Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Validating Addressing and Routing configuration

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Veiga, Anthony < anthony_ve...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > > > Question 1) Should we allow the user to build a potentially broken > network, knowing that there may be a use case we haven't covered? > In my non-OpenStack work I have found that if your using bridge-

Re: [openstack-dev] Ready to import Launchpad Answers into Ask OpenStack

Hi Sergey On Tue 11 Feb 2014 08:01:48 AM CET, Sergey Lukjanov wrote: > Stefano, is it possible to import savanna's answers@launchpad to ask.o.o? Yes, indeed. I apologize for not putting you explicitly in the cc list. The full list of projects we'll work on is on the bug itself: https://bugs.la

[openstack-dev] [tempest] Bluiprint for improvement neutron test coverage

Hello! I'm amoung people who are working on improvement neutron test coverage. Over work is cooperating on etherpad page https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-summit-qa-neutron. Meanwhile some reviewers ask for blueprint or bug report to be associated with change. That's why I created this blu

Re: [openstack-dev] Ready to import Launchpad Answers into Ask OpenStack

Awesome! Stefano, is it possible to import savanna's answers@launchpad to ask.o.o? Thanks. On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 02/06/2014 12:07 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: > > Hello folks, > > > > we're ready to import the answers from Launchpad into Ask OpenStack. A >

Re: [openstack-dev] How to write a new neutron L2 plugin using ML2 framework?

Thank you for your detailed info, but I want to implement this in Havana release, mlnx is a good reference, what I want to implement on Intel NIC is similar to mlnx, but it is a standalone plugin and didn't use ML2 framework, I want to use ML2 framework, I think nova has supported SR-IOV in Hava

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Validating Addressing and Routing configuration

For Question 1, I think we can allow potential use cases (even OpenStack doesn't support it for now), but we should not permit the combinations of modes which don't make any sense. For Question 2, for modes which don't make sense, I think error messages and return code are needed. For mode combina

[openstack-dev] [Heat] in-instance update hooks

Hi, so in the previous thread about rolling updates it became clear that having in-instance control over updates is a more fundamental idea than I had previously believed. During an update, Heat does things to servers that may interrupt the server's purpose, and that may cause it to fail subsequent

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Support for multiple provider networks with same VLAN segmentation id

Bob and Kyle, Thanks for your review. We looked at this option and it seems it might meet our needs. Here is what we intend to do: Let's say we have three racks (each rack supports three VLANs - 100, 200 and 300). We create the following config file for the neutron server tenant_network_type

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Nominate Oleg Bondarev for Core

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Mark McClain [mailto:mmccl...@yahoo-inc.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 4:59 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Nominate Oleg Bondarev for Core > > All- > > I'd like to nominat

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Nominate Oleg Bondarev for Core

+1 On Feb 10, 2014, at 5:28 PM, Mark McClain wrote: > All- > > I’d like to nominate Oleg Bondarev to become a Neutron core reviewer. Oleg > has been valuable contributor to Neutron by actively reviewing, working on > bugs, and contributing code. > > Neutron cores please reply back with +1/0

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [group-policy] Changing the meeting time

Folks: I’d like to propose moving the Neutron Group Policy meeting going forward, starting with this Thursday. The meeting has been at 1600 UTC on Thursdays, I’d like to move this to 1700UTC Thursdays on #openstack-meeting-alt. If this is a problem for anyone who regularly attends this meeting, pl

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Nominate Oleg Bondarev for Core

+1 On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Yongsheng Gong wrote: > +1 > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Mark McClain wrote: > >> All- >> >> I'd like to nominate Oleg Bondarev to become a Neutron core reviewer. >> Oleg has been valuable contributor to Neutron by actively reviewing, >> working on

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core

+1! On 02/10/2014 06:38 AM, Steve Baker wrote: I would like to nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core. His reviews are valuable and prolific, his code contributions have demonstrated a good knowledge of heat internals, and he has endured a sound hazing to get multi-engine into heat. http://russ

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] CLI for the new subnet keywords

