

2015-11-03 Thread Kyle Mestery
I'm reaching out to whoever owns the networking-powervm project [1]. I have a review out [2] which updates the PyPI publishing jobs so we can push releases for networking-powervm. However, in looking at PyPI, I don't see a networking-powervm project, but instead a neutron-powervm project. Is there

[openstack-dev] [openstack] [nova] Instance snapshot creation locally and Negative values returned by Resource Tracker

2015-11-03 Thread Vilobh Meshram
Hi All, I see negative values being returned by resource tracker, which is surprising, since enough capacity is available on Hypervisor (as seen through df -ha output [0]). In my setup I have configured nova.conf to created instance snapshot locally and I *don't have* disk-filter enabled. Local i

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] new change management tools and processes for stable/liberty and mitaka

2015-11-03 Thread Fei Long Wang
Hi Doug, Thanks for posting this. I'm working on this for Zaqar now and there is a question. As for the stable/liberty patch, where does the "60fdcaba00e30d02" in [1] come from? Thanks. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241322/1/releasenotes/notes/60fdcaba00e30d02-start-using-reno.yaml

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

2015-11-03 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Clint, Morgan, I totally agree that the pub/sub model is better approach. However, there are 2 great things about polling: 1) it's simpler to use than pub/sub (especially in shell) 2) it has really simple implementation & we can get this in OpenStack in few days/weeks What about just supporting

[openstack-dev] [tacker] Summary from the Mitaka summit

2015-11-03 Thread Sridhar Ramaswamy
Here are the notes related to OpenStack Tacker project from Tokyo summit. Tacker Developer Meetup --- Rough notes are captured in the tacker design summit etherpad [1]. As discussed in the previous irc meeting [2] the team discussed possible new irc meeting slots for the upcom

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

2015-11-03 Thread Morgan Fainberg
On Nov 3, 2015 4:29 PM, "Clint Byrum" wrote: > > Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2015-11-03 14:20:10 -0800: > > Hi stackers, > > > > Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool > > that works with OpenStack are working with resources (e.g. VM, Volumes, > > Ima

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][glance][murano][app-catalog] Summary from the Mitaka summit

2015-11-03 Thread Fox, Kevin M
+1. I think we all had a great experience coming together, finding common ground, and coming up with a solid plan to move forward that helps everyone make progress. Thanks everyone for not skipping over a potentially unpleasant conversation and getting together to talk it through. I think we all

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

2015-11-03 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2015-11-03 14:20:10 -0800: > Hi stackers, > > Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool > that works with OpenStack are working with resources (e.g. VM, Volumes, > Images, ..) in the next way: > > >>> resource = api.resouce_d

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

2015-11-03 Thread michael mccune
On 11/03/2015 05:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: What if we add new API method that will just resturn resource status by UUID? Or even just extend get request with the new argument that returns only status? Thoughts? not sure i understand the resource status by UUID, could you explain that a lit

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ian Wienand as core reviewer on diskimage-builder

2015-11-03 Thread Steve Kowalik
On 04/11/15 02:25, Gregory Haynes wrote: > Current cores - Please respond with any approvals/objections by next Friday > (November 13th). +1 from me as well. -- Steve "...In the UNIX world, people tend to interpret `non-technical user' as meaning someone

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] notification subteam

2015-11-03 Thread Michael Davies
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Michael Still wrote: > I'd be interested in being involved with this, and I know Paul Murray is > interested as well. > > I went to make a doodle, but then realised the only non-terrible timeslot > for Australia / UK / US Central is 8pm UTC (7am Australia, 8pm Lond

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][glance] Summary from the Mitaka summit

2015-11-03 Thread Christopher Aedo
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:48 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > [...] > Glance Artifacts REpository (Glare) > === > > Do you remember the Glance *EXPERIMENTAL* Glance V3 API? We had that > famous discussion again, the one we had in Vancouver, Paris and > Atlanta :) This tim

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ian Wienand as core reviewer on diskimage-builder

2015-11-03 Thread Derek Higgins
On 03/11/15 15:25, Gregory Haynes wrote: Hello everyone, I would like to propose adding Ian Wienand as a core reviewer on the diskimage-builder project. Ian has been making a significant number of contributions for some time to the project, and has been a great help in reviews lately. Thus, I

