Adrian Otto writes:
> Team,
>
> Our StackForge code repo is open, so you may begin submitting code for
> review. For those new to the process, I made a will page with links to the
> repo and information about how to contribute:
>
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/Contributing
>
1. .gitre
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Jesse Pretorius
wrote:
> On 31 October 2013 18:46, John Griffith wrote:
>
>> Upgrading Essex->Folsom introduced both the challenge of upgrading
>> nova-volume to cinder and the challenge of upgrading nova-network to
>> quantum. Upgrading Folsom->Grizzly presents th
On 2013-10-31 22:45:56 + (+), Romain Hardouin wrote:
> Adding a message for new comers is a good idea.
> I am a new Horizon contributor, some of my fixes have been merged
> (thanks to Upstream University :-) and reviewers of course) but I
> still hesitate to do code review. To my mind, it i
one question here, if we have vm-discovery, what's differece between
discoveried vm and orphron vm already handled in the periodic task of
nova-compute?
2013/10/30 Swapnil Kulkarni
> I had a discussion with russellb regarding this for yesterday, I would
> like to discuss this with the team rega
On 10/31/2013 04:38 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Ironic has reached a point where it is capable of being added to
> integration tests and the gate pipeline. Does that mean we /should/ add
> it? I think so, and I'd like to know what others think, but let me be
> more specific a
On 10/31/2013 07:58 PM, Adam Young wrote:
On 10/31/2013 03:40 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
Hi all,
So firstly, if you're an XML guru, I apologize, the questions below are
probably really basic, I always prefer JSON or YAML, because every
time I
deal with XML, I get a week-long-headache ;)
So I'm
On 10/31/2013 03:24 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2013-10-31 13:30:32 + (+), Mark McLoughlin wrote:
[...]
In cases like that, I'd be of a mind to go "+2 Awesome! Thanks for
catching this! It would be great to have a unit test for this, but
it's clear the current code is broken so I'm fine
On 10/31/2013 03:40 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
Hi all,
So firstly, if you're an XML guru, I apologize, the questions below are
probably really basic, I always prefer JSON or YAML, because every time I
deal with XML, I get a week-long-headache ;)
So I'm writing Tempest API tests for the keystone OS
On 10/31/2013 03:45 PM, Romain Hardouin wrote:
> Adding a message for new comers is a good idea.
> I am a new Horizon contributor, some of my fixes have been merged
> (thanks to Upstream University :-)
Indeed :) Can you share with us briefly what you found interesting in
the sessions of Upstream U
On 01/11/13 08:35, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 11:49 -0700, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
Another idea that Tom suggested is to use gerrit automation to send back
to first time committers something in addition to the normal 'your patch
is waiting for review' message. The message coul
Team,
Our StackForge code repo is open, so you may begin submitting code for review.
For those new to the process, I made a will page with links to the repo and
information about how to contribute:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/Contributing
Regards,
Adrian
Hi all, Adding a message for new comers is a good idea. I am a
new Horizon contributor, some of my fixes have been merged (thanks to Upstream
University :-) and reviewers of course) but I still hesitate to do code review.
To my mind, it is reserved to "known" developpers whose opinion matters...
I noticed several filters (AggregateMultiTenancyIsoaltion, ram_filter,
type_filter, AggregateInstanceExtraSpecsFilter) have DB access in the
host_passes(). Some will even access for each invocation.
Just curios if this is considered a performance issue? With a 10k nodes, 60 VM
per node, and 3 h
Thanks for the well-wishes (from everyone)! As I said, I'm not gone for good.
By way of explanation, it's a combination of things: personal items I've put
off too long (startup life, right?) and new responsibilities at Nebula (which
will keep me at least partly engaged in OpenStack, just not on
Jay,
It is November 19 and 20. Looks like because it was sent as a calendar invite
that the notes were scrubbed. Here is the text:
Workshop sessions
Nov 19 Tuesday 9:30 am - 5 pm
Nov 20 Wednesday 9:30 am - 3:00 pm (we break early on Wednesday if some of us
want to catch an evening return flight
On 10/31/2013 05:41 PM, Roshan Agrawal wrote:
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
I think you probably want to say which particular dates people should
hol
@Gabriel, thanks for an awesome time leading Horizon in towards what is now
a awesome Framework / UI for OpenStack! I'm sure you'll bring awesome to
whatever you're doing next!
