Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints

2014-11-02 Thread Kevin Benton
When/where is the meeting on Monday? -- Kevin Benton > On Nov 2, 2014, at 11:12 PM, Erik Moe wrote: > > > > From: Ian Wells [mailto:ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk] > Sent: den 31 oktober 2014 23:35 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [n

Re: [openstack-dev] [tuskar] Puppet module

2014-11-02 Thread Emilien Macchi
Sebastien Badia & I finished the code (manifests + unit tests) and now move puppet-tuskar in Stackforge: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/132488/ Would be great to have reviews from Tuskar folks. Thanks! Emilien On 10/29/2014 10:21 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Just started a PoC: https://github.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tuskar] Puppet module

2014-11-02 Thread Sebastien Badia
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:21:15PM (-0400), Emilien Macchi wrote: Just started a PoC: https://github.com/enovance/puppet-tuskar Once I'll finish unit tests, I'll move it to Stackforge. Unit tests added, and patch for stackforge in review https://review.openstack.org/132488 Cheers, Seb -- Se

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints

2014-11-02 Thread Erik Moe
From: Ian Wells [mailto:ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk] Sent: den 31 oktober 2014 23:35 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints On 31 October 2014 06:29, Erik Moe mailto:erik@ericsson.com>> wrot

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Alternative federation mapping

2014-11-02 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Sunday, November 2, 2014, John Dennis wrote: > It was hoped we could simply borrow the Keystone mapping > implementation but it was found to be too limiting and not sufficiently > expressive. We could not find another alternative so we designed a new > mapper which is described in this PDF. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Alternative federation mapping

2014-11-02 Thread John Dennis
On 11/02/2014 03:55 PM, Marek Denis wrote: > Hi John, > > It indeed looks interesting and enhancing the mapping engine is on > ours to-do list for a long time. I'd be happy to talk this through > during the summit. Do you think you will be able to come for a > Keystone websso/federation Design Se

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] pci pass through turing complete config options?

2014-11-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 08:27:24PM +, Robert Li (baoli) wrote: > Without direct oslo support, to implement it requires a small method that > uses oslo cfg¹s MultiConfigParser(). > > Now a few questions if we want to do it in Kilo: > ‹ Do we still need to be back-ward compatible in configurin

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Alternative federation mapping

2014-11-02 Thread Marek Denis
Hi John, It indeed looks interesting and enhancing the mapping engine is on ours to-do list for a long time. I'd be happy to talk this through during the summit. Do you think you will be able to come for a Keystone websso/federation Design Session on Wednesday at 16.30? Thanks, Marek On

Re: [openstack-dev] [blazar]: proposal for a new lease type

2014-11-02 Thread Nikolay Starodubtsev
Hi Lisa, As far as I get the main idea of your blueprint it's something that we've planned to do in the "future". So, yes this idea is something that Blazar should do. But the problem is that we have some real-time problems. I mean we are in rename process (yeah, it takes real long time for us) and

[openstack-dev] [Keystone] Alternative federation mapping

2014-11-02 Thread John Dennis
While working on federated authentication for a different project (OpenDaylight) we discovered we needed to map from the assertion provided by an external federated IdP to local values. This is essentially the same requirement which exists in Keystone's federated support. It was hoped we could simp

[openstack-dev] [tempest] Fault Injection

2014-11-02 Thread Herscheid, Lena
Hi all, I'd like to continue the discussion on the following thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-April/031660.html Are there still plans for fault injection as an integrated OpenStack project? Is there any currently ongoing work on it? I would be interested in impleme

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [barbican] Stable check of openstack/cinder failed

2014-11-02 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 11/02/2014 12:13 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: > the release of the new barbicanclient caused another bug as > well: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1388414, this one is > causing all grenade jobs on master to fail. It looks like we have a hole > in the gating logic somewhere. python-barbicancli

[openstack-dev] [Third-party] Third-party CI WG Meeting

2014-11-02 Thread Kurt Taylor
Hi, Reminder: the Third-party Work Group meeting for this week (November 3) has been cancelled due to Summit. We will resume our normal time next week. The meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) __

[openstack-dev] Keybase.io invites for OpenStack people (was Re: Key signing at the summit?)

2014-11-02 Thread Mark Atwood
> I will also try to get more keybase.io invites, for those who want them. > keybase.io is a web service that provides an independently provable > binding between your social media and github identities, and your gpg > key. I have been granted *many* invites from keybase.io for OpenStack develope

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [barbican] Stable check of openstack/cinder failed

2014-11-02 Thread Joe Gordon
the release of the new barbicanclient caused another bug as well: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1388414, this one is causing all grenade jobs on master to fail. It looks like we have a hole in the gating logic somewhere. On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Alan Pevec wrote: > Hi, > > cinder

Re: [openstack-dev] TC election by the numbers

2014-11-02 Thread Sean Dague
On 10/31/2014 05:17 PM, Matt Joyce wrote: > On one hand, I agree a member of the TC should be a very active member > of the development community. Something I have not been, much to my shame. > > However, there are obviously some fundamental issues in how the TC has been > governing OpenStack in t

Re: [openstack-dev] Cross distribution talks on Friday

2014-11-02 Thread Matthias Runge
On 01/11/14 14:13, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if some distribution OpenStack package maintainers would > be interested to have some cross-distribution discussion on Friday, > during the contributors sessions. > Unfortunately, this is at the same time as Ceilometer, Glance, He