Re: [openstack-dev] Learning to Debug the Gate

2015-11-03 Thread Anita Kuno
On 11/02/2015 12:39 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: > On 10/29/2015 10:42 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: >> On 10/29/2015 08:27 AM, Anita Kuno wrote: >>> On 10/28/2015 12:14 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 10/27/2015 4:08 AM, Anita Kuno wrote: > Learning how to debug the gate was identified as a theme

[openstack-dev] [Heat] Enabling and Reading notifications

2015-11-03 Thread Pratik Mallya
Hello, I was looking for guidance as to how to enable notifications in heat and if there is already a tool that can read those events? Looking through the code, it gives somewhat conflicting information as to the extent to which notifications are supported. e.g. [1] says its not supported, but

[openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

2015-11-03 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Hi stackers, Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool that works with OpenStack are working with resources (e.g. VM, Volumes, Images, ..) in the next way: >>> resource = api.resouce_do_some_stuff() >>> while api.resource_get(resource["uuid"]) != expected_status >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] notification subteam

2015-11-03 Thread Michael Still
I'd be interested in being involved with this, and I know Paul Murray is interested as well. I went to make a doodle, but then realised the only non-terrible timeslot for Australia / UK / US Central is 8pm UTC (7am Australia, 8pm London, 2pm Central US). So what do people think of that time slot?

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Adding a new feature in Kilo. Is it possible?

2015-11-03 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/3/2015 11:57 AM, Michał Dubiel wrote: Hi all, We have a simple patch allowing to use OpenContrail's vrouter with vhostuser vif types (currently only OVS has support for that). We would like to contribute it. However, We would like this change to land in the next maintenance release of K

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [inspector] Auto discovery extension for Ironic Inspector

2015-11-03 Thread Pavlo Shchelokovskyy
Hi all, For auto-setting driver options on enrollment, I would vote for option 2 with default being fake driver + optional CMDB integration. This would ease managing a homogeneous pool of BMs, but still (using fake driver or data from CMDB) work reasonably well in heterogeneous case. As for setti

[openstack-dev] Upgrading elasticsearch cluster Monday 11/9

2015-11-03 Thread Clark Boylan
Hello, The infrastructure team will be upgrading the Elasticsearch cluster used by Logstash and elastic-recheck on Monday November 9th starting at about 1700UTC. Because we are upgrading from 0.90.9 to 1.7.3 this will require a full cluster restart. During the cluster restart you will not be able

Re: [openstack-dev] updating upper-constraints for stable branches

2015-11-03 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 Doug On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > lifeless had some proposals about managing stable requirements and > constraints that he presented during the summit. We should get those > written down before we start approving any changes. > > Doug > > Excerpts from Davanum Sriniva

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tripleo] Mesos orchestration as discussed at mid cycle (action required from core reviewers)

2015-11-03 Thread Zane Bitter
On 02/11/15 18:33, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Blame the core team :) I suspect you will end up retrying a lot of patterns we tried and failed with Kubernetes. Kubernetes eventually was found to be non-viable by the delivery of this 2 week project: https://github.com/sdake/compute-upgrade Do

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Question about Microsoft Hyper-V CI tests

2015-11-03 Thread Sławek Kapłoński
Hello, I'm now working on patch to neutron to add QoS in linuxbridge: https:// review.openstack.org/#/c/236210/ Patch is not finished yet but I have some "problem" with some tests. For example Microsoft Hyper-V CI check are failing. When I checked logs of this tests in http://64.119.130.115/neut

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Creating puppet-keystone-core and proposing Richard Megginson core-reviewer

2015-11-03 Thread Matt Fischer
Sorry I replied to this right away but used the wrong email address and it bounced! > I've appreciated all of richs v3 contributions to keystone. +1 from me. On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: > He's very good reviewer with a deep knowledge of keystone and puppet. > Thank

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Role for Fuel Master Node

2015-11-03 Thread Igor Kalnitsky
Hi Javeria, Try to use 'master' in 'role' field. Example: - role: 'master' stage: pre_deployment type: shell parameters: cmd: echo all > /tmp/plugin.all timeout: 42 Let me know if you need additional help. Thanks, Igor P.S: Since Fuel 7.0 it's recommen

