[Openstack] How to purge old meter data of Ceilometer

With the default 1 minute interval, Ceilometer collects quite large amounts of meter data. Does Ceilometer provide a TTL configuration option for the meter data, or some other functionality or API for purging old meter data? Thanks for any help, Harri

Re: [Openstack] How to purge old meter data of Ceilometer

On Thu, Apr 04 2013, Harri Pyy wrote: > With the default 1 minute interval, Ceilometer collects quite large amounts > of meter data. > > Does Ceilometer provide a TTL configuration option for the meter data, or > some other functionality or API for purging old meter data? Not yet unfortunately.

[Openstack] Could not connect to VM

Hello, I'm having some issues with ping or connecting with SSH to A vm after creation. My setup is - 1 controller node + networking node - 2 compute nodes all are running ubuntu 12.04 when trying to ping a vm after creation i get the following output: ping 50.50.1.3 PING 50.50.1.3 (50.50.1.3)

[Openstack] Swift proxy and swift-informant

Hi to all. I try to configure swift proxy to work with swift-informant. I've installed swift-informant and add/modify the following section to /etc/swift/proxy-server.conf: [pipeline:main] pipeline = informant healthcheck cache swift3 authtoken keystone proxy-server [filter:informant] use = egg

[Openstack] New schema for LDAP + Keystone Grizzly?

Hello to all!Before the release of version grizzly 3, the suggested schema in the openstack documentation (http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-compute/admin/content/configuring-keystone-for-ldap-backend.html) worked fine. This is the suggested schema:dn: cn=openstack,cn=org dc: openstack obj

Re: [Openstack] Swift proxy and swift-informant

swob is not a separate package, it is part of the swift core. You may either get older version of informant which does not use swob or upgrade swift. Tong Li Emerging Technologies & Standards Building 501/B205 liton...@us.ibm.com From: Giovanni Colapinto To: openstack@lists.launchpad.ne

Re: [Openstack] Swift proxy and swift-informant

Thank you for the reply. How I can upgrade swift? On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Tong Li wrote: > swob is not a separate package, it is part of the swift core. You may > either get older version of informant which does not use swob or upgrade > swift. > > Tong Li > Emerging Technologies & Stan

[Openstack] OpenStack on two physical servers - devstack

Hello all. For getting a 'full' OpenStack environment up and running for testing and semi-serious use, with two physical servers (to enable redundancy), is devstack still the way to go? thanks,Andy ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openst

Re: [Openstack] Swift proxy and swift-informant

on ubuntu, you can try the following. apt-get install python-software-properties add-apt-repository ppa:swift-core/release apt-get update apt-get install swift python-swiftclient Also look into the doc at this link. http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/howto_installmultinode.html If you wa

[Openstack] OpenStack 2013.1 ("Grizzly") is released !

Hello everyone, The "Grizzly" development cycle, started 6 months ago, ends today with the immediate release of OpenStack 2013.1. It is the result of the work of 550 different people who contributed code, documentation, or infrastructure configurations. This amazing journey saw the implementation

Re: [Openstack] [openstack-announce] OpenStack 2013.1 ("Grizzly") is released !

Amazing accomplishment everyone! I just posted a blog post with a few highlights and included a link to your message, Thierry. http://www.openstack.org/blog/2013/04/openstack-grizzly/ On Thursday, April 4, 2013 9:47am, "Thierry Carrez" said: > Hello everyone, > > The "Grizzly" deve

[Openstack] Ceilometer 2013.1 released

Hello, Ceilometer 2013.1 has been released, ending the Grizzly development cycle where we were an incubated project, and became an integrated one for the Havana cycle. The tarball can be found with the list of features and bugfixes here: https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/grizzly/2013.1 Congr

Re: [Openstack] How to purge old meter data of Ceilometer

I created a blueprint for this: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/purge-data On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04 2013, Harri Pyy wrote: > > > With the default 1 minute interval, Ceilometer collects quite large > amounts of meter data. > > > > Do

Re: [Openstack] [Nova] Creating instances with custom UUIDs

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Chris Behrens wrote: > I'm having a hard time understanding the original problem. nova boot > should return in milliseconds. There's no blocking on provisioning. > > The only thing that could block is DB access, as AFAIK the RPC to the scheduler is still pass by

Re: [Openstack] [Quantum] Anybody implemented DMZ?

Hi David, The quantum network node would route traffic between the non-DMZ-DMZ network if both of those subnets are uplinked to the same quantum router. I believe if you create another router for your dmz hosts then traffic in/out of that network should route our to your physical infrastructure wh

Re: [Openstack] [Quantum] Anybody implemented DMZ?

