Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Event Subscription

2014-12-01 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Hi Winson, > On 02 Dec 2014, at 09:10, W Chan wrote: > > To clarify on the shortcut solution, are you saying 1) we add an adhoc event > subscription to the workflow spec OR 2) add a one time event subscription to > the workflow execution OR both? Not sure what you mean by “adhoc” here. What I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [Nailgun] Unit tests improvement meeting minutes

2014-12-01 Thread Przemyslaw Kaminski
As I mentioned, we just discovered all handlers along with their urls (Tornado pre-processed url regexps so this was bit easier) and all models (we used Django). Based on this we set up a handler that generated Swagger JSON file according to this schema https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-s

Re: [openstack-dev] SRIOV failures error-

2014-12-01 Thread Itzik Brown
Hi, Seems like you don't have available devices for allocation. What's the output of: #echo 'use nova;select hypervisor_hostname,pci_stats from compute_nodes;' | mysql -u root Itzik On 12/02/2014 08:21 AM, Murali B wrote: Hi we are trying to bring-up the SRIOV on set-up. facing the below e

[openstack-dev] [gantt] Scheduler sub-group meeting agenda 12/2

2014-12-01 Thread Dugger, Donald D
Meeting on #openstack-meeting at 1500 UTC (8:00AM MST) 1) Status on cleanup work - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gantt/kilo -- Don Dugger "Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale Ph: 303/443-3786 ___ OpenStack-dev mai

[openstack-dev] SRIOV failures error-

2014-12-01 Thread Murali B
Hi we are trying to bring-up the SRIOV on set-up. facing the below error when we tried create the vm. *Still during creating instance ERROR appears .PciDeviceRequestFailed: PCI device request ({'requests': [InstancePCIRequest(alias_name=None,count=1,is_new=False,request_id=58584ee1-8a41-4979-99

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] REST and Django

2014-12-01 Thread Richard Jones
On Mon Dec 01 2014 at 4:18:42 PM Thai Q Tran wrote: > I agree that keeping the API layer thin would be ideal. I should add that > having discrete API calls would allow dynamic population of table. However, > I will make a case where it *might* be necessary to add additional APIs. > Consider that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Edge-VPN and Edge-Id

2014-12-01 Thread Mohammad Hanif
I hope we all understand how edge VPN works and what interactions are introduced as part of this spec. I see references to neutron-network mapping to the tunnel which is not at all case and the edge-VPN spec doesn’t propose it. At a very high level, there are two main concepts: 1. Creation

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Event Subscription

2014-12-01 Thread W Chan
Renat, Alternately, what do you think if mistral just post the events to given exchange(s) on the same transport backend and let the subscribers decide how to consume the events (i.e post to webhook, etc.) from these exchanges? This will simplify implementation somewhat. The engine can just take

[openstack-dev] [docs] Older Developer documentation Icehouse? Havana?

2014-12-01 Thread Russell Sim
Hi, >From what I can see it seems like the developer documentation available on the OpenStack website is generated from the git repositories. http://docs.openstack.org/developer/openstack-projects.html Are older versions of this documentation currently generated and hosted somewhere? Or is it p

Re: [openstack-dev] [diskimage-builder] Tracing levels for scripts (119023)

2014-12-01 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-11-28 11:27:20 -0800: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Sullivan, Jon Paul > wrote: > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Ben Nemec [mailto:openst...@nemebean.com] > >> Sent: 26 November 2014 17:03 > >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Deprecating osprofiler option 'enabled' in favour of 'profiler_enabled'

2014-12-01 Thread Zhi Yan Liu
Why not change other services instead of glance? I see one reason is "glance is the only one service use this option name", but to me one reason to keep it as-it in glance is that original name makes more sense due to the option already under "profiler" group, adding "profiler" prefix to it is real

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party

2014-12-01 Thread Joshua Hesketh
Hey, So to suit most APAC business hours we'd be looking somewhere between 00:00am -> 09:00am UTC. So we have a starting point, how would 00:00am Tuesday UTC suit people? For China that would be 8am, for Australia 11am (when in daylight savings). Cheers, Josh Rackspace Australia On 12/2/14

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party

2014-12-01 Thread daya kamath
hi anita,i am located in india, so, would prefer something slightly earlier, maybe 1-2 hours.thanks for checking. From: Anita Kuno To: openstack Development Mailing List ; "openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org" Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 1:37 AM Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-p

