Re: [Openstack] Swift Ring Maintenance

2014-08-25 Thread Clay Gerrard
If you're truly not concerned about the replication overhead the balance is going to require the minimal amount of data movement if you just remove and re-add the devices in their new zone with a single rebalance and ring-push. That may or may not be a good idea to recommend depending on how much

Re: [Openstack] Swift Ring Maintenance

2014-08-25 Thread Lillie Ross-CDSR11
Thanks John, Yes, I’ve read this article, but thanks for pointing me at it again. /ross On Aug 22, 2014, at 2:29 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > You've actually identified the issues involved. Here's a writeup on how you > can do it, and the general best-practice for capacity management in Swift:

Re: [Openstack] Swift Ring Maintenance

2014-08-22 Thread John Dickinson
You've actually identified the issues involved. Here's a writeup on how you can do it, and the general best-practice for capacity management in Swift: https://swiftstack.com/blog/2012/04/09/swift-capacity-management/ --John On Aug 22, 2014, at 11:50 AM, Lillie Ross-CDSR11 wrote: > All, >

[Openstack] Swift Ring Maintenance

2014-08-22 Thread Lillie Ross-CDSR11
All, I want to reconfigure a number of disks in my Swift storage cluster to reside in different zones, and I’m unsure of the best way to accomplish this. One way would be to set the drive weights to 0 and wait for data to migrate off the drives, then remove the drive from their current zone and