On 29 April 2014 12:27, Dolph Mathews wrote:
>
> Sure: domain names are unambiguous but user mutable, whereas Heat's approach
> to using admin tenant "name" is at risk to both mutability and ambiguity (in
> a multi-domain deployment).
Isn't domainname/user unambiguous and unique? mutability is
Currently, Nova API achieve this feature based on the database’s REGEX support.
Do you have advice on alternative way to achieve it?
--
zhangleiqiang (Trump)
Best Regards
From: laserjetyang [mailto:laserjety...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 1:49 PM
To: OpenStack Development
Hi all:
Currently I'm working on ssl vpn, based on patchsets by Nachi[1] and Rajesh[2]
There are secure issues pointed by mark, that ssl private keys are
stored plain in database and in config files of vpn-agents. As
Barbican is incubated, we can store certs and their private keys in
Barbican. Bu
Hi all
I'm getting follwoing error when trying to run nova-compute service..
if ret is None: raise libvirtError ('virNodeListDevices() failed',
conn=self)
2014-04-29 00:51:47.153 28127 TRACE nova.openstack.common.threadgroup
libvirtError: this function is not supported by the connection driver:
It looks to me the Nova API will be dangerous source of DoS attacks due to
the regexp?
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Duncan Thomas wrote:
> Regex matching in APIs can be a dangerous source of DoS attacks - see
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReDoS. Unless this is mitigated sensibly,
> I will c
I don't think it is supported in OpenStack community right now, however, I
think nova-network with some modification may work that way, but the code
may not have big chance to be in community.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:21 PM, ZhengLingyun wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I want to use OVS instead of Lin
Hi,
For everyone's convenience, I've added to the pad short descriptions of Network
Scenarios that are currently in tree (or under review) that I am familiar with.
Feel free to add/edit
Regards
Yair
- Original Message -
> From: "Miguel Lavalle"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing Li
+1 to lock May 7
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> +1 to lock down the page May 7th.
>
> -- dims
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Jeremy Stanley
> >
> wrote:
> > On 2014-04-26 17:05:41 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
> >> Just a friendly reminder to add yourself to thi
Hello Maksym,
Thank you for your work!
I suggest you to consider more general approach and hide backend specific
staff. I have the next proposal:
1) add support for inconsistent write operation by adding PutItem,
UpdateItem and DeleteItem request parameters "consistent" = True of False
(as well a
Hi list,
I want to use OVS instead of Linux bridge in Nova networking without Neutron.
How to do that?
I use OpenStack Icehouse which is deployed by DevStack on a single host.
Thanks.
Dustin Zheng
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.ope
1) Open action items
a. Merge sessions 262 & 140
b. Publish nova-spec for no-db scheduling BP
2) Status on forklift efforts
3) Juno summit design sessions
4) Opens
Topic vault (so we don't forget)
1 - no-db scheduler
--
Don Dugger
"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
Ph
Waiting on review.openstack.org to come back live to look at the demo code and
provide more accurate feedback…
Interesting and good to hear the code moved easily. The possibility to have a
functional a common image transfer service wasn't questioned (IMHO). What I
was stating was that we'll n
> We had a good discussion on IRC about some of the possible difficulties with
> this domain: 1) is the developer.example.com standard commercial-based and
> not open-source? and 2) will developers who want to contribute to OpenStack
> be confused by this additional subdomain? For 1), I don't be
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 04/28/2014 02:06 PM, David Kranz wrote:
> > On 04/27/2014 10:02 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:01:00AM +, Kenichi Oomichi wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for my late response, but I'd like to discuss this
Yes, thanks Jamie for the very thorough write ups and Matt for the thoughtful
comments.
My comments are inline below. A point of clarification: I’m using “SDK authors”
to mean all of us who are building the SDK and I’m using “SDK consumers” to
mean the end-user developers who will be using the
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Sorry for all the drama on the list lately.
>
Not a problem. Like I said, the passion from all sides is great, and
I'm especially happy to see all the operators engaging with Neutron
for LBaaS.
> Kyle: I appreciate the sentim
Hi stackers,
I found there are two "policy.json" files in cinder project.
One is for source code(cinder/etc/policy.json), another is for the unit
test(cinder/cinder/tests/policy.json).
