Re: [openstack-dev] Requests + urllib3 + distro packages

On 10/13/2015 12:44 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Anvil gets somewhat far on this, although its not supporting DEBs it > does build its best attempt at RPMs building them automatically and > turning git repos of projects into RPMs. > > http://anvil.readthedocs.org/en/latest/topics/summary.html (hopef

Re: [openstack-dev] Requests + urllib3 + distro packages

On 10/12/2015 03:58 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2015-10-12 15:40:48 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote: > [...] >> Has the infra team ever thought about doing that for (at least) all of >> the 3rd party libs we use? I'd love to work closer with the infra team >> to provide them with missing pac

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][cli][openstackclient] conflict in nova flavor and zaqar flavor

On 12/10/15 19:25 -0300, Victoria Martínez de la Cruz wrote: HI all, Thanks for your feedback. We discussed this topic in this week weekly meeting and we came to the conclusion that it would be better to use "pool-flavor" instead of creating a namespace for Zaqar only (by prefixing everything wi

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] liberty stable branch development

Hi folks, A heads-up: we are currently experiencing a number of failures on the stable/liberty for neutron [1]. Bear with us whilst we go through the painstaking process of fixing the dependency issues that caused the recent grief. Thanks, Armando [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:ope

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

Excerpts from Ian Wells's message of 2015-10-12 19:43:48 -0700: > On 11 October 2015 at 00:23, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > I'm in, except I think this gets simpler with an intermediary service > > like ZK/Consul to keep track of this 1GB of data and replace the need > > for 6, and changes the implem

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed solution to "Admin" ness improperly scoped:

Sorry for my lack of explanation. Are the both scopes of admin and non-admin totally different? Is each project not nested in admin scope like: admin { Some properties ... { ... project-a { owner-a ... } project-b { owner-b ... } ... project-x {

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed solution to "Admin" ness improperly scoped:

On 10/12/2015 08:07 PM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: Just question. Will be scopes of non-admin users projects in admin scoped project? I'm sorry I don't understand what you are asking. Shinobu - Original Message - From: "Adam Young" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" Sent: Monday,

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

Ian Wells wrote: On 10 October 2015 at 23:47, Clint Byrum mailto:cl...@fewbar.com>> wrote: > Per before, my suggestion was that every scheduler tries to maintain a copy > of the cloud's state in memory (in much the same way, per the previous > example, as every router on the i

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

On 11 October 2015 at 00:23, Clint Byrum wrote: > I'm in, except I think this gets simpler with an intermediary service > like ZK/Consul to keep track of this 1GB of data and replace the need > for 6, and changes the implementation of 5 to "updates its record and > signals its presence". > OK, s

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

On 10 October 2015 at 23:47, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Per before, my suggestion was that every scheduler tries to maintain a > copy > > of the cloud's state in memory (in much the same way, per the previous > > example, as every router on the internet tries to make a route table out > of > > what i

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] CI jobs blocked on oslo.messaging and webob releases

Matt, oslo.messaging 2.6.1 has unclogged the pipe - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-announce/2015-October/000712.html Thanks, Dims On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Most people are probably already aware of this but given we have two > changes that now rel

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: On 10/12/15, 11:45 AM, "Joshua Harlow" wrote: Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: On 10/10/15, 11:35 PM, "Clint Byrum" wrote: Excerpts from Alec Hothan (ahothan)'s message of 2015-10-09 21:19:14 -0700: On 10/9/15, 6:29 PM, "Clint Byrum" wrote: Excerpts fr

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

On 10/12/15, 11:45 AM, "Joshua Harlow" wrote: >Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On 10/10/15, 11:35 PM, "Clint Byrum" wrote: >> >>> Excerpts from Alec Hothan (ahothan)'s message of 2015-10-09 21:19:14 -0700: On 10/9/15, 6:29 PM, "Clint Byrum" wrote: > Excerpts from

Re: [openstack-dev] Open a new project in OpenStack or Stackforge ?

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015, at 05:09 PM, joehuang wrote: > Hello, > > Could you or someone else pls. help us to open a new project? We learned > that Stackforge will be retired soon, so shall we open this new project > under OpenStack directly instead? How to do it ? > > A new project, a standalone ne

[openstack-dev] Open a new project in OpenStack or Stackforge ?

