hi,all
why we use sha256 instead md5 in chunk based backup-driver , in the current
file chunkeddriver.py, we have object_sha256['sha256s'] list to store all the
sha256 value of sha_block_size data , why we do not use md5 ,md5 is faster
compute than sha256,and we all use the md5 value in _bac
Hi All
Dear List,
I am trying to do SLO upload of large object. The naming convention of the
segmentswill include a timestamp. The scenario I tried is described below:1.
Created container 2. Used CURL command to upload segments.3. Uploaded the
manifest file. Result looks some what like this
#
Hey everyone,
Just a reminder that the meetups team will be meeting today 4/11 at 1500UTC
Agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ops-meetups-team
https://www.worldtimebuddy.com/?qm=1&lid=100,1816670,2147714,4699066&h=100&date=2017-4-11&sln=15-16
https://www.worldtimebuddy.com/?qm=1&lid=100,26
GREAT SUCCESS !!!
2017-04-11 10:51 GMT-03:00 Melvin Hillsman :
> Hey everyone,
>
> Just a reminder that the meetups team will be meeting today 4/11 at 1500UTC
>
> Agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ops-meetups-team
>
>
> https://www.worldtimebuddy.com/?qm=1&lid=100,1816670,
> 2147714,469906
Hi,
The probability of collision with MD5 is more compared to SHA256 based message
digests. Even SHA128 is not strong enough and most dedupe engines use SHA256
based message digest.
Obviously if there is a collision, the incremental backup may not capture
modified data which result in corrupt d
On 04/10/2017 04:25 PM, Georgios Dimitrakakis wrote:
Hello again,
after some time...
The "nova list" command is very fast indeed and the only problem I
observer is through the EC2 API.
I have found out the following bug and I believe is related to it, what
do you people think?
https://bugs.la
Hi,
Please see the following article regarding the risks of using MD5.
http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/4500270165/MD5-vulnerability-renews-calls-for-faster-SHA-256-transition
Thanks,
Xing
From: yuliy...@cmss.chinamobile.com [yuliy...@cmss.chinamobile.
This is somewhat unrelated to the original email, but more of a question of an
issue I have recently come across that seems tangentially related.
When run_one_command is executed and the message is sent to rootwrap via that
pipe, if rootwrap errors for some reason, I get " Unserializable message
Hi guys,
I'm new to openstack.
Installed mirantis os 9,
If one of controllers goes down - vm machines are not accesible, I though
openstack supposed to work even if one controller is alive
Any thoughts?
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bi