It's very sad to see good people leave the PTL positions but hey, time goes
by and people do new things.
Good luck and s
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Pacific Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T02000
Nevermind and ignore the last e-mail, it was wrongly intended.
Endre
2013/10/31 Endre Karlson
> Hey, I'm just curious. You quitting the PTL position to focus on Nebula
> efforts or ?
>
>
> 2013/10/31 Gabriel Hurley
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It saddens me to say that for a mix of reasons I have decid
Hey, I'm just curious. You quitting the PTL position to focus on Nebula
efforts or ?
2013/10/31 Gabriel Hurley
> Hi all,
>
> It saddens me to say that for a mix of reasons I have decided to abdicate
> my position as PTL for Horizon. If anything, the reasons are all good ones
> overall, I just h
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 11:49 -0700, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> Another idea that Tom suggested is to use gerrit automation to send back
> to first time committers something in addition to the normal 'your patch
> is waiting for review' message. The message could be something like:
>
> > thank you f
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Central Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T02000
On 1 November 2013 09:20, Birdsall, Dave wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to the Openstack community. I have what is probably a naïve question.
>
> Suppose source code for a project is in Git repository A, while the Jenkins
> test suite for it is in Git repository B.
>
> First question: Does this happen
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Birdsall, Dave wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to the Openstack community. I have what is probably a naïve question.
>
> Suppose source code for a project is in Git repository A, while the Jenkins
> test suite for it is in Git repository B.
>
> First question: Does this
Excerpts from Alexander Kuznetsov's message of 2013-10-31 10:51:54 -0700:
> Hi Heat, Savanna and Trove teams,
>
> All this projects have common part related to software configuration
> management. For creation, an environment user should specify a hardware
> parameter for vms: choose flavor, d
Hi all,
Ironic has reached a point where it is capable of being added to
integration tests and the gate pipeline. Does that mean we /should/ add it?
I think so, and I'd like to know what others think, but let me be more
specific about what I'm talking about.
At this point, it is possible for devs
On Oct 31, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
>
> On 10/31/2013 04:15 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
>>> On 10/31/2013 07:05 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
>>> [...]
If we want to grow the committer base and help people t
On 10/31/2013 04:15 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
>> On 10/31/2013 07:05 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
>> [...]
>>> If we want to grow the committer base and help people to become
>>> better reviewers, taking the time to show them
Hi,
I'm new to the Openstack community. I have what is probably a naïve question.
Suppose source code for a project is in Git repository A, while the Jenkins
test suite for it is in Git repository B.
First question: Does this happen in Openstack? (For example, are there nova
tests in the tempe
On 10/31/2013 04:06 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It saddens me to say that for a mix of reasons I have decided to
> abdicate my position as PTL for Horizon. If anything, the reasons are
> all good ones overall, I just have to make the right decision for
> both myself and the project.
On Oct 31, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> On 10/31/2013 07:05 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
> [...]
>> If we want to grow the committer base and help people to become
>> better reviewers, taking the time to show them the ropes is part of
>> the game.
>
> hijacking the thread usi
Hi all,
It saddens me to say that for a mix of reasons I have decided to abdicate my
position as PTL for Horizon. If anything, the reasons are all good ones
overall, I just have to make the right decision for both myself and the project.
In the interim David Lyle will be the acting PTL. The Hor
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 12:50 -0700, Mark Washenberger wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Ian McLeod
> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 11:56 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Ian McLeod's message of 2013-10-31 11:27:39
> -0700:
> > > Hello,
>
On 2013-10-31 12:43:19 -0700 (-0700), Gary Kotton wrote:
> Over the last few days I have noticed that bug fixes posted to
> gerrit are not updated in Launchpad.
[...]
