Hi !
I use OpenStack Folsom and i would like to perform an instance evacuation
from down host to specified host. I saw the function "nova evacuate" for
OpenStack Grizzly but i don't find the same function for OpenStack Folsom !
How can i resolve my problem ?
Thanks !
--
regards,
Alexandre
___
Hi guys,
I'm running in a problem raised by cinder api.
I'll show you the log output it's more then my explaination :)
2013-06-12 10:50:13AUDIT [cinder.api.v1.volumes] Create volume of 30 GB
2013-06-12 10:50:13 WARNING [cinder.volume.api] Quota exceeded for
d4e1c14691d841f6b53a24b6c4c42a0e
Hi,
"Wolfgang Richter" wrote:
> Am I missing something or does Horizon as released with Grizzly not have an
> option for booting an instance from a volume?
When you click on the button to "Launch an instance" on the Instances page, you
should see a "Volume Options" tab that will let you choose
The OpenStack community has been and needs to continue to be a welcoming
community for developers in all programming languages. Naturally I’m referring
to developers who are building systems on top of OpenStack and not the
developers of OpenStack itself.
This email is prompted by a minor incide
This looks like a bug, so you could raise a bug on cinder at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+filebug
When you do you could include information about the version of cinder
you are using, is it grizzy, folsom or are you testing on head?
Also, if you can include any context information for ex
On 06/12/2013 10:09 AM, Everett Toews wrote:
The OpenStack community has been and needs to continue to be a welcoming
community for developers in all programming languages. Naturally I’m
referring to developers who are building systems on top of OpenStack and
not the developers of OpenStack itsel
On 06/12/2013 07:09 AM, Everett Toews wrote:
> The OpenStack community has been and needs to continue to be a welcoming
> community for developers in all programming languages.
Indeed. As more public clouds are appearing powered by OpenStack,
developers of applications are becoming even more impo
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 07:09 AM, Everett Toews wrote:
> > The OpenStack community has been and needs to continue to be a welcoming
> > community for developers in all programming languages.
>
> Indeed. As more public clouds are appearing powered b
Is there any way we can punish these people in the future? Ban them?
Actually, ban doesn't work on public IRC
If this happens again, we should just mention their irc nicknames. Some of
them reuse the same name on other IRC channels.
Why don't we have this in oUR faq? Or do we already have it i
Gentlemen,
Why don't we think about doing something like "Geek on Duty", something
that Ceph community does.
http://ceph.com/community/ceph-community-expands-geek-on-duty/
Cheers,
Syed Armani
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:49 AM, John Wong wrote:
> Is there any way we can punish these people in th
On Wed 12 Jun 2013 01:19:50 PM PDT, John Wong wrote:
> Is there any way we can punish these people in the future?
Let's be clear: we're *nowhere* near having to think about using such
measures.
I would like to focus the discussion on how we can help developers
discover and use the existing SDKs
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:19 PM, John Wong wrote:
> Is there any way we can punish these people in the future? Ban them?
> Actually, ban doesn't work on public IRC
>
> If this happens again, we should just mention their irc nicknames. Some of
> them reuse the same name on other IRC channels.
On 06/12/2013 05:01 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On Wed 12 Jun 2013 01:19:50 PM PDT, John Wong wrote:
Is there any way we can punish these people in the future?
Let's be clear: we're *nowhere* near having to think about using such
measures.
I would like to focus the discussion on how we can he
Ah! Touche! What a nicer option to start instances based on volumes :-)
I was hoping also for a button or option from the "Volumes" or "Snapshots"
areas of the web app as well, but this works (albeit being a bit hidden).
--
Wolf
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Julie Pichon wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
Hi Jarda,
I'm Toshi, I'm also working on Horizon UI improvement (mainly network
topology view). I totally agree with you.
I've been wondering how to discuss the design ideas for Horizon, and I
think we need some documents such as a design guideline to keep
Horizon UI as a certain level of look&fee
Couldn't find anything specifically tracking this so:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1190376
Somewhat related:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/improved-boot-from-volume
On Jun 12, 2013, at 2:14 PM, Wolfgang Richter wrote:
> Ah! Touche! What a nicer option to start in
On Jun 12, 2013, at 5:01 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> On Wed 12 Jun 2013 01:19:50 PM PDT, John Wong wrote:
>> Is there any way we can punish these people in the future?
>
> Let's be clear: we're *nowhere* near having to think about using such
> measures.
+1 on *nowhere* near
I tried to write
On 06/12/2013 02:10 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> I'd just +1 on the "more volunteers" front. We could deputize some folks
> to make sure they pay attention to the channel and voice them in it. The
> reality is that with so many channels, #openstack tends to get forgotten
> by most of the -dev community,
I am not sure we want to allow python developers... those guys have a PEP
for everything. Can't even sit down to a slice of cake without a PEP to
tell them how to cut it and a CI environment to make sure their slice is
within those PEP defined tolerances.
I've had it up to here with those people.
Hi Toshi,
it's great to meet you and thanks for support. What you mentioned here
is one of the issues: worse awareness of such an activity. Hopefully GH
will enhance this (as well as the other issues). Apart from being among
other projects, we can also help making it more visible with some not
20 matches
Mail list logo
