Hi Jay,
Thank you for your response.
I will soon submit patch for the same.
Thanks,
Rajesh Tailor
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 8:07 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Use Launcher/P
Greetings,
I'm trying to figure out if Keystone can support more granular role
management or if there is any plan to do that in the future. Currently,
AWS can support adding a role and assigning the capability from 3
different level/perspective: service, function and resource[1]. Keystone
can supp
Hi All,
I was terribly SAD indeed that our spec proposal to add gw-mode
extension[1] to the midonet plugin was not accepted last Sunday, and I am
sending out this email to see if the core reviewers could accept this as
SFE.
It was originally rejected because the upstream plugin was not working
pr
I would like to request one Juno Spec freeze exception for "Support
Stateful and Stateless DHCPv6 by dnsmasq" BP.
This BP is an important part if IPv6 support in Juno. Router
advertisement support by RADVD has been merged and this BP is planned
for configure OpenStack dnsmasq to co-work with r
On 07/22/2014 06:55 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 05:20:44PM -0700, Nathan Kinder wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've had a few discussions recently related to Keystone trusts with
>> regards to imposing restrictions on trusts at a deployment level.
>> Currently, the creator of a trust i
Hi,
Here's a patch to allow hostname in Ring which is under developing you
might be interested in.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80421/
-Edward Zhang
"Matsuda,
Hi Salvatore and Kyle,
Thanks for your review the following bug:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97516/
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1325986
I think I did not make myself clear in the bug description.
And you have the following comments:
"
I have a question regarding the removal of the followin
Hi,
I want to use FQDN in Ring files instead of "ip".
I tried the following Swift APIs with using FQDN and it succeeded.
(I used swift1.13.1.)
- PUT Container
- PUT Object
In some documents there is no info for using FQDN in Ring files.
- swift 1.13.1 documentation The Rings > List of Dev
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 05:20:44PM -0700, Nathan Kinder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've had a few discussions recently related to Keystone trusts with
> regards to imposing restrictions on trusts at a deployment level.
> Currently, the creator of a trust is able to specify the following
> restrictions on th
Since it looks like the TLS blueprint was approved I''m sure
were all eager to start coded so how should we divide up work on the
source code. I have Pull requests in pyopenssl
"https://github.com/pyca/pyopenssl/pull/143";. and a few one liners
in pica/cryptography to expose the needed low
+1
To provide some more context, we discussed this in the team meeting last week:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/fuel/2014/fuel.2014-07-17-16.00.log.html#l-107
and agreed to stop doing it until further discussion, or at all.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Andrew Woodward wrote:
> Th
Hi,
I've had a few discussions recently related to Keystone trusts with
regards to imposing restrictions on trusts at a deployment level.
Currently, the creator of a trust is able to specify the following
restrictions on the trust at creation time:
- an expiration time for the trust
- the num
There has been an increased occurrence of using [tag] in the title instead
of adding tag to the tags section of the LP bugs for Fuel.
As we discussed in the Fuel meeting last Thursday, We should stop doing
this as it causes several issues
* It spams e-mail.
* It breaks threading that your mail cli
On 2014-07-21 11:36:43 -0700 (-0700), Kevin Benton wrote:
> I see. So then back to my other question, is it possible to get
> access to the same branch that is being passed to the OpenStack CI
> devstack tests?
>
> For example, in the console output I can see it uses a ref
> like refs/zuul/ master
This spec freeze exception only has one core signed up. Are there any
other cores interested in working with Sylvain on this one?
Michael
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 7:59 PM, John Garbutt wrote:
> On 18 July 2014 09:10, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
>> Hi team,
>>
>> I would like to put your attention on ht
Ok, this one has two cores, so the exception is approved. The
exception is in the form of another week to get the spec merged, so
quick iterations are the key.
Cheers,
Michael
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:02 AM, Kevin L. Mitchell
wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 10:55 +0100, John Garbutt wrote:
>> On
Ok, I am going to take Daniel and Dan's comments as agreement that
this spec freeze exception should go ahead, so the exception is
approved. The exception is in the form of another week to get the spec
merged, so quick iterations are the key.