Links to one or two example changes might help. There are a number
of other subtle ways this can break down (wrong branch/no
corres
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Ian McLeod wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 11:56 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Ian McLeod's message of 2013-10-31 11:27:39 -0700:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Would any of you attending the summit be interested in snagging an
> > > unconference session t
Hi,
Over the last few days I have noticed that bug fixes posted to gerrit are not
updated in Launchpad. Am I doing something wrong? I think that the commit
message is the correct format: Closes-Bug: #.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Gary
___
OpenStack-dev mailing li
Hi all,
So firstly, if you're an XML guru, I apologize, the questions below are
probably really basic, I always prefer JSON or YAML, because every time I
deal with XML, I get a week-long-headache ;)
So I'm writing Tempest API tests for the keystone OS-TRUST extension, as
was previously requested
I've got a sqlalchemy-migrate blueprint up for review to add DB2 support
in migrate.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/sqlalchemy-migrate/+spec/add-db2-support
This is a pre-req for getting DB2 support into Nova so I'm targeting
icehouse-1. We've been running with the migrate patches internall
On 2013-10-31 13:30:32 + (+), Mark McLoughlin wrote:
[...]
> In cases like that, I'd be of a mind to go "+2 Awesome! Thanks for
> catching this! It would be great to have a unit test for this, but
> it's clear the current code is broken so I'm fine with merging the
> fix without a test". Yo
On 10/30/2013 11:37 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> This is a bit of a social norms thread
>
> I've been consistently asking for tests in reviews for a while now,
> and I get the occasional push-back. I think this falls into a few
> broad camps:
>
> A - there is no test suite at all, adding one
On 31 October 2013 19:05, Russell Bryant wrote:
> Right, Nova (and probably other projects, too) only supports N to N+1
> upgrades. If you need to go to N+2, you'll need to go through N+1 to
> get there.
>
Dead right, and especially with the aggressive schedule we have this is the
only sane app
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 11:56 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Ian McLeod's message of 2013-10-31 11:27:39 -0700:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Would any of you attending the summit be interested in snagging an
> > unconference session to discuss the state of play with image creation,
> > customizatio
Agreed,
I don't think we should enforce a hard requirement for the same reason we
should avoid zookeeper.
To me they are the same, saying 'no ZK' is the same as saying 'only mysql
or rabbitmq'...
Both not so open.
On 10/31/13 11:04 AM, "Monty Taylor" wrote:
>
>
>On 10/31/2013 01:32 PM, Joshu
On 31 October 2013 18:46, John Griffith wrote:
> Is your disappointment that there isn't a path from Essex -->
> Grizzly/Havana, or are you unhappy with the content?
Upgrading Essex->Folsom introduced both the challenge of upgrading
nova-volume to cinder and the challenge of upgrading nova-netw
I like Steve's suggestion:
> The approach the Heat team have sometimes taken in this situation is to
> merge the patch, but raise a bug (targetted at the next milestone)
> identifying the missing coverage.
I'm (almost!) a first time contributor and I've put a fix on the backburner
as I find the t
Excerpts from Ian McLeod's message of 2013-10-31 11:27:39 -0700:
> Hello,
>
> Would any of you attending the summit be interested in snagging an
> unconference session to discuss the state of play with image creation,
> customization and import?
>
> I can contribute an overview and demonstration
On 13-10-30 10:37 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
This is a bit of a social norms thread
I've been consistently asking for tests in reviews for a while now,
and I get the occasional push-back. I think this falls into a few
broad camps:
A - there is no test suite at all, adding one in unreasonable
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:30:32PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 15:37 +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
> > This is a bit of a social norms thread
> >
> > I've been consistently asking for tests in reviews for a while now,
> > and I get the occasional push-back. I think thi
On 10/31/2013 07:05 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
[...]
> If we want to grow the committer base and help people to become
> better reviewers, taking the time to show them the ropes is part of
> the game.
hijacking the thread using Kyle's comment as an excuse.
It's not an 'if' but a 'since':
Excerpts from Khanh-Toan Tran's message of 2013-10-31 07:22:06 -0700:
> Hi all,
>
> As a newbie of the community, I'm not familiar with unittest and how to use
> it here. I've learned that Jenkins runs tests
> everytime we submit some code. But how to write the test and what is a 'good
> test' a
Team,
In the interest of providing adequate advance notice, we will not consider any
of the timeslots for today. I have edited the poll accordingly. It also looks
like a number of us did not notice that there are a lot of proposed times
hiding under the accordion view of the poll.
