Hi Gary,
After I patched your code I dont see the DHCP server starting now.
Am I missing something here?
2016-07-29 19:19:46.101 12719 ERROR neutron.agent.dhcp.agent [-] Unable to
disable dhcp for f9652dac-7f9e-4910-8d8f-38e84a9fa7c7.
2016-07-29 19:19:46.101 12719 ERROR neutron.agent.dhcp.agent Tr
I just applied that update as per your suggestion but it started creating
many tap devices.
root@controller:~# ovs-vsctl show
d516b5b1-db3f-4acd-856c-10d530c58c23
Bridge br-dvs
Port "tape26cd624-d4"
Interface "tape26cd624-d4"
type: internal
Port "eth
Yes Gary,
I know that this will not have support to sec group and l3 support.
How about the OVS agent. Do we still need it or we dont.
Regards,
Vaidy
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry this is missing the following:
>
>
>
> In neutron/agent/linux/interface.py
>
There is no need for the OVS agent. The code I gave you below does the OVS
wiring.
From: Vaidyanath Manogaran
Date: Friday, July 29, 2016 at 10:42 AM
To: Gary Kotton
Cc: Scott Lowe , "openstack@lists.openstack.org"
, "commun...@lists.openstack.org"
Subject: Re: [Openstack] vm unable to get
Hi,
Sorry this is missing the following:
In neutron/agent/linux/interface.py
cfg.StrOpt('dvs_integration_bridge',
default='br-dvs',
help=_('Name of Open vSwitch bridge to use for DVS networks')),
The dvs_integration_bridge was not defined.
This is the name of t
No I have only one network and one subnet created fresh.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Those are most prob for all of the networks that you have defined.
>
>
>
> *From: *Vaidyanath Manogaran
> *Date: *Friday, July 29, 2016 at 10:51 AM
>
> *To: *Gary Kotton
> *Cc: *Scott
Hi,
I'm wondering if anyone else has noticed this, if I'm in the images
view (Horizon) of a project and click on "Launch" to boot an instance
from this selected image, the resulting dialog has no image
pre-selected as it used to have, so I have to select the source again.
I'm not sure if
On Jul 29, 2016, at 10:50 AM, Eugen Block wrote:
> I'm wondering if anyone else has noticed this, if I'm in the images view
> (Horizon) of a project and click on "Launch" to boot an instance from this
> selected image, the resulting dialog has no image pre-selected as it used to
> have, so I ha
On Jul 29, 2016, at 1:36 AM, Kevin Benton wrote:
> So if that's not reflected in Horizon maybe you've come across a Horizon
> bug.
Well, I can't create instances beyond the 'ten' that Horizon is
showing… Hence my initial question(s)..
--
Turbo Fredriksson
tu...@bayour.com
I dint understand. what do you mean by sec group.
On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 11:41 AM, Remo Mattei wrote:
Did you open the sec groups?
Inviato da iPhone
Il giorno 26 lug 2016, alle ore 21:20, shivkumar gupta
ha scritto:
Hello,I tried the same but no improvement.
On Wednesday,
Legal. Obrigado
Em 29/07/2016 10:36, "Turbo Fredriksson" escreveu:
> On Jul 29, 2016, at 10:50 AM, Eugen Block wrote:
>
> > I'm wondering if anyone else has noticed this, if I'm in the images view
> (Horizon) of a project and click on "Launch" to boot an instance from this
> selected image, the r
yes security groups.
> On Jul 29, 2016, at 06:59, shivkumar gupta
> wrote:
>
> I dint understand. what do you mean by sec group.
>
>
> On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 11:41 AM, Remo Mattei wrote:
>
>
> Did you open the sec groups?
>
> Inviato da iPhone
>
> Il giorno 26 lug 2016, alle ore 21:2
Hello.
We have two deployments with networking-sfc:
mirantis 8.0 (liberty) and mirantis 9.0 (mitaka).
I noticed a difference in how flow classifiers conflict with each other
which I do not understand. I'm not sure if it is a bug or not.
I did the following on mitaka:
1. Create tenant 1 and net
I managed to solve my problem.
As suggested, I enabled rootwrap.
However, I also needed to set use_namespaces = false, and instead set
custom proxy_command.
This is because use_namespaces = true implies that proxy_command = 'ip
netns exec qrouter-{router_id} nc {host} {port}'.
In my two-controller
Quick question:
Can I start testing Newton VLAN Aware VMs now (Beta 2)?
Thanks,
Thiago
On 22 July 2016 at 04:45, Kevin Benton wrote:
> Since they are essentially regular ports in the neutron data model, the
> regular rules for attaching to networks would apply. So you can should be
> able to c
15 matches
Mail list logo