Thanks for Suggestions and Support on this.
Regards,
Balaji.P
-Original Message-
From: Alan Kavanagh [mailto:alan.kavan...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 1:48 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] New Plug-in development for N
Hi folks,
I will be out this week after 23:00 UTC Wednesday, so I can't hold the
glance meeting this Thursday. I'll be back next Wednesday the 19th.
Let's get those RC1 bugs finished and reviewed!
Thanks!
markwash
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenSta
I have a different point of view. First I will offer some assertions:
A-1) We need to keep it simple.
A-1.1) Systems that are hard to comprehend are hard to debug, and
that's bad.
A-1.2) Complex systems tend to be much more brittle than simple ones.
A-2) Scale-up operations need
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Rosa, Andrea (HP Cloud Services)
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I need to debug a specific test but when I try to run it in debug mode using
> the "run_tests -d" (I need to attach pdb) that command fails but if I run the
> script without the "-d" option that works.
> I creat
Hello,
I can confirm this is a bug.
I use nosetests instead for the moment.
nosetests -s test.module
nosetests -s another.test:TestCase.test_method
nosetests -s a.test:TestCase
nosetests -s /path/to/test/file.py:test_function
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Rosa, Andrea (HP Cloud Services) <
a
Jon Maron wrote on 09/10/2013 08:50:23 PM:
> From: Jon Maron
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
,
> Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> Date: 09/10/2013 08:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] Program name and Mission
statement
>
> Openstack Big Data Platform
Let's se
Openstack Big Data Platform
On Sep 10, 2013, at 8:39 PM, David Scott wrote:
> I vote for 'Open Stack Data'
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Zhongyue Luo wrote:
>> Why not "OpenStack MapReduce"? I think that pretty much says it all?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Glen Campb
I vote for 'Open Stack Data'
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Zhongyue Luo wrote:
> Why not "OpenStack MapReduce"? I think that pretty much says it all?
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Glen Campbell wrote:
>
>> "performant" isn't a word. Or, if it is, it means "having performance." I
>>
Why not "OpenStack MapReduce"? I think that pretty much says it all?
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Glen Campbell wrote:
> "performant" isn't a word. Or, if it is, it means "having performance." I
> think you mean "high-performance."
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Matthew Farrellee wr
On 09/10/2013 04:58 PM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
> First, I'm a newbie here, wondering: is this the right place for
> comments/questions on blueprints? Supposing it is...
Yes, this is the right place.
> I am referring to
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/instance-group-api-extension
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Russell Bryant"
> To: "David Kang"
> Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List"
> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 5:17:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [pci device passthrough] fails with
> "NameError: global name '_' is not defined"
> On 09/10
On 10 September 2013 18:02, D.Selvaraj wrote:
> I am working in providing federated access to Horizon. As of now I have
> got a dropdown form that displays the list of Identity providers available
> in teh Keystone. But I am confused on how to redirect the user to the
> server that is to the Ide
+1
This is the best approach and one we discussed in Portland and a track most
folks are developing plugins under ML2
/Alan
-Original Message-
From: Robert Kukura [mailto:rkuk...@redhat.com]
Sent: September-10-13 12:27 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-d
First, I'm a newbie here, wondering: is this the right place for
comments/questions on blueprints? Supposing it is...
I am referring to
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/instance-group-api-extension
In my own research group we have experience with a few systems that do
something lik
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph
wrote:
> The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
> meeting tomorrow, Tuesday September 10th, at 19:00 UTC in
> #openstack-meeting
Meeting minutes and logs:
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2
Hi,
I'm trying to test pci device passthrough feature.
Havana3 is installed using Packstack on CentOS 6.4.
Nova-compute dies right after start with error "NameError: global name '_' is
not defined".
I'm not sure if it is due to misconfiguration of nova.conf or bug.
Any help will be appreciate
On 09/10/2013 04:42 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 09/10/2013 03:56 PM, David Kang wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to test pci device passthrough feature.