Hello, Could you or someone else pls. help us to open a new project? We learned that Stackforge will be retired soon, so shall we open this new project under OpenStack directly instead? How to do it ? A new project, a standalone new service Kingbird (https://launchpad.net/kingbird ) for distr

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed solution to "Admin" ness improperly scoped:

Just question. Will be scopes of non-admin users projects in admin scoped project? Shinobu - Original Message - From: "Adam Young" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 3:38:01 AM Subject: [openstack-dev] Proposed solution to "Admin" ness improperly sco

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][cli][openstackclient] conflict in nova flavor and zaqar flavor

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Victoria Martínez de la Cruz < victo...@vmartinezdelacruz.com> wrote: > So, this commands would look like > > openstack pool-flavor create > openstack pool-flavor get > openstack pool-flavor delete > openstack pool-flavor update > openstack pool-flavor list > I wo

[openstack-dev] [nova] CI jobs blocked on oslo.messaging and webob releases

Most people are probably already aware of this but given we have two changes that now rely on each other to land things are a bit complicated for tracking, so I figured I'd dump the info here. We have to bugs introduced with dependent library releases: 1. oslo.messaging 2.6.0: https://bugs.lau

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] DevStack switching from MySQL-python to PyMySQL

On 12 October 2015 at 17:16, Sean Dague wrote: > > Yes, the last patch was landed on June 16th. We've been running on > pymysql for most of the liberty development cycle. Great news! Thanks Sean. __ OpenStack Development Ma

[openstack-dev] Oslo survey

Hi OpenStack devs, The Oslo team would like to collect feedback and information from its user base in order to help us plan and strategize around Mitaka deliverables and to help improve itself and the projects it maintains. To do so, we have developed a survey that we think will be helpful in ma

Re: [openstack-dev] Requests + urllib3 + distro packages

Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2015-10-12 15:40:48 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote: [...] Has the infra team ever thought about doing that for (at least) all of the 3rd party libs we use? I'd love to work closer with the infra team to provide them with missing packages they would need, and I'm sur

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][cli][openstackclient] conflict in nova flavor and zaqar flavor

HI all, Thanks for your feedback. We discussed this topic in this week weekly meeting and we came to the conclusion that it would be better to use "pool-flavor" instead of creating a namespace for Zaqar only (by prefixing everything with the "message" key). So, this commands would look like open

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Cross-project track schedule draft: Feedback needed

cc'ing w/o ' (facepalm) On 13/10/15 07:05 +0900, Flavio Percoco wrote: Greetings, We have a draft schedule for the cross-project track for the Mitaka summit[0] (find it at the bottom of the etherpad). Yay! We would like to get feedback from folks that have proposed these sessions - hopefully y

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] novaclient functional test failures

On Oct 12, 2015, at 12:14, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: > http://logs.openstack.org/77/232677/1/check/gate-novaclient-dsvm-functional/2de31bc/ > (For review https://review.openstack.org/232677) > > http://logs.openstack.org/99/232899/1/check/gate-novaclient-dsvm-functional/6d6dd1d/ > (For review ht

[openstack-dev] [all] Cross-project track schedule draft: Feedback needed

Greetings, We have a draft schedule for the cross-project track for the Mitaka summit[0] (find it at the bottom of the etherpad). Yay! We would like to get feedback from folks that have proposed these sessions - hopefully you're all cc'd - or other folks that may be co-moderating them. If there

Re: [openstack-dev] Requests + urllib3 + distro packages

On 13/10/15 02:05, Thomas Goirand wrote: BTW, the same applies for tablib which is in a even more horrible state that makes it impossible to package with Py3 support. But tablib could be removed from our (build-)dependency list, if someone cares about re-writing cliff-tablib, which IMO wouldn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Ironic] Testing Ironic multi-tenancy feature

Hi Pavlo, This feature spans three projects; Neutron, Nova, and Ironic. The code for neutron modification was merged in Liberty, but, because of the timeline/logistics, we missed the deadline to merge the Nova and Ironic code in Liberty. Most of the patches are ready and the functionality is being

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [neutron] A larger batch of questions about configuring DevStack to use Neutron

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 04:48:09PM EDT, Mike Spreitzer wrote: > Thanks, i will review soon. BTW, i am interested in creating a config in > which a Compute Instance can be created on an external network. > That would be with the provider networking extension. I've only done it with a dedicated i

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [neutron] A larger batch of questions about configuring DevStack to use Neutron

Thanks, i will review soon. BTW, i am interested in creating a config in which a Compute Instance can be created on an external network. Thanks, Mike Sean M. Collins --- Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [neutron] A larger batch of questions about configuring DevStack to use Neutron ---

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]What happened when the 3-rd controller restarted?