Re: [openstack-dev] updating upper-constraints for stable branches

2015-11-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
lifeless had some proposals about managing stable requirements and constraints that he presented during the summit. We should get those written down before we start approving any changes. Doug Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2015-11-03 14:57:01 -0500: > Matthew, > > There's a

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Role for Fuel Master Node

2015-11-03 Thread Javeria Khan
Hey everyone, I've been working on a fuel plugin and for some reason just cant figure out how to run a task on the fuel master node through the tasks.yaml. Is there even a role for it? Something similar to what ansible does with localhost would work. Thanks, Javeria _

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleO] appropriate location for docker image uploading

2015-11-03 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Jeff Peeler's message of 2015-11-03 11:54:24 -0800: > I'm looking at introducing the ability for tripleoclient to upload > docker images into a docker registry (planning for it to be installed > in the undercloud [1]). I wanted to make sure something like this > would be accepted or g

Re: [openstack-dev] updating upper-constraints for stable branches

2015-11-03 Thread Matthew Thode
On 11/03/2015 01:57 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Matthew, > > There's a failure in grenade - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232918/ > There's a fix in progress - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/240371/ > > Once that gets released in oslo.reports. We should be able to unclog > those updates >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Mesos orchestration as discussed at mid cycle (action required from core reviewers)

2015-11-03 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
With the spec that Angus proposed, a read/write bind mount volume is not a requirement as the configuration comes from the central data store (etcd or zookeeper). Just pid=host and net=host are hard requirements. Nova will not work without net=host, atleast on RPM based distributions. Sam Yaple

Re: [openstack-dev] updating upper-constraints for stable branches

2015-11-03 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Matthew, There's a failure in grenade - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232918/ There's a fix in progress - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/240371/ Once that gets released in oslo.reports. We should be able to unclog those updates thanks, Dims On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Matthew Thode w

[openstack-dev] [tripleO] appropriate location for docker image uploading

2015-11-03 Thread Jeff Peeler
I'm looking at introducing the ability for tripleoclient to upload docker images into a docker registry (planning for it to be installed in the undercloud [1]). I wanted to make sure something like this would be accepted or get suggestions on an alternate approach. Ultimately may end up looking som

[openstack-dev] [release] new change management tools and processes for stable/liberty and mitaka

2015-11-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
As we discussed at the summit, the release management team is modifying our change management tracking tools and processes this cycle. This email is the official announcement of those changes, with more detail than we provided at the summit. In past cycles, we have used a combination of Launchpad

[openstack-dev] updating upper-constraints for stable branches

2015-11-03 Thread Matthew Thode
Are these constraints locked in place for the entire release cycle? It doesn't look like the stable/liberty version has been updated since release and it'd be nice if newer versions of the packages were tested, specifically babel in my case (as we have to have users mask the newer, stable version)

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Mesos orchestration as discussed at mid cycle (action required from core reviewers)

2015-11-03 Thread Jeff Peeler
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Michal Rostecki wrote: > On 11/03/2015 04:16 PM, Jeff Peeler wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Michal Rostecki >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> +1 to what Steven said about Kubernetes. >>> >>> I'd like to add that these 3 things (pid=host, net=host, -v) are

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][qos][fwaas] service groups vs. traffic classifiers

2015-11-03 Thread Vikram Choudhary
Thanks for all your efforts Sean. I was actually thinking a separate IRC for this effort would be great and will help all the interested people to come together and develop. Any thoughts on this? Thanks Vikram On Nov 3, 2015 11:54 PM, "Sean M. Collins" wrote: > I made a very quick attempt to j

[openstack-dev] Neutron DVR Subteam Meeting Resumes from Nov 4th 2015.

2015-11-03 Thread Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville)
Hi Folks, We would like to resume the Neutron DVR Subteam Meeting starting November 4th 2015. If you are an active technical contributor in openstack and would like to discuss any DVR related items feel free to join the meeting. Here are the meeting details. IRC channel: #openstack-meeting-alt

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Adding a new feature in Kilo. Is it possible?

