[openstack-dev] after change the system time backward, swift upload file return 409 conflict

After changed the system time from 4-20 to 4-5, upload file to swift returned 409 conflict, this file had been uploaded to swift at 4-20, the 409 conflict is caused by the fact that swift compares the request time against the disk_file's X-Timestamp, if the request time is older than the file's

[openstack-dev] ?????? [ceilometer] time based auto scaling

Agree with ZhiQiang. Maybe we could achieve this by heat itself or other project like Mistral, but it seems more natural to achieve this through ceilometer alarm system. -- Luo gangyiluogan...@chinamobile.com -- -- ??: "Zhi

[openstack-dev] [sahara][CDH] Is it possible to add CDH5.4 into Kilo release now?

Hi all, Currently Cloudera has already release CDH5.4.0 version. I have already registered a bp and submitted two patches for it (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/sahara/+spec/cdh-5-4-support) . However, they are for master stream, and Cloudera hope it can be added to the latest release version

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] time based auto scaling

+1, if you really care about time range, Mistral can meet your requirements. Besides, maybe not directly related, as for autoscaling, I always believe there should be a message queue service(like Zaqar) between the (web) application and the worker, a task request will be posted to the queue as a m

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] time based auto scaling

what about Mistral? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Mistral Thanks, Kevin From: ZhiQiang Fan Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 9:23:20 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] time based auto scaling Hi devs, I'm thinking to a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Nova] [Cinder] [tc] Should Openstack project maintained by core team keep only API/DB in the future?

Yes, ml2 was created since each of the drivers used to be required to do everything themselves and it was decided it would be far better for everyone to share the common bits. Thats what ml2s about. Its not about implementing an sdn Thanks, Kevin From: loy wolfe

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] time based auto scaling

Hi devs, I'm thinking to add new type of alarm for time based auto scaling, but not sure if there is a better way to achieve it outside ceilometer scope Currently we can auto scaling based on vm load, but it will take several minutes to do it. For the worst case, when the vm load is heavy, ceilom

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Why ceilometer do notoffer run_tests.sh script?

Thanks for your reply. Yes, we can do as you said. But still a bit weird using database in unit tests :) -- Luo gangyiluogan...@chinamobile.com -- Original -- From: "Lu, Lianhao";; Date: Wed, Apr 29, 2015 10:18 AM To: "OpenStack Devel

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Pre-Liberty Virtual Mini Summit

Hi all, Please note an important update on the schedule. Since we need to finalize the Glance summit sessions by May 8th, we have planned an earlier virtual meetup on Thursday May 7th 2015. We are still planning to have the discussions on May 12th and if necessary on May 13th. The details are i

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Stack/Resource updated_at conventions

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been looking into $subject recently, I raised this bug: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1448155 > > Basically we've got some historically weird and potentially inconsistent > behavior around updated_at, and I'm tryin

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Why ceilometer do not offer run_tests.sh script?

everything llu mentioned below. also, if you don't want to install mongo, you can run tests against mysql/postgres/elasticsearch instead using tox -epy-mysql, tox -epy-pgsql or tox -epy-elastic. if you want to debug the tests you can similar run tox -edebug- cheers, gord -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Why ceilometer do not offer run_tests.sh script?

On Apr 29, 2015 09:49, Luo Gangyi wrote: > Hi guys, > > When I try to run unit tests of ceilometer, I find there is no > run_tests.sh script offers. > > And when I use tox directly, I got a message ' 'Could not find mongod > command'. Please use setup-test-env-mongodb.sh instead. See tox.ini f

Re: [openstack-dev] Neutron Lbaas v2 not showing operating_status as inactive

Yes you are right. The statuses call is correctly changing the operating status to DISABLED, but not showing operating status as DISABLED when doing POST/PUT/GET on loadbalancer upon specifying admin_state_up as 'False' explicitly. Thanks for confirming though. Madhu On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 6:59

Re: [openstack-dev] Neutron Lbaas v2 not showing operating_status as inactive

?So that is the right URL for the statuses call. As I understand the issue the statuses call is correctly changing the operating status to DISABLED correct? The problem is when you do an operationg on a loadbalancer and admin_state_up = False. In that case the body returned for those operatio

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Why ceilometer do not offer run_tests.sh script?