Re: [openstack-dev] [diskimage-builder] Tracing levels for scripts (119023)

2014-12-01 Thread Steve Kowalik
On 02/12/14 12:27, Ian Wienand wrote: > - pretty sure SHELLOPTS doesn't survive sudo, which might add another > layer of complication for users sudo is well-known to strip out all but a well-defined list of environment variables when you use it. sudo -E turns that off, but the configuration can

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Event Subscription

2014-12-01 Thread W Chan
Renat, To clarify on the shortcut solution, are you saying 1) we add an adhoc event subscription to the workflow spec OR 2) add a one time event subscription to the workflow execution OR both? I propose a separate worker/executor to process the events so to not disrupt the workflow executions. W

[openstack-dev] [CI]Setup CI system behind proxy

2014-12-01 Thread thanh le giang
Dear all I have set up a CI system successfully with directly access to internet. Now I have another requirement which requires setting up CI system behind proxy but i can't find any way to configure zuul to connect to gerrit through proxy. Any advice is appreciated. Thanks and Regards -- L.G.

[openstack-dev] [qa] Should it be allowed to attach 2 interfaces from the same subnet to a VM?

2014-12-01 Thread Danny Choi (dannchoi)
Hi, When I attach 2 interfaces from the same subnet to a VM, there is no error returned and both interfaces come up. lab@tme211:/opt/stack/logs$ nova interface-attach --net-id e38dba4a-74ed-4312-ba21-2a04b5c5a5b5 cirros-1 lab@tme211:/opt/stack/logs$ nova list +---

Re: [openstack-dev] [diskimage-builder] Tracing levels for scripts (119023)

2014-12-01 Thread Ian Wienand
On 12/02/2014 04:25 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: 1) A specific reason SHELLOPTS can't be used. IMO leave this alone as it changes global behaviour at a low-level and that is a vector for unintended side-effects. Some thoughts: - We don't want tracing output of various well-known scripts that might

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Reminder Meeting moved to Wed

2014-12-01 Thread David Lyle
We recently changed the Horizon meeting times to be friendlier for more timezones. This week the Horizon team meeting will be at 2000 UTC on Wed in #openstack-meeting-3 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Horizon David ___ OpenStack-dev mailing lis

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Edge-VPN and Edge-Id

2014-12-01 Thread Ian Wells
On 1 December 2014 at 09:01, Mathieu Rohon wrote: This is an alternative that would say : you want an advanced service > for your VM, please stretch your l2 network to this external > component, that is driven by an external controller, and make your > traffic goes to this component to take benef

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Using Job Queues for timeout ops

2014-12-01 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-12-01 13:05:42 -0800: > On 13/11/14 13:59, Clint Byrum wrote: > > I'm not sure we have the same understanding of AMQP, so hopefully we can > > clarify here. This stackoverflow answer echoes my understanding: > > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1784

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][neutron] Proposal to split Neutron into separate repositories

2014-12-01 Thread Angus Lees
On Mon Dec 01 2014 at 2:06:18 PM henry hly wrote: > My suggestion is that starting with LB and VPN as a trial, which can > never be distributed. > .. Sure they can! Loadbalancing in particular _should_ be distributed if both the clients and backends are in the same cluster... (I agree with yo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Rework auto-scaling support in Heat

2014-12-01 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 28/11/14 02:33, Qiming Teng wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> Auto-Scaling is an important feature supported by Heat and needed by >> many users we talked to. There are two flavors of AutoScalingGroup >> resources in Heat today: the AWS-based one

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] New config options, no default change

2014-12-01 Thread Jay S. Bryant
On 11/25/2014 08:10 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 16/11/14 20:17, Jay S. Bryant wrote: All, This is a question I have been struggling with for Cinder recently. Where do we draw the line on backports. How do we handle config changes? One thing

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] mid-cycle details final draft

2014-12-01 Thread Clint Byrum
Hello! I've received confirmation that our venue, the HP offices in downtown Seattle, will be available for the most-often-preferred least-often-cannot week of Feb 16 - 20. Our venue has a maximum of 20 participants, but I only have 16 possible attendees now. Please add yourself to that list _now_

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] alembic 0.7.1 will break neutron's "heal" feature which assumes a fixed set of potential autogenerate types