Maybe it's better to united them and make the unit test to use the
"policy.json" file in the source code:
1. "
Doug, I have a few concerns with handling the PHP SDK this way.
The authors of the novaclient are working on openstack, using python
which has common community processes, and there is a bit of
documentation covering the commonalities. Contributors to the PHP SDK
are likely not going to know how th
Jamie, thanks for going into so much detail.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Matthew Farina wrote:
> While reading this it struck me that we should prioritize the experience
> of end-user, that is application developers, over the experience of those
> working on the SDK. I don't think we'd eve
While reading this it struck me that we should prioritize the experience of
end-user, that is application developers, over the experience of those
working on the SDK. I don't think we'd ever directly talked about this so I
wanted to take a moment and state it.
What I put in below isn't my full set
Sysprep is independent from the Heat templates. Generally providing a
sysprepped (and generalized) Windows image in Glance is the best solution.
The Cloudbase-Init installer offers an option to run it [1] and our automated
OpenStack image building scripts do the same [2].
The official Windows Ser
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Dolph Mathews's message of 2014-04-28 12:28:41 -0700:
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >
> > > So in the process of making Heat deploy itself, I've run into a bit of
> a
> > > deadlock.
> > >
> > > http
Hi
Can you all review the Wiki page here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/ApiModel
This is trying to describe what we talked about at the Solum meetup
in March.
Also remember the Environments page:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/Environments
If we can work on this before summit, w
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> On 04/28/2014 01:04 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
>>
>> I've collated the votes and put a proposed selection of talks (some
>> sessions merged) up; I'm going to push a draft timetable as soon as I
>> finish clicking on the clicky thing .:).
>>
>> If
+1 to lock down the page May 7th.
-- dims
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2014-04-26 17:05:41 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
>> Just a friendly reminder to add yourself to this list if you are
>> interested in participating in the key signing in Atlanta:
>>
>> http
Does sysprep work in this template?
-原始邮件-
发件人: "Alessandro Pilotti"
发送时间: 2014/4/28 6:07
收件人: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
主题: [openstack-dev] Heat Windows templates contribution
Hi all,
Following up to various conversations during the Icehouse
Hi guys,
Sorry for all the drama on the list lately.
*Kyle*: I appreciate the sentiment. I'd also be happy to open up my API doc
for general editing by people on the internet (and not just comments) if
you think that would help.
For us new-comers to the OpenStack project environment, what do peo
Dear fellow Neutron'ers and QA'ers,
During the Atlanta Design Summit we have been assigned 20 minutes (
http://junodesignsummit.sched.org/event/48ccd60090740ae80b4d1811b9a61303#.U12EsqbwBPq)
to agree on the Tempest testing that will be developed for Neutron during
the Juno cycle. In order to make
On 2014-04-26 17:05:41 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
> Just a friendly reminder to add yourself to this list if you are
> interested in participating in the key signing in Atlanta:
>
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OpenPGP_Web_of_Trust/Juno_Summit
[...]
It has a sign-up cutoff of two weeks
On 2014-04-28 18:37:56 +0400 (+0400), Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
> IIRC there was a key signing party on the launch time in Hong
> Kong, isn't it?
Nope, according to the old wiki article we ended up doing it
Thursday November 7 2013 during the 10:30-11:00 AM break. (Though I
suppose that was fairly cl
Hi, I pulled devstack yesterday and have been trying to get any test to run
successfully.
My process is this:
Install tox >=1.6,<1.7
Install libmysqlclient-dev
Install mongodb-server
Source .tox/py27/bin/activate
Install test-requuirements packages in venv
Install pytidylib 0.2.1 from ta
Good afternoon Neutron developers!
There has been a discussion about dynamic routing in Neutron for the past few
weeks in the L3 subteam weekly meetings. I've submitted a review request of the
blueprint documenting the proposal of this feature:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90833/. If you ha
On 04/28/2014 01:04 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
I've collated the votes and put a proposed selection of talks (some
sessions merged) up; I'm going to push a draft timetable as soon as I
finish clicking on the clicky thing .:).
If your session has been selected you now need to:
- ensure there is
Hello folks,
FWIW, we've been trying to refine the ssl cert generation workflows via this
blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/barbican/+spec/add-ssl-ca-support
These flows could be kicked off via the orders API.