>> Havana3 is installed using Packstack on CentOS 6.4.
>> Nova-compute dies right after start with error "NameError: global name '_'
>> is
On 09/10/2013 03:56 PM, David Kang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to test pci device passthrough feature.
> Havana3 is installed using Packstack on CentOS 6.4.
> Nova-compute dies right after start with error "NameError: global name '_' is
> not defined".
> I'm not sure if it is due to misconf
- Original Message -
> From: "Russell Bryant"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List"
> Cc: "David Kang"
> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 4:42:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [pci device passthrough] fails with
> "NameError: global name '_' is not defined"
> On 09/10/
On 09/10/2013 05:03 PM, David Kang wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Russell Bryant"
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List"
>> Cc: "David Kang"
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 4:42:41 PM
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [pci device passthrough] fails with
>> "Na
"performant" isn't a word. Or, if it is, it means "having performance." I
think you mean "high-performance."
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Matthew Farrellee wrote:
> Rough cut -
>
> Program: OpenStack Data Processing
> Mission: To provide the OpenStack community with an open, cutting edge,
>
On Sep 10, 2013, at 2:14 PM, Ian Wells wrote:
> Speaking as someone who didn't know what Savanna was before now... I still
> don't know what Savanna is. You need to be more specific than that.
+1
-- Ed Leafe
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStac
Hi,
I am working in providing federated access to Horizon. As of now I have got a
dropdown form that displays the list of Identity providers available in teh
Keystone. But I am confused on how to redirect the user to the server that is
to the Identity Provider from Horizon ? Please help
Thank
Speaking as someone who didn't know what Savanna was before now... I still
don't know what Savanna is. You need to be more specific than that.
--
Ian.
On 10 September 2013 18:34, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
> +1 for both program name and mission statement
>
>
> Sincerely yours,
> Sergey Lukjanov
>
Hi everyone,
Today’s Hyper-V meeting minutes.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-09-10-16.02.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-09-10-16.02.txt
Log:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meet
On 10/09/13 08:18 -0700, Alex Gaynor wrote:
Hi Roman,
Yes eventlet works well on PyPy, both Marconi and Swift use it.
Small nit, Marconi is not using eventlet. It used to depend on eventlet
because openstack.common.local did but that part is gone now.
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
+1 for both program name and mission statement
Sincerely yours,
Sergey Lukjanov
Savanna Technical Lead
Mirantis Inc.
On Sep 10, 2013, at 21:22, Ilya Elterman wrote:
> +1 for OpenStack Data Processing and
>
> Mission: To provide the OpenStack community with an open, cutting edge,
> performant
Hi all,
I've created a temporary page for UIs mockups. Please take a look:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Savanna/UIMockups/JobCreationProposal
Chad, it's just pictures demonstrate how we see dependencies in UI. It's
not a final decision.
Guys, feel free to comment this. I think it's time to sta
+1 for OpenStack Data Processing and
Mission: To provide the OpenStack community with an open, cutting edge,
> performant and scalable data processing stack and associated management
> interfaces.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Matthew Farrellee wrote:
> Rough cut -
>
> Program: OpenStack D
Clint Byrum wrote:
> My point is this: The summit isn't just about us sitting around pushing
> our vision. We need to be open to the OpenStack Deployment tool chain
> supporting other deployment models. So while I'm not sure calling it
> "Deployment" will have a positive effect, I am also not sure
Hi Dan,
Yeah, I figured that out. I was already using objects, but
I didn't add the interface to the conductor.rpcapi. It's working
fine now.
Thanks.