>*But there is no such a feature in Neutron. Right? Will the community merge it soon? And can we consider it with agent-style mechanism together?* The agents have their own mechanisms for getting information from the server. The community has no plans to merge a feature that is going to be differe

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] novaclient functional test failures

On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 12:16 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 10/12/2015 11:54 AM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: > > Functional tests on novaclient (gate-novaclient-dsvm-functional) have > > started failing consistently. The test failures all seem to be for an > > HTTP 300, which leads me to suspect a prob

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

On 10/12/2015 02:45 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: On 10/10/15, 11:35 PM, "Clint Byrum" wrote: Excerpts from Alec Hothan (ahothan)'s message of 2015-10-09 21:19:14 -0700: On 10/9/15, 6:29 PM, "Clint Byrum" wrote: Excerpts from Chris Friesen's message of 2015-10-

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Meter-list with multiple filters in simple query is not working

Hi Thanks for your reply. Yes, I need the logical OR operation here. Seems the simple query is not either doing logical "AND" operation also. Because, if so, the output should be empty list in my example. However, the output is list of meters with the project_id value as d41cd...*. If I in

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: On 10/10/15, 11:35 PM, "Clint Byrum" wrote: Excerpts from Alec Hothan (ahothan)'s message of 2015-10-09 21:19:14 -0700: On 10/9/15, 6:29 PM, "Clint Byrum" wrote: Excerpts from Chris Friesen's message of 2015-10-09 17:33:38 -0700: On 10/09/2015 03:36 PM, Ia

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

On 10/10/15, 11:35 PM, "Clint Byrum" wrote: >Excerpts from Alec Hothan (ahothan)'s message of 2015-10-09 21:19:14 -0700: >> >> On 10/9/15, 6:29 PM, "Clint Byrum" wrote: >> >> >Excerpts from Chris Friesen's message of 2015-10-09 17:33:38 -0700: >> >> On 10/09/2015 03:36 PM, Ian Wells wrote

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] OpenStack Ironic dinner

Since many of us is going to be in Tokyo for the summit, who's interested in an OpenStack Ironic dinner? Let's first decide what day of the week suits most people, so please vote here: http://doodle.com/poll/2nqbemmrdd9a5ypd if you have any food requirements or restrictions please add it to the "

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2015-10-11 01:14:08 -0700: Clint, There are many PROS and CONS in both of approaches. Reinventing wheel (in this case it's quite simple task) and it gives more flexibility and doesn't require usage of ZK/Consul (which will simplify i

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Reminder: Team meeting on Monday at 2100 UTC

A kind reminder for today's meeting. Please add agenda items to the meeting here [1]. See you all in a few hours! Armando [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for u

[openstack-dev] [Infra] Meeting Tuesday October 13th at 19:00 UTC

Hi everyone, The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is having our next weekly meeting on Tuesday October 13th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Meeting agenda available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is welcome to to add agenda items) Everyone intere

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Design Summit schedule - update

Hi folks, As some of you may know, this summit we have 12 fishbowl sessions between Wednesday and Thursday, and a full day on Friday for team get-together. We broke down the 12 sessions in three separate tracks: - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-neutron-core-track - https://etherpa

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2015-10-11 01:14:08 -0700: > Clint, > > There are many PROS and CONS in both of approaches. > > Reinventing wheel (in this case it's quite simple task) and it gives more > flexibility and doesn't require > usage of ZK/Consul (which will simplify integrati

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-10-12 08:35:20 -0700: > Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Clint Byrum wrote: > >> Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-10-10 17:43:40 -0700: > >>> I'm curious is there any more detail about #1 below anywhere online? > >>> > >>> Does cassandra use some

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

On 10/12/2015 12:43 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-10-12 05:57:26 -0700: On 10/11/2015 02:53 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Thomas, i am curious as well. AFAIK, cassandra works well with OpenJDK. Can you please elaborate what you concerns are for #1? Thanks

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Team meeting minutes - 10/12/2015

Hi, Thanks for joining team meeting today. Meeting minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2015/mistral.2015-10-12-16.00.html Meeting log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2015

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-10-12 05:57:26 -0700: > On 10/11/2015 02:53 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > Thomas, > > > > i am curious as well. AFAIK, cassandra works well with OpenJDK. Can you > > please elaborate what you concerns are for #1? > > > > Thanks, > > Dims > > s/wor

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Auto-abandon bot

On 10/10/2015 08:12 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2015-10-09 17:10:15 -0500 (-0500), Ben Nemec wrote: >> As discussed in the meeting a week or two ago, we would like to bring >> back the auto-abandon functionality for old, unloved gerrit reviews. > [...] >> -WIP patches are never abandoned > [...]