Cheers,
Michael
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Mic
Ok, this one has two cores, so the exception is approved. The
exception is in the form of another week to get the spec merged, so
quick iterations are the key.
Cheers,
Michael
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Kenichi Oomichi
wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: John Garbutt [mailto:j.
On Jul 20, 2014, at 6:32 AM, Evgeny Fedoruk wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> In a current version of TLS capabilities RST certificate SubjectCommonName
> and SubjectAltName information is cached in a database.
> This may be not necessary and here is why:
>
> 1. TLS containers are immutable, mea
Hi Russell
Thanks. I got it.
2014-07-22 14:21 GMT-07:00 Russell Bryant :
> On 07/21/2014 04:10 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> Hi nova folks
>>
>> QQ: Who uses migrate_instance_start/finish, and why we need this rpc call?
>>
>> I greped code but I couldn't find implementation for it.
>>
>> https://githu
On Jul 17, 2014, at 4:59 PM, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
> From the comments there, I think the reason for storing the subjectAltNames
> was to minimize the number of calls we will need to make to barbican, and
> because the barbican container is immutable, and therefore the list of
> subjectAltN
On 07/22/2014 06:08 PM, Kurt Griffiths wrote:
> FYI, we chatted about this in #openstack-marconi today and decided to try
> 2100 UTC for tomorrow. If we would like to alternate at an earlier time
> every other week, is 1900 UTC good, or shall we do something more like
> 1400 UTC?
We can keep the
Gents,
For what it’s worth - We’ve long accounting for “extension points” within our
VM and physical server provisioning flows, where developers may drop in code to
augment OOTB behavior with customer/solution-specific needs. While there are
many extension points laced throughout different poi
How do you like alternate design: uses can chose any image he wants (say
any Linux) but the JSON that is in image tag has enough information on what
applications are installed on that image. And not just installed or not but
the exact state installation was frozen (say binaries are deployed but
con
Hi Steve,
1. There are no objections whatsoever if you know how to do it without
breaking the entire concept
2. I thing that deployment workflow need to be broken to more fine-grained
steps. Maybe instead of single "deploy" methdos have "prepareDeploy" (which
doesn't push the changes to Heat), "de
On 07/21/2014 04:10 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
> Hi nova folks
>
> QQ: Who uses migrate_instance_start/finish, and why we need this rpc call?
>
> I greped code but I couldn't find implementation for it.
>
> https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/372c54927ab4f6c226f5a1a2aead40b89617cf77/nova/network/m
On 07/22/2014 11:51 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 07/22/2014 10:48 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
>> On 07/21/2014 12:03 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>> Thanks Matthew for the analysis.
>>>
>>> I think you missed something though.
>>>
>>> Right now the frustration is that unrelated intermittent bugs stop your
>>>
Sean, David
So seems like I am better in writing code then english, sorry for that=)
Let me try to explain my position and try to make this situation clear.
We have the great program "QA" that helps to keep OpenStack working
(automation of testing, unit/function/integration tests, log analyze,
e
I have logged below bug to enforce 'content-type' check before RBAC enforcement
on POST requests, but seems we have difference in opinion.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/barbican/+bug/1347101
Please look at the above bug and share your thoughts.
"IMO" -
"content-type" enforcement is concern of REST
At the meetup today, the topic of our spec process came up. The general
sentiment is that the process is still young and the hiccups are
expected, but we do need to get better about making sure we're staying
on top of them.
As a first step, it was proposed to add 1 spec review a week to the
e
Today was a relatively quick meeting, but a meeting nonetheless.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/python_openstacksdk/2014/python_openstacksdk.2014-07-22-19.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/python_openstacksdk/2014/python_openstacksdk.2014-07-22-19.0
On 07/21/2014 04:45 AM, Christian Berendt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> There are some files using the Python source code encodings as the first
> line. That's normally not necessary and I want propose to introduce a
> hacking check to check for the absence of the source code encodings.