2015-11-03 Thread Dulko, Michal
On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 18:57 +0100, Michał Dubiel wrote: > Hi all, > We have a simple patch allowing to use OpenContrail's vrouter with > vhostuser vif types (currently only OVS has support for that). We > would like to contribute it. > However, We would like this change to land in the next maint

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Mesos orchestration as discussed at mid cycle (action required from core reviewers)

2015-11-03 Thread Michal Rostecki
On 11/03/2015 04:16 PM, Jeff Peeler wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Michal Rostecki wrote: Hi, +1 to what Steven said about Kubernetes. I'd like to add that these 3 things (pid=host, net=host, -v) are supported by Marathon, so probably it's much less problematic for us than Kubernetes

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][qos][fwaas] service groups vs. traffic classifiers

2015-11-03 Thread Sean M. Collins
I made a very quick attempt to jot down my thoughts about how it could be used. It's based off what I proposed in https://review.openstack.org/238812, and is my attempt to take that review and use SQLAlchemy to make it actually work. https://github.com/sc68cal/neutron-classifier/blob/master/doc/s

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per sub-project stable-maint teams?

2015-11-03 Thread Salvatore Orlando
This plan makes a lot of sense to me. With the staggering number of sub-projects in neutron it is impossible for the stable team to cope with the load. Delegation and decentralisation is a must and both sub-project maintainers and the stable team will benefit from it. Also, since patches can always

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] about $::os_service_default

2015-11-03 Thread Clayton O'Neill
What is the issue with logging? Can someone other than Yanis look into this? On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > I'm seeing a lot of patches using the new $::os_service_default. > > Please stop trying to using it at this time. The feature is not stable > yet and we're testin

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ian Wienand as core reviewer on diskimage-builder

2015-11-03 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Gregory Haynes's message of 2015-11-03 07:25:27 -0800: > Hello everyone, > > I would like to propose adding Ian Wienand as a core reviewer on the > diskimage-builder project. Ian has been making a significant number of > contributions for some time to the project, and has been a grea

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ian Wienand as core reviewer on diskimage-builder

2015-11-03 Thread Ben Nemec
+1 On 11/03/2015 09:25 AM, Gregory Haynes wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I would like to propose adding Ian Wienand as a core reviewer on the > diskimage-builder project. Ian has been making a significant number of > contributions for some time to the project, and has been a great help in > reviews

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Mesos orchestration as discussed at mid cycle (action required from core reviewers)

2015-11-03 Thread Michal Rostecki
Egor, I don't have much experience with Aurora, but as far as I see, it doesn't support mounting volumes from host yet: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1107 In my opinion we should try to investigate currently existing frameworks which meets our main criteria before making decis

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][qos][fwaas] service groups vs. traffic classifiers

2015-11-03 Thread Sean M. Collins
Hi Ihar, This sounds good. I actually had a draft e-mail that I've been saving until I got back, that may be relevant. Some contributors met on Friday to discuss the packet classification framework, mostly centered around just building a reusable library that can be shared among multiple services.

[openstack-dev] [nova] Adding a new feature in Kilo. Is it possible?

2015-11-03 Thread Michał Dubiel
Hi all, We have a simple patch allowing to use OpenContrail's vrouter with vhostuser vif types (currently only OVS has support for that). We would like to contribute it. However, We would like this change to land in the next maintenance release of Kilo. Is it possible? What should be the process

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Mesos orchestration as discussed at mid cycle (action required from core reviewers)

2015-11-03 Thread Egor Guz
Michal/Steve, could you elaborate about choosing Marathon vs Aurora vs custom scheduler (to implement very precise control around placement/failures/etc)? ‹ Egor On 11/2/15, 22:44, "Michal Rostecki" wrote: >Hi, > >+1 to what Steven said about Kubernetes. > >I'd like to add that these 3 thing

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Outcome of distributed lock manager discussion @ the summit

2015-11-03 Thread Mike Perez
On 15:26 Nov 03, Robert Collins wrote: > Hi, at the summit we had a big session on distributed lock managers (DLMs). > > I'd just like to highlight the conclusions we came to in the session ( > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-cross-project-dlm > ) Also Cinder will be spearheading

[openstack-dev] [neutron][qos][fwaas] service groups vs. traffic classifiers

2015-11-03 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, on fwaas design session in Tokyo it was pointed out that for new fwaas API we may want to use service groups [1] that were approved but never merged. As far as I can tell, service groups are designed to catch several criteria to describe a typ

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][bandit] Handling bandit configuration files in Oslo.