2014-12-01 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Thanks Mike! I've left some comments on the patch. Just out of curiosity, since now alembic can autogenerate foreign keys, are we be able to remove the logic for identifying foreign keys to add/remove [1]? Salvatore [1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/neutron/tree/neutron/db/migration/al

Re: [openstack-dev] sqlalchemy-migrate call for reviews

2014-12-01 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 12/01/2014 06:19 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Indeed, the review queue is non-responsive. There are other patches in > the queue that bit rot there: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/sqlalchemy-migrate,n,z I did +2 some of the patches which I thought were tota

[openstack-dev] oslo.serialization 1.1.0 released

2014-12-01 Thread Ben Nemec
The Oslo team is pleased to announce the release of oslo.serialization 1.1.0. This is primarily a bug fix and requirements update release. Further details of the changes included are below. For more details, please see the git log history below and https://launchpad.net/oslo.serialization/+milest

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Please enable everyone to see patches and reviews on http://review.fuel-infra.org

2014-12-01 Thread Andrew Woodward
Jay, AFAIU review.fuel-infra.org is only for packages and specs being built to include in the 'distro' packages. This is done so that we don't have to pollute review.openstack.org / stackforge with every package we need to rebuild (There are more than 925 repos). As to the link you attempted to f

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Rework auto-scaling support in Heat

2014-12-01 Thread Zane Bitter
On 28/11/14 02:33, Qiming Teng wrote: Dear all, Auto-Scaling is an important feature supported by Heat and needed by many users we talked to. There are two flavors of AutoScalingGroup resources in Heat today: the AWS-based one and the Heat native one. As more requests coming in, the team has p

[openstack-dev] [Keystone] Functional Testing

2014-12-01 Thread Adam Young
Keystone doesn't depend on other services, but every other service in OpenStack depends on Keystone. So, I propose we treat all of the Admin aspects of the Keystone server just like any other consumer of auth token middleware, but only for testing. It means that we would be using a different

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Using Job Queues for timeout ops

2014-12-01 Thread Zane Bitter
On 13/11/14 13:59, Clint Byrum wrote: I'm not sure we have the same understanding of AMQP, so hopefully we can clarify here. This stackoverflow answer echoes my understanding: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17841843/rabbitmq-does-one-consumer-block-the-other-consumers-of-the-same-queue Not

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] force_gateway_on_subnet, please don't deprecate

2014-12-01 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Assaf Muller wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> >> My proposal here, is, _let’s not deprecate this setting_, as it’s a valid use >> case of a gateway configuration, and let’s provide it on the reference >> implementation. > > I agree. As long as the refere

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-01 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Anant Patil's message of 2014-11-30 23:02:29 -0800: > On 27-Nov-14 18:03, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote: > > Hi Zane, > > > > > > > > At this stage our implementation (as mentioned in wiki > > ) achieves your > > design goals. >

[openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party

2014-12-01 Thread Anita Kuno
One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from non-North American time zones. Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc whi

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How should libvirt pools work with distributed storage drivers?

2014-12-01 Thread Solly Ross
Hi Peter, > Right. So just one more question now - seeing as the plan is to > deprecate non-libvirt-pool drivers in Kilo and then drop them entirely > in L, would it still make sense for me to submit a spec today for a > driver that would keep the images in our own proprietary distributed > stora

Re: [openstack-dev] sqlalchemy-migrate call for reviews

2014-12-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-12-01 13:24:43 -0500 (-0500), Mike Bayer wrote: [...] > for users on the outside of immediate Openstack use cases I’d > prefer if they can continue working towards moving to Alembic; the > major features I’ve introduced in Alembic including the SQLite > support are intended to make transiti

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Please enable everyone to see patches and reviews on http://review.fuel-infra.org

2014-12-01 Thread Jay Pipes
Hi Fuel Devs, I'm not entirely sure why we are running our own infrastructure Gerrit for Fuel, as opposed to using the main review.openstack.org site that all OpenStack and Stackforge projects use (including Fuel repositories on stackforge...). Could someone please advise on why we are doing t

[openstack-dev] [neutron] alembic 0.7.1 will break neutron's "heal" feature which assumes a fixed set of potential autogenerate types