~Peeyush Gupta
From: Dan Smith
To: Peeyush Gupta ; OpenStack Development Mailing List
Sent: Tuesday, 10 S
Alex Gaynor wrote:
> Many of you have probably seen me send review requests in the last few weeks
> about adding PyPy support to various OpenStack projects. A few people were
> confused by these, so I wanted to fill everyone in on what I'm up to :)
>
> First, for those who aren't familiar with wha
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2013-09-10 00:56:29 -0700:
> Robert Collins wrote:
> > Thierry, is it possible to change this to 'Deployment' rather than
> > TripleO in the summit tool? I think it would avoid folk interested in
> > Tuskar failing to find a place to submit their proposals,
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Many of you have probably seen me send review requests in the last few
> weeks
> about adding PyPy support to various OpenStack projects. A few people were
> confused by these, so I wanted to fill everyone in on what I'm up to :)
>
On 09/10/2013 10:45 AM, Mark McClain wrote:
> I think Gary and Kyle have answered this very well; however I do have a few
> things to add. It is definitely too late for Havana, so Icehouse is next
> available release for new plugins. I can work with you offline to find you a
> core sponsor.
O
Looking further in to this. The bug you mentioned appears to have been
marked as a duplicate of a bug that was resolved about a month ago. I
added the recheck comment to the gerrit review and Jenkins did not do
anything with it overnight. I assume it noticed that the bug was marked
as resolved.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Alex Gaynor wrote:
> > Many of you have probably seen me send review requests in the last few
> weeks
> > about adding PyPy support to various OpenStack projects. A few people
> were
> > confused by these, so I wanted to fill everyone in on
Thanks Matt!
You can check the list of supported operating systems at:
http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CM4Ent/latest/Cloudera-Manager-Installation-Guide/cmig_cm_requirements.html
Cheers,
-- Andrei
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Matthew Farrellee wrote:
> On 09
I think Gary and Kyle have answered this very well; however I do have a few
things to add. It is definitely too late for Havana, so Icehouse is next
available release for new plugins. I can work with you offline to find you a
core sponsor.
mark
On Sep 10, 2013, at 9:37 AM, "Kyle Mestery (km
Hi Roman,
Yes eventlet works well on PyPy, both Marconi and Swift use it.
Alex
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Roman Podolyaka wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> That's really cool! I believe, performance is not the only benefit we can
> get from running OpenStack projects on PyPy. We can also improve th
A quick dictionary lookup of "data processing" yields the following. I
wonder if you mean something more specific.
data processing |ˈˌdædə ˈprɑsɛsɪŋ|
noun
a series of operations on data, esp. by a computer, to retrieve,
transform, or classify information.
From: Matthew Farrellee
To: O
The Heat team holds a weekly meeting in #openstack-meeting, see
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HeatAgenda for more details
The next meeting is on Wed Sept 11th at 2000 UTC
Current topics for discussion:
* Review last week's actions
* RC1 bugs
* Summit design session proposals : http://
Rough cut -
Program: OpenStack Data Processing
Mission: To provide the OpenStack community with an open, cutting edge,
performant and scalable data processing stack and associated management
interfaces.
On 09/10/2013 09:26 AM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
It sounds too broad IMO. Looks like we nee
On 09/10/2013 03:15 AM, lzy@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The feature BP at
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/read-only-volumes. The
> Cinder server side change (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38322/)
> was done and merged, but since there was a delay of a few weeks on the
> Ci
Assignments (user to project, group to project, user to domain, group to
domain) are OpenStack specific Data, where as Identity (users, groups,
and user to group assignments) is general organizational data. When all
of this was in a single backend, we had no choice but to force people to
use L
On Sep 10, 2013, at 4:05 AM, P Balaji-B37839 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We have gone through the below link for new plug-in development.
>
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronDevelopment#Developing_a_Neutron_Plugin
>
> Just want to confirm that is it mandatory to be Core Neutron Developer for
It sounds too broad IMO. Looks like we need to define Mission Statement first.
Sincerely yours,
Sergey Lukjanov
Savanna Technical Lead
Mirantis Inc.
On Sep 10, 2013, at 17:09, Alexander Kuznetsov wrote:
> My suggestion OpenStack Data Processing.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Sergey
My suggestion OpenStack Data Processing.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> due to the Incubator Application we should prepare Program name and
> Mission statement for Savanna, so, I want to start mailing thread about it.
