Re: [Openstack] Storage decision

rage, but need to create 1 volume > for each node > This option does not make sense. > > In any case you loose the ability to live migrate instance. > > Right ? > I am using the first option and live migration works fine. regards -- Maciej Gałkiewicz Shelly Cloud Sp.

Re: [Openstack] Storage decision

er Ceph you should take a look at Ceph RBD not CephFS ( http://ceph.com/docs/master/rbd/rbd/). It is stable and works great for me. -- Maciej Gałkiewicz Shelly Cloud Sp. z o. o., Sysadmin http://shellycloud.com/, mac...@shellycloud.com KRS: 440358 REGON: 101504426 _

Re: [Openstack] Storage, glusterfs v ceph

eously from/to many disks in the cluster. At some point 10Gbit is a must. regards -- Maciej Gałkiewicz Shelly Cloud Sp. z o. o., Sysadmin http://shellycloud.com/, mac...@shellycloud.com KRS: 440358 REGON: 101504426 ___ Mailing list: http://lists.

Re: [Openstack] Why GlusterFS should not be integrated with OpenStack

(and many others). I am not:) I just really like the way how it is implemented in Ceph and integrated with Cinder. regards -- Maciej Gałkiewicz Shelly Cloud Sp. z o. o., Sysadmin http://shellycloud.com/, mac...@shellycloud.com KRS: 440358 REGON: 101504426 ___

Re: [Openstack] Why GlusterFS should not be integrated with OpenStack

On 10 September 2013 17:22, Maciej Gałkiewicz wrote: >> Our dev process is now also much cleaner and inclusive - you can see the >> results of our recent 3.5 feature decisions here: >> http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Planning35 > > Glusterfs rel

Re: [Openstack] Why GlusterFS should not be integrated with OpenStack

m taking about version 3.3.0 or previous. Management of many glusterfs volumes generated many problems for me:( I am looking forward to test 3.4.0. regards -- Maciej Gałkiewicz Shelly Cloud Sp. z o. o., Sysadmin http://shellycloud.com/, mac...@shellycloud.com KRS: 440358 REGON: 1

Re: [Openstack] Why GlusterFS should not be integrated with OpenStack

eems it has been added in Havana and it's in master branch > since mid August: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39498/ > > If I had to consider a scalable storage solution for an Openstack > deployment for the next 10 years, I would consider Gluster. > Just out of curiosity.

[Openstack] Why GlusterFS should not be integrated with OpenStack

Hello For everyone looking for some info regarding GlusterFS and Openstack integration I suggest my blog post: https://shellycloud.com/blog/2013/09/why-glusterfs-should-not-be-implemented-with-openstack regards -- Maciej Gałkiewicz Shelly Cloud Sp. z o. o., Sysadmin http://shellycloud.com/, mac

Re: [Openstack] Diskless Compute Nodes?

Thanks for the response. I thought that you want to boot VMs from pxe not nodes. In case of puppet/chef on github there is a lot of cookbooks and scripts for both. They will probably require some modifications but it is still better than nothing:) regards -- Maciej Gałkiewicz Shelly Clo

Re: [Openstack] Diskless Compute Nodes?

nsidered booting instances from volumes stored in ceph? In such case you dont have to use pxe and keep os in memory. I suggest using chef/puppet whatever is suitable for you for deployment. regards -- Maciej Gałkiewicz Shelly Cloud Sp. z o. o., Sysadmin http://s