Hi guys, When I try to run unit tests of ceilometer, I find there is no run_tests.sh script offers. And when I use tox directly, I got a message ' 'Could not find mongod command'. So another question is why unit tests needs mongo? Can someone give me some hint? Thanks a lot.

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Kubernetes AutoScaling with Heat AutoScalingGroup and Ceilometer

You can take a look onto Murano Kubernetes package. There is no autoscaling out of the box, but it will be quite trivial to add a new action for that as there are functions to add new ETC and Kubernetes nodes on master as well as there is a function to add a new VM. Here is an example of a scaleUp

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Nova] [Cinder] [tc] Should Openstack project maintained by core team keep only API/DB in the future?

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Kevin Benton wrote: > The concern is that having broken drivers out there that claim to work with > an OpenStack project end up making the project look bad. It's similar to a > first time Linux user experiencing frequent kernel panics because they are > using hardw

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Why do we need to select subnet when creating a pool?

Hi Wanjing, As it's Juno, I assume you are using LBaaSv1. If that's the case, as Brandon pointed, there's no subnet-id switch in the "neutron lb-member-create" command. Having said that you still use the subnet-id in both the following commands: neutron lb-pool-create neutron lb-vip-create You s

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Why do we need to select subnet when creating a pool?

Brandon Just saw this. So using horizon, when adding a member to the pool, I can either select from active vm lists, or just specify ip address of the member. There is no subnet selection on this page. So what is the usage of pool subnet what I have to enter when creating pool on horizon? Tha

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Core Reviewer Update

Congrats Doug, Rob and Travis! thanks for all the hard work On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:57 PM, David Lyle wrote: > I am pleased to announce the addition of Doug Fish, Rob Cresswell and > Travis Tripp to the Horizon Core Reviewer team. > > Doug Fish has been an active reviewer and participant in Ho

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Why do we need to select subnet when creating a pool?

Thanks, Brandon. I am using V1. And trying to create via horizon, this field is the mandatory field in horizon creating pool pageWanjing From: brandon.lo...@rackspace.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 01:40:00 + Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Why

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] beaker-rspec tests blueprint

On 04/28/2015 04:16 PM, Gabriele Cerami wrote: > Hi, > > for people who, like me, would like to contribute to the effort of > adding tests to the upcoming beaker-rspec framework, could be really > helpful discussing about the scope, requirements and goals for the > framework and for a test to ma

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Stack/Resource updated_at conventions

On 28/04/15 03:56, Steven Hardy wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 06:41:52PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: On 27/04/15 13:38, Steven Hardy wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:46:20PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: AFAICT there's two options: 1. Update the stack.Stack so we store "now" at every transition

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Two nominations for Manila Core Reviewer Team

On 04/22/2015 02:23 PM, Ben Swartzlander wrote: I would like to nominate Thomas Bechtold to join the Manila core reviewer team. Thomas has been contributing to Manila for close to 6 months and has provided a good number of quality code reviews in addition to a substantial amount of contribution

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Core Reviewer Update

Welcome to the team Doug, Rob, and Travis!!!-David Lyle wrote: -To: OpenStack Development Mailing List From: David Lyle Date: 04/28/2015 04:00PMSubject: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Core Reviewer UpdateI am pleased to announce the addition of Doug Fish, Rob Cresswell and Travis Tripp to the

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Core Reviewer Update

I am pleased to announce the addition of Doug Fish, Rob Cresswell and Travis Tripp to the Horizon Core Reviewer team. Doug Fish has been an active reviewer and participant in Horizon for a few releases now. He represents a strong customer focus and has provided high quality reviews. Rob Cresswell

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposal for Madhuri Kumari to join Core Team

+1, welcome Madhuri! 2015-04-29 0:00 GMT+08:00 Adrian Otto : > +1 > > On Apr 28, 2015, at 8:14 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) > wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I would like to nominate Madhuri Kumari to the core team for Magnum. > Please remember a +1 vote indicates your acceptance. A –1 vote acts as a

Re: [openstack-dev] Navigating the ever changing OpenStack codebase

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2015-04-28 16:08:03 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: >> Honestly, I see no problem with some helper bash scripts that >> simplify life for new contributors. >> [...] > > [...] > I remember it happening regularly before we started begging p

Re: [openstack-dev] Navigating the ever changing OpenStack codebase

On 2015-04-28 16:08:03 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: > Honestly, I see no problem with some helper bash scripts that > simplify life for new contributors. [...] Well, the main downside to them is that rather than serving as documentation of how to run the tests, they serve as a temptation to dev

