Hi,
I have the Openstack Grizzly ubuntu 12.04 multi node installed the VM is coming
up fine with IP and also I can associate floating ip however cannot login to
VM using ssh or on console. It just says loading and no go. The security group
is also set.
Any help?
Now on VNC it says
console
[root@grizzly nova]# cat nova.conf|grep vnc
vnc_ip=172.21.2.111
novncproxy_base_url=http://$vnc_ip:6080/vnc_auto.html
vncserver_proxyclient_address=$vnc_ipvnc_enabled=true
vnc_keymap=en-us
vncserver_listen=$vnc_ip
[root@grizzly nova]#
change it into
[root@grizzly nova]# cat nova.conf|grep vnc
no
Hi,
Can someone please help me as I have successfully setup Openstack grizzly on
DomU but getting below error and not able to launch instance due to Spawning
issue.
2013-09-10 13:19:43.536 WARNING nova.scheduler.driver
[req-8cef211b-5ea4-4657-b823-1ca967efd232 33156467441344e8817046e95f0c38
Yes, the scenario you are asking for is:
http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-network/admin/content/use_cases_single_flat.html
.
You have a demo setup in:
http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-network/admin/content/app_demo_flat.html
Regards,
---
JuanFra
2013/9/5 Krzysztof G
> Hi eve
Hi all,
I have been trying to add a new table to the database. Now, I have created
the table and I am going through conductor API to populate/update it. I have
defined some function to achieve the task. There function are defined in
conductor
and db api, along with in conductor.manage and d
Hi Edgard,
Thanks again for your email
Just n feedback and, I hope, a question of general interest:
Among the guides available at the URL you sent:
https://github.com/mseknibilel/OpenStack-Grizzly-Install-Guide/tree/OVS_MultiNode
there is in my opinion at least one guide not updated, and in this
Hello
For everyone looking for some info regarding GlusterFS and Openstack
integration I suggest my blog post:
https://shellycloud.com/blog/2013/09/why-glusterfs-should-not-be-implemented-with-openstack
regards
--
Maciej Gałkiewicz
Shelly Cloud Sp. z o. o., Sysadmin
http://shellycloud.com/, mac.
Hi all
I've been trying to understand where in the code I should apply changes so
that the l3 agent could use a router which is not yet supported by
Openstack. I've been debugging with pdb and reading the available
documentation - at least the ones pointed by other Openstack developers.
Would anyo
Hi!
On Sep 9, 2013, at 9:46 AM, Michael Basnight wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
>> Perhaps: "Trove is designed to support a multi-user database for a single
>> OpenStack tenant within a Nova instance."
>
> +1. Very succinct, and it does remove ambiguity. Giuseppe, fe
Good reading :)
Razique Mahroua - Nuage & Corazique.mahr...@gmail.comTel : +33 9 72 37 94 15
Le 10 sept. 2013 à 14:36, Maciej Gałkiewicz a écrit :HelloFor everyone looking for some info regarding GlusterFS and Openstackintegration I suggest my blog post:https://shellycloud
You are describing the problems of using a shared filesystem backend for
cinder, instead of using a driver with direct connection at block-device
level.
It has improved a lot in the last 18 months or so, specially if you want to
use as shared storage for your VMs.
Seems the snapshotting feature i
It should be available this week. We are currently in the middle of
backporting it to 12.04.
Regards
chuck
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm seeing that `Ubuntu Cloud Archive' for Havana is outdated... Still not
> H3...
>
> How can I test it today? Is there an
Jeff Darcy, GlusterFS developer, responded here:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6359851
I'm not sure what the OP was trying to achieve if he didn't completely
understand what he was talking about.
Pasting Jeff's comments:
GlusterFS developer here. The OP is extremely misleading, so I'll tr
> Just out of curiosity. Have you tested any other Cinder backends?
>
> Yes, I can confirm:
- Solidfire
- NetApp
- NFS (our -now obsolete- driver and community driver)
- Nexenta
- Gluster
- Ceph
- Linux + LVM of course
Probably more... but can't tell you now...