2015-11-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Cyril Roelandt's message of 2015-11-03 16:46:25 +0100: > On 11/02/2015 07:32 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > > If we can add this command directly in our tox.ini and entirely avoid > > having the bandit.yaml would that be even better? > > Why not, but it'd have some drawbacks as we

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per sub-project stable-maint teams?

2015-11-03 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > currently we have a single neutron-wide stable-maint gerrit group that > maintains all stable branches for all stadium subprojects. I believe > that in lots of cases it would

[openstack-dev] [release] stable branch release process changes

2015-11-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
As we discussed at the summit, we are going to be changing the way we handle releases from stable branches, starting with stable/liberty this cycle. In the past the release team and stable maintenance team have coordinated stable releases of all projects at specific times during the life cycle of

[openstack-dev] [release] process changes for mitaka releases

2015-11-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Release liaisons, At the summit we discussed some of the process changes we are putting in place for the Mitaka cycle. This email thread is the official notification of those changes for folks who weren't able to be in the room for the discussion, and the reminder for those who were. The biggest

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Change VIP address via API

2015-11-03 Thread Aleksey Kasatkin
Folks, Here is a resume of our recent discussion: 1. Add new URLs for processing VIPs: /clusters//network_configuration/vips/ (GET) /clusters//network_configuration/vips// (GET, PUT) where is the id in ip_addrs table. So, user can get all VIPS, get one VIP by id, change parameters (IP address)

[openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per sub-project stable-maint teams?

2015-11-03 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, currently we have a single neutron-wide stable-maint gerrit group that maintains all stable branches for all stadium subprojects. I believe that in lots of cases it would be better to have subproject members to run their own stable maintenance

[openstack-dev] [release] team communication changes for mitaka

2015-11-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Release liaisons, The release team is making a few changes to its communication plans for Mitaka, to account for things we learned last cycle. First, we are renaming the IRC channel used for release work. The bots and logging are already configured and pleia2 has helped us rename #openstack-relmg

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Match type checking from oslo.config.

2015-11-03 Thread Hunter Haugen
I have some code that is similar to this in the F5 and Netscaler modules. I make a generic "truthy" property that accepts various truthy/falsy values ( https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-netscaler/blob/master/lib/puppet/property/netscaler_truthy.rb) then just define that as the parent of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] notification subteam

2015-11-03 Thread Mario Villaplana
Hi, I'll be working on adding notifications to Ironic and would also be interested in chatting about the direction of Nova notifications. I'm on US Central but usually work a little later to stay more in sync with the rest of the team, so 4pm-12am UTC would be best, but a bit earlier or later (lat

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Weekly DVR Meeting starting next week

2015-11-03 Thread Sean M. Collins
Cool. I plan on attending, now that I have a config for running DVR in my local lab. -- Sean M. Collins __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?s

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] live migration sub-team meeting

2015-11-03 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 12:18:38PM +, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote: > Hi all, > > Live migration was confirmed as a Nova priority for the Mitaka cycle > and a sub-team section can be found on the priorities tracking page > [1]. > > Most team members expressed they would like a regular IRC me

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Group Management

2015-11-03 Thread Bruce M Potter
I was at the ironic group mgmt design session at the summit (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/summit-mitaka-ironic-group-management), and didn't get a chance to share my thoughts, so i thought i'd do it here.  I worked on the open source cluster management tool called xCAT (http://xcat.org/) which

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][bandit] Handling bandit configuration files in Oslo.

2015-11-03 Thread Brant Knudson
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Cyril Roelandt wrote: > On 11/02/2015 07:40 PM, Brant Knudson wrote: > >> >> We could use something like this in keystone since we've got a few >> repositories. There should be a way to document why the test was skipped >> since otherwise we'll have to figure it ou

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][bandit] Handling bandit configuration files in Oslo

2015-11-03 Thread McPeak, Travis
Hi Cyril, This is a really cool idea. It should be fairly easy to implement and can only help make Bandit more usable. To be honest enhancing the way we're using the 'bandit.yaml' file has been on our list for a while. A tool like this seems like it would be a nice intermediate solution until w

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][bandit] Handling bandit configuration files in Oslo.