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-announce] [release][oslo] oslo.log release 1.12.0 (mitaka)

On Mon, Oct 12 2015, dava...@gmail.com wrote: > We are amped to announce the release of: > > oslo.log 1.12.0: oslo.log library > […] This version breaks Gnocchi (and probably all other projects) on platform that are not Linux, for no good reason. I'm trying to push a fix here: https://review.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] novaclient functional test failures

On 10/12/2015 11:54 AM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: > Functional tests on novaclient (gate-novaclient-dsvm-functional) have > started failing consistently. The test failures all seem to be for an > HTTP 300, which leads me to suspect a problem with the test environment, > rather than with the tests i

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] DevStack switching from MySQL-python to PyMySQL

On 10/12/2015 12:03 PM, Jesse Pretorius wrote: > On 15 June 2015 at 12:30, Sean Dague > wrote: > > > As a heads up for where we stand. The switch was flipped, but a lot of > neutron jobs (rally & tempest) went into a pretty high failure rate > after it was (all

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] [xen] [ovs]: how to handle the ports when there are multiple ports existing for a single VM vif

Hi guys, I'm working on a bug #1268955 which is due to neutron ovs agent/plugin can't process the ports correctly when multiple ports existing for a single VM vif. I originally identified two potential solutions but one of them requires not minor change; and the other one may result in a race

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] DevStack switching from MySQL-python to PyMySQL

On 15 June 2015 at 12:30, Sean Dague wrote: > > As a heads up for where we stand. The switch was flipped, but a lot of > neutron jobs (rally & tempest) went into a pretty high failure rate > after it was (all the other high volume jobs seemed fine). > > We reverted the change here to unwedge thin

[openstack-dev] [nova] novaclient functional test failures

Functional tests on novaclient (gate-novaclient-dsvm-functional) have started failing consistently. The test failures all seem to be for an HTTP 300, which leads me to suspect a problem with the test environment, rather than with the tests in novaclient. Anyone have any insights as to how to addr

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

Thierry Carrez wrote: Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-10-10 17:43:40 -0700: I'm curious is there any more detail about #1 below anywhere online? Does cassandra use some features of the JVM that the openJDK version doesn't support? Something else? This about su

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [neutron] A larger batch of questions about configuring DevStack to use Neutron

On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 01:47:31PM EDT, Mike Spreitzer wrote: > .. > > > In the section > > > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/devstack/guides/ > > neutron.html#using-neutron-with-a-single-interface > > > there is a helpful display of localrc contents. It says, among other > > > things, > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]What happened when the 3-rd controller restarted?

Inline, Salvatore On 12 October 2015 at 09:29, Germy Lure wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > *Thank you for your response. Periodic data checking is a popular and > effective method to sync info. But there is no such a feature in Neutron. > Right? Will the community merge it soon? And can we consider it wit

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]Anyone tried to mix-use openstack components or projects?

Inline, Salvatore On 12 October 2015 at 10:23, Germy Lure wrote: > Thank you, Kevin. > So the community just divided the whole openstack into separate > sub-projects(Nova,Neutron and etc.) but it's not taken into account that if > those modules can work together with different versions. Yes? >

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][ec2-api][nova] Future of Tempest ec2 tests

Hi Matthew, I'd like to provide you with some info in regard to standalone EC2 API part. I can't claim clear understanding of tempest development directions but here are the things to take in account about EC2 API: 1. Standalone EC2 API carry all of its tests including previously tempest ones

[openstack-dev] [QA][ec2-api][nova] Future of Tempest ec2 tests

Hi everyone, I think it's time we revisit having ec2 api tests in the tempest tree. They have always been something that was really out of scope for tempest, since tempest is about using and testing the OpenStack APIs, not OpenStack's implementation of amazon's APIs. We only kept these tests aroun

