Re: [Openstack] Mitaka - OVS Firewall Driver, not working = OVSFWPortNotFound

2016-04-26 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
On 25 April 2016 at 01:51, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > Guys, > > I'm trying to replace this (openvswitch_agent.ini across the cloud): > > --- > firewall_driver = > neutron.agent.linux.iptables_firewall.OVSHybridIptablesFirewallDriver > --- > > By this: > > --- > firewall_driver = openvswitch > -

Re: [Openstack] Openstack powered Public cloud

2016-04-26 Thread Jaison Peter
Thanks Brian. That's a very much needed implementation. On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Brian Haley wrote: > On 4/26/16 12:05 PM, Jaison Peter wrote: > >> Hi George, >> >> Thanks for letting me know that we can create distributed router by >> disabling SNAT in central router. >> >> Even thou

Re: [Openstack] [Neutron][mpls][bgp] l3vpn

2016-04-26 Thread Vikram Choudhary
Hi Adam, You can refer to http://docs.openstack.org/developer/networking-bgpvpn/ Thanks Vikram On Apr 27, 2016 8:01 AM, "Adam Lawson" wrote: > Hey everyone! > > Does Neutron support mpls/bgp presently? I'm looking for use cases/methods > where it's done outside Calico or Contrail. > > Anyone ha

[Openstack] [Neutron][mpls][bgp] l3vpn

2016-04-26 Thread Adam Lawson
Hey everyone! Does Neutron support mpls/bgp presently? I'm looking for use cases/methods where it's done outside Calico or Contrail. Anyone have a link to a doc or steps where it's been done successfully? //adam ___ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack

Re: [Openstack] Ring rebuild, multiple copies of ringbuilder file, wasRe: swift ringbuilder and disk size/capacity relationship

2016-04-26 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Yeah, a builtin method to distribute rings would be nice. The puppet module (puppet-swift) does do this. I'm guessing most people are going to use some configuration management tool (Pupper, Ansible etc) to manage their deployment (especially if installing the rest of Openstack too). Cheers

Re: [Openstack] Openstack powered Public cloud

2016-04-26 Thread Rick Jones
On 04/26/2016 10:16 AM, Rick Jones wrote: On 04/25/2016 11:33 PM, Jaison Peter wrote: But one of the major drawback we are seeing with DVR is the public IP consumption.If we have 100 clients and 1 VM per client , eventually there will be 100 tenants and 100 routers. Since its a public cloud, we

Re: [Openstack] Openstack powered Public cloud

2016-04-26 Thread Brian Haley
On 4/26/16 12:05 PM, Jaison Peter wrote: Hi George, Thanks for letting me know that we can create distributed router by disabling SNAT in central router. Even though we use VRRP HA router, it will consume 100 public IPs in the scenario I mentioned above, but can save IPs used in compute fip nam

Re: [Openstack] Openstack powered Public cloud

2016-04-26 Thread Rick Jones
On 04/25/2016 11:33 PM, Jaison Peter wrote: I have many concerns about the scaling and right choices , since openstack is offering lot of choices and flexibility, especially in networking side.Our major challenge was choosing between simplicity and performance offered by Linux bridge and feature

Re: [Openstack] Openstack powered Public cloud

2016-04-26 Thread Jaison Peter
Hi George, Thanks for letting me know that we can create distributed router by disabling SNAT in central router. Even though we use VRRP HA router, it will consume 100 public IPs in the scenario I mentioned above, but can save IPs used in compute fip namespace. Yes, compute node do not need publ

[Openstack] [Mentoring] Some clarifications on the mentoring program

2016-04-26 Thread Emily K Hugenbruch
Hi, We've had a few questions here at the summit about the mentoring program, so I wanted to give some clarifications: Enrollment is still open for mentors/mentees. We'd like to keep it open indefinitely. Link to the enrollment questionnaire is on the wiki page - https://wiki.openstack.

Re: [Openstack] Openstack powered Public cloud

2016-04-26 Thread David Medberry
Hi Jaison, This is an issue that the Neutron team is aware. They will likely be addressing this (at some point) but your understanding aligns with my own. So, public IPV4 usage is a well known, well documented issue and DVR / HA exacerbates it. On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:33 AM, Jaison Peter wrote

Re: [Openstack] Openstack powered Public cloud

2016-04-26 Thread Mike Spreitzer
There's no shortage of public IPv6 addresses. Regards, Mike ___ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ope

Re: [Openstack] Ring rebuild, multiple copies of ringbuilder file, wasRe: swift ringbuilder and disk size/capacity relationship

2016-04-26 Thread Peter Brouwer
Hi Mark, Having pondered of this a bit, it made me realize that capacity management in swift being deployed on enterprise level ( lets say 25+ storage nodes) might be a bit of a challenge for a sysadmin. Would it be an idea to consider the following addition to the ringbuilder tools for fut

Re: [Openstack] Openstack instances with more than one block device file

2016-04-26 Thread Tomas Vondra
Robson Ramos Barreto writes: > > Hi Guys,My environment is Juno / KVM.I wonder to know if it's possible an openstack instance to have more than one block device file attachedI know that is possible in libvirt attach a second disk something like:# virsh attach-disk domain --source /path/second_di

[Openstack] [Nova][RabbitMQ] RabbitMQ beam.smp take high CPU usage issue with latest master code devstack environment

2016-04-26 Thread Shang, Li (Li@HPservers-Core-OE-PSC)
Hi All Last Wednesday I try to setup a devstack environment with latest openstack master code in one Ubuntu 14.04 LTS system, after devstack installation finished I have met RabbitMQ beam.smp take high CPU usage issue in the system, the RabbitMQ beam.smp process will take high CPU usage which

Re: [Openstack] Ephemeral Instances storage on a shared file system

2016-04-26 Thread Jean-Pierre Ribeauville
Thx for help. Regards, J.P. From: Pierre Garel [mailto:pie...@garel.net] Sent: mardi 26 avril 2016 09:52 To: Jean-Pierre Ribeauville Cc: openstack@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [Openstack] Ephemeral Instances storage on a shared file system Hello, The path of the ephemeral and instances in

Re: [Openstack] Ceilometer - Meter for getting active tenants

2016-04-26 Thread Tomas Vondra
murali writes: > > Hello All, I have one query regarding the ceilometer meters available.Is there any default meters available for getting the active tenants. (Non-metric or metric)That is I need to get the active tenants from the ceilometer for some particular goal.So I want to know if there is

Re: [Openstack] Ephemeral Instances storage on a shared file system

2016-04-26 Thread Pierre Garel
Hello, The path of the ephemeral and instances info is by default /var/lib/nova/intances. This parameter can be defined in nova.conf. There is a good documentation about live migration and how to set ip up on the Mirantis website: https://www.mirantis.com/blog/tutorial-openstack-live-migration

Re: [Openstack] Openstack powered Public cloud

2016-04-26 Thread Jaison Peter
Yes, thats also an option. But we would like to get the flexibility and features that a floating IP provides. So, in that case, there wont be any floating IPs , openstack will assign public IPs like it assigning private IPs , right? On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:57 PM, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:

Re: [Openstack] Openstack powered Public cloud

2016-04-26 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:03:03PM +0530, Jaison Peter wrote: > Hi all, > > I was working in an openstack project to build a small to medium level > public cloud on the top of openstack. We are researching lot more about > scalable large openstack deployments and planning our design accordingly.