On 2 August 2016 at 17:49, Armando M. wrote:
>
>
> On 29 July 2016 at 12:59, Martinx - ジェームズ
> wrote:
>
>> Quick question:
>>
>> Can I start testing Newton VLAN Aware VMs now (Beta 2)?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Thiago
>>
>>
> If you're paying close attention the LinuxBridge version is almost
> functional
On 29 July 2016 at 12:59, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> Quick question:
>
> Can I start testing Newton VLAN Aware VMs now (Beta 2)?
>
> Thanks,
> Thiago
>
>
If you're paying close attention the LinuxBridge version is almost
functional, and the OVS one is coming along. I'd advise to wait a tad
longer.
Quick question:
Can I start testing Newton VLAN Aware VMs now (Beta 2)?
Thanks,
Thiago
On 22 July 2016 at 04:45, Kevin Benton wrote:
> Since they are essentially regular ports in the neutron data model, the
> regular rules for attaching to networks would apply. So you can should be
> able to c
Since they are essentially regular ports in the neutron data model, the
regular rules for attaching to networks would apply. So you can should be
able to create a sub-port on another network if that network is shared with
you (either globally shared or via RBAC).
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 8:55 AM, F
Below is the latest spec for vlan-aware-vms
https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/newton/vlan-aware-vms.html
I have a quick question on the above. (multi-tenancy).
Assume the case of nested containers in a VM.
Yes, the containers can be in different networks of the same tena