What release are you using?
In 2016 I tried to get this working for a client of mine at HPE, and found
that it wouldn't work without a fair bit of hacking. Basically the software
hadn't been updated in about a year, and the newest release was
incompatible with the version of OpenStack that we were
the VM in this
file, including the number of cores, memory size, disk, network, etc. The
following listing is a template of libvirt.xml used for Solaris
installation."
On Aug 14, 2017 7:01 AM, "John van Ommen" wrote:
> Take a look at this:
> https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Solar
is getting stuck at
very initial stage(at boot options step).
Attached screenshot{solaris-qcow2.JPG]
Thanks & Regards,
Shyam Biradar,
Email: shyambiradarsgg...@gmail.com,
Contact: +91 8600266938 <+91%2086002%2066938>.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 3:53 PM, John van Ommen
wrote:
> What is
What is the error that you are receiving?
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Shyam Biradar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to install solaris on OpenStack. I am facing many issues
> during os installation process.
>
> Does OpenStack support solaris in any release/distribution?
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
new one
>> does
>> > better.
>> >
>> > Nevertheless I do not see many using hp out there. Maybe different
>> regions
>> > like emea do better with that.
>> >
>> > Inviato da iPhone
>> >
>> > Il giorno 20 giu 201
At HPE we originally used TripleO but switched to a 'flat' model.
I personally didn't see any advantage to Triple O. In theory, it should be
easier to manage and upgrade. In the real world, Helion 3.0 and 4.0 are
superior in every respect.
John
On Jun 20, 2017 9:02 PM, "Remo Mattei" wrote:
> I
Hewlett Packard's "Helion Open Stack" has improved a great deal since
the initial release. They offer quite a few deployment options now,
and the reliability is quite good:
https://docs.hpcloud.com/hos-4.x/index.html#helion/installation/installation_overview.html
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 2:38 PM,
From today's news.
http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2016/11/30/hpe-dumps-openstack-cloud-foundry-assets-onto-suse/
In what would appear to be a reversal of a commitment made last July
to maintain a presence in the OpenStack market, amid the sale of its
software division to Micro Focus,
To me, the errors you're receiving are indicative of the swift3
package not installing correctly.
When you ran that first step (setup.py), did you get errors?
John
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Alexandr Porunov
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It still doesn't work... The same error is shown. Maybe I mi
Are you installing OpenStack from trunk?
I've installed Swift3 on Helion Open Stack 2.0, and the published
instructions didn't work for me at all.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Alexandr Porunov
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to use S3 api for Swift.
>
> I have installed swift3 as here:
>
> git c
If you'd like to avoid the pain of configuring this manually, Helion
OpenStack has many HA features enabled by default:
http://docs.hpcloud.com/#3.x/helion/planning/high_availability.html
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Alexandr Porunov
wrote:
> Thank you for pointing on it. I haven't yet use p
The Swift3 plugin for Swift supports multipart upload.
So you could do the following:
1) install the Swift3 plugin
2) use Amazon's s3 API for multi part upload
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/mpuoverview.html
On Aug 23, 2016 9:16 AM, "Alexandr Porunov"
wrote:
> Hello Jay,
>
> U
my case /etc/init.d/swift-proxy for details)
>
> On that note, would be helpful to know your platform and Swift version as
> well.
>
> Cheers
>
> Mark
>
> On 20/08/16 04:48, John van Ommen wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone been able to successfully integrate the S3 api
Has anyone been able to successfully integrate the S3 api with Swift?
I'm working on this in my lab, and finding a number of issues:
1) I've found that when I enable the S3 API, my swift proxy doesn't
bind to it's port. I'm guessing that it's failing to start for some
reason, but the logs don't s
Let's say I have two networks. One network is 10.241.0.1/24, and my
VMs are on that network. The other network is a provider network with
a CIDR of 192.168.100.0/22.
There's an illustration of what I mean here:
https://developer.rackspace.com/blog/neutron-networking-l3-agent/
Okay, so here's my
I am working on an OpenStack deployment where my customer's VLANs do
not appeared to be configured properly.
I am in a time crunch and I'm looking for a way to work around this.
Would it be possible to use VxLAN for my guest traffic, and basically
pick the subnets arbitrarily?
I am using OpenSta
s, one for VLAN and the other for VxLAN.
>
> Br,
> Chao
>
> ------ Original --
> *From: * "John van Ommen";
> *Date: * Fri, Feb 26, 2016 03:46 AM
> *To: * "Neil Jerram";
> *Cc: * "openstack@lists.openstack.org";
> *Subject: * Re: [Openst
I want to have VLAN provider networks for some customers.
I currently have my cloud configured for VxLAN, and I'm not able to create
a VLAN provider network.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Neil Jerram
wrote:
> On 25/02/16 19:08, John van Ommen wrote:
> > Is it possible to have
Is it possible to have one interface configured with VLAN and another with
VxLAN?
I'm in a situation where I have some customers who want to do VxLAN, but I
also have some legacy customers that need VLAN.
To complicate matters further, my compute nodes are in vCenter. I
understand that KVM can do
I have a client who isn't happy with the performance of their storage.
The client is currently running a mix of SAS HDDs and SATA SSDs.
They wanted to remove the SAS HDDs and replace them with SSDs, so the
entire array would be SSDs.
I was running benchmarks on the current hardware and I found th
Excellent! Thanks for clarifying how this works. I was reading the docs
from James Denton and the one from Openstack.org and getting quite confused.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 8:17 AM, gustavo panizzo (gfa)
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 07:38:37 -0800, John van Ommen wrote:
> > My com
C: scheuran)
>
> On Do, 2016-01-14 at 22:08 -0800, John van Ommen wrote:
> > If I have a VM that's getting it's IP addresses from a VLAN provider
> > network, is it sufficient to have a network namespace that corresponds
> > to that network?
> >
> > Or
If I have a VM that's getting it's IP addresses from a VLAN provider
network, is it sufficient to have a network namespace that corresponds to
that network?
Or do I also need to have a network interface on the server that
corresponds to it?
For instance, if I have a provider network with a CIDR o
23 matches
Mail list logo