Thanks,
John
From: Adam Young [ayo...@r
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Shaunak Kashyap <
shaunak.kash...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your inputs, Matt and Anne. I'm punting on the first question
> (re: publishing) for now. It sounds like this is a larger discussion and we
> can make progress on the PHP SDK user-facing documenta
Hi All--
We've finally got the check-tempest-dsvm-virtual-ironic passing
successfully in the Ironic gate. Among other things, this test runs the
tempest.scenario.test_baremetal_basic_ops which is a functional
provisioning test directly stressing Ironic, Nova and Neutron as well as
devstack and di
On 29/04/14 01:41, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
> Excerpts from Steve Baker's message on 28/04/2014 01:25:29:
>
>> I'm with Clint on this one. Heat-engine cannot know the true state
>> of a server just by monitoring what has been polled and signaled.
>> Since it can't know it would be dangerous for it to
On 04/28/2014 02:06 PM, David Kranz wrote:
> On 04/27/2014 10:02 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:01:00AM +, Kenichi Oomichi wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Sorry for my late response, but I'd like to discuss this again.
>>>
>>> Now we are working for adding Nova API responses c
Sam,
The use cases where pretty complete the last time I checked so let's move them
to gerrit so we can all vote.
Echoing Kyle I would love to see us focusing on getting things ready for the
summit.
German
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Bercovici [mailto:samu...@radware.com]
Sent:
On 28/04/14 23:04, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following up to various conversations during the Icehouse cycle, we'd
> like to contribute the Heat templates work that we did at Cloudbase,
> partly available at:
> https://github.com/cloudbase/windows-heat-templates
>
It looks like progre
Sounds like a good idea to me. Is the pod area for neutron-specific
discussions?
Thanks,
manish
On 4/28/14 12:08 PM, "Kyle Mestery" wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
>> Kyle,
>>
>> Could you point to any information about the "pod" area? I would like
>> to do somet
We may want to consider making use of Heat outputs for this.
This was my first thought as well. stack-show returns a JSON document
that would be easy enough to parse through instead of having it in two
places.
Rather than assuming hard coding, create an output on the overcloud
template that
On 04/28/2014 02:07 PM, Pitucha, Stanislaw Izaak wrote:
Hi all,
I've seen some blueprints/wikis from people interested in certificate
signing via barbican orders, so hopefully you'll have some feedback.
I submitted a proposal for certificate/signing order API at
https://review.openstack.org/9061
Excerpts from Dolph Mathews's message of 2014-04-28 12:28:41 -0700:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> > So in the process of making Heat deploy itself, I've run into a bit of a
> > deadlock.
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1287453
> > https://bugs.launchpa
Hi Jay,
(I havent checked your link yet)
But just to get some more clarification.. I haven't understood yet, why you
think its not called w/ the expected args ?
I expect it to get called with the expected args bcos ...
_load_shares_config is mocked to _fake_load_shares_config
which sets self._dri
On 2014-04-25 10:40:02 -0700 (-0700), James E. Blair wrote:
[...]
> Of course, for some of us, that's not a lot. So on Monday, we'll
> send a GPG signed email with the fingerprints as well. And this is
> just another reminder that as a community, we should endeavor to
> build our GPG web of trust.
From: Kyle Mestery mailto:mest...@noironetworks.com>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Monday, April 28, 2014 3:08 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@li
On 4/28/2014 3:03 PM, Denis Makogon wrote:
Good day, Boden.
I think you should file the blueprint for it and put it into BP meeting
agenda.
Best regards,
Denis Makogon
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:50 PM, boden mailto:bo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote:
Guys,
I have a few small features / e
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> So in the process of making Heat deploy itself, I've run into a bit of a
> deadlock.
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1287453
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1313003
>
> Currently, we deploy OpenStack like this:
>
> * First
Guys,
I have a few small features / enhancements I'd like to suggest. I'm
willing to contribute the code / unit tests myself, but am looking for a
consensus from the group before I invest the time.
There are a few enhancements on my list -- I will send details each in a
separate email to keep
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
> Kyle,
>
> Could you point to any information about the "pod" area? I would like
> to do something with the DNS discussion. Will this area be
> schedulable or first-come-first-served?