So, please t
On 10/31/2013 01:51 PM, Alexander Kuznetsov wrote:
Hi Heat, Savanna and Trove teams,
All this projects have common part related to software configuration
management. For creation, an environment user should specify a
hardware parameter for vms: choose flavor, decide use cinder or not,
config
Hello,
Would any of you attending the summit be interested in snagging an
unconference session to discuss the state of play with image creation,
customization and import?
I can contribute an overview and demonstration of our Nova-native image
building tool.
I'd be interested in exploring integra
On 10/31/2013 01:32 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> In the spirt of openness, yes I do think they are all needed.
>
> If they are not supported, then openstack is not open, it is a closed
> system.
>
> We should strive to innovate, not strive to be stuck with the status quo.
>
> To me it is a devel
Hi,
Here is the wiki page with Savanna release 0.3 retrospective:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Savanna/Release_0.3_Retrospective
Thanks everyone who sent your opinions. If someone wants to add more
thoughts you are welcome to edit above page!
--
Regards,
Alexander Ignatov
___
Hi Heat, Savanna and Trove teams,
All this projects have common part related to software configuration
management. For creation, an environment user should specify a hardware
parameter for vms: choose flavor, decide use cinder or not, configure
networks for virtual machines, choose topology fo
In the spirt of openness, yes I do think they are all needed.
If they are not supported, then openstack is not open, it is a closed
system.
We should strive to innovate, not strive to be stuck with the status quo.
To me it is a developers decision to pick the right solution, if that
solution inv
On 2013-10-31 09:05, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
On Oct 31, 2013, at 8:56 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Mark McLoughlin's message of 2013-10-31 06:30:32 -0700:
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 15:37 +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
This is a bit of a social norms thread
I've been consistently
Sigh.
Yay We've added more competing methods of complexity!!!
Seriously. We now think that rabbit and zookeeper and mysql are ALL needed?
Joshua Harlow wrote:
>I'm pretty sure the cats out of the bag.
>
>https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/global-requirements.t
>xt#L29
>
Hi all,
I just wanted to cancel the state-management IRC meeting for the next 2 weeks
due to people traveling and the HK summit.
Since it won't be as productive as usual I think we can just skip it until
after the summit :-)
Likely most people will be in #openstack-state-management anyway, fee
I'm pretty sure the cats out of the bag.
https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/global-requirements.t
xt#L29
https://kazoo.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
-Josh
On 10/31/13 7:43 AM, "Monty Taylor" wrote:
>
>
>On 10/30/2013 10:42 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>> So, recently we've had quite
On 10/31/2013 06:04 AM, Rosa, Andrea (HP Cloud Services) wrote:
A - there is no test suite at all, adding one in unreasonable B - this thing
cannot
be tested in this context (e.g. functional tests are defined in a different
tree)
C - this particular thing is very hard to test
>> D - testing t
On 10/31/2013 12:46 PM, John Griffith wrote:
>> Issues at hand, for now, are:
>>
>> 1) Migrating from nova-volume to cinder
>
> So to be quite honest we never intended to make skips like you
> describe. Perhaps that wasn't such a good choice in retrospect. I'm
> willing to take a look at putting
Dolph,
Thanks! It is good that python example is provided!
Qing
From: Dolph Mathews [mailto:dolph.math...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 9:25 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] distibuted caching system in front of mysql s
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013, Sean Dague wrote:
> So there is a series of patches starting with -
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53417/ that go back and radically
> change existing migration files.
>
> This is really a no-no, unless there is a critical bug fix that
> absolutely requires it. Changing
- Original Message -
> - Original Message -
> > Hi Clayton,
> >
> > Thank you for creating these diagrams. They are a great starting point for
> > discussions
> > around the git deploy blueprint.
> >
> > Some questions/comments:
> >
> > In both the diagrams, what do the arrows i
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Jesse Pretorius
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Migrations from Essex to Grizzly/Havana are starting to hit my radar of
> responsible tasks and I'm disappointed that beyond this old wiki note [1]
Is your disappointment that there isn't a path from Essex -->
Grizzly/Hav
On 2013-10-31 12:24:49 +0100 (+0100), Thierry Carrez wrote:
> OK, made it official
[...]
And:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OpenPGP_Web_of_Trust/Icehouse_Summit
If you add yourself to the table there in the wiki by noon the day
before, I'll try to bring a stack of printouts we can use as
check
Yes, OS as big product tries to split hierarchy of responsibilities.
Currently we have serveral tasks, i suppose.
First one is upgrading from one stable release to another.
Second one is migrating from one release to another.
Currently OpenStack has several deployment projects: TripleO, Fuel (<---
Actually no confusion. :-) Joe Gordon just made me realize that I didn't
really explain why we had that policy.
That really should have been a follow up to my own post, not yours. Sorry
if I made it look like I was arguing with you, which I wasn't.. :-)
We're all good.
Sean Dague
http://dague.ne
Hi everyone,
Migrations from Essex to Grizzly/Havana are starting to hit my radar of
responsible tasks and I'm disappointed that beyond this old wiki note [1]
and a wealth of questions with very few answers [2], there is very little
available to support the migrations from what used to be part of
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Qing He wrote:
> In my hard drive-less use case, I need an in-core-db/cache that can be in
> the same db cluster with real db (with hard drive) with the same sql api so
> that the current openstack code do not need to be changed, instead, just a
> pluggin with som
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Sebastian Porombka <
porom...@uni-paderborn.de> wrote:
> Hello Folks.
>
> I have a problem after grizzly->havana migration where i’m unable to
> rescue myself.
> When I open the "Admin -> Resource-Usage View i get no results – only a
> red error box with the mes
On 10/31/2013 11:56 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 10/31/2013 11:23 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 10/31/2013 08:01 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
So there is a series of patches starting with -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53417/ that go back and radically
change existing migration files.
This is really a no-n
On 10/31/2013 11:23 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 10/31/2013 08:01 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
So there is a series of patches starting with -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53417/ that go back and radically
change existing migration files.
This is really a no-no, unless there is a critical bug fix that
Hi,
I have created two document to discuss SSL termination and L7 Rules at:
SSL termination :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qnoJLD1txY5wnjx4k480AtEGCOEtkPMvTzxPo3_DPcs/edit?usp=sharing
SSL BP: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/lbaas-ssl-termination
L7 Rules:
https://docs.goog
-Mike Spreitzer/Watson/IBM@IBMUS wrote: ->To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)">>From: Mike Spreitzer/Watson/IBM@IBMUS>Date: 10/30/2013 03:56PM>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Comments on Steve Baker's>Proposal on HOT Software Config>>Lakshminaraya Rengana
On 10/31/2013 08:01 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
So there is a series of patches starting with -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53417/ that go back and radically
change existing migration files.
This is really a no-no, unless there is a critical bug fix that
absolutely requires it. Changing past migr
On 10/31/2013 11:43 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
> Yes. I'm strongly opposed to ZooKeeper finding its way into the already
> complex pile of things we use.
Monty, is that just because the stack is very complicated now, or
something personal against ZK (or Java specifically)?
Curious.
-S
>
> _
On 10/30/2013 08:08 PM, Steven Dake wrote:
> On 10/30/2013 12:20 PM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
>>
>> On 10/30/2013 03:10 PM, Steven Dake wrote:
>>> I will -2 any patch that adds zookeeper as a dependency to Heat.
>> Certainly any distributed locking solution should be plugin based and
>> optional. Just
On 10/30/2013 10:42 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> So, recently we've had quite a long thread in gerrit regarding locking
> in Heat:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/49440/
>
> In the patch, there are two distributed lock drivers. One uses SQL,
> and suffers from all the problems you might imagin
Okay Brant, sounds good. I'll start working on the SQL code today.
Please bear in mind that I'm going to be on vacation next week, so a
patch won't be ready until some time after November 11.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Brant Knudson wrote:
> Peter -
>
> We discussed better use of transacti
- Original Message -
> Hi Clayton,
>
> Thank you for creating these diagrams. They are a great starting point for
> discussions
> around the git deploy blueprint.
>
> Some questions/comments:
>
> In both the diagrams, what do the arrows indicate?
> Data flow, control-flow, or some kind
Hi all,
As a newbie of the community, I'm not familiar with unittest and how to use it
here. I've learned that Jenkins runs tests
everytime we submit some code. But how to write the test and what is a 'good
test' and a 'bad test'? I saw some commits
in gerrit but am unable to say if the written
Adrian ++.
