Hello Jay,
I agree with you.
In open contrail what we have done is there is no need to provision logical
routers.
1. create multiple networks
2. create policy of who can talk to whom.
We are proposing a extension called network policy which is used influence
traffic between the networks.
https://
On 10/14/2013 02:52 AM, Marco Fornaro wrote:
Hi Jay,
Thanks for your answer
BTW:
About ”unecessarly complex” I do think more or less as you BUT
It’s worth to mention that somebody in the list correctly answered:
“we can have many networks, and the subnets within network can have
overlap IPs.”
]
Sent: den 12 oktober 2013 16:55
To: Marco Fornaro
Cc: openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Tricky questions - 1/3 Quantum Network Object
I've wondered exactly the same question -- or, put another way, why have the
concept of a "subnet" at all; why not just have one
...@gmail.com]
Sent: den 12 oktober 2013 16:55
To: Marco Fornaro
Cc: openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Tricky questions - 1/3 Quantum Network Object
I've wondered exactly the same question -- or, put another way, why have the
concept of a "subnet" at all; why not j
I've wondered exactly the same question -- or, put another way, why have
the concept of a "subnet" at all; why not just have one or more network
objects that have either a CIDR or set of IP ranges set on them, along with
certain flags like "shared". The way the API is right now seems needlessly
com