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Kilo RC3 available

Hello everyone, Due to a critical upgrade issue (bug 1448075) discovered in RC2 testing, a new Nova release candidate was just created for Kilo. The list of RC3 last-minute fixes, as well as the RC3 tarball are available at: https://launchpad.net/nova/kilo/kilo-rc3 At this late stage, this tarba

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] trimming down Tempest smoke tag

On 04/28/2015 06:38 AM, Sean Dague wrote: The Tempest Smoke tag was originally introduced to provide a quick view of your OpenStack environment to ensure that a few basic things were working. It was intended to be fast. However, during Icehouse the smoke tag was repurposed as a way to let neutro

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] Weekly subteam status report

Hi, Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) (As of Mon, 27 Apr, 15:20 UTC) Open: 145 (+2) 4 new (-4), 41 in progress (+7), 0 critical, 9 high (-1) and 11 (+3) incomplete Drivers

Re: [openstack-dev] Navigating the ever changing OpenStack codebase

Thanks again for the clarification. Your initial --notests was an option I was unaware of and I didn't take the time to try variations. I was familiar with invoking test names by regex I just thought it was more a convention. Regards Ronald On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] Neutron Lbaas v2 not showing operating_status as inactive

Hi Anand, There is an api which calls 'statuses' method.. I could see the status 'DISABLED' in: GET /lbaas/loadbalancers/loadbalancer_id/statuses. Maybe we need to correct the doc to reflect the right URL to avoid confusion. If that is the right API call, I shall update the bug and mark it as fix

Re: [openstack-dev] Navigating the ever changing OpenStack codebase

On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 16:08 -0400, Jay Pipes wrote: > Honestly, I see no problem with some helper bash scripts that simplify > life for new contributors. The bash scripts do wonders for developers > new to OpenStack or Python coding by having a pretty easy and readable > way of determining what

[openstack-dev] [puppet] beaker-rspec tests blueprint

Hi, for people who, like me, would like to contribute to the effort of adding tests to the upcoming beaker-rspec framework, could be really helpful discussing about the scope, requirements and goals for the framework and for a test to make sense in this environment. I'd like to see, if possible,

[openstack-dev] [Elections] Vote Vote Vote in the TC election!

We are coming down the the last day plus hours for voting in the TC election. Search your gerrit preferred email address[0] for the following subject: Poll: OpenStack Technical Committee (TC) Election - April 2015 That is your ballot and links you to the voting application. Please vote. If you

Re: [openstack-dev] Navigating the ever changing OpenStack codebase

On 04/27/2015 06:38 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 21:42 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: I consider it an unfortunate oversight that those files weren't deleted a very, very long time ago. Unfortunately, there's one problem with that: you can't tell tox to use a virtualenv tha

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Kilo RC3 available

Hello everyone, Due to a security issue (bug 1447883) discovered in RC2 testing, a new Neutron release candidate was just created for Kilo. The list of RC3 last-minute fixes, as well as the RC3 tarballs are available at: https://launchpad.net/neutron/kilo/kilo-rc3 At this late stage, these tarba

[openstack-dev] [Infra][Neutron] request to mark plumgrid-ci back to voting

Folks, PLUMgrid CI was marked as non-voting some time back when plugin decomposition work was done. Now the CI has been back up and running with the requirements [1] fulfilled, this is a request to enable PLUMgrid CI to vote +1/-1 Verified on any Neutron changes. As mentioned in the third party C

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Liberty Summit Topics etherpad

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 3:11 PM, James Slagle wrote: > I've created an etherpad for for TripleO to track the topics we'd like > to discuss at the Liberty Summit: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-liberty-proposed-sessions > > It's also linked from the main Design Summit Planning wiki page:

Re: [openstack-dev] Navigating the ever changing OpenStack codebase

On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 10:40 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: > > No dice. I don't want to have to parse the tox.ini directly. We're > > talking about automated tests here, by the way. > > Why not? It's an ini file, with a stable interface. Yes, but it's tox's perview. Also, it's not just the command;

[openstack-dev] Neutron Lbaas v2 not showing operating_status as inactive

Hi , I am working on the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1449286 In this bug the admin_state_up is made to false when creating a lbaas v2 loadbalancer.The operating_state should become DISABLED for the created loadbalancer but it is showing as online. I can see that there is a method