2014-12-01 Thread Mike Bayer
hey neutron - Just an FYI, I’ve added https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137989/ / https://launchpad.net/bugs/1397796 to refer to an issue in neutron’s “heal” script that is going to start failing when I put out Alembic 0.7.1, which is potentially later today / this week. The issue is pretty str

[openstack-dev] [Infra] Meeting Tuesday December 2nd at 19:00 UTC

2014-12-01 Thread Elizabeth K. Joseph
Hi everyone, The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly meeting on Tuesday December 2nd, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Meeting agenda available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is welcome to to add agenda items) Everyone interested

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [Nailgun] Unit tests improvement meeting minutes

2014-12-01 Thread Dmitriy Shulyak
Swagger is not related to test improvement, but we started to discuss it here so.. @Przemyslaw, how hard it will be to integrate it with nailgun rest api (web.py and handlers hierarchy)? Also is there any way to use auth with swagger? On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Przemyslaw Kaminski wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] How to debug test using pdb

2014-12-01 Thread Steve Martinelli
Link to the docs for the debugger script: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslotest/features.html#debugging-with-oslo-debug-helper We have support for it in some of the Keystone related projects and folks seem to find it useful. If may not fit your needs, but as Ben suggested, give it a whir

Re: [openstack-dev] sqlalchemy-migrate call for reviews

2014-12-01 Thread Mike Bayer
I can +2 whichever patches are needed by Openstack projects, or that are critically needed in general, that you can point me towards directly. Overall I’m not the “maintainer” of sqlalchemy-migrate, I’ve only volunteered to have a +2 role for critically needed issues, so in the absence of so

Re: [openstack-dev] How to debug test using pdb

2014-12-01 Thread Ben Nemec
I don't personally use the debugger much, but there is a helper script that is supposed to allow debugging: https://github.com/openstack/oslotest/blob/master/tools/oslo_debug_helper On 11/30/2014 05:08 AM, Saju M wrote: > Hi, > > How to debug test using pdb > > I want to debug tests and tried fo

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] change to Oslo release process to support stable branch requirement caps

2014-12-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:57 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Doug Hellmann wrote: >> On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >> >>> Are we going to have stable releases for those branches? >> >> We will possibly have point or patch releases based on those branches, as >> fixes end up needi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Do we need an IntrospectionInterface?

2014-12-01 Thread Victor Lowther
+9001 for introspection On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Shivanand Tendulker wrote: > +1 for separate interface. > > --Shivanand > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes < > lucasago...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for putting it up Dmitry. I think the idea is fine to

Re: [openstack-dev] [diskimage-builder] Tracing levels for scripts (119023)

2014-12-01 Thread Ben Nemec
Okay, boiling my thoughts down further: James's (valid, IMHO) concerns aside, I want to see one of two things before I'm anything but -1 on this change: 1) A specific reason SHELLOPTS can't be used. Nobody has given me one besides hand-wavy "it might not work" stuff. FTR, as I noted in my previ

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Team meeting minutes/log - 12/01/2014

2014-12-01 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Thanks for joining our team meeting today! Meeting minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/mistral.2014-12-01-16.00.html Meeting log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Edge-VPN and Edge-Id

2014-12-01 Thread Mathieu Rohon
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Ian Wells wrote: > On 1 December 2014 at 04:43, Mathieu Rohon wrote: >> >> This is not entirely true, as soon as a reference implementation, >> based on existing Neutron components (L2agent/L3agent...) can exist. > > > The specific thing I was saying is that that's

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] A mascot for Ironic

2014-12-01 Thread Lucas Alvares Gomes
Ah forgot to say, Please add your launchpad ID on the Name Field. And I will close the poll on Wednesday at 18:00 UTC (I think it's enough time to everyone take a look at it) Cheers, Lucas On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm sorry for the long delay on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] A mascot for Ironic

2014-12-01 Thread Lucas Alvares Gomes
Hi all, I'm sorry for the long delay on this I've been dragged into some other stuff :) But anyway, now it's time I've asked the core Ironic team to narrow down the name options (we had too many, thanks to everyone that contributed) the list of finalists is in the poll right here: http://dood

[openstack-dev] Cross-Project meeting tomorrow, Tue December 2nd, 21:00 UTC

2014-12-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Dear PTLs, cross-project liaisons and anyone else interested, We'll have a cross-project meeting tomorrow at 21:00 UTC, with the following agenda: * Convergence on specs process (johnthetubaguy) * Incompatible rework of client libraries (notmyname, morganfainberg) * New work in openstack-sdk, k