Hi Aron, Thank you for your reply. We deploy one (quantum) subnet as a DMZ network and the other (quantum) subnet as a non-DMZ network. They are routed to the network node where quantum services (dhcp, l3, linuxbridge) are running. They can talk each other through network node, now. Howe

[Openstack] Gerrit Review + SSH

Hi, As OS dev cycle involves Gerrit review tool which requires ssh into the gerrit server, I was wondering if any of you guys face problems where your company/org does not allow ssh to external hosts. In general, what is the best practice in terms of environment for generating code review? I app

Re: [Openstack] [Quantum] Anybody implemented DMZ?

In my reply I suggested you to create two quantum routers which I believe should solve this for you. quantum net-create DMZ-net --external=True quantum subnet-create --name DMZ-Subnet1 DMZ-net # Public ip pool quantum net-create non-DMZ --external=True quantum subnet-create --name nonDMZ-Sub

Re: [Openstack] Gerrit Review + SSH

On 2013-04-04 10:51:20 -0700 (-0700), Ronak Shah wrote: > As OS dev cycle involves Gerrit review tool which requires ssh > into the gerrit server, I was wondering if any of you guys face > problems where your company/org does not allow ssh to external > hosts. [...] It usually involves the uphill

Re: [Openstack] Gerrit Review + SSH

On 04/04/2013 02:23 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2013-04-04 10:51:20 -0700 (-0700), Ronak Shah wrote: >> As OS dev cycle involves Gerrit review tool which requires ssh >> into the gerrit server, I was wondering if any of you guys face >> problems where your company/org does not allow ssh to exter

Re: [Openstack] Gerrit Review + SSH

+1 Regards, Pranav On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 04/04/2013 02:23 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2013-04-04 10:51:20 -0700 (-0700), Ronak Shah wrote: > >> As OS dev cycle involves Gerrit review tool which requires ssh > >> into the gerrit server, I was wondering if a

Re: [Openstack] "multi-host" mode in quantum

Hello, As Grizzly is released today, can anybody confirm that the multi-host network mode is supported by Quantum in this new release? Thanks, Xin On 12/13/2012 6:04 AM, Heiko Krämer wrote: Hey Guys, it's a good point. I hope this option will include in Grizzly. We get now (since the switc

Re: [Openstack] "multi-host" mode in quantum

Hi Xin, This is in the release notes at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Grizzly#OpenStack_Network_Service_.28Quantum.29 - Multiple Network support for multiple network nodes running L3-agents and DHCP-agents - provides better scale + high-available for quantum deployments

Re: [Openstack] "multi-host" mode in quantum

Unfortunately, I don't think "multiple network nodes" is the same "multi-host network mode" that Xin is asking about. The following did not make it into grizzly and is now targeted for havana: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/quantum-multihost -- Henry On Thu, Apr 04, at 3:11 pm An

Re: [Openstack] "multi-host" mode in quantum

Henry, thank you for clarifying! I was just posting what was in the release notes. Perhaps someone on the Quantum core team can add to the release notes for clarity. Anne On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Henry Gessau wrote: > Unfortunately, I don't think "multiple network nodes" is the same >

Re: [Openstack] "multi-host" mode in quantum

Hi All, On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Henry Gessau wrote: >Unfortunately, I don't think "multiple network nodes" is the same "multi-host network mode" that Xin is asking about. >The following did not make it into grizzly and is now targeted for havana: >https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum

[Openstack] AUTO: I am out of the office. (returning 2013/04/06)

I am out of the office until 2013/04/06. I will respond to your message when I return. Note: This is an automated response to your message "[Openstack] OpenStack 2013.1 ("Grizzly") is released !" sent on 04/04/2013 22:47:45. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is

[Openstack] Grizzly release notes and the never-ending image-cache-manager issue

Michael (et al): The Grizzly release notes < https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Grizzly> say: "The image-cache-manager has been turned on by default. This may have potential issues for users who are using a shared filesystem for their instances_path. Set remove_unused_base_images=false

Re: [Openstack] Grizzly release notes and the never-ending image-cache-manager issue

On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Lorin Hochstein wrote: > Michael (et al): > > The Grizzly release notes > say: > > "The image-cache-manager has been turned on by default. This may have > potential issues for users who are using a shared filesy

Re: [Openstack] Gerrit Review + SSH

On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 10:51:20AM -0700, Ronak Shah wrote: > Hi, > > As OS dev cycle involves Gerrit review tool which requires ssh into the > gerrit server, I was wondering if any of you guys face problems where your > company/org does not allow ssh to external hosts. > > In general, what is th

Re: [Openstack] Gerrit Review + SSH

On 2013-04-04 22:11:10 +0100 (+0100), Daniel P. Berrange wrote: [...] > I don't know how hard it would be for OpenStack Infrastructure team > to officially make Gerrit available via port 443, in addition to the > normal SSH port. We'd need to use different hostnames mapped to different IP addresse

Re: [Openstack] Swift proxy and swift-informant

Yes, I read that documentation on upgrade, but unfortunately in that repository quantal distribution doesn't exists. Is it safe to use precise packages even if I got quantal? Thank you On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Tong Li wrote: > on ubuntu, you can try the following. > > apt-get install py