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] A big tent home for Neutron backend code

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 04/27/2015 08:52 PM, Armando M. wrote: > > > > Any project that fails to meet the criteria later can be dropped at > any > > time. For example, if some repo is clearly unmaintained, it can be > > removed. > > > > > > If we o

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] A big tent home for Neutron backend code

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 04/22/2015 02:19 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: > > a) Adopt these as repositories under the Neutron project team. > > > > In this case, I would see them operating with their own review teams as > > they do today to avoid imposing additional

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] A big tent home for Neutron backend code

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > Apologies for commenting so late, but I'm not clear on the concept of > bringing all possible backend projects back inside Neutron. > > > I think my question is similar to what Henry and Mathieu are getting at > below - viz: > > > We just

[openstack-dev] [Congress] Cores

Hi all, I'm nominating Alex Yip for core status in Congress. He's active on IRC and gerrit, fixes important bugs routinely, and developed a number of key features for the project: - added a DSL that makes writing datasource-drivers much easier - improved scale-up performance by orders of magnit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Nova] [Cinder] [tc] Should Openstack project maintained by core team keep only API/DB in the future?

The concern is that having broken drivers out there that claim to work with an OpenStack project end up making the project look bad. It's similar to a first time Linux user experiencing frequent kernel panics because they are using hardware with terrible drivers. They aren't going to recognize the

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI Driver

Dear Cinder team, A patchset has been uploaded to request re-integration of Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI Cinder driver to 2 branches: master and stable/kilo: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/178319 Here are some success reports of the Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI CI: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175809/ https

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Question for the TC candidates

Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-04-28 11:30:01 -0700: > Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2015-04-28 16:30:21 +0100 (+0100), Chris Dent wrote: > > [...] > >> What's important to avoid is the blog postings being only reporting of > >> "conclusions". They also need to be invitations to parti

Re: [openstack-dev] Navigating the ever changing OpenStack codebase

Excerpts from Ronald Bradford's message of 2015-04-28 14:24:37 -0400: > Thanks Doug. For others following this thread. The following creates and > activates the tox virtual environment. > > # Note: its --notests not --notests Sorry, that was a typo on my part. The option name is actually '--notes

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Dependency management summit sessions

On 28 April 2015 at 22:57, Sean Dague wrote: > On 04/27/2015 05:53 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > I'm still generally suspicious of the precompute / install model because > solving that ends up being... interesting some times. I also think there > is a related issue of "dependencies for optional fea

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][nova] Does anyone use Zookeeper, Memcache Nova ServiceGroup Driver ?

Attila Fazekas wrote: How many compute nodes do you want to manage ? If it less than ~1000, you do not need to care. If you have more, just use SSD with good write IOPS value. Mysql actually can be fast with enough memory and good SSD. Even faster than [1]. zk as technology is good, the curren

Re: [openstack-dev] Navigating the ever changing OpenStack codebase

On 29 April 2015 at 06:24, Ronald Bradford wrote: > Thanks Doug. For others following this thread. The following creates and > activates the tox virtual environment. > > # Note: its --notests not --notests > $ tox -epy27 -- notests > $ source .tox/py27/bin/activate > (py27)$ openstack help Actual

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Question for the TC candidates

Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2015-04-28 16:30:21 +0100 (+0100), Chris Dent wrote: [...] What's important to avoid is the blog postings being only reporting of "conclusions". They also need to be invitations to participate in the discussions. Yes, the mailing list, gerrit and meeting logs have some o

Re: [openstack-dev] Navigating the ever changing OpenStack codebase

Thanks Doug. For others following this thread. The following creates and activates the tox virtual environment. # Note: its --notests not --notests $ tox -epy27 -- notests $ source .tox/py27/bin/activate (py27)$ openstack help -- http://ronaldbradford.com/blog/running-openstack-tests-with-tox-2

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Mount automation using Zeroconf

Thanks, Luis, I agree with your assessment that one good way to solve this issue is a publisher-subscriber model. The publisher would be Manila, using zeroconf or AMQP or Zaqar (the one I¹m investigating now). The subscriber would be a lightweight agent running on the client that listens for shar

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] implement openvswitch container

From: "Steven Dake (stdake)" mailto:std...@cisco.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 7:52 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Question for the TC candidates

