Re: [Openstack] Keystone active/active

2013-12-21 Thread Ryan Lane
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 12/21/2013 04:19 PM, Ryan Lane wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Jay Pipes > > wrote: >> >> On 12/21/2013 03:27 PM, Ryan Lane wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:05 PM, 陈锐 >

Re: [Openstack] Keystone active/active

2013-12-21 Thread Jay Pipes
On 12/21/2013 04:19 PM, Ryan Lane wrote: On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Jay Pipes mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 12/21/2013 03:27 PM, Ryan Lane wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:05 PM, 陈锐 mailto:chenrui.m...@gmail.com>

Re: [Openstack] Keystone active/active

2013-12-21 Thread Ryan Lane
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 12/21/2013 03:27 PM, Ryan Lane wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:05 PM, 陈锐 > > wrote: >> >> I think you should use UUID token and backend should be sql or >> memcache >> >> >> If you want this to work ac

Re: [Openstack] Keystone active/active

2013-12-21 Thread Jay Pipes
On 12/21/2013 03:27 PM, Ryan Lane wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:05 PM, 陈锐 mailto:chenrui.m...@gmail.com>> wrote: I think you should use UUID token and backend should be sql or memcache If you want this to work across regions, redis or sql is likely what you want (with replication). sql

Re: [Openstack] Keystone active/active

2013-12-21 Thread Ryan Lane
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:05 PM, 陈锐 wrote: > I think you should use UUID token and backend should be sql or memcache > > If you want this to work across regions, redis or sql is likely what you want (with replication). sql with galera is likely the best option if you want to avoid a SPOF for writ

Re: [Openstack] Keystone active/active

2013-12-19 Thread 陈锐
I think you should use UUID token and backend should be sql or memcache 2013/12/17 Anton Massoud > Hi, > Could keystone HA active/active? > Any hints or links how to do that if possible ? Any special setting that > is required > > regards Anton > > _

Re: [Openstack] Keystone active/active

2013-12-17 Thread Syed Armani
l workloads (single process) like devstack can use the > # dogpile.cache.memory backend. > # backend = keystone.common.cache.noop > > Look that good? > > /Anton > > Från: Clint Byrum [cl...@fewbar.com] > Skickat: den 17 december 2013 16

Re: [Openstack] Keystone active/active

2013-12-17 Thread Anton Massoud
Från: Clint Byrum [cl...@fewbar.com] Skickat: den 17 december 2013 16:25 Till: openstack Ämne: Re: [Openstack] Keystone active/active Excerpts from Anton Massoud's message of 2013-12-17 06:14:36 -0800: > Hi, > Could keystone HA active/active? > Any hints or links how to do that if

Re: [Openstack] Keystone active/active

2013-12-17 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Anton Massoud's message of 2013-12-17 06:14:36 -0800: > Hi, > Could keystone HA active/active? > Any hints or links how to do that if possible ? Any special setting that is > required Keystone is basically stateless if configured to use only the SQL and Memcache backends. Both of th

[Openstack] Keystone active/active

2013-12-17 Thread Anton Massoud
Hi, Could keystone HA active/active? Any hints or links how to do that if possible ? Any special setting that is required regards Anton ___ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.opensta