Re: [Openstack] Openstack Mitaka Domain question

2016-06-21 Thread Eugen Block
Could you attach copies of your Keystone policy.json file and your Horizon keystone_policy.json file? I use the same file for both horizon and keystone, it's attached to this email. Please note that I changed the cloud_admin rule to use the user_id of my admin user because domain_id didn't w

Re: [Openstack] Create instance fails on creating block device - Block Device Mapping is Invalid

2016-06-21 Thread Eugen Block
Can't you boot an instance without cinder? Don't know, can I?? Well, you should ;-) How do you try to boot your instance, from CLI or Horizon? If it's Horizon, you would have to NOT klick the button "Create a new volume --> Yes" ;-) If it's CLI it's sufficient to only execute "nova boot

Re: [Openstack] Virtual networking by hardware

2016-06-21 Thread James Guo
Traditional network device vendors have embrace openstack. So H3C and Huawei in china have implemented the solution. 发件人: Ops Cloud [mailto:o...@19cloud.net] 发送时间: 2016年6月21日 9:12 收件人: openstack@lists.openstack.org 主题: [Openstack] Virtual networking by hardware Hi Rather than the soft SDN solut

Re: [Openstack] Create instance fails on creating block device - Block Device Mapping is Invalid

2016-06-21 Thread Abhishek Shrivastava
Hi Turbo, The first thing I want to know - Which VM are you creating(i.e; which OS image are you taking)? - What size are you using and all? Secondly, - Which flavor are you using for VM creation.? On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Eugen Block wrote: > Can't you boot an instance wi

Re: [Openstack] Create instance fails on creating block device - Block Device Mapping is Invalid

2016-06-21 Thread Turbo Fredriksson
On Jun 21, 2016, at 11:40 AM, Abhishek Shrivastava wrote: > The first thing I want to know > > - Which VM are you creating(i.e; which OS image are you taking)? I've tried both the CirrOS and Debian GNU/Linux Jessie images. http://download.cirros-cloud.net/0.3.4/cirros-0.3.4-x86_64-disk.img

Re: [Openstack] Create instance fails on creating block device - Block Device Mapping is Invalid

2016-06-21 Thread Abhishek Shrivastava
​Have you tried any other flavors? For instance if you are creating a 1GB volume then you can go for flavor m1.tiny flavor. So try creating a VM having boot volume size 1GB​ and use flavor m1.tiny and see if it works. On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: > On Jun 21, 2016,

Re: [Openstack] Create instance fails on creating block device - Block Device Mapping is Invalid

2016-06-21 Thread Turbo Fredriksson
On Jun 21, 2016, at 12:19 PM, Abhishek Shrivastava wrote: > ​Have you tried any other flavors? No, I never saw the point. The resources I specified was well within the flavors rules. And the error was "Block Device Mapping is Invalid" I can not see how changing the flavor would change that. -- S

Re: [Openstack] Create instance fails on creating block device - Block Device Mapping is Invalid

2016-06-21 Thread Eugen Block
If it was the flavor, you would get different errors, something like "flavor disk too small" or "out of memory". Again, I recommend to launch an instance on local disk to see if that is working, then fix the iscsi issue to be able to create volumes at all, first empty volumes, then from an

Re: [Openstack] Virtual networking by hardware

2016-06-21 Thread Michael Gale
Hey, Cisco has a ML2 plugin, old style that integrates with the Nexus 9K to offer vxlan hardware support. Michael On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 7:22 PM Ops Cloud wrote: > Hi > > Rather than the soft SDN solution in neutron, is there any networking > solution which is driven by hardware? > What I mea

[Openstack] [Tempest] two-node setup verification

2016-06-21 Thread Paul S.
Hi everyone, I've installed the openstack mitaka with packstack on a two-node setup to get some common knowledge for the openstack. I use tempest to verify the openstack components, so as for now I've got a couple of errors I hope you can help me with. I've attached my latest errors log with the e