Hi, Abishek: Thank you for taking care of Horizon for IPv6 enhancement. So now we have coverage on both CLI and dashboard side. Very exciting! W.r.t your questions, these two parameters work independently. In other words, Horizon should present both options if the interested subnet is IPv6. For

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Nominate Oleg Bondarev for Core

+1 On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Mark McClain wrote: > All- > > I'd like to nominate Oleg Bondarev to become a Neutron core reviewer. > Oleg has been valuable contributor to Neutron by actively reviewing, > working on bugs, and contributing code. > > Neutron cores please reply back with +1/0

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] CLI for the new subnet keywords

Hi IPv6 experts, This is regarding the BP - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ipv6-two-attributes Is it possible to give me a quick example of the CLI that you envision? This is so that the Horizon BP can be updated accordingly. Once the neutron side of things is ready, when creatin

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Proposing Sergey Lukjanov for infra-core

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:48 PM, James E. Blair wrote: > Hi, > > I'm very pleased to propose that we add Sergey Lukjanov to the > infra-core team. > > He is among the top reviewers of projects in openstack-infra, and is > very familiar with how jenkins-job-builder and zuul are used and > configur

Re: [openstack-dev] universal wheel support

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Doug Hellmann > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Monty Taylor > wrote: > >> > >> Hey all! > >> > >> There are a bunch of patches adding: > >> > >> [wheel] > >> universal = 1 > >> > >> to

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Nominate Oleg Bondarev for Core

All- I’d like to nominate Oleg Bondarev to become a Neutron core reviewer. Oleg has been valuable contributor to Neutron by actively reviewing, working on bugs, and contributing code. Neutron cores please reply back with +1/0/-1 votes. mark ___ Open

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Milestone 1 End to end scenario

Thanks Dev. Done. > -Original Message- > From: devdatta kulkarni [mailto:devdatta.kulka...@rackspace.com] > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 12:59 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Milestone 1 End to end scenario >

[openstack-dev] [keystone][all] Keystone V2 and V3 support in icehouse

Hi, I’m working on a tempest blueprint to make tempest able to run 100% on keystone v3 (or later versions) – the auth version to be used will be available via a configuration switch. The rationale is that Keystone V2 is deprecated in icehouse, V3 being the primary version. Thus it would

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] logging wsgi requests exactly once ... issues with request usefulness

On 02/10/2014 05:37 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Sean Dague > wrote: > > On 02/10/2014 05:05 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Sean Dague > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Proposing Sergey Lukjanov for infra-core

Clark Boylan writes: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:48 AM, James E. Blair wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm very pleased to propose that we add Sergey Lukjanov to the >> infra-core team. >> >> He is among the top reviewers of projects in openstack-infra, and is >> very familiar with how jenkins-job-builder a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] logging wsgi requests exactly once ... issues with request usefulness

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 02/10/2014 05:05 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Sean Dague > > wrote: > > > > In upstream Nova master we're currently logging ec2 wsgi requests > twice, > > once in the paste

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core

Thanks everyone. It's an honor to join the team. I'm looking forward to meeting you all in Atlanta. On Mon, Feb 10 2014, Jeff Peeler wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:38:40AM +1300, Steve Baker wrote: >> I would like to nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core. >> >> His reviews are valuable an

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] logging wsgi requests exactly once ... issues with request usefulness

On 02/10/2014 05:05 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Sean Dague > wrote: > > In upstream Nova master we're currently logging ec2 wsgi requests twice, > once in the paste pipeline, and once in eventlet. > > The following patch remov

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] logging wsgi requests exactly once ... issues with request usefulness

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > In upstream Nova master we're currently logging ec2 wsgi requests twice, > once in the paste pipeline, and once in eventlet. > > The following patch removes the paste pipeline portion - > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/67736/ > > However... I

[openstack-dev] [nova] logging wsgi requests exactly once ... issues with request usefulness