Different solutions, different cus
On 10 September 2013 15:15, Diego Parrilla Santamaría <
diego.parrilla.santama...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You are describing the problems of using a shared filesystem backend for
> cinder, instead of using a driver with direct connection at block-device
> level.
>
>
This is how it is implemented right
On 10 September 2013 16:16, Diego Parrilla Santamaría
wrote:
> BTW, what are you running then? Ceph?
Yep. Cinder integrates quite well with it. Ceph has really great
support and is developed in very organized manner. What I love about
it is flexibility and maintenance. Both implemented in very fr
Hi there,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Maciej Gałkiewicz
wrote:
>
> I am also using glusterfs but for different purposes. I hope to
> replace it with cephfs when it will be production ready. What I
> dislike in Glusterfs is it's stability. Many times it was not working
> as expected during b
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Caitlin Bestler <
caitlin.best...@nexenta.com> wrote:
> I'm an architect at Nexenta. So not surprisingly I fully agree that
> Gluster is a poor choice for storage in OpenStack.
>
Nexenta could easily apply GlusterFS as an aggregation/scale-out layer -
in fact,
I'm an architect at Nexenta. So not surprisingly I fully agree that Gluster
is a poor choice for storage in OpenStack.
However the real question is what criteria storage vendors should be judged
by the project. These should be
clearly stated and easily verified. Once compliance is dealt with, j
On 09/08/2013 06:24 PM, Peter Feiner wrote:
> I'm giving a webinar on OpenStack performance tuning on Wednesday
> September 11 at 1PM EST. The webinar will focus on configuration
> considerations geared toward efficiency and concurrency. If you're
> interested, please register now!
>
> https://att
I'm an architect at Nexenta. So not surprisingly I fully agree that Gluster
is a poor choice for storage in OpenStack.
However the real question is what criteria storage vendors should be judged
by the project. These should be
clearly stated and easily verified. Once compliance is dealt with,
I strongly believe this is the wrong forum to discuss pro and cons of a
particular offering here. Obviously no one solution fits all and every
products have merits.
On Tuesday, September 10, 2013, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
>
> I'm an architect at Nexenta. So not surprisingly I fully agree that
> Glu
On Sep 10, 2013, at 6:01 AM, Brian Aker wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sep 9, 2013, at 9:46 AM, Michael Basnight wrote:
>
>> On Sep 9, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>
>>> Perhaps: "Trove is designed to support a multi-user database for a single
>>> OpenStack tenant within a Nova instance."
>>
>
On 09/10/2013 10:42 AM, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
> The Cinder project has set minimum standards for Volume Drivers for the
> Havana release. Those standards should be applied without debating their
> specifics for Gluster on the mailing list.
>
> Storage vendors are used to dealing with certificatio
On 10 September 2013 17:22, Maciej Gałkiewicz wrote:
>> Our dev process is now also much cleaner and inclusive - you can see the
>> results of our recent 3.5 feature decisions here:
>> http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Planning35
>
> Glusterfs releases are rare. At least the
On 10 September 2013 16:42, John Mark Walker wrote:
> I'm happy to help you test out 3.4. A lot has changed with it, and much of
> it affects the use cases you described, specifically libgfapi, the QEMU
> integration, Nova integration, and the block device translator.
I would like to test libgfap
Cool! Tks! I'm available to test it in deep...=)
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Excerpts from Muralidhar Balcha's message of 2013-09-10 16:23:09 -0700:
> I strongly believe this is the wrong forum to discuss pro and cons of a
> particular offering here. Obviously no one solution fits all and every
> products have merits.
>
What forum would you suggest people share OpenStack
Hi, following this guide
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/development_saio.html#partition-section
i am stuck at step 14 = Check that you can GET
account:curl-v-H'X-Auth-Token:'
*I run this command*
#curl -v -H 'X-Auth-Token: AUTH_tkebd882e8ac094a08a1842811e025f2a8'
http://127.0.0.1:80
To those who are interested in Horizon translation and I18n...
The strings of Horizon in Transifex have been updated.
A new resource "OpenStack Dashboard Authentication" is added
which includes the strings in the login page.
Although the string frozen day was passed, there may be string updat
30 matches
Mail list logo