On 04/28/2015 12:42 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2015-04-28 16:21:17 +: >> On 2015-04-28 16:30:21 +0100 (+0100), Chris Dent wrote: >> [...] >>> What's important to avoid is the blog postings being only reporting of >>> "conclusions". They also need to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Question for the TC candidates

On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Anita Kuno wrote: At present, I am beginning to wonder to what degree you are being honest with us? Is you intention to know the candidates or to communicate your dissatisfaction with the current blog post situation? You'll note that I didn't have anything to say about the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Question for the TC candidates

On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 16:30 +0100, Chris Dent wrote: > What's important to avoid is the blog postings being only reporting of > "conclusions". They also need to be invitations to participate in the > discussions. Yes, the mailing list, gerrit and meeting logs have some > of the ongoing discussions

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] A big tent home for Neutron backend code

On 04/28/2015 01:17 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > Apologies for commenting so late, but I'm not clear on the concept of > bringing all possible backend projects back inside Neutron. > > > I think my question is similar to what Henry and Mathieu are getting at > below - viz: > > > We just recently de

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][nova] Does anyone use Zookeeper, Memcache Nova ServiceGroup Driver ?

Attila, Thanks for the details. Why the current Zk driver is not good ? Apart from the slowness of Mc, Zk driver are they reliable enough ? Lets say I have more than 1000 compute would you still suggest to go with DB Servicegroup driver ? >The sg drivers was introduced to eliminate 100 Update/

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Question for the TC candidates

On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 17:00 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > I would have to go back and check, but I'm pretty sure the posts were > highlighted in Stef's community newsletter email. They were, in fact. But I know as a fact that even if people many love the newsletter, I have the impression that few

Re: [openstack-dev] Navigating the ever changing OpenStack codebase

Excerpts from Kevin L. Mitchell's message of 2015-04-28 08:15:51 -0700: > On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 15:54 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Excerpts from Kevin L. Mitchell's message of 2015-04-27 15:38:25 -0700: > > > On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 21:42 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > > I consider it an unfortu

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Question for the TC candidates

On 04/23/2015 12:14 PM, Chris Dent wrote: > > This might be a bit presumptuous, but why not give it a try... > > This cycle's TC elections didn't come with a set of prepackaged > questions and though the self-nomination messages have included some > very interesting stuff I think it would be usef

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] A big tent home for Neutron backend code

Apologies for commenting so late, but I'm not clear on the concept of bringing all possible backend projects back inside Neutron. I think my question is similar to what Henry and Mathieu are getting at below - viz: We just recently decided to move a lot of vendor-specific ML2 mechanism driver

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Call to action, revisit CIS state

On 4/28/15, 00:31, "Tripp, Travis S" wrote: > >>On 4/27/15, 05:39, "Kuvaja, Erno" wrote: >> >>>The spec bluntly states that >>>there is no security impact from the implementation >>> and the concerns should have been brought up so reviewers would have >>>had >>>better chance to catch possible

[openstack-dev] [infra][third-party][neutron-lbaas] git review - how to provide the URL to the test artifacts

Hi all I am running into trouble with how to post back the link to the log artefacts after running the CI. I can see how this is done in zuul using the url_pattern in zuul.conf, but as it stands now I am only using jenkins and the command line to monitor gerrit and build test environments.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Question for the TC candidates

Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2015-04-28 16:21:17 +: > On 2015-04-28 16:30:21 +0100 (+0100), Chris Dent wrote: > [...] > > What's important to avoid is the blog postings being only reporting of > > "conclusions". They also need to be invitations to participate in the > > discussions

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Linuxbridge as the default in DevStack

I wanted to provide a quick update - the patch is passing tests at the gate, however it is with a couple defaults hard-coded in. We are picking eth0 as the physical interface, and VLANs. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168423/ I have another patch that is WIP that switches to VXLAN, but I also n

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Question for the TC candidates

On 2015-04-28 16:30:21 +0100 (+0100), Chris Dent wrote: [...] > What's important to avoid is the blog postings being only reporting of > "conclusions". They also need to be invitations to participate in the > discussions. Yes, the mailing list, gerrit and meeting logs have some > of the ongoing dis

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Why do we need to select subnet when creating a pool?