In upstream Nova master we're currently logging ec2 wsgi requests twice, once in the paste pipeline, and once in eventlet. The following patch removes the paste pipeline portion - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/67736/ However... I'm not very satisfied with this approach, as the resulting log en

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:38:40AM +1300, Steve Baker wrote: > I would like to nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core. > > His reviews are valuable and prolific, his code contributions have > demonstrated a good knowledge of heat internals, and he has endured a > sound hazing to get multi-engine in

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Validating Addressing and Routing configuration

During last week's IRC meeting, we ran into a question about validating the configuration options for ipv6_address_mode[1] and ipv6_ra_mode[1] for IPv6 networks. This brought up a few issues, but after mulling it over for a while I think it breaks down into 2 distinct questions. Question 1) Should

Re: [openstack-dev] [gantt] Scheduler sub-group meeting 2/11 - Cancel this week

Gary- We do intend to talk about gantt this afternoon, you can join via a Google hangout, it's the first link on this pad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-icehouse-mid-cycle-meetup-items -- Don Dugger "Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale Ph: 303/443-3786 Fr

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][ml2] Proposal to support VIF security, PCI-passthru/SR-IOV, and other binding-specific data

On 01/31/2014 03:47 PM, Robert Kukura wrote: > On 01/29/2014 10:26 AM, Robert Kukura wrote: >> The neutron patch [1] and nova patch [2], proposed to resolve the >> "get_firewall_required should use VIF parameter from neutron" bug [3], >> replace the binding:capabilities attribute in the neutron por

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Proposing Sergey Lukjanov for infra-core

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:48 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > Hi, > > I'm very pleased to propose that we add Sergey Lukjanov to the > infra-core team. > > He is among the top reviewers of projects in openstack-infra, and is > very familiar with how jenkins-job-builder and zuul are used and > configure

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Proposing Sergey Lukjanov for infra-core

On 02/10/2014 12:48 PM, James E. Blair wrote: > Hi, > > I'm very pleased to propose that we add Sergey Lukjanov to the > infra-core team. > > He is among the top reviewers of projects in openstack-infra, and is > very familiar with how jenkins-job-builder and zuul are used and > configured. He h

[openstack-dev] [barbican] Meeting Today

All, Barbican will be having our weekly meeting in #openstack-meeting-alt in 30 minutes at 2:00pm Central, 2000 UTC. On the list today is a quick discussion covering the status of the Barbican incubation request. We may also discuss the asymmetric work going on and possibly an update on Dogtag su

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Milestone 1 End to end scenario

Hi Roshan, Great to see the big picture that we are targeting. Some minor comments/suggestions: 1) It will be helpful to explicitly call out in the first step that the git repositories are not hosted by Solum but are public repositories on github.com 1) In step 3, what do you mean by 'automa

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Using Python-Neutronclient from Python - docstrings needed?

Hi Sean, Yes, please do improve docstrings for the client object! And I think you found that Lorin Hochstein recently added a Python SDK chapter to the end user guide at http://docs.openstack.org/user-guide/content/ch_sdk.html. As for the CLI project itself, the docs team has taken all the command

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core

+1 look forward to more from Jason! Regards -steve On 02/09/2014 03:38 PM, Steve Baker wrote: I would like to nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core. His reviews are valuable and prolific, his code contributions have demonstrated a good knowledge of heat internals, and he has endured a sound ha

[openstack-dev] [Solum] Milestone 1 End to end scenario

It is exciting to see we are getting close to delivering the first end to end use case for Solum ! Though we have blueprints to track individual work items for Milestone 1, it is useful to have a view into exactly what end to end experience we will be delivering. I have made an attempt at docum

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core

+1! -- Thomas - Mail original - > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:38:40AM +1300, Steve Baker wrote: > > I would like to nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core. > > > > His reviews are valuable and prolific, his code contributions have > > demonstrated a good knowledge of heat internals, and h

Re: [openstack-dev] universal wheel support

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: >> >> Hey all! >> >> There are a bunch of patches adding: >> >> [wheel] >> universal = 1 >> >> to setup.cfg: >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:wheel-publish,n,z

