Jay Lau wrote on 04/27/2014 12:31:01 AM:
> I think server group is an important feature especially when working
> with heat auto scaling group, there is already some discussion for this
> http://markmail.org/message/jl5wlx3nr3g53ko5
> The current server group feature does support add/delete a V
I think server group is an important feature especially when working with
heat auto scaling group, there is already some discussion for this
http://markmail.org/message/jl5wlx3nr3g53ko5
The current server group feature does support add/delete a VM instance
to/from the server group but seems not ab
Jay Lau wrote on 04/26/2014 11:41:25 PM:
> Just noticed this email, I have already filed a blueprint related to
> this topic https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/vm-instance-
> group-support
> My idea is that can we add a new field such as "PlacemenetPolicy" to
> AutoScalingGroup? If the
Just noticed this email, I have already filed a blueprint related to this
topic https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/vm-instance-group-support
My idea is that can we add a new field such as "PlacemenetPolicy" to
AutoScalingGroup? If the value is affinity, then when heat engine create
the Au
> -Original Message-
> From: Alun Champion [mailto:p...@achampion.net]
> Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 7:19 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Manila]
>
> I'm sure this has been discussed I just couldn't find any refer
Just a friendly reminder to add yourself to this list if you are
interested in participating in the key signing in Atlanta:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OpenPGP_Web_of_Trust/Juno_Summit
Now that we have more visibility about schedules, I think we should try
to find a time slot. Does anybody ha
All,
I am looking for feedback on how to complete implementation of i18n
support for Cinder. I need to open a new BluePrint for Juno as soon as
the cinder-specs process is available. In the mean time I would like to
start working on this and need feedback on the scope I should undertake
with thi
I'm sure this has been discussed I just couldn't find any reference to
it, perhaps someone can point me to the discussion/rationale.
Is there any reason why there needs to be another service to present a
control-plane to storage? Obviously object storage is different as
that is presenting a data-pl
The so called multivendor work is dependent now on the "flavors"
framework. Patches were presented in the Icehouse release to enable
multivendor support using the service-type-framework, however there
were concerns on the use of that framework, and hence those patches
were not approved in time.
A
On Apr 25, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Chris Behrens wrote:
>
> On Apr 25, 2014, at 2:15 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
>> Hi Stackers,
>>
>> When recently digging in to the new server group v3 API extension
>> introduced in Icehouse, I was struck with a bit of cognitive dissonance
>> that I can't seem to sha
>Hmm, I totally see the value of doing this. Not sure that there could be
>the same kinds of "liveness" guarantees with non-shared-storage, but I
>am certainly happy to see a proof of concept in this area! :)
By "liveness", if you mean down time of migration, our current results
show that liveness
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Zaro wrote:
> Do you mean making it default to WIP on every patchset that gets
> uploaded?
>
No. I mean carrying WIP to all new patch sets once it is set just like
Code-Review -2 is handled by default.
Gerrit 2.8 does allow you to carry the same label score for
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 5:15 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Hi Stackers,
>
> When recently digging in to the new server group v3 API extension
> introduced in Icehouse, I was struck with a bit of cognitive dissonance
> that I can't seem to shake. While I understand and support the idea
> behind the featu
Maybe the link is help for you.
http://superuser.com/questions/232807/iproute2-not-functioning-rtnetlink-answers-operation-not-supported
Best regards to you.
Ricky
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 6:29 PM, abhishek jain wrote:
> Hi Ricky
>
> Thanks.You are right.
> I'm getting following error after runn
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 18:28:38 -0400
Jay Pipes wrote:
>
> > i) This is a feature that was discussed in at least one if not two
> > Design Summits and went through a long review period, it wasn't one
> > of those changes that merged in 24 hours before people could take a
> > good look at it.
>
> Co
I'm trying to configure any VPNaaS plugin in single-provider mode. I'm not
able to achieve this goal. I'm using a devstack installation and I'm
editing */etc/neutron/neutron.conf* file, modifying this line:
...
service_provider=VPN:cisco_csr:neutron.services.vpn.service_drivers.ipsec.IPsecVPNDrive
Hi Ricky
Thanks.You are right.
I'm getting following error after running the command ...
sudo ip link add qvbb2fc7c52-ae type veth peer name qvob2fc7c52-ae
RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported
Below is the description of my system..
uname -a
Linux t4240-ubuntu1310 3.8.13-rt9-QorIQ-SDK-
Hi, all:
I find almost all of the @utils.synchronized decoration usage in
cinder-volume (cinder.volume.manager / cinder.volume.drivers.*) with an
"external=True" param. Such as
cinder.volume.manager.VolumeManager:attach_volume:
def attach_volume(self, context, volume_id, in
It seems that the command “ip link add qvbb2fc7c52-ae type veth peer name
qvob2fc7c52-ae” failed.
Maybe you can try it manually and confirm whether it’s the reason.
Best regards to you.
Ricky
From: abhishek jain [mailto:ashujain9...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 3:25 PM
To: OpenSta
> -Original Message-
> From: Jay S. Bryant [mailto:jsbry...@electronicjungle.net]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 8:09 AM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [cinder] proposal of definitions/processes for
> cinder-spec
>
> All,
>
> I have gotten questions f
Hi all..
I'm getting following nova-compute error and thus not able to boot the VMs
on my compute node...
nova-ompute service stopped and started giving following error...
[02:06:44] Abhishek Jain: 2014-04-25 15:32:00.112 6501 TRACE
nova.openstack.common.threadgroup cmd=' '.join(cmd))
2014-0
21 matches
Mail list logo