Re: [Openstack] Create instance fails on creating block device - Block Device Mapping is Invalid

2016-06-21 Thread Cynthia Lopes
Hi, First of all, think dis question did no get answered: -I'll try that thanx. How do you do that with the "openstack" command? If not, the command is: openstack volume create --size (size in GB) --image (image name or id) volume_name Just for info the cinder command was not exact, it should b

Re: [Openstack] [Tempest] two-node setup verification

2016-06-21 Thread Remo Mattei
Hi Paul, do you use this on RHEL? If you do then the rdo repo is ok, if you are using it on CentOS then the packages have changed. My 2 cents. Remo > On Jun 21, 2016, at 07:17, Paul S. wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I've installed the openstack mitaka with packstack on a two-node setup to ge

Re: [Openstack] [Tempest] two-node setup verification

2016-06-21 Thread Paul S.
>do you use this on RHEL? No, actually I was using that on the CentOS 7.2, and I saw that repo as a legit one in a lot of openstack guides available on the Internet. So what repo should I use instead of it, and what would be the difference that I should know of? On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Re

Re: [Openstack] [Tempest] two-node setup verification

2016-06-21 Thread Remo Mattei
On RHEL: $ sudo yum install -y https://www.rdoproject.org/repos/rdo-release.rpm $ sudo yum update -y $ sudo yum install -y openstack-packstack $ packstack --allinone On CentOS: $ sudo yum install -y centos-release-openstack-mitaka $ sudo yum update -y $ sudo yum install -y openstack-packstack $ pac

Re: [Openstack] [Tempest] two-node setup verification

2016-06-21 Thread Paul S.
Thanks, I will try that to see how different repo will affect the tempest errors that I get! On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Remo Mattei wrote: > >- On RHEL: > >$ sudo yum install -y https://www.rdoproject.org/repos/rdo-release.rpm >$ sudo yum update -y >$ sudo yum install -y op

Re: [Openstack] Devstack Auth Error in Neutron

2016-06-21 Thread Adam Young
On 06/17/2016 08:03 AM, Mohan Kumar wrote: Karun, Please check q-svc (neutron) service is running or not ! Error complaining that keystone url is not reachable to authenticate , IP 192.168.202.130 should be reachable and keystone service should be active . Maybe you can rerun devstack if

Re: [Openstack] Projects deals tricky job

2016-06-21 Thread Timothy Symanczyk
We implemented something here at Symantec that sounds very similar to what you¹re both talking about. We have three levels of Admin - Cloud, Domain, and Project. If you¹re interested in checking it out, we actually presented on this topic in Austin. The presentation : https://www.youtube.com/watch

Re: [Openstack] Openstack Mitaka Domain question

2016-06-21 Thread Brad Pokorny
When you said "I use the same file for both horizon and keystone", I'm wondering if that means your Keystone policy file in Horizon is called policy.json. By default, it will need to be called keystone_policy.json. And if you installed everything with devstack, it will need to be in /opt/stack/hori

[Openstack] Release naming for P and Q open for nominations

2016-06-21 Thread Monty Taylor
Hey everyone! It's time to pick a name for the P and Q releases. If you have a name you'd like us to vote on, please add it here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Release_Naming/P_Proposals https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Release_Naming/Q_Proposals The nominations will be open until 2016-06-28

[Openstack] Ironic node information including credentials exposed to unathenticated users

2016-06-21 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
= Ironic node information including credentials exposed to unathenticated users = :Date: June 21, 2016 :CVE: CVE-2016-4985 Affects ~~~ - Iro

[Openstack] Reply: [openstack-dev] Release naming for P and Q open for nominations

2016-06-21 Thread Lizhonghua (C)
2016-6-22 4:50 Monty Taylor [mailto:mord...@inaugust.com] wrote: > Hey everyone! > > It's time to pick a name for the P and Q releases. > > If you have a name you'd like us to vote on, please add it here: > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Release_Naming/P_Proposals > > https://wiki.openstack