I too believe its a very good initiative started with #Solum & to follow
up. Other projects (existing/incubating/future) will definitely have a
fruitful benefit following similar approach in the long run, thus
benefiting the OpenStack ecosystem :)
Best Regards,
Swapnil
On Thu, Oct 3
On Oct 31, 2013, at 8:56 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Mark McLoughlin's message of 2013-10-31 06:30:32 -0700:
>> On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 15:37 +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
>>> This is a bit of a social norms thread
>>>
>>> I've been consistently asking for tests in reviews for a while
On 10/29/2013 06:29 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Dina Belova wrote:
There is no such mixed calendar. It was made, as far as I remember,
because design and summit talks are very different and should be separated.
But still, it is not really comfortable.
Yes, it's a bit of a trade-off...
In the pa
On 31 окт. 2013 г., at 2:37, Clint Byrum wrote:
> My point
> is really that we should not care how serialization happens, we should
> just express the work-flow, and let the underlying mechanisms distribute
> and manage it as it is completed.
Sounds reasonable.
In this context, you may want t
Uri,
Yes. We will need to offer a facility for customizing the CD pipeline(s). We
have not contemplated all of the possibilities for that yet, so this is
something that we will certainly discuss further. We will need to strike the
right balance between options and simplicity.
We have thought t
Excerpts from Mark McLoughlin's message of 2013-10-31 06:30:32 -0700:
> On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 15:37 +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
> > This is a bit of a social norms thread
> >
> > I've been consistently asking for tests in reviews for a while now,
> > and I get the occasional push-back. I thin
Peter -
We discussed better use of transactions in irc, but I don't think anyone
has had a chance to look at it. This would be a very useful thing to have
someone look at. I'm fine with holding off on the oslo.db sessions work
until we're sure the code is correct w/r/t multi-processing so that tem
Hello Folks.
I have a problem after grizzly->havana migration where i’m unable to rescue
myself.
When I open the "Admin -> Resource-Usage View i get no results – only a red
error box with the message "Error: Unable to retrieve tenant list.“.
Horizon log:
[Thu Oct 31 11:39:44 2013] [error] Cre
Joshua,
Good question. It's a project specific initiative, rather than an OpenStack
Foundation effort. One of the interesting aspects of the OpenStack ecosystem is
that each OpenStack Related project can work individually on growing its
community, which in turn feeds the OpenStack ecosystem. If
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 15:37 +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
> This is a bit of a social norms thread
>
> I've been consistently asking for tests in reviews for a while now,
> and I get the occasional push-back. I think this falls into a few
> broad camps:
>
> A - there is no test suite at all, a
a huge +1!
thanks, chris, noticed the spreadsheet before, and have add some contents I
have been working on. I think more people should know that, avoid
conflicting.
2013/10/31 Zhu Bo
> hi, Chris thanks for your work.
>
> It's a good way. And how about creating a blue-print and putting these
On 10/30/2013 10:37 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
This is a bit of a social norms thread
I've been consistently asking for tests in reviews for a while now,
and I get the occasional push-back. I think this falls into a few
broad camps:
A - there is no test suite at all, adding one in unreasonab
Hi Thierry,
Yes, you are right. AWS SimpleDB and DynamoDB look alike.
I think in API implementation itself there are a lot of common parts.
But exactly backend makes the difference.
Planning to engage Trove for datasource provisioning and management, the
key features of MagnetoDB is autoscaling
Hi all,
>This is a bit of a social norms thread
>
>I've been consistently asking for tests in reviews for a while now, and I get
>the
>occasional push-back. I think this falls into a few broad camps:
>
>A - there is no test suite at all, adding one in unreasonable B - this thing
>cannot
>be
So there is a series of patches starting with -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53417/ that go back and radically
change existing migration files.
This is really a no-no, unless there is a critical bug fix that
absolutely requires it. Changing past migrations should be considered
with the sa
Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 31/10/13 11:06 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> The summit being a bit huge it can be difficult for the PGP-minded to
>> cross paths. We could informally designate one of the Design Summit
>> breaks (Thursday 10:30am ?) as a keysigning break and encourage people
>> interes
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