>
> Please, provide any ideas here.
>
Hi Daisy,
"Ying Chun Guo" wrote:
> I noticed Horizon has dependency to the binary code of
> django_openstack_auth.
> When I want to enable I18n of Horizon, I also need to enable the I18n of
> django_openstack_auth ?
> The po files of django_openstack_auth were out of date. (only a small
> change)
Hi folks,
due to the Incubator Application we should prepare Program name and Mission
statement for Savanna, so, I want to start mailing thread about it.
Please, provide any ideas here.
P.S. List of existing programs: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Programs
P.P.S. https://wiki.openstack.org/w
> I have been trying to add a new table to the database.
Just FYI, new database interfaces should be added using objects, which
are automatically remotable. New conductor interfaces should not be
added to make database queries.
> #In class LocalAPI
> def xx(self, context, node_id, values):
>
On 09/06/2013 03:00 PM, Andrei Savu wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Matthew Farrellee mailto:m...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Once done, what will the procedure be for me to verify it without
becoming a Cloudera customer? What will the limitations be to its
use, if any, if I'm not a
Hi
Was looking at the below link and checking if the feature to support
Multihost networking is part of Havana.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/quantum-multihost
I couldnot find out the feature in the Havana blue print. Could you let me
know details reg. the feature ?
https://blue
Thanks Gary.
We will target for IceHouse version.
Regards,
Balaji.P
From: Gary Kotton [mailto:gkot...@vmware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 2:46 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List; Mark McClain; Thierry Carrez; Kyle
Mestery (kmestery)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] New Pl
Hi,
I noticed Horizon has dependency to the binary code of
django_openstack_auth.
When I want to enable I18n of Horizon, I also need to enable the I18n of
django_openstack_auth ?
The po files of django_openstack_auth were out of date. (only a small
change)
Do I need to add the translation resour
Hi all,
I have been trying to add a new table to the database. Now, I have created
the table and I am going through conductor API to populate/update it. I have
defined some function to achieve the task. There function are defined in
conductor
and db api, along with in conductor.manage and db.
Hi,
Anyone can submit a new plugin :). The proposed code will go through the
regular review process.
It is best to open a blueprint for the proposed plugin
(https://launchpad.net/neutron). At the moment we are in a feature freeze for
the H cycle. So the chances of it getting in now are pretty sl
Hi,
We have gone through the below link for new plug-in development.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronDevelopment#Developing_a_Neutron_Plugin
Just want to confirm that is it mandatory to be Core Neutron Developer for
submitting a new plug-in.?
How do we get a reviewer for this like Can w
Today in the project/release status meeting, we'll check status for
feature freeze exceptions and review havana-rc1 buglists.
Feel free to add extra topics to the agenda:
[1] http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/ProjectMeeting
All Technical Leads for integrated programs should be present (if you
ca
Mark Washenberger wrote:
> I buy an exception here if the configuration defaults to off (no change).
+1
Also don't forget to mention that new configuration option to the Docs
team to make sure they are aware of its late addition.
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
Robert Collins wrote:
> Thierry, is it possible to change this to 'Deployment' rather than
> TripleO in the summit tool? I think it would avoid folk interested in
> Tuskar failing to find a place to submit their proposals, and as a
> program we are multi-project - Tomas and I have just discussed th
Hello,
The feature BP at
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/read-only-volumes. The
Cinder server side change (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38322/)
was done and merged, but since there was a delay of a few weeks on the
Cinder side while team debated between some design options, and I
Hi,
Don is on vacation. Lets try and have the meeting today.
Topics that come to mind:
1. https://etherpad.openstack.org/IceHouse-Nova-Scheduler-Sessions
2. Scheduling BP's that missed H. Bad timing or do we need to discuss and see
how we can improve the process
3. Open issues
Thanks
Gary
63 matches
Mail list logo