Re: [openstack-dev] [gerrit] Gerrit review problem

2014-12-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-12-01 17:04:23 +0800 (+0800), Jay Lau wrote: > Cool, Thierry! I see. This is really what I want ;-) Also note that we're not running a modified version of Gerrit, so if a behavior change is desired it likely needs to be reported at http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/issues instead. -- Jeremy

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Gate error

2014-12-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-12-01 12:45:04 +0800 (+0800), Eli Qiao wrote: [...] > HTTP error 404 while getting http://pypi.IAD.openstack.org/ > packages/source/l/logilab-common/logilab-common-0.63.2.tar.gz [...] This was reported as https://launchpad.net/bugs/1397931 and handled a few hours ago. -- Jeremy Stanley _

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Edge-VPN and Edge-Id

2014-12-01 Thread Ian Wells
On 1 December 2014 at 04:43, Mathieu Rohon wrote: > This is not entirely true, as soon as a reference implementation, > based on existing Neutron components (L2agent/L3agent...) can exist. > The specific thing I was saying is that that's harder with an edge-id mechanism than one incorporated int

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Deprecating osprofiler option 'enabled' in favour of 'profiler_enabled'

2014-12-01 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 12/1/14, 08:37, "Louis Taylor" wrote: >Hi all, > >In order to enable or disable osprofiler in Glance, we currently have an >option: > >[profiler] ># If False fully disable profiling feature. >enabled = False > >However, all other services with osprofiler integration use a similar >

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] REST and Django

2014-12-01 Thread Wood, Matthew David (HP Cloud - Horizon)
In theory, for many cases, the service(s) will allow this to happen with ~1 rest call. I THINK this was a big part of the batch action code, atleast at the beginning, though I think we’ve (unfortunately) started moving away from that idea. -- Matthew Wood HP Cloud Services Full-Stack Engineer P

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Integration with Ceph

2014-12-01 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, One additional issue to take into account here is that the maximum free disk space reported by the backend may not be contiguous. Nova should also be made aware of that too. Thanks Gary On 12/1/14, 2:28 PM, "Roman Podoliaka" wrote: >Hi Sergey, > >AFAIU, the problem is that when Nova was desi

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] rpm packages versions

2014-12-01 Thread Dmitry Pyzhov
Just FYI. We have updated versions of nailgun-related packages in 6.0: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137886/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137887/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137888/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137889/ We need it in order to support packages updates both in current

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] change to Oslo release process to support stable branch requirement caps

2014-12-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Doug Hellmann wrote: > On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > >> Are we going to have stable releases for those branches? > > We will possibly have point or patch releases based on those branches, as > fixes end up needing to be backported. We have already done this in a few > ca

[openstack-dev] [glance] Deprecating osprofiler option 'enabled' in favour of 'profiler_enabled'

2014-12-01 Thread Louis Taylor
Hi all, In order to enable or disable osprofiler in Glance, we currently have an option: [profiler] # If False fully disable profiling feature. enabled = False However, all other services with osprofiler integration use a similar option named profiler_enabled. For consistency, I'm p

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] change to Oslo release process to support stable branch requirement caps

2014-12-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Signed PGP part > Are we going to have stable releases for those branches? We will possibly have point or patch releases based on those branches, as fixes end up needing to be backported. We have already done this in a few cases, which is w

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] change to Oslo release process to support stable branch requirement caps

2014-12-01 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Are we going to have stable releases for those branches? On 01/12/14 15:19, Doug Hellmann wrote: > As part of setting up version caps for Oslo and client libraries in > the stable branches, we discovered that the fact that we do not > always create

[openstack-dev] [oslo] change to Oslo release process to support stable branch requirement caps

2014-12-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
As part of setting up version caps for Oslo and client libraries in the stable branches, we discovered that the fact that we do not always create stable branches of the Oslo libraries means the check-requirements-integration-dsvm job in stable branches is actually looking at the requirements in

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][oslo] Handling contexts and policy enforcement in services

2014-12-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Nov 30, 2014, at 8:51 PM, Jamie Lennox wrote: > TL;DR: I think we can handle most of oslo.context with some additions to > auth_token middleware and simplify policy enforcement (from a service > perspective) at the same time. > > There is currently a push to release oslo.context as a > libra

