r journals, and thus
provides very misleading results.
--
Chuck
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:03 AM, Vincenzo Pii wrote:
> Hi Chuck,
>
> Many thanks for your comments!
> I have replied on the blog.
>
> Best regards,
> Vincenzo.
>
>
> 2014-06-12 21:10 GMT+02:00 Chuck
-for-object-storage-on-small-clusters/
>
>
> 2014-06-06 20:19 GMT+02:00 Matthew Farrellee :
>
>> On 06/02/2014 02:52 PM, Chuck Thier wrote:
>>
>> I have heard that there has been some work to integrate Hadoop with
>>> Swift, but know very little about it. Int
s that handle?
>
> Thanks for you sharing I m sure everyone will take a good lesson.
>
> Ciao
>
> Inviato da iPhone ()
>
> Il giorno May 29, 2014, alle ore 22:39, Chuck Thier ha
> scritto:
>
> Hello Remo,
>
> That is quite an open ended question :) If you c
Hello Remo,
That is quite an open ended question :) If you could share a bit more
about your use case, then it would be easier to provide more detailed
information, but I'll try to cover some of the basics.
First, a disclaimer. I am one of the original Openstack Swift developers,
so I *may* be
Hello Ankit,
The easiest way is to create a new loopback device that is 40GB in the same
way the 10GB device is created. This will create a new empty device, and
you will lose your data. This usually isn't a problem since the SAIO is
specifically for development and learning-- not for production
Well the short answer to that question is that it is generally a best
practice to run a disk controller card with a persistent cache in front of
your storage drives. When this is the case you want to turn barriers off,
otherwise they would render your cache ineffective.
If you are not running a
to integrate swift with azure. Or How can solve this problem?
>
> Regards.
>
>
> 2014-04-15 20:51 GMT+03:00 Chuck Thier :
>
> I'm not aware of any integration between Swift and Azure. Could you
>> explain more what problem you are trying to solve?
>>
>> T
I'm not aware of any integration between Swift and Azure. Could you
explain more what problem you are trying to solve?
Thanks,
--
Chuck
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:55 AM, mehmet hacısalihoğlu
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I want to integrate swift with azure. But I dont find related document to
> this s
Hi Shrinand,
For your use case, it would certainly lower the overall latency, and likely
increase throughput. The downside is that the client has to track all of
the objects, and you loose some of the other features like usage.
Is it viable for swift? That's a tough question. I think could be
My first guess is that the Redhat kernel in 5.8 may not have as many xfs
improvements and may require that the inode size set to 1024 instead of the
default.
That would be the first thing I would try.
--
Chuck
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 5:57 PM, John Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:53
Hi Shri,
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Shrinand Javadekar wrote:
> Thanks for the inputs Chuck. Please see my responses inline.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Chuck Thier wrote:
>
>> Hi Shri,
>>
>> I think your observations are fairly spot on.
otational) of the servers running swift. But the
> relative numbers give a better picture of the benefits of:
>
> i) Sharding across containers to increase throughput
> ii) Restricting the number of objects per container
>
> Let me know if I have missed out on anything or if the
At a minimum, you want 100 partitions per disk. More partitions doesn't
really matter unless you get way too many (for example 100K partitions on a
disk is probably a bad idea). And yes, since there are 3 replicas, there
will be 3 copies of every partition.
When determining the part power, you r
Hi Shri,
The short answer is that sharding your data across containers in swift is
generally a good idea.
The limitations with containers has a lot more to do with overall
concurrency rather than total objects in a container. The number of
objects in a container can have an affect on that, but w
Hi Pangj,
First, make sure you have an updated version of swift-bench. There was a
bug where it was relying on python-swiftclient to setup eventlet, but when
eventlet was removed from swiftclient, that caused swift-bench to not run
requests concurrently.
There are quite a few things that should
Hi Steve,
The services start with the ports defined in the configuration files.
Since it looks like you want to run several servers on the same machine, I
would suggest looking at the all in one docs (
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/development_saio.html) as it is
set up in a similar w
happy to accept pull requests or comments.
>
> What clients do you use against your swift implementation? Have you gotten
> pyrax to work with it?
>
> -- Kyle
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Chuck Thier wrote:
>
>> Hey Kyle,
>>
>> I'm interested
17 matches
Mail list logo