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Proposing Sergey Lukjanov for infra-core

+1 absolutely agree with all words, thank you Sergey for help! Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:48 PM, James E. Blair wrote: > Hi, > > I'm very pleased to propose that we add Sergey Lukjanov to the > infra-core team. > > He is among the top reviewers of projects in openst

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Proposing Sergey Lukjanov for infra-core

On 2014-02-10 09:48:51 -0800 (-0800), James E. Blair wrote: > I'm very pleased to propose that we add Sergey Lukjanov to the > infra-core team. [...] Consider my vote a resounding affirmative. Sergey has been doing a great job with reviews both for our configuration repository and most of our core

[openstack-dev] [infra] Proposing Sergey Lukjanov for infra-core

Hi, I'm very pleased to propose that we add Sergey Lukjanov to the infra-core team. He is among the top reviewers of projects in openstack-infra, and is very familiar with how jenkins-job-builder and zuul are used and configured. He has done quite a bit of work in helping new projects through th

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Scheduler] Policy Based Scheduler and Solver Scheduler

On 02/10/2014 10:54 AM, Khanh-Toan Tran wrote: Heat may orchestrate the provisioning process, but eventually the instances will be passed to Nova-scheduler (Gantt) as separated commands, which is exactly the problem Solver Scheduler wants to correct. Therefore the Instance Group API is needed, w

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Using Python-Neutronclient from Python - docstrings needed?

I'm sure the Documentation team would love to hear from you: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation -Ben On 2014-02-09 23:24, Rajdeep Dua wrote: > Yes, We would be interested in doing that. > Please let me know which is the right group/ team for this? > > On Monday, February 10,

Re: [openstack-dev] XenAPI / XCP going away from Debian & Ubuntu

Hi Thomas, > I don't agree with this view. If there's no XCP in Debian, I don't see the > point > in supporting it in OpenStack. (and no, adding support for the "magical" > Citrix CentOS appliance blackbox isn't something I wish to do...) All use of XenAPI in OpenStack is through a VM - even if

[openstack-dev] [oslo] team meeting 14 Feb at 1400 UTC

The Oslo team will meet this Friday, 14 Feb, at 1400 UTC. The primary item on the agenda is our icehouse-3 status, but if you have anything else we need to go over please add it to the wiki page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Oslo#Agenda_for_Next_Meeting Doug ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Using Python-Neutronclient from Python - docstrings needed?

On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 09:24:48PM -0800, Rajdeep Dua wrote: > Yes, We would be interested in doing that. > Please let me know which is the right group/ team for this? I believe you would add your examples somewhere in netconn-api git://git.openstack.org/openstack/netconn-api Then you would add

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Scheduler] Policy Based Scheduler and Solver Scheduler

> I'm not sure what you mean by "whatever it takes to finally create the > instances", but that sounds like what I had assumed everybody meant by > "orchestration" (until I heard that there is no widespread agreement) --- > and I think we need to take a properly open approach to that. I think the

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:38:40AM +1300, Steve Baker wrote: > I would like to nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core. > > His reviews are valuable and prolific, his code contributions have > demonstrated a good knowledge of heat internals, and he has endured a > sound hazing to get multi-engine in

Re: [openstack-dev] XenAPI / XCP going away from Debian & Ubuntu

On 02/10/2014 10:15 PM, Bob Ball wrote: > The second part is that XCP/XenServer support in OpenStack > makes use of a VM which is where nova is run. Both Debian > and Ubuntu can be used as those without any XAPI XCP > packages, and only need the XenAPI.py API wrapper script. > In this way Debian a

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Can heat automatically create a flavor as part of stack creation?