>
I assume you mean
The v3 experimental jobs are available for tempest [0]:
- check-tempest-dsvm-keystonev3-full
- check-tempest-dsvm-neutron-keystonev3-ful
At the moment the difference between these and the regular jobs are that
what has been implemented in this bp [1]:
- tempest works with v3 credential
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014, at 06:38 AM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
> Hello, Ben.
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Ben Nemec
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The oslo.serialization and oslo.concurrency graduation specs are both
> > approved, but unfortunately I haven't made as much progress on them as I
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014, at 08:41 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 21/07/14 17:11, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 21, 2014, at 4:45 AM, Christian Berendt
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> There are some files using the Python source c
Thanks guys, much appreciated! I should be around on IRC for the rest
of the week if you have any questions. Next week I'm unlikely to have
internet access so don't wait. :-)
-Ben
On 2014-07-22 06:37, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Yuriy,
> Hop onto #openstack-oslo, that's where we hang out.
>
> Be
I would like to request Juno spec freeze exception for the Multiple IPv6
Prefixes/Addresses per port blueprint:
https://review.openstack.org/98217
This feature defines how multiple IPv6 prefixes and/or addresses per Neutron
port should be supported in OpenStack, in a manner that is consistent w
Workers can consume more than one message at a time due to
eventlet/greenthreads. The conf option rpc_thread_pool_size determines how many
messages can theoretically be handled at once. Greenthread switching can happen
any time a monkeypatched call is made.
Vish
On Jul 21, 2014, at 3:36 AM, fd
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
>
>
> > > I wasn't aware that PKI tokens had domains in them. What happens to
> nova
> > > in this case, It just works?
> > >
> >
> > Both PKI and UUID responses from v3 contain:
> >
> > 1. the user's domain
> >
> > And if it's a project sc
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Dolph Mathews
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Morgan Fainberg <
>> morgan.fainb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Reposted now will a lot less bad quote issues. Thanks for being patient
>>> wi
Thanks for the response.
Primarily I’m thinking about a situation where I have an image that has a
specific piece of software installed (let’s say MySQL for the sake of
argument). My application (which configures mysql) requires a glance image that
has MySQL pre-installed, and doesn’t particula
Hi
I mean I could use another patch instead of "/usr/libexec/qemu-kvm"
Thanks
--
Gareth
*Cloud Computing, OpenStack, Distributed Storage, Fitness, Basketball*
*OpenStack contributor, kun_huang@freenode*
*My promise: if you find any spelling or grammar mistakes in my email from
Mar 1 2013, notif
Since Rally is the first OpenStack project that I contributed to, I can
personally vouch for Boris' magical abilities to welcome new contributors and
set the technical direction for the project. If you spend some time in the
#openstack-rally irc you quickly realize that boris-42 is available ac
The issue (if I understand your diagram correctly) is that the VPN GW
address is on the other side of your home router from the neutron router.
The nexthop address has to be an address on one of the subnets directly
attached to the router. In this topology, the static route should be on
your home r
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> I'm running a HA overcloud configuration and as far as I'm aware, there is
> currently no mechanism in place for restarting failed nodes in the cluster.
> Originally, I had been wondering if we would use a corosync/pacemaker
> cluster across the control pla
Hello,
As discussed earlier this morning, we are working towards switching
SELinux to enforcing mode in tripleo. The work required are detailed in
this spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108168/. I welcome
additional comments and suggestions.
Thank you,
Richard
+1 At yahoo we are using and contributing to Rally. Within our company
performance engineering and QE are distinct job groups with different skill
sets and focus. As a result, I think that it makes perfect sense to have a
dedicated program for performance and scalability within OpenStack. I a
Mike,
I don't think we should SCF until the review queue is addressed, there are
far to many outstanding reviews presently. I'm not saying the queue has to
be flushed and revised (although we should give this time given the size of
the outstanding queue) , but all patches should be reviewed, and m
Dear Dan,
I understand.
Thanks for your information.
Regards,
Johnson
-Original Message-
From: Dan Genin [mailto:daniel.ge...@jhuapl.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 9:14 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] The image s
I'm happy to announce that python-swiftclient 2.2.0 has been released.