>
The pod area is more free-form, no schedule necessary no
Guys,
I have a few small features / enhancements I'd like to suggest. I'm
willing to contribute the code / unit tests myself, but am looking for a
consensus from the group before I invest the time.
There are a few enhancements on my list -- I will send details each in a
separate email to keep
Good day, Boden.
I think you should file the blueprint for it and put it into BP meeting
agenda.
Best regards,
Denis Makogon
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:50 PM, boden wrote:
> Guys,
> I have a few small features / enhancements I'd like to suggest. I'm
> willing to contribute the code / unit tests
Steve Gordon wrote on 04/28/2014 08:58:35 AM:
> - Original Message -
> > Hi Stackers,
> > Proposal
> >
> > Create two new options to nova boot:
> >
> > --near-tag
> > and
> > --not-near-tag
> >
> > The first would tell the scheduler to place the new VM near other VMs
> > having a p
> I'd like to propose the ability to support a pluggable trove conductor
> manager. Currently the trove conductor manager is hard-coded [1][2] and
> thus is always 'trove.conductor.manager.Manager'. I'd like to see this
> conductor manager class be pluggable like nova does [3].
Note that most of u
Guys,
I have a few small features / enhancements I'd like to suggest. I'm
willing to contribute the code / unit tests myself, but am looking for a
consensus from the group before I invest the time.
There are a few enhancements on my list -- I will send details each in a
separate email to keep
Hi,
I was just working to push the use cases into the new format .rst but I agree
that using google doc would be more intuitive.
Let me know what you prefer to do with the use cases document:
1. leave it at google docs at -
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ewl95yxAMq2fO0Z6Dz6fL-w2FScERQXQR1-m
Kyle,
Could you point to any information about the "pod" area? I would like
to do something with the DNS discussion. Will this area be
schedulable or first-come-first-served?
Carl
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> Hi everyone:
>
> I've pushed out the Neutron Design Summit
On 04/28/2014 11:22 AM, Dan Smith wrote:
2. There's no way to add an existing server to this "group".
In the original API there was a way to add existing servers to the
group. This didn't make it into the code that was submitted. It is
however supported by the instance group db API in nova.
On 04/28/2014 02:00 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
I was writing this in test_glusterfs.py
def test_ensure_shares_unmounted_1share(self):
with contextlib.nested(
mock.patch.object(self._driver, '_load_shares_config'),
mock.patch.object(self._driver, '_ensure_sha
Hi all,
I've seen some blueprints/wikis from people interested in certificate
signing via barbican orders, so hopefully you'll have some feedback.
I submitted a proposal for certificate/signing order API at
https://review.openstack.org/90613 (based on previous Arvind's work with
keys)
It's not pr
On 04/27/2014 10:02 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:01:00AM +, Kenichi Oomichi wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for my late response, but I'd like to discuss this again.
Now we are working for adding Nova API responses checks to Tempest[1] to
block backward incompatible changes.
Wit
I was writing this in test_glusterfs.py
def test_ensure_shares_unmounted_1share(self):
with contextlib.nested(
mock.patch.object(self._driver, '_load_shares_config'),
mock.patch.object(self._driver, '_ensure_share_unmounted')
) as (self._fake_load_share
So in the process of making Heat deploy itself, I've run into a bit of a
deadlock.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1287453
https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1313003
Currently, we deploy OpenStack like this:
* First we generate usernames/passwords for all service accounts
* Next we dep
Hello,
Have any performance numbers been published for Marconi? I have asked this
question before
(http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/031004.html) but
there were none at that time.
Thanks,
Tomasz Janczuk
___
OpenStack-dev
>> 2. There's no way to add an existing server to this "group".
>
> In the original API there was a way to add existing servers to the
> group. This didn't make it into the code that was submitted. It is
> however supported by the instance group db API in nova.
>
>> 3. There's no way to remove
On 04/28/2014 06:58 AM, Steve Gordon wrote:
- Original Message -
Create two new options to nova boot:
--near-tag and --not-near-tag
The first would tell the scheduler to place the new VM near other
VMs having a particular "tag". The latter would tell the scheduler
to place the new
Hi Stackers,
Mirantis has been collaborating with a number of OpenStack contributors
and PTLs for the last couple months on something called DriverLog. It is
an effort to consolidate and display information about the verification
of vendor drivers in OpenStack.
