Hello everyone.
I had a motherboard which contains 3 x Intel I210 and 1 x Intel i219-LM
network adapter.
Trying to deploy this machine as compute node by using Fuel 7.0, but found
that CentOS bootstrap can't recognize i219-LM.
So I'm trying to build a new "e1000e" kernel driver which can support
What? Are you serious?
I want to use DNS to find the internal private IP of my instances...
Is there anyone else who is more familiar with neutron internal DNS or
designate that can help me out?
Thanks,
Brandon
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016, 19:16 Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 12:04 AM,
On Sep 8, 2016, at 12:04 AM, Brandon Sawyers wrote:
> That's a floating ip that I set in an earlier test but didn't release
> before killing the instance. It shouldn't be there. If I had released
> before deleting the entry wouldn't be there.
The fact that it IS there might mean something. I'm ju
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:47 PM Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2016, at 11:03 PM, Brandon Sawyers wrote:
>
> >
> https://openstack.nimeyo.com/83652/openstack-neutron-designate-tenancy-neutrons-integration?start=0#a_list_title
>
> "and the zone from the private network".
>
> Meaning, "there c
On Sep 7, 2016, at 11:03 PM, Brandon Sawyers wrote:
> https://openstack.nimeyo.com/83652/openstack-neutron-designate-tenancy-neutrons-integration?start=0#a_list_title
"and the zone from the private network".
Meaning, "there can be only one"! And it's automatic (this
part: "the network is set to
> -Original Message-
> From: Satish Patel [mailto:satish@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 1:10 PM
> To: openstack
> Subject: [Openstack] dual interface instance not getting IP from DHCP after
> reboot
>
>
> but today i have added one more interface on instance eth1 wh
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:40 PM Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2016, at 10:24 PM, Brandon Sawyers wrote:
>
> > I think we are. I'm specifically talking about having my nodes talk to
> each
> > other using a FQDN.
>
> Yes, that IS what you use a DNS for.
>
> > I'm not sure if this is the case
On Sep 7, 2016, at 10:24 PM, Brandon Sawyers wrote:
> I think we are. I'm specifically talking about having my nodes talk to each
> other using a FQDN.
Yes, that IS what you use a DNS for.
> I'm not sure if this is the case or not. I've seen several things online
> saying that it is possible. I
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:51 PM Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2016, at 9:24 PM, Brandon Sawyers wrote:
>
> > I am using Designate. But from what I understand it's just for external
> > DNS. I'm talking about internal dns between my guests on the same private
> > network.
>
> A DNS is a DNS
On Sep 7, 2016, at 9:24 PM, Brandon Sawyers wrote:
> I am using Designate. But from what I understand it's just for external
> DNS. I'm talking about internal dns between my guests on the same private
> network.
A DNS is a DNS is a DNS.. There's nothing that forces you to publish
the Designate DN
Thanks for your reply.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 3:49 PM Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2016, at 2:42 PM, Brandon Sawyers wrote:
>
> > I'm wondering if there is a way to manage internal dns in mitaka other
> than
> > setting dns_domain to a blanket domain in neutron.conf (that applies to
> al
On Sep 7, 2016, at 2:42 PM, Brandon Sawyers wrote:
> I'm wondering if there is a way to manage internal dns in mitaka other than
> setting dns_domain to a blanket domain in neutron.conf (that applies to all
> guests created across all projects/networks).
You can always use Designate. That is the
On 9/3/2016 7:04 PM, Kevin Wilson wrote:
Hi all,
I saw that one can create a VM with "openstack image create" but also with
"glance image-create",
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/python-glanceclient/man/glance.html
I saw that some of the parameters are common.
My question is: is there any d
After doing more research I've become even more confused.
I'm not at all confident in my understanding of how internal dns is
supposed work anymore.
I've seen different slideshows and forum posts that seem to point out that
internal dns should be working exactly as I want it to. IE: I have a
priv
Does anyone have a pointer to a Fedora Atomic image that works with
stable/mitaka Magnum, and supports the kubernetes external load balancer
feature [1]?
I'm trying to test the kubernetes external load balancer feature with
stable/mitaka Magnum. However, when I try to bring up a load-balanced s
I have instance configured with single interface which is working find
and getting IP address from DHCP itself on eth0
but today i have added one more interface on instance eth1 which is
not getting IP address itself when i reboot VM. I need to run
following command to get IP
vm# dhclient eth1
i
Hi Sergey,
The policies in github are expected to be this way. For many environments,
Domains are used to separate users (including domain admins) from doing bad
things to each other. Restricting access to the list of all domains in the
cloud is just one aspect of this separation, so that a dom
Hello ,
I have multi-domain environment , two domains , some projects under these
two domains.
Fallowing this article
http://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide/cli-set-compute-quotas.html
Version is liberty
When execute such commands > nova quota-class-update --instances 150
default
my already
Hello everyone:
I'm wondering if there is a way to manage internal dns in mitaka other than
setting dns_domain to a blanket domain in neutron.conf (that applies to all
guests created across all projects/networks).
What I'd like to be able to do is have each private network (or project
maybe?) be
Hi everyone,
Please excuse the post bump. I thought this might have gotten buried
in US holiday weekend spam. Does anyone have any ideas on this?
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Erik McCormick
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I recently found myself with a requirement for Sahara and, for the
> most part,
Hi all,
I’ve set up keystone V3 policies and enabled Multidomain attribute in horizon.
When I’m logging into horizon as domain admin horizon executes domain_lookup
function which
performs
policy.check((("identity", "identity:list_domains"),), request)
And by default keystone v3 policies enab
Hello,
I have multi-domain kilo setup. Used cloud_admin policy json.
nova-list with default domain is working fine. But with non-default domain
having exact permissions is not working.
I am using following rc file:
export OS_USERNAME=p
Hi all,
I have installed Openstack Mitaka using devstack.
I have a problem when I launch a CIrros VM. I can't use the console because
of this error:
atkbd serio0: Use 'setkeycodes 00 ' to make it known.
[ 41.750245] atkbd serio0: Unknown key released (translated set 2,
code 0x0 on isa0060/serio0
23 matches
Mail list logo