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Team meeting - 12/01/2014

2014-12-01 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Hi, This is a reminder about team meeting that we’ll have today at #openstack-meeting at 16.00 UTC. Agenda: Review action items Current status (progress, issues, roadblocks, further plans) Release "Kilo-1" progress Open discussion (see [0] to see the agenda as well as the meeting archieve) [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] proper syncing of cinder volume state

2014-12-01 Thread Duncan Thomas
John: States that the driver can/should do some cleanup work during the transition: attaching -> available or error detaching -> available or error error -> available or error deleting -> deleted or error_deleting Also in possibly wanted in future but much harder: backing_up -> available or erro

Re: [openstack-dev] Where should Schema files live?

2014-12-01 Thread Sandy Walsh
>From: Duncan Thomas [duncan.tho...@gmail.com] >Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 5:40 AM >To: OpenStack Development Mailing List >Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Where should Schema files live? > >Duncan Thomas >On Nov 27, 2014 10:32 PM, "Sandy Walsh" wrote: >> >> We were thinking each service API wo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Edge-VPN and Edge-Id

2014-12-01 Thread Mathieu Rohon
Hi, On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Ian Wells wrote: > On 27 November 2014 at 12:11, Mohammad Hanif wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> Recently, as part of the L2 gateway thread, there was some discussion on >> BGP/MPLS/Edge VPN and how to bridge any overlay networks to the neutron >> network. Just to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Integration with Ceph

2014-12-01 Thread Roman Podoliaka
Hi Sergey, AFAIU, the problem is that when Nova was designed initially, it had no notion of shared storage (e.g. Ceph), so all the resources were considered to be local to compute nodes. In that case each total value was a sum of values per node. But as we see now, that doesn't work well with Ceph

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] force_gateway_on_subnet, please don't deprecate

2014-12-01 Thread Assaf Muller
- Original Message - > > My proposal here, is, _let’s not deprecate this setting_, as it’s a valid use > case of a gateway configuration, and let’s provide it on the reference > implementation. I agree. As long as the reference implementation works with the setting off there's no need t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [Mellanox] [5.1.1] Critical bugs found by Mellanox for v5.1.1

2014-12-01 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
Gil, I wrote a fix for 1397907. Please, test and review. On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Gil Meir wrote: > I’ve mistakenly put issue #1 link in issue #3, > > the correct link for the floating IPs issue is: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/13979

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Rework auto-scaling support in Heat

2014-12-01 Thread Qiming Teng
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 02:33:10PM +, Jastrzebski, Michal wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Qiming Teng [mailto:teng...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] > > Sent: Friday, November 28, 2014 8:33 AM > > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Rework auto-s

Re: [openstack-dev] logilab-common 404 in jobs

2014-12-01 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Launchpad issue - https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1397931 Elastic search query: http://logstash.openstack.org/#eyJzZWFyY2giOiJ0YWdzOlwiY29uc29sZVwiIEFORCBtZXNzYWdlOlwiSFRUUCBlcnJvciA0MDQgd2hpbGUgZ2V0dGluZ1wiIEFORCBtZXNzYWdlOiBcImxvZ2lsYWJcIiIsImZpZWxkcyI6W10sIm9mZnNldCI6MCwidGltZWZyYW1

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Counting resources

2014-12-01 Thread Sean Dague
On 12/01/2014 05:36 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > > >> detail=concise is not a media type and looking at the grammar in the RFC it >> wouldn’t be valid. >> I think the grammar would allow for "application/json; detail=concise". See >> the last line in the definition of the "media-range" nonterminal i

[openstack-dev] logilab-common 404 in jobs

2014-12-01 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Hey, there was a pypi mirrors issue with downloading logilab-common 0.63.2 from our mirrors: HTTP error 404 while getting http://pypi.IAD.openstack.org/packages/source/l/logilab-common/logilab-common-0.63.2.tar.gz#md5=2bf4599ae1f2ccf4603ca02c5d7e798e (from http://pypi.IAD.openstack.org/simp

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [Nailgun] Unit tests improvement meeting minutes

2014-12-01 Thread Przemyslaw Kaminski
On 11/28/2014 05:15 PM, Ivan Kliuk wrote: Hi, team! Let me please present ideas collected during the unit tests improvement meeting: 1) Rename class ``Environment`` to something more descriptive 2) Remove hardcoded self.clusters[0], e.t.c from ``Environment``. Let's use parameters instead 3)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][all] Gate error