On 09/02/14 03:09, Robert Collins wrote: In principle yes. You need: - to write a module to orchestrate the nova flavor API. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/Plugins - to configure your policy rules in the cloud in question to let the heat engine user create flavors Not quite. Heat

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core

On 09/02/14 17:38, Steve Baker wrote: I would like to nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core. His reviews are valuable and prolific, his code contributions have demonstrated a good knowledge of heat internals, and he has endured a sound hazing to get multi-engine into heat. http://russellbryant.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] User Signup

Hi Soren, On 10 February 2014 08:27, Soren Hansen wrote: > I've just taken a look at the feedback in the whiteboard. If it's ok, > I'd like to take this discussion back to the mailing list. I find the > whiteboards somewhat clumsy for discussions. > > Akihiro Motoki points out that all services s

Re: [openstack-dev] universal wheel support

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > Hey all! > > There are a bunch of patches adding: > > [wheel] > universal = 1 > > to setup.cfg: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:wheel-publish,n,z > > I wanted to follow up on what the deal is with them, and what I think

[openstack-dev] [infra] Meeting Tuesday February 11th at 19:00 UTC

Hi everyone, The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly meeting tomorrow, Tuesday February 11th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Meeting agenda available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is welcome to to add agenda items) Everyone in

Re: [openstack-dev] oslo.config improvements

On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Shaun McCance wrote: > I've been working on the code that generates our configuration docs. A > couple week ago, I rewrote most of it to address some major problems, > most notably its inability to distinguish same-named options in > different groups. > > I've tri

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Using Python-Neutronclient from

All dictionaries are not created equal; in some respects it's like we have a medical dictionary and an automotive terms dictionary and on for each api. So, we need to document our dictionaries, by which key names (and possibly sample values) are required in the dictionary and which are optional

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Possible Hyper-V false CI failures

Here’s the Zuul error for this specific patch from the logs. Looks like Zuul reports back the “please rebase” message independently from the error it encounters. Given that, we’re looking into how to improve resiliency and error reporting. Alessandro On 10 Feb 2014, at 12:45 , Gabriel Samfira

Re: [openstack-dev] XenAPI / XCP going away from Debian & Ubuntu

Hi Thomas, > This means that it will also be impossible to support XCP support in > OpenStack, unfortunately (the support for XCP was removed a few months > ago because that was blocking migration to Debian testing anyway). Just a quick note - there are two separate issues here which some might c

[openstack-dev] XenAPI / XCP going away from Debian & Ubuntu

Hi, Just to make sure nobody misses the information. Due to a lack of upstream support from Citrix, and because XCP cannot be built in recent versions of Debian and Ubuntu, I asked for the removal of XCP from Debian Sid (it's already gone from Debian testing). A removal from Ubuntu has also been r

[openstack-dev] [qa][Nova] Update: Nova *V3* API List for Missing Tempest Tests

Hi, I have updated: Nova *V3* API List for Missing Tempest Tests. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmYuZ6T4IJETdEVNTWlYVUVOWURmOERSZ0VGc1BBQWc#gid=6 The summary of this list: different count from Tested or not # of APIs ratio the last

Re: [openstack-dev] several oslo library repositories have moved

Done. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/72335/ thanks for the pointer :) -- dims On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> They are listed in projects.yaml already: >> https://github.com/openstack-infra/config/blob/master/modules/openstack_project/files/

Re: [openstack-dev] several oslo library repositories have moved

Davanum Srinivas wrote: > They are listed in projects.yaml already: > https://github.com/openstack-infra/config/blob/master/modules/openstack_project/files/jenkins_job_builder/config/projects.yaml#L1760 > > I did push a review to add them to projects.txt in requirements repo: > https://review.open

[openstack-dev] [Murano] Murano Release 0.4.1 Announcement

Hi, everyone! Let me introduce you new Murano-0.4.1 release! This is the bug-fix release for a Murano-0.4 version: more than 40 bugs were resolved and all known issues from the previous release were fixed - now there is no any problems with deploying web-fa

Re: [openstack-dev] several oslo library repositories have moved

Thierry, They are listed in projects.yaml already: https://github.com/openstack-infra/config/blob/master/modules/openstack_project/files/jenkins_job_builder/config/projects.yaml#L1760 I did push a review to add them to projects.txt in requirements repo: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/72330/ --

Re: [openstack-dev] How to write a new neutron L2 plugin using ML2 framework?