This release has the following significant features:
* Ability to set a storage policy on container and object upload
* Ability to generate Swift temporary URLs from the CLI and SDK
* Added context-sensitive help to the CLI co
Hi all,
Towards the end of the SAD one of my spec (
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104378/) did not make it on Sunday;
understandably because there were flurry of specs getting reviewed in
burst.
I would like to ask cores to take a look at this very basic change and see
if it can be made in. Ple
On 07/22/2014 11:58 AM, David Kranz wrote:
> On 07/22/2014 10:44 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>> Honestly, I'm really not sure I see this as a different program, but is
>> really something that should be folded into the QA program. I feel like
>> a top level effort like this is going to lead to a lot of d
Hi,
This is a little rambling, so I'll put this summary here and some discussion
below. I would like to be able to add heat template fragments (primarily
softwareconfig) to a template before an instance is created by Heat. This could
be possible by updating but not pushing the heat template bef
FYI, we chatted about this in #openstack-marconi today and decided to try
2100 UTC for tomorrow. If we would like to alternate at an earlier time
every other week, is 1900 UTC good, or shall we do something more like
1400 UTC?
On 7/21/14, 11:21 AM, "Kurt Griffiths"
wrote:
>I think Wednesday woul
On 07/21/2014 11:16 PM, Jay Lau wrote:
Hi Jay,
There are indeed some China customers want this feature because before
they do some operations, they want to check the action plan, such as
where the VM will be migrated or created, they want to use some
interactive mode do some operations to make s
No. There a blueprint in to do the integration, but no code merged yet let
alone documentation.
Duncan Thomas
On Jul 22, 2014 4:42 PM, "Giuseppe Galeota"
wrote:
> Dear all,
> is Cinder capable today to use Barbican for encryption? If yes, can you
> link to me some useful doc?
>
> Thank you,
> Gi
Maybe you are using local storage for your vm system volume backend,
accroding to the 'resize' implementation, 'rsync' and 'scp' will be
executed during the resize process, which will be the bottleneck
2014-07-19 13:07 GMT+08:00 fdsafdsafd :
> Did someone test the concurrency of nova's resize? i f
Thanks, boris, really big +1! we at huawei are using Rally as our
performance testing tool for OpenStack API, but I still hope Rally
will be more mature with more and more talented folks within the
OpenStack community. I am really excited to be able to participate.
2014-07-22 5:53 GMT+08:00 Boris
On 07/22/2014 10:44 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
Honestly, I'm really not sure I see this as a different program, but is
really something that should be folded into the QA program. I feel like
a top level effort like this is going to lead to a lot of duplication in
the data analysis that's currently goi
This is somewhat confusing, but long ago the decision was made that booting
from an ISO image should use the ISO as a root drive. This means that it is
only really useful for things like live cds. I believe you could use the new
block device mapping code to create an instance that boots from an
On 07/22/2014 10:48 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 07/21/2014 12:03 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Thanks Matthew for the analysis.
I think you missed something though.
Right now the frustration is that unrelated intermittent bugs stop your
presumably good change from getting in.
Without gating, the res
Dear all,
is Cinder capable today to use Barbican for encryption? If yes, can you
link to me some useful doc?
Thank you,
Giuseppe
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensta
Hey Kent,
Appreciate your effort and being pro-active for your patches. For future review
requests please join us at the #openstack-glance channel on Freenode.
Thanks,
-Nikhil
From: Wang, Kent [kent.w...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 1:20 PM
To: openstac
We still need another core to approve L7
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99709
From: Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 3:44 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Update on specs
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'd like to request an exception for the Flavor Framework spec:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102723/
>
> It already have more or less complete server-side implementation:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105982/
>
>
Hi folks,
I'd like to request an exception for the Flavor Framework spec:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102723/
It already have more or less complete server-side implementation:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105982/
CLI will be posted on review soon.
Thanks,
Eugene.
__
Hi Fuelers,
Looks like we are more or less good to call for a Soft Code Freeze [1] on
Thursday.