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] Proposing Vitaly Gridnev to core reviewer team

+1. Thank you for your contributions, Vitaly! Regards, Alexander Ignatov > On 12 Oct 2015, at 17:06, Ethan Gafford wrote: > > I'm a very hearty +1 to this; Vitaly's a critical driver of both reviews and > features in Sahara. > > Cheers, > Ethan > > - Original Message - > From: "mic

[openstack-dev] [puppet] weekly meeting #55

Hello! Here's an initial agenda for our weekly meeting, tomorrow at 1500 UTC in #openstack-meeting-4: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20151013 Feel free to add any items you'd like to discuss. If our schedule allows it, we'll make bug triage during the meeting.

[openstack-dev] Cross-project meeting, Tue Oct 13th, 21:00 UTC

Dear PTLs, cross-project liaisons, and interested team members, We'll have a cross-project meeting tomorrow at 21:00 UTC, with the following agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/CrossProjectMeeting#Proposed_agenda - Review past action items - Team announcements (horizontal, ver

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][Horizon] UI for pools and flavors

On 12/10/15 20:36, Matthias Runge wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/10/15 09:25, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 10/10/15 21:07 +0530, Shifali Agrawal wrote: Greetings! I have prepared mock-ups[1],[2] to build Zaqar UI, at present focusing only to bring pools and flavors

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] Proposing Vitaly Gridnev to core reviewer team

I'm a very hearty +1 to this; Vitaly's a critical driver of both reviews and features in Sahara. Cheers, Ethan - Original Message - From: "michael mccune" To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 8:49:18 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] Proposing Vita

Re: [openstack-dev] Requests + urllib3 + distro packages

On 2015-10-12 15:40:48 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote: [...] > Has the infra team ever thought about doing that for (at least) all of > the 3rd party libs we use? I'd love to work closer with the infra team > to provide them with missing packages they would need, and I'm sure my > RPM buddy Ha

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][Horizon] UI for pools and flavors

On 12/10/15 20:36, Matthias Runge wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/10/15 09:25, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 10/10/15 21:07 +0530, Shifali Agrawal wrote: Greetings! I have prepared mock-ups[1],[2] to build Zaqar UI, at present focusing only to bring pools and flavors

Re: [openstack-dev] Requests + urllib3 + distro packages

On 10/09/2015 03:39 PM, William M Edmonds wrote: > When you're using a distro, you're always going to have to worry about > someone pip installing something that conflicts with the rpm, no? The point of this thread is: no you don't. You do only if some (bad) upstream decide to vendorize. > Unless

Re: [openstack-dev] Requests + urllib3 + distro packages

On 10/12/2015 02:16 AM, Robert Collins wrote: > On 10 October 2015 at 02:58, Cory Benfield wrote: >> >>> On 9 Oct 2015, at 14:40, William M Edmonds wrote: >>> >>> Cory Benfield writes: > The problem that occurs is the result of a few interacting things: > - requests has very very specif

Re: [openstack-dev] Requests + urllib3 + distro packages

Note: it's not my intention to restart a flame war about vendorizing of urllib3 in requests, however, I can't let you write wrong things, and the point of this message is only that, not discussing if requests should stop vendorizing (I've given up a long time ago any attempt to convince upstream ab

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST 08:00 (Tue) Japan 21:00 (Tue) China 20:00 (Tue) United Kingdom 13:00 (Tue) The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meeti

Re: [openstack-dev] Requests + urllib3 + distro packages

On 10/09/2015 02:39 AM, Robert Collins wrote: > - get the distros to stop un-vendoring urllib3 I'm not the package maintainer of requests, but I know that Barry Warsaw, the actual maintainer, will not want to do that. The other solutions which you didn't mention: 1- Stop using a vendorized versi

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Team meeting - 10/12/2015

Hi, This is a reminder that we’ll have a team meeting today at #openstack-meeting at 16.00 UTC. Agenda: Review action items Current status (progress, issues, roadblocks, further plans) Official Liberty Release health Bugfixing progress Documentation progress https://review.openstack.org/232507

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] service catalog: TNG

On 10/09/2015 07:14 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > I don't think we're suggesting that we abandon the current one. We don't > break userspace! > > However, replacing the underpinnings of the current one with the new one, > and leaving the current one as a compatibility layer _is_ a way to get > progres