2015-11-03 Thread Cyril Roelandt
On 11/02/2015 07:32 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: If we can add this command directly in our tox.ini and entirely avoid having the bandit.yaml would that be even better? Why not, but it'd have some drawbacks as well: - should the conf generator be broken for some reason, the gate may end up be

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][bandit] Handling bandit configuration files in Oslo.

2015-11-03 Thread Cyril Roelandt
On 11/02/2015 07:40 PM, Brant Knudson wrote: We could use something like this in keystone since we've got a few repositories. There should be a way to document why the test was skipped since otherwise we'll have to figure it out every time we update the file. Putting a comment on the command lin

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] weekly meeting #57

2015-11-03 Thread Emilien Macchi
On 11/02/2015 08:02 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Hello! > > Here's an initial agenda for our weekly meeting, tomorrow at 1500 UTC > in #openstack-meeting-4: > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20151103 > > Feel free to add any item

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][bandit] Handling bandit configuration files in Oslo.

2015-11-03 Thread Cyril Roelandt
On 11/03/2015 10:50 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: Hi, I don't like very long command lines, it's hard to document them or comment them. I prefer configuration files. But bandit.yaml, the "template", is already a configuration file!? Yes, the config file provided by bandit is some kind of "enable

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ian Wienand as core reviewer on diskimage-builder

2015-11-03 Thread Gregory Haynes
Hello everyone, I would like to propose adding Ian Wienand as a core reviewer on the diskimage-builder project. Ian has been making a significant number of contributions for some time to the project, and has been a great help in reviews lately. Thus, I think we could benefit greatly by adding him

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Mesos orchestration as discussed at mid cycle (action required from core reviewers)

2015-11-03 Thread Jeff Peeler
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Michal Rostecki wrote: > Hi, > > +1 to what Steven said about Kubernetes. > > I'd like to add that these 3 things (pid=host, net=host, -v) are supported > by Marathon, so probably it's much less problematic for us than Kubernetes > at this moment. I don't actively

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

2015-11-03 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Reviving the thread. On the design summit session dedicated to agent and plugin extensions [1] the following was stated for l2 agent extensions (I appreciate if someone checks me on the following though): - current l2 agent extensions mechanism lacks insight into agent details like bridge

[openstack-dev] [Nova] notification subteam

2015-11-03 Thread Balázs Gibizer
Hi, We discussed in the summit that nova notification API needs some care. It was suggested that forming a subteam around notifications might help coordinate and track the effort. So I have created a wikipage [1] and I added a section in the Mitaka tracking etherpad [2] for the subteam. We

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] about $::os_service_default

2015-11-03 Thread Denis Egorenko
+1 to Emilien. If somebody already have uploaded such patches - please, mark them as WIP, until we finish all work for cinder. 2015-11-03 22:57 GMT+09:00 Emilien Macchi : > I'm seeing a lot of patches using the new $::os_service_default. > > Please stop trying to using it at this time. The featu

[openstack-dev] [tacker] Next IRC weekly meeting on Nov 10th Tuesday

2015-11-03 Thread Sridhar Ramaswamy
As discussed in the Mitaka Summit developer meetup, Tacker weekly IRC meeting is moved to Tuesday 1700 UTC. We are skipping this week's meeting. We will resume next week and mostly likely use a new meeting channel (still TBD for now, will announce here once confirmed). - Sridhar #sridhar_ram @sri

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] [RFC] split pip line of functional testing

2015-11-03 Thread Kai Qiang Wu
Hi eliqiao, 1) I think there are many openstack projects constructed multi-pipeline for different purpose, for example test different os distro pipelines. It is good to refer them. 2) we are construct new envs for different COE, I think it is easy to maintain. 3) yes, for code restructure, sorts

[openstack-dev] [puppet] about $::os_service_default

2015-11-03 Thread Emilien Macchi
I'm seeing a lot of patches using the new $::os_service_default. Please stop trying to using it at this time. The feature is not stable yet and we're testing it only for puppet-cinder module. I've heard Yanis found something that is not backward compatible with logging, but he's away this week so