Then hard code freeze [2] will follow. It is planned to have no more than 2
weeks between SCF and HCF [3]. When hard code freeze is called, we create
stable/5.1 branch at the same time to accept only cr
Hi Faizan,
The Nova proposal is missing a dependency reference for UEFI support in
Ironic. That spec has not been approved, and, since this feature will
require changes in the Nova driver and scheduler, I am blocking it now so
that we can stay focused on simply landing the Ironic driver in Nova.
Hi Folks,
Could someone please share his experience with Nova "Boot from ISO" feature
[1].
We test it on Havana + KVM, uploaded the image with DISK_FORMAT set to
'iso'. Windows deployment does not happen. The VM has two volumes: one is
config-2 (CDFS, ~400Kb, don't know what that is); and the sec
On 07/21/2014 12:03 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Thanks Matthew for the analysis.
I think you missed something though.
Right now the frustration is that unrelated intermittent bugs stop your
presumably good change from getting in.
Without gating, the result would be that even more bugs, many of them
I agree with Sam. We're under a strict timeline here and the simpler
the code the faster it will be implemented and reviewed. Is there any
strong reason why this caching can't wait until K if it decided it is
really needed?
Thanks,
Brandon
On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 11:01 +, Samuel Bercovici wro
Honestly, I'm really not sure I see this as a different program, but is
really something that should be folded into the QA program. I feel like
a top level effort like this is going to lead to a lot of duplication in
the data analysis that's currently going on, as well as functionality
for better l
As I mentioned on the review, the title could cause confusion.
Rally tests performance and scalability but the title could lead people to
think that if you install Rally, you will get Performance and Scale from your
OpenStack instance. Adding Benchmark or Testing in to the description would
cl
Hello guys
I have the following network setup at home:
[openstack instances] -> [neutron router] -> [ [home router] [vpn gw] ]
TENANT NETWORK EXTERNAL NETWORK
I need my instances to connect to machines that are connected thru the vpn
gw server.
By default, al
On Tue, Jul 22 2014, gordon chung wrote:
> hi,
> following the oslo graduation protocol, could the oslo team review the
> oslo.middleware library[1] i've created and see if there are any issues.
> [1] https://github.com/chungg/oslo.middleware
LGTM. Don't forget to gate it on py33. :)
--
Julien
Hi all,
Please provide your valuable inputs on the proposal below mentioned.
Thanks,
Rajesh Tailor
From: Tailor, Rajesh
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 12:38 PM
To: 'openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org'
Subject: [openstack-dev] [glance] Use Launcher/ProcessLauncher in glance
Hi all,
Why glance is
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:17 PM, Isaku Yamahata
wrote:
>
> I'd like to request Juno spec freeze exception for ML2 OVS portsecurity
> extension.
>
> - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99873/
> ML2 OVS: portsecurity extension support
>
> - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-ovs-po
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:32 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi
wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> A quick note that SAD has passed. We briskly approved a pile of BPs
>
> it's sad. ;-(
>
>> over the weekend, most of them vendor related as low priority, best
>> effort attempts for Juno-3. At this point, we're hugely overs
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Mooney, Sean K
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to propose
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/107797/1/specs/juno/ml2-use-dpdkvhost.rst
> for a spec freeze exception.
>
>
>
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-use-dpdkvhost
>
>
>
> This blueprint adds
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
> I would like to request Juno spec freeze exceptions for the following, all of
> which add features to the ML2 driver for the Cisco Nexus family of switches.
>
>
> https://review.openstack.org/95834 - Provider Segment Support
> https://review.
hi,
following the oslo graduation protocol, could the oslo team review the
oslo.middleware library[1] i've created and see if there are any issues.
[1] https://github.com/chungg/oslo.middleware
cheers,
gord
___
Hi,
I'm running a HA overcloud configuration and as far as I'm aware, there is
currently no mechanism in place for restarting failed nodes in the cluster.
Originally, I had been wondering if we would use a corosync/pacemaker cluster
across the control plane with STONITH resources configured for
It seems that there already are posts out there explaining how to
resolve your issue
https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/6196/programmingerror-programmingerror-1146-table-novaservices-doesnt-exist/.
Generally, usage questions should be directed to other fora such as
ask.openstack.org. This m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
FYI: I've moved the spec to oslo space since the switch is not really
limited to neutron, and most of coding is to be done in oslo.db
(though not much anyway).
New spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108355/
On 09/07/14 13:17, Ihar Hrachyshka wr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 21/07/14 17:11, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> On Jul 21, 2014, at 4:45 AM, Christian Berendt
> wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> There are some files using the Python source code encodings as
>> the first line. That's normally not necessary and I want propo
Yuriy,
Hop onto #openstack-oslo, that's where we hang out.
Ben,
I can help as well.
thanks,
-- dims
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
> Hello, Ben.
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The oslo.serialization and oslo.concurrency graduati
Stephen,
This will increase the complexity of the code since it will add managing the
cache lifecycle in tandem with the barbican back end and the fact that
containers may be shared by multiple listeners.
At this stage, I think that it serves us all to keep the code at this stage as
small and s
Hello, Ben.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The oslo.serialization and oslo.concurrency graduation specs are both
> approved, but unfortunately I haven't made as much progress on them as I
> would like. The serialization repo has been created and has enough acks
Hi,
Kicking open an old thread[0] about Libvirt not migrating cdrom
devices (config-drive) [0] with the attached LP bug[1].
It seems that the direction was to consider switching to vfat, as
libvirt supports this. It isn't clear to me if the cdrom limitation
is specific to libvirt, nor if vfat co
Folks, please, don't +1 it. If we'll have >= 2 candidates, we'll have
CIVS elections.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Hugh Saunders wrote:
> +1 Boris has the enthusiasm, and time to take Rally forwards. He is
> especially good at encouraging people to get involved.
>
> "Ensure that everybody's u
On 22 July 2014 11:06, Luke Gorrie wrote:
> This must have been bad for you guys since you were stuck waiting on us
> and couldn't fix the problem on your side. I was also contacted by email,
> as the previous contact person for that driver, but the message simply
> asked me to confirm my colleag
ack
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose my candidacy for Rally PTL.
>
> I started this project to make benchmarking of OpenStack simple as possible.
> This means not only load generation, but as well OpenStack specific
> benchmark framework, d
+1 Boris has the enthusiasm, and time to take Rally forwards. He is
especially good at encouraging people to get involved.
"Ensure that everybody's use cases are fully covered" - this must be
balanced against the need for focus and clear scope.
--
Hugh Saunders
On 21 July 2014 19:38, Boris Pavl
Hi.
There are now quite a few spec freeze exceptions out there.
Realistically, I don't think they will all get up, mostly because of
concerns about review bandwidth coming up to the end of the release
cycle.
The proposed process from here is that I will wait until my morning
tomorrow (12 hours fr
Dear All,
I can't use it to attach volume because the status is 'BUILD', not 'ACTIVE'.
#> nova list
+--++++-+--+
| ID | Name | Status | Task State |
Power State
Hi Sean,
On 21 July 2014 22:53, Collins, Sean
wrote:
> The fact that I tried to reach out to the person who was listed as the
> contact back in November to try and resolve the –1 that this CI system
> gave, and never received a response until the public mailing list thread
> about revoking vot
Dear all,
have you some good news about the problem related to
the "
Keystone PKI token too much long" for Barbican?
Thank you,
Giuseppe
2014-01-31 14:27 GMT+01:00 Ferreira, Rafael :
> By the way, you can achieve the same benefits of uuid tokens (shorter
> tokens) with PKI by simply using
It's interesting and practical!
There're some early efforts to make openstack more robust and efficient,
however, we're still lacking one such framework.
Just a little question.
On the wiki, it says to consider the scalability problem.
How can we measure the performance at large scale? By real dep
Any chance for getting it streamed or at least IRC'd for those of us who have
an interest in this but can't attend?
From: Robert Collins [robe...@robertcollins.net]
Sent: 20 July 2014 20:30
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Triple
Dear Jay,
Yes, it's answer my question.
Because I have problem to launch an instance from an image, I can not do "nova
volume-attach" to check if iSCSI LUN mechanism is work.
Thanks for your reply.
Regards,
Johnson
-Original Message-
From: Jay S. Bryant [mailto:jsbry...@electronicjungl
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