2014-12-01 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
I've made a temp fix for it by removing the logilab-common 0.63.2 from our mirror and start full re-sync for mirrors, hopefully it'll fix everything. Thanks to lifeless for help. On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 12/01/2014 05:45 AM, Eli Qiao wrote: > > Got gate error t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [Mellanox] [5.1.1] Critical bugs found by Mellanox for v5.1.1

2014-12-01 Thread Gil Meir
I've mistakenly put issue #1 link in issue #3, the correct link for the floating IPs issue is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1397907 Gil From: Gil Meir [mailto:gilm...@mellanox.com] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 12:19 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [Fuel]

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Need reviews for "Deploy GlusterFS server" patch

2014-12-01 Thread Deepak Shetty
Just correcting the tag and subject line in $subject, so that it gets the attention of the right group of folks (from devstack). thanx, deepak On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Bharat Kumar wrote: > Hi All, > > Regarding the patch "Deploy GlusterFS Server" ( > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/1

[openstack-dev] [neutron] force_gateway_on_subnet, please don't deprecate

2014-12-01 Thread Miguel Ángel Ajo
My proposal here, is, _let’s not deprecate this setting_, as it’s a valid use case of a gateway configuration, and let’s provide it on the reference implementation. TL;DR I’ve been looking at this yesterday, during a test deployment on a site where they provide external connectivity with th

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Counting resources

2014-12-01 Thread Eoghan Glynn
> detail=concise is not a media type and looking at the grammar in the RFC it > wouldn’t be valid. > I think the grammar would allow for "application/json; detail=concise". See > the last line in the definition of the "media-range" nonterminal in the > grammar (copied below for convenience): > Ac

[openstack-dev] Fw: #Personal# Ref: L3 service integration with service framework

2014-12-01 Thread Priyanka Chopra
Hi Kyle, Gentle reminder. Please suggest a good time when we can discuss on blueprint - L3 router Service Type Framework I am looking for a L3 driver and plugin to enable neutron L3 calls from OS to ODL. Best Regards Priyanka - Forwarded by Priyanka Chopra/TVM/TCS on 12/01/2014 03:44 P

Re: [openstack-dev] sqlalchemy-migrate call for reviews

2014-12-01 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Indeed, the review queue is non-responsive. There are other patches in the queue that bit rot there: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/sqlalchemy-migrate,n,z I guess since no one with a +2 hammer systematically monitor

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] [Mellanox] [5.1.1] Critical bugs found by Mellanox for v5.1.1

2014-12-01 Thread Gil Meir
We have found 3 critical bugs for Fuel v5.1.1 here in Mellanox: 1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1397891 This is related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1396020 The kernel fix there is working, but there is a missing OVS service restart, since restarting Mellanox driver op

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][all] Gate error

2014-12-01 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 12/01/2014 05:45 AM, Eli Qiao wrote: > Got gate error today. > how can we kick infrastructure team to fix it? > > HTTP error 404 while getting > http://pypi.IAD.openstack.org/packages/source/l/logilab-common/logilab-common-0.63.2.tar.gz#md5=2bf4599ae1f2ccf4603ca02c5d7e798e >

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] image create mysql error

2014-12-01 Thread Vineet Menon
Hi, Looks like the password supplied wasn't correct. Have you changed the pasword given in local.conf after a devstack installation? If yes, you need to purge mysql credentials stores in your machine. Regards, Vineet Menon On 1 December 2014 at 01:33, liuxinguo wrote: > When our CI run de

Re: [openstack-dev] [gerrit] Gerrit review problem

2014-12-01 Thread Jay Lau
Cool, Thierry! I see. This is really what I want ;-) Thanks! 2014-12-01 16:51 GMT+08:00 Thierry Carrez : > Jay Lau wrote: > > > > When I review a patch for OpenStack, after review finished, I want to > > check more patches for this project and then after click the "Project" > > content for this

Re: [openstack-dev] [gerrit] Gerrit review problem

2014-12-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Jay Lau wrote: > > When I review a patch for OpenStack, after review finished, I want to > check more patches for this project and then after click the "Project" > content for this patch, it will **not** jump to all patches but project > description. I think it is not convenient for a reviewer if