Hi, As stated below, we are already having this work both in nova and neuron. Please take a look at the following discussions: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#PCI_Passthrough_Meeting For neutron part there are two different flavors that are coming as part of this effort: 1. Cisco SRIOV s

Re: [openstack-dev] How to write a new neutron L2 plugin using ML2 framework?

Hi, SRIOV is under implementation in nova and neutron. Did you have a look to : https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PCI_passthrough_SRIOV_support https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-binding-profile https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-request-vnic-type https://blueprints.l

[openstack-dev] [Mistral] Cancelling community meeting today on Feb 10

Hi guys, I would suggest we skip today’s community meeting since some folks from the team (including myself) won’t be able to participate. My apologies for the late notice.. Renat Akhmerov @ Mirantis Inc. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-d

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Maintaining support for the Tail-f NCS mech driver in Icehouse

Hi Akihiro, That would be nice like we are in the process of setting CI test setup and will be useful. Regards, Balaji.P > -Original Message- > From: Akihiro Motoki [mailto:mot...@da.jp.nec.com] > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 3:53 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Port binding information, transactions, and concurrency

Hi, one other comment inline : On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Robert Kukura wrote: > On 02/05/2014 09:10 AM, Henry Gessau wrote: >> Bob, this is fantastic, I really appreciate all the detail. A couple of >> questions ... >> >> On Wed, Feb 05, at 2:16 am, Robert Kukura wrote: >> >>> A couple of

Re: [openstack-dev] several oslo library repositories have moved

Doug Hellmann wrote: > The Oslo program has adopted cliff, pycadf, stevedore, and taskflow, > promoting them from stackforge, so we can establish symmetric gating > with the rest of OpenStack. In order to do that, the git repositories > were moved from "stackforge/*" to "openstack/*" Doug, If you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Policy Issue

On Mon, Feb 10 2014, ZhiQiang Fan wrote: > So, is this loose policy limit designed purposely, or it just a simple > implementation for policy? It's just nobody stepped up to implement a more complete one, indeed. > So, is there any opportunity to implement more strict policy check, for > i.e. a

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Maintaining support for the Tail-f NCS mech driver in Icehouse

I think testing with sandbox repo is really useful during setting up third party CI. Not so many people know sandbox repo. When neutron folks were setting up third party CI, we created test reviews in openstack/neutron, but if we knew it it would be great. It is worth documented in "Third Party Te

[openstack-dev] [Glance] delayed delete and user credentials

Hi Pete, See the comments in patch set 5 for scrubber.py and also this documentation: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59471/ -Stuart Message: 2 Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 11:56:28 -0700 From: Pete Zaitcev To: OpenStack Dev Subject: [openstack-dev] [Glance] delayed delete and user credentials Mes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Service VM: irc discussion?

Many thanks! : ) -Original Message- From: Isaku Yamahata [mailto:isaku.yamah...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 5:47 PM To: Wangyang (Alex) Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Isaku Yamahata Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Service VM: irc di

[openstack-dev] [Openstack] [KEYSTONE] Keystone federation

Dear all, I would provide both PaaS and IaaS (Openstack) services, with two keystone services: one for the PaaS (Keystone PaaS) and the other one for the IaaS (Keystone IaaS). In particular, I would Openstack system appear as a PaaS service towards PaaS's users, so that an user that authenticate

Re: [openstack-dev] [gantt] Scheduler sub-group meeting 2/11 - Cancel this week

Hi, I saw that one of the days there will be talk about Gantt. Would it be possible that people not at the local meet up can join this discussion? Thanks Gary From: , Donald D mailto:donald.d.dug...@intel.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:open

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Service VM: irc discussion?

https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings Now we're scheduling. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 07:43:09AM +, "Wangyang (Alex)" wrote: > Hi everyone, > Is there anyone can kindly tell me how to join your conference? > ^^ > > > -?始?原件- > ??件人: balaj...@freescale.com [mailto:balaj...@freesc