On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 20:43:13 +0200, Florian Haas wrote:
I have a question about enabling nested KVM, or for that matter
passing in any required CPU features to an instance, in combination
with using a "custom" cpu-mode. My compute nodes (Ocata) are
configured to run with cpu_mode=custom, cpu_mode
Hi everybody!
As the subject reads, the "S" release of OpenStack is officially "Stein". As
been with previous elections this wasn't the first choice, that was "Solar".
Solar was judged to have legal risk, so as per our name selection process, we
moved to the next name on the list.
Thanks to ever
Hi everyone!
I have a question about enabling nested KVM, or for that matter
passing in any required CPU features to an instance, in combination
with using a "custom" cpu-mode. My compute nodes (Ocata) are
configured to run with cpu_mode=custom, cpu_model=IvyBridge. They are
also configured for ne
I have a small 5 server openstack lab with RDO
1 controller + 4 compute
The controller also runs the storage on LVM backed with some decent disk -> +-
40.000 iops
Glance on file on the same server
When I request 10 instances of centos to be spun up, I see every instance go to
block device mappi
Thanks a lot Jorge for the reply.
I sent an email but it may has some problem, so why I attached the
output of the commands mentioned in a file.
Thanks a lot Jorge for your response, these are the outputs:
ip netns exec qrouter-570a7359-1658-4ff4-8f0c-947e487ffc76 ifconfig
lo: flags=73 mtu 655
Thanks a lot Jorge for your response, these are the outputs:
ip netns exec qrouter-570a7359-1658-4ff4-8f0c-947e487ffc76 ifconfig
lo: flags=73 mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10
loop txqueuelen 1 (Local Loopback)
RX
Thanks Romeo for your response,
The VM is created by using the rule which is defined by me beforehand.
On 03/29/2018 02:16 AM, r...@italy1.com wrote:
If the vm is already running and you have created a new sec groups the
vm will not know about that. So you need to add the rules to that vm.
If
