Re: [Openstack] [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

2012-07-11 Thread Jon Mittelhauser
+1 for option 1 On 7/11/12 8:26 AM, "Vishvananda Ishaya" wrote: >Hello Everyone, > >Now that the PPB has decided to promote Cinder to core for the Folsom >release, we need to decide what happens to the existing Nova Volume >code. As far as I can see it there are two basic strategies. I'm going >

Re: [Openstack] [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

2012-07-12 Thread Jon Mittelhauser
George, I am relatively new to this mailing list so I assume that there is some history that is prompting the vehemence but I do not understand what you are trying to accomplish. Vish sent out two proposed ways for dealing with the migration. Most of the early voting (including mine) has been

Re: [Openstack] [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

2012-07-12 Thread Jon Mittelhauser
nder is written)? Or do you disagree with the migration strategies proposed (which is what Vish's email was opening discussion about)? Or…?? -Jon From: George Reese mailto:george.re...@enstratus.com>> Date: Thursday, July 12, 2012 12:47 PM To: Jon Mittelhauser mailto:jon.mittelhau