Hi,
I observe that while placing data, the object server creates a
directory structure:
/srv/node/r0/objects//<3 byte hash suffix>//.data.
Is there a reason for the directory to be created? Couldn't
this just have been
/srv/node/r0/objects//<3 byte hash suffix>/.data?
I am seeing a situation w
Hello everyone,
Due to release-critical issues spotted in Ceilometer during RC1 testing,
a new release candidate was created for Kilo. The list of RC2 fixes, as
well as the RC2 tarball are available at:
https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/kilo/kilo-rc2
Unless new release-critical issues are found t
thanks a million!!!
is there any way to know the VM that has been provisioned by a specific
user, or in a specific project, if the VMs have been deleted?
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Mike Smith wrote:
> If you do a “nova show ”, there is a “user_id” field that shows you
> the keystone user
I have had many problems with ./unstack.sh and often have seen people with
the same problems. For me it is not reliable. So what I always recommend
is, start fresh, and if possible save the live state of the VM after
devstack finishes so you do have to start all over.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:59
Hi,
Sorry but this was not my issue. I completely deactivated the NM and still
have the same problem.
# service NetworkManager stop
Redirecting to /bin/systemctl stop NetworkManager.service
I discovered the /etc/hosts was generated by puppet and has the good values.
The problem is that those 19
Likely you don't have connectivity?
If you used VLANs, check your switch / if you use correct ports...
There is a network verification in Fuel, it should pass before you start
deployment. Did you try to run it?
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 5:17 AM, Pedro Velho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry but this was not
Hello everyone,
Due to release-critical issues spotted in Glance, Horizon and Cinder
during RC1 testing, new release candidates were created for Kilo. The
list of RC2 fixes, as well as RC2 tarballs are available at:
https://launchpad.net/glance/kilo/kilo-rc2
https://launchpad.net/horizon/kilo/kil
> On Apr 24, 2015, at 12:42 AM, Shrinand Javadekar
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I observe that while placing data, the object server creates a
> directory structure:
>
> /srv/node/r0/objects//<3 byte hash suffix>//.data.
>
> Is there a reason for the directory to be created? Couldn't
> this just ha
Yes I did, network verification passes. Using the 10.20.0.x network I get
conectivity the problem is with this interfaces created by puppet, 192.168.0.x,
there is no switch I am using fuel on virtualbox.
Thanks,
Pedro
Sent from smartphone
> On 24/04/2015, at 17:40, Mike Scherbakov wrote:
>
>
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 15:00 +0200, Salvo Rapisarda wrote:
> I have a problem with auth google n ask.openstack.org
>
> When I try to login the page redirect to
>
> https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/6206245?p=openid&rd=1
Hi Salvo
I apologize for the issue. We've had a couple of delays wh
Hi,
I'm still trying to figure out if thin provisioning is actually
supported or not when using OpenStack (Juno or Kilo, tried both) and
the VMWare drivers pointing to vCenter. All my attempts of creating a
Glance image end up with a new VM (functional) but with a Tick
provisioned lazy zeroed inst
On 04/24/2015 06:57 AM, Jesus arteche wrote:
thanks a million!!!
is there any way to know the VM that has been provisioned by a
specific user, or in a specific project, if the VMs have been deleted?
There might be some ability to recreate some of this from Audit data.
Assuming you are colle
12 matches
Mail list logo