[openstack-dev] Keystone X509 Subjects

2014-05-03 Thread Adam Young
We need a way to link users and services to the X509 certificates that sign messages from them. The most immediate need is to have multiple Keystone servers with their own signing certs, but the RPC mechanism also will need PKI message signing. Please read and contribute to the Spec for the b

Re: [openstack-dev] Monitoring as a Service

2014-05-03 Thread Bohai (ricky)
+1 I like this idea. Best regards to you. Ricky > -Original Message- > From: Alexandre Viau [mailto:alexandre.v...@savoirfairelinux.com] > Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 5:17 AM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: [openstack-dev] Monitoring as a Service > > Hello Everyone!

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal: remove the server groups feature

2014-05-03 Thread Qiming Teng
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 08:49:11PM +0800, Jay Lau wrote: > Jay Pipes and all, I'm planning to merge this topic to > http://junodesignsummit.sched.org/event/77801877aa42b595f14ae8b020cd1999after > some discussion in this week's Gantt IRC meeting, hope it is OK. > > Thanks! The link above didn't wo

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] sphinxcontrib-docbookrestapi broken with latest pip

2014-05-03 Thread Anne Gentle
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2014-05-03 18:41:05 -0500 (-0500), Anne Gentle wrote: > > You could log a bug against openstack-manuals and tag it with > > doc-builds. That's where we track other doc tooling bugs. > > Thanks Anne! https://launchpad.net/bugs/1315768 > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] sphinxcontrib-docbookrestapi broken with latest pip

2014-05-03 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-05-03 18:41:05 -0500 (-0500), Anne Gentle wrote: > You could log a bug against openstack-manuals and tag it with > doc-builds. That's where we track other doc tooling bugs. Thanks Anne! https://launchpad.net/bugs/1315768 > It would be great to get that renamed, since it's a wadlrestapi >

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] sphinxcontrib-docbookrestapi broken with latest pip

2014-05-03 Thread Anne Gentle
You could log a bug against openstack-manuals and tag it with doc-builds. That's where we track other doc tooling bugs. It would be great to get that renamed, since it's a wadlrestapi converter. On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > As of TODAY's pip 1.5.5 release, which vend

[openstack-dev] [QA] sphinxcontrib-docbookrestapi broken with latest pip

2014-05-03 Thread Jeremy Stanley
As of TODAY's pip 1.5.5 release, which vendors in a newer setuptools (3.4.4), sphinxcontrib-docbookrestapi is uninstallable pending approval of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84132 and we have gate jobs on OpenStack projects which cannot pass as a result. http://logs.openstack.org/15/91815/4/gat

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] explanations on the current state of config file handling

2014-05-03 Thread gustavo panizzo
On 05/02/2014 11:09 AM, Mark McClain wrote: > > To throw something out, what if moved to using config-dir for optional > configs since it would still support plugin scoped configuration files. > > Neutron Servers/Network Nodes > /etc/neutron.d > neutron.conf (Common Options) > ser

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] explanations on the current state of config file handling

2014-05-03 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 08:18:18AM -0500, Kyle Mestery wrote: > On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > > Some non insignificant number of devstack changes related to neutron > > seem to be neutron plugins having to do all kinds of manipulation of > > extra config files. The grenade up

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Branchless Tempest QA Spec - final draft

2014-05-03 Thread Kenichi Oomichi
Hi Matthew, > -Original Message- > From: Matthew Treinish [mailto:mtrein...@kortar.org] > Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 12:36 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Branchless Tempest QA Spec - final draft > > > > When addi

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Branchless Tempest QA Spec - final draft

2014-05-03 Thread Kenichi Oomichi
Hi David, > -Original Message- > From: David Kranz [mailto:dkr...@redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 2:30 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Branchless Tempest QA Spec - final draft > > > The verify_tempest_conf

[openstack-dev] nova compute error

2014-05-03 Thread abhishek jain
Hi all I want to boot VM from controller node onto the compute node using devstack.All my services such as nova,q-agt,nova-compute,neutron,etc are running properly both on compute node as well on the controller node.I'm also able to boot VMs on controller node from the openstack dashvoard .However

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Use-Cases with VPNs Distinction

2014-05-03 Thread Adam Harwell
Sounds about right to me. I guess I agree with your agreement. :) Does anyone actually oppose this arrangement? --Adam From: Stephen Balukoff mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: F

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Fulfilling Operator Requirements: Driver / Management API

2014-05-03 Thread Adam Harwell
My comments in red (sorry again). From: Eugene Nikanorov mailto:enikano...@mirantis.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Friday, May 2, 2014 5:08 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage qu