Current implementation is here
No problem.
Thanks
On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 11:13 +0400, Nikolay Starodubtsev wrote:
> Congrats, Pablo! I was out of office and have no internet and couldn't
> give you +1 :(
>
>
>
> Nikolay Starodubtsev
>
>
> Software Engineer
>
> Mirantis Inc.
>
>
>
> Skyp
On 04/25/2014 03:15 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
There are myriad problems with the above user experience and
implementation. Let me explain them.
1. The user isn't creating a "server group" when they issue a nova
server-group-create call. They are creating a policy and calling it a
group. Cognitive di
Any comments on this?
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 18:58 +, Fuente, Pablo A wrote:
> Hi
> I'm trying to tackle this bug
> (https://bugs.launchpad.net/climate/+bug/1304435). The options that I'm
> considering are:
>
> 1 - Add the project_id query parameter to the leases API
> 2 - Us
Thanks for joining today’s community meeting.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/mistral.2014-04-28-16.00.html
Full log:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/mistral.2014-04-28-16.00.log.html
The next meeting is scheduled for May 5.
Renat Akhmerov
@ M
Hey folks,
I've finished descriptions / schedule for our design summit in Atlanta.
You can find sched: http://junodesignsummit.sched.org
General etherpad with all links and assignees:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-summit-sahara
Volunteers to help working on etherpads are welcome, please,
Jay,
Thanks again for the reply. If this migration is implemented using the
object "versioning", then the new "status as int" column cannot be utilized
(ie, sorted on) until the existing "status as string" column is eventually
dropped.
Is this correct? If so, then this approach will not actuall
Hi, Ilya!
Thank you for your suggestion! I totally argee with you, I'll make changes in
bp.
Andrey Ostapenko
From: Ilya Sviridov [isviri...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 6:37 AM
To: ANDREY OSTAPENKO (CS)
Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Duncan,
Thanks for the response. Have some additional thoughts, in-line, below:
On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 12:15 +0100, Duncan Thomas wrote:
> Two separate patches, or even two chains of separate patches, will
> make reviewing and more importantly (hopefully temporary) backouts
> easier. It will als
Since this is the designated "off" week, I'm going to cancel this week's
IRC meeting. By happy coincidence, that will give us until after Summit
to decide on a new alternate meeting time :)
The next meeting will be on the 7th of May, at the regular time (2000 UTC).
cheers,
Zane.
_
Thanks Matt for bringing up these questions - I think having this kind of
discussion is essential for such a big idea. It also helps me clarify my own
thinking towards this issue.
Before I answer, I want to point out that I'm not staunchly for or against any
particular idea. I do think that sch
Thanks for your reply.
Regex matching can be implemented in Database, and glob matches may not
work fine with "paginate_query". However, the ReDoS you mentioned will not
be avoided when using regex matching.
I will think of it again.
Thanks.
2014-04-28 19:04 GMT+08:00 Duncan Thomas :
> Regex
Hey Liz,
thank you very much for taking a time, proposing and covering this
agenda. It looks very good and I am happy that we got two slots for UX
discussions.
I agree with Thierry that we should definitely cover as much UX areas as
possible. Therefore I would like to encourage people from a
The most popular time slot right now is Wed 4:30 pm Central US time. The issue
with this time though is that it is bad time for folks in India and Europe
[Noorul, Rajdeep, Julien]
I have added a few more time slot options [8 am, 9 am central US time]. Please
retake the poll keeping in view tha
cc'ing Intel and Ericsson engineers who are interested in a similar
plan...
On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 15:33 +0100, John Garbutt wrote:
> On 28 April 2014 13:30, Jiangying (Jenny) wrote:
> > Nova now can detect host unreachable. But it fails to make out host
> > isolation, host dead and nova compute s
On 04/26/2014 09:41 PM, Jay Lau wrote:
Just noticed this email, I have already filed a blueprint related to
this topic
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/vm-instance-group-support
My idea is that can we add a new field such as "PlacemenetPolicy" to
AutoScalingGroup? If the value is affi
2014-04-28 16:33 GMT+02:00 John Garbutt :
>
> I don't think Nova should try to include functionality that
> re-implements other good monitoring tools (Nagios, etc)
>
> Having said that, having a new service group API that uses information
> from external tools to decide if a host is dead or not, a
Hi Everyone,
The Barbican team is hosting our weekly meeting today, Monday April 28, at
20:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt
Meeting agenda is avaialbe here
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Barbican and everyone is welcomed
to add agenda items
You can check this link
http://time.is/0800P
IIRC there was a key signing party on the launch time in Hong Kong, isn't it?
