I think this is it : http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top/faq.html#calccpu
Thank averyone!
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Alejandro Comisario
wrote:
> Thanks Suo.
> Still, i dont get how the math is repressented, can you explain how
> this uses the cpuTime for each vm t
sformer:
> https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/etc/ceilometer/pipeline.yaml#L43
>
>
> 2014-05-14 22:55 GMT+08:00 Alejandro Comisario
> :
>>
>> Hi Guys, any help regarding this matter ?
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Alejandro Comis
Hi Guys, any help regarding this matter ?
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Alejandro Comisario <
alejandro.comisa...@mercadolibre.com> wrote:
> Hi guys, sorry if this has been asked already.
>
> I dont seem to find the cpu % util implementation for libvirt using qemu.
>
>
Hi guys, sorry if this has been asked already.
I dont seem to find the cpu % util implementation for libvirt using qemu.
https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/compute/virt/libvirt/inspector.py
Is it possible to get it or the code is somewere else ?
Its no real use the %
ch to all the community.
Alejandro Comisario
*MercadoLibre Cloud Services*
Arias 3751, Piso 7 (C1430CRG)
Ciudad de Buenos Aires - Argentina
Cel: +549(11) 15-3770-1857
Tel : +54(11) 4640-8443
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Adam Lawson wrote:
> Since AWS defines cost per GB in terms of co
ld be : project-saving.
Thanks so much.
Alejandro Comisario
*MercadoLibre Cloud Services*
Arias 3751, Piso 7 (C1430CRG)
Ciudad de Buenos Aires - Argentina
Cel: +549(11) 15-3770-1857
Tel : +54(11) 4640-8443
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 2:37 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
> Alejandro,
>
> We blog
Hi guys.
After amazon dropped its prices among other things, on S3 its seems that i
need in my compañy to justify/analyze if swift keeps being the most cost
convenient solution (we have it in house)
When we decided going with swift one year ago, one of the main constraints
was "keeping the data in
Anyone!
Alejandro Comisario
MercadoLibre Cloud Services
Arias 3751, Piso 7 (C1430CRG)
Ciudad de Buenos Aires - Argentina
Cel: +549(11) 15-3770-1857
Tel : +54(11) 4640-8443
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Alejandro Comisario
wrote:
> Hi guys,
> In the company i work for we are r
Hi guys,
In the company i work for we are running openstack essex into
production among other things, and want ceilometer to run "standalone"
on the compute node, is there a chance to run ceilometer compute agent
and not collector to log on files locally in the compute for me to
analyze this data ?
Alejandro
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Alejandro Comisario
wrote:
>
> Thanks to everyone for the prompted respones!
> Its clear that _base on NFS is not the way to go 100% when thinking
> about avoiding dissasters.
> So, i believe its good to start talking about not using _ba
on the compute on the same disks where the vms are
running ( in our case are SATA disks ).
That kind of discussion is think is the most relevant one.
What are the experiences of running the backing files locally on the
same compute where vms are running ?
best
Alejandro Comisario
On Thu, Apr 3
Hi guys ...
We have a pretty big openstack environment and we use a shared NFS to
populate backing file directory ( the famous _base directory located
on /var/lib/nova/instances/_base ) due to a human error, the backing
file used by thousands of guests was deleted, causing this guests to
go read-on
It was not a rootkit, and we couldnt get any traffic captures during the
problem.
Maybe some compute's bridge causing some loop in that specific VLAN ?
Any thoughts ?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Robert van Leeuwen <
robert.vanleeu...@spilgames.com> wrote:
> > any tip or experience regard
We have a 9-nodes galera cluster into production, and we purge the database
issuing a query every midnight.
As how galera works, you only need to run the query against just one node.
regards.
* @lejandrito*
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/c
Hi community, the weirdest thing happened to one of our openstack regions,
running more than 200 vms
This region is :
* openstack essex 2012.1.4
* ubuntu 12.04.2
* Linux DC4-r59-02vms 3.2.0-49-generic #75-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 18 17:39:32
UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
On Saturday all 16 no
Hi guys, we had in the past when using physical servers, several throughput
issues regarding the throughput of our APIS, in our case we measure this
with packets per seconds, since we dont have that much bandwidth (Mb/s)
since our apis respond lots of packets very small ones (maximum response of
3.
ng: how does the app run from the hypervisor? You can rule a
> lot of things out by testing that.
> -nld
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Alejandro Comisario <
> alejandro.comisa...@mercadolibre.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Narayan, thanks fir the prompted response, le
thinking about going upper with ring or txqueuelen settings.
Any idea ?
*Alejandro Comisario #melicloud CloudBuilders*
Arias 3751, Piso 7 (C1430CRG)
Ciudad de Buenos Aires - Argentina
Cel: +549(11) 15-3770-1857
Tel : +54(11) 4640-8443
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Narayan Desai wrote
/ ethtool / power / etc
settings on the compute side ?
Best regards.
* alejandrito*
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Alejandro Comisario <
alejandro.comisa...@mercadolibre.com> wrote:
> Well, its been a long time since we use nova with KVM, we got over the
> many thousand vms, and s
Well, its been a long time since we use nova with KVM, we got over the many
thousand vms, and still, something doesnt feel right.
We are using ubuntu 12.04 kernel 3.2.0-[40-48], tuned sysctl with lots of
parameters, and everything ... works, you can say, quite well.
But here's the deal, we have an
Hi guys, we are deploying:
havana + OVS on vlan mode + neutron using this EXACT production schema :
http://docs.openstack.org/network-admin/admin/content/figures/2/figures/under-the-hood-scenario-2-ovs-compute.png
Since we are using this schema, im gonna reffer about devices as they are
named in
Hi guys, we have just one question.
Since we are already traveling our way into deploying havana release for
early 2014, we were stuck under the deep questioning of the identity api
v3.X.
Since we are using the access to keystone v2.0 identity api a lot, even
from lots of in-house developments, we
22 matches
Mail list logo