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] weekly bug status + bug tag contacts

2015-11-03 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 03/11/2015 12:53, Markus Zoeller a écrit : Hey Nova folks, this is your bug lord speaking. You may have noticed that we have around 3 bugs open ... just kidding, it's above 1000 and keeps growing. During the summit, we concluded that the "fix all the crap" action item was a bit too unspecifi

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Outcome of distributed lock manager discussion @ the summit

2015-11-03 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Here's a Devstack review for zookeeper in support of this initiative: https://review.openstack.org/241040 Thanks, Dims On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Thanks robert, > > I've started to tweak https://review.openstack.org/#/c/209661/ with regard > to the outcome of that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][db][migration] Neutron db migration by python scripts

2015-11-03 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Zhi Chang wrote: Hi, all Now, I should make some database model definitions if I want to upgrade db. And a database migration script will generated when I run "neutron-db-manage revision -m "description of revision" --autogenerate". The database will upgraded when run "neutron-db-manage u

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][ThirdPartyCI]CloudFounders OpenvStorage CI - request to re-add the cinder driver

2015-11-03 Thread Eduard Matei
Hi Duncan, here is the review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241174 Thanks, Eduard __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe h

[openstack-dev] [Nova] live migration sub-team meeting

2015-11-03 Thread Murray, Paul (HP Cloud)
Hi all, Live migration was confirmed as a Nova priority for the Mitaka cycle and a sub-team section can be found on the priorities tracking page [1]. Most team members expressed they would like a regular IRC meeting for tracking work and raising blocking issues. Looking at the contributors here

[openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] weekly bug status + bug tag contacts

2015-11-03 Thread Markus Zoeller
Hey Nova folks, this is your bug lord speaking. You may have noticed that we have around 3 bugs open ... just kidding, it's above 1000 and keeps growing. During the summit, we concluded that the "fix all the crap" action item was a bit too unspecific, so let's try another thing. Beginning by end of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][db][migration] Neutron db migrationby python scripts

2015-11-03 Thread Henry Gessau
Your installed neutron is not current. When developing new db migrations you should be working with the master branch. Fast forward your repo and re-run devstack to get the latest neutron-db-manage. On Tue, Nov 03, 2015, Zhi Chang wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > There is an error when I run mi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][db][migration] Neutron db migrationby python scripts

2015-11-03 Thread Anna Kamyshnikova
Do you have the lasted code of Neutron? Change [1] that allows this was merged on the 22d of October. [1] - https://github.com/openstack/neutron/commit/9d069c48aed3a087c5c51366c8e70b29f339e794 On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Zhi Chang wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > There is an error when I

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Creating puppet-keystone-core and proposing Richard Megginson core-reviewer

2015-11-03 Thread Sofer Athlan-Guyot
He's very good reviewer with a deep knowledge of keystone and puppet. Thank you Richard for your help. +1 Emilien Macchi writes: > At the Summit we discussed about scaling-up our team. > We decided to investigate the creation of sub-groups specific to our > modules that would have +2 power. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] Service chain node creation fails

2015-11-03 Thread NareshA kumar
Hi Sumit, As you mentioned I used the AWS template format and now able to create a service chain successfully. But I dont see any firewall and lb created in my network. Am I missing anything here? Regards, Naresh. On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:42 PM, NareshA kumar wrote: > Hi Sumit, > Thanks for you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][db][migration] Neutron db migrationby python scripts

2015-11-03 Thread Zhi Chang
Thanks for your reply. There is an error when I run migration cmd: stack@devstack:~/neutron/neutron/db/migration$ neutron-db-manage revision -m 'desc' --contract usage: neutron-db-manage [-h] [--config-dir DIR] [--config-file PATH] [--core_plugin CORE_PLUGIN] [--nosplit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][db][migration] Neutron db migration by python scripts

2015-11-03 Thread Anna Kamyshnikova
You can create new migration using "neutron-db-manage revision -m 'desc' --expand/--contract" depends in what changes do you want to do in migration expand - add something, contract - delete or modify. More information - http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/devref/alembic_migrations.html O

  1   2   >