t;
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
--
Arne Wiebalck
CERN IT
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
st: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
> Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
--
Arne Wiebalck
CERN IT
___
Mailing list: http://lists.opensta
does not contain any rows.
I think there is only a minor issue in assuming where the table is in which
database.
Could anyone suggest a solution for this.
Thanks,
S.Gopinath
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post t
tely mine Ocata version does not have that.
>
> I am attaching what I am seeing both as an admin and as a non-privileged user.
>
> Furthermore I cannot find anything like that either in API Access or in
> KeyPairs sections.
>
> Best,
>
> G.
>
>
> On M
gt; Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
> Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
—
Arne Wiebalck
CERN IT
___
Mailing list: htt
> On 07 Feb 2017, at 20:05, Steve Gordon wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Arne Wiebalck"
>> To: "Steve Gordon"
>> Cc: "Manuel Sopena Ballesteros" ,
>> openstack@lists.openstack.org
>> Sent: T
> On 07 Feb 2017, at 18:57, Steve Gordon wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Arne Wiebalck" mailto:arne.wieba...@cern.ch>>
>> To: "Manuel Sopena Ballesteros" > <mailto:manuel...@garvan.org.au>>
>> Cc: openstack@l
>
> Sinh
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Arne Wiebalck wrote:
> Manuel,
>
> Rather than with aggregate metadata we assign instances to NUMA nodes via
> flavor extra_specs,
> i.e. nova flavor-show reports something like
>
> —>
> | extra_spec
fy us at
> once by return email and then delete both messages. We accept no liability
> for the distribution of viruses or similar in electronic communications. This
> notice should not be removed.
> ___
> Mailing list: http:
s.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to :
openstack@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack@lists.openstack.org>
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
--
Arne Wiebalck
CERN IT
___
Mailing list: http:/
pinning the performance was sufficiently close to the physical
one).
To implement this, we specify the numa_nodes extra_spec for the corresponding
flavor and rely on nova’s placement policy.
HTH,
Arne
—
Arne Wiebalck
CERN IT
> On 08 Jul 2016, at 19:22, Steve Gordon wrote:
>
> -
U. In contrast, a
> dedicated vCPU gets a whole host CPU all to itself.
>
> As for the guest being aware of the underlying NUMA topology, this isn't
> possible when the number of vCPUs in the instance isn't a multiple of the
> number of hyperthreads in a host core. The p
t;
> To the original poster, you should be using
>
> 'hw:cpu_policy': 'dedicated'
>
> in your flavor extra-specs to enable CPU pinning. And you should enable the
> NUMATopologyFilter scheduler filter.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> On 12/15/2015
0 free: 270 MB
> node 1 cpus: 1 2 4 7
> node 1 size: 2038 MB
> node 1 free: 329 MB
> node distances:
> node 0 1
> 0: 10 20
> 1: 20 10
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Arne Wiebalck wrote:
>> The pinning we set up goes indeed into the block:
>&g
g is correct?
>
> ___
> Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
> Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
--
Arne Wiebalck
CER
missed
to configure?
TIA,
Arne
—
Arne Wiebalck
CERN IT
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
16 matches
Mail list logo
