Re: [Openstack] FWaaS vs Security Groups

2013-10-28 Thread Aaron Rosen
Hi Thiago, Current, FWaaS only manages what's allowed in and out on router ports. Security profiles are applied to instances ports directly. FYI: The current FWaaS API is somewhat experimental and policy applies globally to all the routers a tenant owns (i.e: no zone concept yet). Aaron On Mon

Re: [Openstack] FWaaS vs Security Groups

2013-10-28 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Cool! Thanks!! On 28 October 2013 19:16, Aaron Rosen wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > Current, FWaaS only manages what's allowed in and out on router ports. > Security profiles are applied to instances ports directly. > > FYI: The current FWaaS API is somewhat experimental and policy applies > globally

[Openstack] FWaaS vs Security Groups

2013-10-28 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Guys, I'm trying to figure out the main differences between FWaaS and "Security Groups". * Does it complement each other? Or is FWaaS a "Security Groups" replacement...? * Can FWaaS manage the "Tenant Namespace Router NAT Table"? * Does FWaaS manage the same iptables/ip6tables tables at L3 Nam