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] gates broken by WebOb 1.5 release

Le 12/10/2015 10:43, Victor Stinner a écrit : WebOb 1.5 was released yesterday. test_misc of Cinder starts failing with this release. I wrote this simple fix which should be enough to repair it: https://review.openstack.org/233528 "Fix test_misc for WebOb 1.5" FYI my fix was merged in Cinder.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Ironic] Testing Ironic multi-tenancy feature

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 07:45:55AM +, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: > Hi all, > > we would like to start preliminary testing of Ironic multi-tenant network > setup which is supported by Neutron in Liberty according to [1]. According > to Neutron design integration with network equipment is done

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

On 10/11/2015 02:53 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Thomas, > > i am curious as well. AFAIK, cassandra works well with OpenJDK. Can you > please elaborate what you concerns are for #1? > > Thanks, > Dims s/works well/works/ Upstream doesn't test against OpenJDK, and they close bugs without fixing

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] 7.0.0 (liberty) release: which modules?

Hi, Emilien! I've pushed some basic functional tests for Murano. Here's a review link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/233591/. Also I'll try to add more functional tests as soon as all patches will be merged to puppet-murano. -- Kind Regards, Alexey Deryugin, Intern Deployment Engineer, Miran

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] Proposing Vitaly Gridnev to core reviewer team

i'm +1 for this, Vitaly has been doing a great job contributing code and reviews to the project. mike On 10/12/2015 07:19 AM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote: Hi folks, I'd like to propose Vitaly Gridnev as a member of the Sahara core reviewer team. Vitaly contributing to Sahara for a long time and do

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] About availability zones

Hi, Sylvain&other Nova guys, Our team has also argued about this deeply, and no consensus was reached. if instance.az is designed just for a reflect of the instance at boot time, then it doesn't make any sense after the vm is live-migrated with specified destination for several times, right? Then

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Cross-Project track topic proposals

On 23/09/15 10:45 +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote: Greetings, The community is in the process of collecting topics for the cross-project tack that we'll have in the Mitaka summit. The good ol' OSDREG has been setup[0] to help collectiong these topics and we'd like to encourage the community to prop

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

Hi everyone, What do you think about this proposal ? http://www.slideshare.net/viggates/openstack-india-meetupscheduler It seems they found a real solution for a scaling scheduler. The good idea is to move intelligence on compute. A synchronisation is only needed for anti-afinity and stuff like t

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [inspector] Ideas for summit discussions

Hi inspectors! :) We don't have a proper design session in Tokyo, but I hope it won't prevent us from having an informal one, probably on Friday morning during the contributor meetup. I'm collecting the ideas of what we could discuss, so please feel free to jump in: https://etherpad.openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] ERROR : openstack Forbidden (HTTP 403)

Resolved it. The no_proxy env var needs to be set if your computer is located behind a authenticating proxy infrastructure. Source : https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/67203/kilo-deployment-using-packstack-fails-with-403-error-on-usrbinopenstack-service-list/ On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:12 PM, D

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] Proposing Vitaly Gridnev to core reviewer team

+1 Great work, Vitaly! -- Sergey Reshetnyak 2015-10-12 14:19 GMT+03:00 Sergey Lukjanov : > Hi folks, > > I'd like to propose Vitaly Gridnev as a member of the Sahara core reviewer > team. > > Vitaly contributing to Sahara for a long time and doing a great job on > reviewing and improving Sahara.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Meter-list with multiple filters in simple query is not working

> Hi > > Can anyone plz help me on how to specify a simple query with multiple values > for a query field in a Ceilometer meter-list request? I need to fetch meters > that belongs to more than one project id. I have tried the following query > format, but only the last query value (in this case,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] jobs that make break when we remove Devstack extras.d in 10 weeks

On 10/12/2015 07:12 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 10/09/2015 05:41 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: >> On 10/09/2015 12:58 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: >>> On 10/09/2015 12:35 PM, Sean Dague wrote: From now until the removal of devstack extras.d support I'm going to send a weekly email of jobs th

[openstack-dev] [sahara] Proposing Vitaly Gridnev to core reviewer team

Hi folks, I'd like to propose Vitaly Gridnev as a member of the Sahara core reviewer team. Vitaly contributing to Sahara for a long time and doing a great job on reviewing and improving Sahara. Here are the statistics for reviews [0][1][2] and commits [3]. Existing Sahara core reviewers, please