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Just a friendly reminder to add yourself to this list if you are
> interested in participating in the key signing in Atlanta:
>
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ope
Matt, I'd like to keep the v2 api discussion in the end of our design
sessions track to have enough input on other areas. IMO we should
discuss first what we need to have and then how it'll looks like.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Matthew Farrellee wrote:
> On 04/24/2014 10:51 AM, Sergey Lukj
Good day, Trove community
I'd like to start thread related to orchestration based resource
management. At current state Heat support in Trove is nothing else than
experimental. Trove should be able to fully support Trove as resource
management driver.
*Why is it so important?*
Because Trove
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Oleg Bondarev wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Kyle Mestery
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Oleg Bondarev
>> wrote:
>> > Yeah, I also saw in docs that update-device is supported since 0.8.0
>> > version,
>> > not sure why it didn't work i
On 28 April 2014 13:30, Jiangying (Jenny) wrote:
> Nova now can detect host unreachable. But it fails to make out host
> isolation, host dead and nova compute service down. When host unreachable is
> reported, users have to find out the exact state by himself and then take
> the appropriate measur
Good day, Trove community
I'd like to start thread related to orchestration based resource
management. At current state Heat support in Trove is nothing else than
experimental. Trove should be able to fully support Trove as resource
management driver.
*Why is it so important?*
Because Tro
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Oleg Bondarev
> wrote:
> > Yeah, I also saw in docs that update-device is supported since 0.8.0
> > version,
> > not sure why it didn't work in my setup.
> > I installed latest libvirt 1.2.3 and now update-dev
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 22:07 -0500, Steven Kaufer wrote:
> > yeah, we're talking about thousands and thousands of rows that have
> to
> > be updated before the API can be restarted…
> >
> > > There's also a possibility of adding support for the status codes,
> but
> > > keeping the string columns i
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Oleg Bondarev wrote:
> Yeah, I also saw in docs that update-device is supported since 0.8.0
> version,
> not sure why it didn't work in my setup.
> I installed latest libvirt 1.2.3 and now update-device works just fine and I
> am able
> to move instance tap device
Thanks all for great feedback, I will try to do a short summary:
Wiki
Wiki page is obvious and easy consensus for us. It should contain all
important information about UX, such as "how to contribute", "where to
go to start", various links, etc.
Mailing list - [UX]
---
Hi,
This is a reminder about another community meeting that we’ll be having today
at 16.00 UTC (#openstack-meeting).
The agenda:
Review action items
Current status (quickly by team members)
POC readiness and steps that left to finalise it
Open discussion
You can also find it at https://wiki.ope
Yeah, I also saw in docs that *update-device *is supported since 0.8.0
version,
not sure why it didn't work in my setup.
I installed latest libvirt 1.2.3 and now update-device works just fine and
I am able
to move instance tap device from one bridge to another with no downtime and
no reboot!
I'll t
Hello Andrey,
Great!
Looking closer at blueprint, I've realized that parameter naming is
confusing.
I would suggest to use --request-file parameter instead --description-file
used now.
Also, I believe that table-list will be the most popular call and it has
only two parameters, so would be bett
Hi all,
I've pushed the doc track to:
http://junodesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/documentation#.U15Y4uZdU0w
The two cross-project tracks related to docs are on Tuesday:
Tues 12:05 Cross-project documentation
Tues Lunch: Let's talk docs
Tues 2:00 Easier documentation for all project developer
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message on 28/04/2014 01:25:29:
> #1 Enable software components for full lifecycle:
> So in a short, stripped-down version, SoftwareConfigs could look like
>
> my_sw_config:
> type: OS::Heat::SoftwareConfig
> properties:
> create_config: # the hook for softwar
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
