On 25 April 2016 at 01:51, Martinx - ジェームズ
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I'm trying to replace this (openvswitch_agent.ini across the cloud):
>
> ---
> firewall_driver =
> neutron.agent.linux.iptables_firewall.OVSHybridIptablesFirewallDriver
> ---
>
> By this:
>
> ---
> firewall_driver = openvswitch
> -
Thanks Brian.
That's a very much needed implementation.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Brian Haley wrote:
> On 4/26/16 12:05 PM, Jaison Peter wrote:
>
>> Hi George,
>>
>> Thanks for letting me know that we can create distributed router by
>> disabling SNAT in central router.
>>
>> Even thou
Hi Adam,
You can refer to http://docs.openstack.org/developer/networking-bgpvpn/
Thanks
Vikram
On Apr 27, 2016 8:01 AM, "Adam Lawson" wrote:
> Hey everyone!
>
> Does Neutron support mpls/bgp presently? I'm looking for use cases/methods
> where it's done outside Calico or Contrail.
>
> Anyone ha
Hey everyone!
Does Neutron support mpls/bgp presently? I'm looking for use cases/methods
where it's done outside Calico or Contrail.
Anyone have a link to a doc or steps where it's been done successfully?
//adam
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack
Yeah, a builtin method to distribute rings would be nice.
The puppet module (puppet-swift) does do this. I'm guessing most people
are going to use some configuration management tool (Pupper, Ansible
etc) to manage their deployment (especially if installing the rest of
Openstack too).
Cheers
On 04/26/2016 10:16 AM, Rick Jones wrote:
On 04/25/2016 11:33 PM, Jaison Peter wrote:
But one of the major drawback we are seeing with DVR is the public IP
consumption.If we have 100 clients and 1 VM per client , eventually
there will be 100 tenants and 100 routers. Since its a public cloud, we
On 4/26/16 12:05 PM, Jaison Peter wrote:
Hi George,
Thanks for letting me know that we can create distributed router by
disabling SNAT in central router.
Even though we use VRRP HA router, it will consume 100 public IPs in the
scenario I mentioned above, but can save IPs used in compute fip nam
On 04/25/2016 11:33 PM, Jaison Peter wrote:
I have many concerns about the scaling and right choices , since
openstack is offering lot of choices and flexibility, especially in
networking side.Our major challenge was choosing between simplicity and
performance offered by Linux bridge and feature
Hi George,
Thanks for letting me know that we can create distributed router by
disabling SNAT in central router.
Even though we use VRRP HA router, it will consume 100 public IPs in the
scenario I mentioned above, but can save IPs used in compute fip namespace.
Yes, compute node do not need publ
Hi,
We've had a few questions here at the summit about the mentoring program,
so I wanted to give some clarifications:
Enrollment is still open for mentors/mentees. We'd like to keep it open
indefinitely. Link to the enrollment questionnaire is on the wiki page
- https://wiki.openstack.
Hi Jaison,
This is an issue that the Neutron team is aware. They will likely be
addressing this (at some point) but your understanding aligns with my own.
So, public IPV4 usage is a well known, well documented issue and DVR / HA
exacerbates it.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:33 AM, Jaison Peter wrote
There's no shortage of public IPv6 addresses.
Regards,
Mike
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ope
Hi Mark,
Having pondered of this a bit, it made me realize that capacity
management in swift being deployed on enterprise level ( lets say 25+
storage nodes) might be a bit of a challenge for a sysadmin.
Would it be an idea to consider the following addition to the
ringbuilder tools for fut
Robson Ramos Barreto writes:
>
> Hi Guys,My environment is Juno / KVM.I wonder to know if it's possible an
openstack instance to have more than one block device file attachedI know
that is possible in libvirt attach a second disk something like:# virsh
attach-disk domain --source /path/second_di
Hi All
Last Wednesday I try to setup a devstack environment with latest openstack
master code in one Ubuntu 14.04 LTS system, after devstack installation
finished I have met RabbitMQ beam.smp take high CPU usage issue in the system,
the RabbitMQ beam.smp process will take high CPU usage which
Thx for help.
Regards,
J.P.
From: Pierre Garel [mailto:pie...@garel.net]
Sent: mardi 26 avril 2016 09:52
To: Jean-Pierre Ribeauville
Cc: openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Ephemeral Instances storage on a shared file system
Hello,
The path of the ephemeral and instances in
murali writes:
>
> Hello All, I have one query regarding the ceilometer meters available.Is
there any default meters available for getting the active tenants.
(Non-metric or metric)That is I need to get the active tenants from the
ceilometer for some particular goal.So I want to know if there is
Hello,
The path of the ephemeral and instances info is by default
/var/lib/nova/intances. This parameter can be defined in nova.conf.
There is a good documentation about live migration and how to set ip up on the
Mirantis website:
https://www.mirantis.com/blog/tutorial-openstack-live-migration
Yes, thats also an option. But we would like to get the flexibility and
features that a floating IP provides.
So, in that case, there wont be any floating IPs , openstack will assign
public IPs like it assigning private IPs , right?
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:57 PM, gustavo panizzo (gfa)
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:03:03PM +0530, Jaison Peter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was working in an openstack project to build a small to medium level
> public cloud on the top of openstack. We are researching lot more about
> scalable large openstack deployments and planning our design accordingly.
20 matches
Mail list logo