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] jobs that make break when we remove Devstack extras.d in 10 weeks

On 10/09/2015 05:41 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 10/09/2015 12:58 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 10/09/2015 12:35 PM, Sean Dague wrote: From now until the removal of devstack extras.d support I'm going to send a weekly email of jobs that may break. A warning was added that we can track in logsta

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][mistral] Automatic evacuation as a long running task

On 10/06/2015 04:34 PM, Matthew Booth wrote: > Hi, Roman, > > Evacuated has been on my radar for a while and this post has prodded me > to take a look at the code. I think it's worth starting by explaining > the problems in the current solution. Nova client is currently > responsible for doing thi

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-10-10 17:43:40 -0700: >> I'm curious is there any more detail about #1 below anywhere online? >> >> Does cassandra use some features of the JVM that the openJDK version >> doesn't support? Something else? > > This about sums it up

[openstack-dev] network interface order

Hi I have a vm with 3 network interfaces. I create it through heat template. I want the interfaces to be in a specific order in the vm (eth0 a_net, eth1 b_net, eth2 c_net). How can I do the following? I am using juno version With the following configuration I have : eth0 a_net, eth2 b_net

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

Adam Lawson wrote: > I have a quick question: how is Amazon doing this? When choosing a next > path forward that reliably scales, would be interesting to know how this > is already being done. Well, those who know probably would be sued if they told. Since they have a limited set of instance type

Re: [openstack-dev] Requests + urllib3 + distro packages

> On 12 Oct 2015, at 01:16, Robert Collins wrote: > To sum up the thread, it sounds to me like a viable way-forward is: > > - get distros to fixup their requests Python dependencies (and > hopefully they can update that in stable releases). > - fix the existing known bugs in pip where such accur

[openstack-dev] ERROR : openstack Forbidden (HTTP 403)

Hi, I am getting this error while installing Openstack on Centos. ERROR : Error appeared during Puppet run: 10.16.37.221_keystone.pp Error: Could not prefetch keystone_service provider 'openstack': Execution of '/usr/bin/openstack service list --quiet --format csv --long' returned 1: ERROR: openst

[openstack-dev] [fuel] fuel-python lead candidacy

Hey everyone, I'd like to announce my candidacy for fuel-python component lead position. I've been working on the Nailgun project for year and half now, as one of regular contributor. Last fall I became a core reviewer, and since then I'm doing my best to help others to land their patches and to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Recording little everyday OpenStack successes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/10/15 19:42, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hello everyone, > > OpenStack has become quite big, and it's easier than ever to feel lost, > to feel like nothing is really happening. It's more difficult than ever > to feel part of a single community, and

[openstack-dev] [cinder] gates broken by WebOb 1.5 release

Hi, WebOb 1.5 was released yesterday. test_misc of Cinder starts failing with this release. I wrote this simple fix which should be enough to repair it: https://review.openstack.org/233528 "Fix test_misc for WebOb 1.5" class ConvertedException(webob.exc.WSGIHTTPException): -def __init__

Re: [openstack-dev] Different OpenStack components

Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2015-10-09 23:13:48 + (+), Fox, Kevin M wrote: >> On 2015-10-09 22:20:43 + (+), Amrith Kumar wrote: >> [...] >>> A google search produced this as result #2. >>> >>> http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/index.html >>> >>> Looks pretty complete

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Recording little everyday OpenStack successes

Mike Spreitzer wrote: > Great. I am about to contribute one myself. Lucky I noticed this > email. How will the word get out to those who did not? How about a > pointer to instructions on the Successes page? Yes, we need to document that in various places (infra guide, project team guide, the w

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]Anyone tried to mix-use openstack components or projects?

Thank you, Kevin. So the community just divided the whole openstack into separate sub-projects(Nova,Neutron and etc.) but it's not taken into account that if those modules can work together with different versions. Yes? If so, is it possible to keep being compatible with each other in technology?

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][db]Neutron db revision fails

Have you made changes in db models? There result should be: akamyshnikova@akamyshnikova:/opt/stack/neutron$ .tox/py27/bin/neutron-db-manage --config-file /etc/neutron/neutron.conf --config-file /etc/neutron/plugins/ml2/ml2_conf.ini revision -m 'test' --autogenerate Running revision for neutron .

  1   2   >