?So someone pointed out that you were using lbaas for Juno, which would mean you aren't using LBaaS V2. So you're using V1. V1 member's do not take subnet_id as an attribute. Let me know how you are making your requests. Thanks, Brandon From: Brandon Logan

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Linuxbridge as the default in DevStack [was: Status of the nova-network to Neutron migration work]

This is all good stuff. Thanks. Does/Should the neutron docs have an openvswitch debugging page? This belongs there for easy access. Such a page might go a long way to alleviate fears over the openvswitch backend. Thanks, Kevin From: Attila Fazekas Sent: Tuesday

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Weekly meeting #33

in the etherpad directly. > > See you tomorrow, > > [1] > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20150428 We did our meeting, you can read the notes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/puppet_openstack/2015/puppet_openstack.2015-04-28-15.00.htm

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposal for Madhuri Kumari to join Core Team

+1 On Apr 28, 2015, at 8:14 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) mailto:std...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi folks, I would like to nominate Madhuri Kumari to the core team for Magnum. Please remember a +1 vote indicates your acceptance. A –1 vote acts as a complete veto. Why Madhuri for core? 1. She par

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Kubernetes AutoScaling with Heat AutoScalingGroup and Ceilometer

- Original Message - > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:28:01PM -0400, Rabi Mishra wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Deploying Kubernetes(k8s) cluster on any OpenStack based cloud for > > container based workload is a standard deployment pattern. However, > > auto-scaling this cluster based on load wo

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] creating a rubygems mirror for OpenStack

> On Apr 27, 2015, at 9:19 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > Hi, Hey! > > All Puppet OpenStack jobs (lint, syntax, unit and beaker) are quite > often affected by rubygems.org downtimes and make all jobs failing > randomly because it can't download some gems during the bootstrap. > This is somethi

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Question about tempest API tests that establish SSH connection to instances

Matt, thank you for the answer! Regards, Yaroslav Lobankov. On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 02:21:27PM +0300, Yaroslav Lobankov wrote: > > Guys, thank you for answers! > > > > Then I have one more question :) How do scenario tests (that establi

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Question for the TC candidates

On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Doug Hellmann wrote: Thanks very much for the information about this stuff thus far. To take the discussion to its logical extreme, for the sake of the discussion and not (just) to be snarky, I want to respond to something from this last paragraph We do not always resolve a

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposal for Madhuri Kumari to join Core Team

+1 from me. welcome Madhuri! On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Hi folks, > > I would like to nominate Madhuri Kumari to the core team for Magnum. > Please remember a +1 vote indicates your acceptance. A –1 vote acts as a > complete veto. > > Why Madhuri for core? >

Re: [openstack-dev] Navigating the ever changing OpenStack codebase

On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 15:54 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Kevin L. Mitchell's message of 2015-04-27 15:38:25 -0700: > > On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 21:42 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > I consider it an unfortunate oversight that those files weren't > > > deleted a very, very long time ago

[openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposal for Madhuri Kumari to join Core Team

Hi folks, I would like to nominate Madhuri Kumari to the core team for Magnum. Please remember a +1 vote indicates your acceptance. A –1 vote acts as a complete veto. Why Madhuri for core? 1. She participates on IRC heavily 2. She has been heavily involved in a really difficult projec

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Bump the RPC version required for port_update - AgentNotifierApi

On 28 April 2015 at 05:52, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 04/28/2015 06:25 AM, Rossella Sblendido wrote: > > > > > > On 04/28/2015 03:24 AM, Armando M. wrote: > >> >> UnsupportedVersion error if the version is not bumped in their > agent too. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Could the server fal

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Question about tempest API tests that establish SSH connection to instances

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 02:21:27PM +0300, Yaroslav Lobankov wrote: > Guys, thank you for answers! > > Then I have one more question :) How do scenario tests (that establish SSH > connection to instances) work? > So the scenario tests don't use the run_ssh flag, they just ssh in to servers when t

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] implement openvswitch container

From: FangFenghua mailto:fang_feng...@hotmail.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 7:02 AM To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" mai

Re: [openstack-dev] Navigating the ever changing OpenStack codebase

Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2015-04-27 21:42:15 +: > On 2015-04-27 17:07:56 -0400 (-0400), Ronald Bradford wrote: > [...] > > Specifically, the following two code snippets have become SOP (Standard > > Operating Procedure) jumping around VMs and projects and I suspect if you > > a

