Re: [Openstack] dumb neutron question

2016-06-07 Thread Akash Gunjal
: 04/06/2016 12:31 am Subject:[Openstack] dumb neutron question Let's say I have two networks. One network is 10.241.0.1/24, and my VMs are on that network. The other network is a provider network with a CIDR of 192.168.100.0/22. There's an illustration of what I mean he

Re: [Openstack] dumb neutron question

2016-06-04 Thread David Medberry
Replying to my own message is bad form but you should also consider that they have different rules, so not only is there not a numbering conflict, there is not a routing conflict either. As your 192.168.100.0/22 is in the private IP space, some additional rules (or exceptions) may need to be added

Re: [Openstack] dumb neutron question

2016-06-04 Thread David Medberry
Of course, there are almost always two routers on a subnet... (unless it is the end of the line). What makes you think the neutron router has to be at .1? Mine are typically .1 on the VM side (but it is totally fine to use something else) and not .1 on the provider side. On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 12:

[Openstack] dumb neutron question

2016-06-03 Thread John van Ommen
Let's say I have two networks. One network is 10.241.0.1/24, and my VMs are on that network. The other network is a provider network with a CIDR of 192.168.100.0/22. There's an illustration of what I mean here: https://developer.rackspace.com/blog/neutron-networking-l3-agent/ Okay, so here's my