I don't see any exception using bellow command
root@szxbz:/opt/stack/neutron# neutron port-update
3748649e-243d-4408-a5f1-8122f1fbf501 --allowed-address-pairs action=clear
Allowed address pairs must be a list.
At 2015-09-28 14:36:44, "masoom alam" wrote:
stable KILO
shall I checkout the
stable KILO
shall I checkout the latest code are you saying this...Also can you please
confirm if you have tested this thing at your endand there was no
problem...
Thanks
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:29 PM, shihanzhang wrote:
> which branch do you use? there is not this problem in master b
which branch do you use? there is not this problem in master branch.
At 2015-09-28 13:43:05, "masoom alam" wrote:
Can anybody highlight why the following command is throwing an exception:
Command# neutron port-update db3113df-14a3-4d6d-a3c5-d0517a134fc3
--allowed-address-pairs action=cle
Can anybody highlight why the following command is throwing an exception:
*Command#* neutron port-update db3113df-14a3-4d6d-a3c5-d0517a134fc3
--allowed-address-pairs action=clear
*Error: * 2015-09-27 21:44:32.144 ERROR neutron.api.v2.resource
[req-b1cbe1f2-ba21-4337-a714-f337c54ee9fc admin None]
Is there a lot of people requesting this meeting change?
Thanks,
Brandon
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 23:58 +, Eichberger, German wrote:
> All,
>
> In our last meeting [1] we discussed moving the meeting earlier to
> accommodate participants from the EMEA region. I am therefore proposing to
> move
Meeting on #openstack-meeting-alt at 1400 UTC (8:00AM MDT)
1) Mitaka planning
2) Opens
--
Don Dugger
"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
On 09/26/2015 02:48 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22 2015, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 09/22/2015 05:48 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
A present:
>>> import contextlib
>>> import os
>>>
>>> @contextlib.contextmanager
... def synced_file(path, mode='wb'):
... with open(path, mode) as fh
Russell and Kevin,
Thanks for your detail information!
I got it.
Thanks again,
Tony
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 4:18 AM
To: Kevin Benton; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: WANG, Ming
Hello,
We had a very good Doc Sprint. Thanks everyone who contributed.
Finally tally: Merged 88 commits across 20+ repos and gained one core
commiter! :)
Huge welcome to Brant Knudson. The full list of reviews are at the bottom
of the etherpad [1]
Thanks,
Dims
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.or
On 2015-09-27 18:37:59 -0600 (-0600), Matt Fischer wrote:
> On Sep 27, 2015 6:09 PM, "Emilien Macchi" wrote:
> >
> > should we delete it?
>
> I'm not sure what value it has anymore but why not just readonly?
We aren't deleting any repos, just making them read-only and
committing a change to rep
I'm not sure what value it has anymore but why not just readonly?
On Sep 27, 2015 6:09 PM, "Emilien Macchi" wrote:
> should we delete it?
>
> FYI: the module is deprecated in Juno release.
>
> I vote for yes.
>
>
> Forwarded Message
> Subject: Action required: stackforge/puppet-
should we delete it?
FYI: the module is deprecated in Juno release.
I vote for yes.
Forwarded Message
Subject: Action required: stackforge/puppet-openstack project move
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 21:57:10 +
From: OpenStack Infrastructure Team
To: clayton.one...@twcable.com, c
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>
>
> So after 5 days, here is a bit of feedback (13 people did the poll [1]):
>
> 1/ Providers
> Except for 1, most of people are managing a few number of Keystone
> users/tenants.
> I would like to know if it's because the current implement
On 09/27/2015 06:50 AM, Kevin Benton wrote:
> Assuming it implements the normal provider networks API, you just
> specify the segmentation_id when you create the network.
>
> neutron net-create NET_NAME --provider:network_type vlan
> --provider:physical_network physnet1 --provider:segmentation_id
On 09/27/2015 02:26 AM, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) wrote:
> Russell,
>
> Thanks for your valuable information.
> I understood Geneve is some kind of tunnel format for network virtualization
> encapsulation, just like VxLAN.
> But I'm still confused by the connection between Geneve and VTEP.
> I supp
Hi all,
Living in France I prefer the previous meeting time (20:00 UTC)
regards,
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 3:30 AM, Doug Wiegley
wrote:
> Works for me.
>
> Doug
>
>
> > On Sep 25, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Eichberger, German <
> german.eichber...@hpe.com> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > In our last meeting [1
On 25 September 2015 at 15:40, Chris Hoge wrote:
> In November, the OpenStack Foundation will start requiring vendors
> requesting
> new "OpenStack Compatible" storage driver licenses to start passing the
> Cinder
> third-party integration tests.
The new program was approved by the Board at
> th
Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 20:43:23 +:
> On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:56 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> >
> > Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 17:42:24 +:
> >> On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Brian Rosmaita
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to clarify somethi
Assuming it implements the normal provider networks API, you just specify
the segmentation_id when you create the network.
neutron net-create NET_NAME --provider:network_type vlan
--provider:physical_network physnet1 --provider:segmentation_id VLAN_TAG
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:50 AM, WANG, Ming
Russell,
Another question is about "localnet". It is a very useful feature. :-)
Is it possible to assign which VLAN tag will be used for a specific provider
network?
In your example in
https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/c02819293d52f7ea7b714242d871b2b01f57f905
: "physnet1" is used as ph
20 matches
Mail list logo