Re: [openstack-dev] Navigating the ever changing OpenStack codebase

Excerpts from Kevin L. Mitchell's message of 2015-04-27 17:38:25 -0500: > On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 21:42 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > I consider it an unfortunate oversight that those files weren't > > deleted a very, very long time ago. > > Unfortunately, there's one problem with that: you can't

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Question for the TC candidates

Excerpts from Chris Dent's message of 2015-04-27 23:20:39 +0100: > On Mon, 27 Apr 2015, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > I believe all of the posts were on the main OpenStack foundation blog > > under the "technical committee" tag [1], and they also went to > > planet.openstack.org for folks who subscri

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Kubernetes AutoScaling with Heat AutoScalingGroup and Ceilometer

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:28:01PM -0400, Rabi Mishra wrote: > Hi All, > > Deploying Kubernetes(k8s) cluster on any OpenStack based cloud for container > based workload is a standard deployment pattern. However, auto-scaling this > cluster based on load would require some integration between k8s

Re: [openstack-dev] Problem in loading image in sahara open stack

Hi Sonal, Am I right and you can't just upload an image to glance image-registry? Nikolay Starodubtsev Software Engineer Mirantis Inc. Skype: dark_harlequine1 2015-04-28 16:28 GMT+03:00 Sonal Singh : > Hi, > > > > I have installed Sahara openstack using devstack. > > > > Now I am going to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance?

Hi all, Our team in the Federal University of Campina Grande implemented the initial Hierarchical Multitenancy support and now we are implementing the Reseller use case in Keystone. Already answering Travis question, in the Reseller solution we are merging the domains and projects entities:

[openstack-dev] [kolla] implement openvswitch container

I want to enbale openvswitch container. I tink i can do that like: 1 add a container that run ovs process2 add a container that run neutron-openvswitch-agent3 share the db.sock in compose.yaml4 add configure script and check script for the 2 containers that's all i need to do, right?

[openstack-dev] [EC2 API] Cancelling today's team meeting - 04/28/2015

Team, We decided to cancel today’s meeting because a number of key members won’t be able to attend. Thanks Swami __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.opens

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance?

Yes. 100% upstream. And although I’ve referred to it as “reseller” (following the previous Keystone BP), it’s a much more generic pattern. Long term, I think it turns into something like a supply chain framework for services. Geoff > On Apr 28, 2015, at 3:51 AM, Tim Bell wrote: > > Geoff, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] CI status & proposal for puppet-syntax-future jobs

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 06:56:55PM (-0400), Emilien Macchi wrote: Hi, I dressed a spreadsheet with the current status of our CI [1]. You can see that we need to work on Puppet 4.0 [2] and beaker [3]. Oh! Nice, thanks Emilien :-) Otherwise, gate-puppet-*-puppet-syntax-future is green everywhe

Re: [openstack-dev] Improving OpenStack documentation around RabbitMQ

On 28 April 2015 at 16:44:32, Michael Klishin (mklis...@pivotal.io) wrote: > At this stage I'm trying to understand the process more than > anything. E.g. how can > documentation improvements to Kilo be contributed after it > ships. > > Some of the improvements we have in mind are not HA-rela

Re: [openstack-dev] Improving OpenStack documentation around RabbitMQ

On 28 April 2015 at 16:33:35, Davanum Srinivas (dava...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hello Michael. > > Just moving your thread to the correct mailling list. Apologies, I've signed up to openstack-docs now and will re-post there.  -- MK Staff Software Engineer, Pivotal/RabbitMQ

Re: [openstack-dev] Improving OpenStack documentation around RabbitMQ

On 28 April 2015 at 16:33:35, Davanum Srinivas (dava...@gmail.com) wrote: > Have you seen this? > https://github.com/openstack/ha-guide/tree/master/doc/high-availability-guide/ha_aa_rabbitmq > > > That url was built from this github repo: > https://github.com/openstack/ha-guide/tree/master/doc

Re: [openstack-dev] Improving OpenStack documentation around RabbitMQ

Michael, Have you seen this? https://github.com/openstack/ha-guide/tree/master/doc/high-availability-guide/ha_aa_rabbitmq That url was built from this github repo: https://github.com/openstack/ha-guide/tree/master/doc/high-availability-guide/ha_aa_rabbitmq There's a weekly meeting for the HA doc

  1   2   >