Hey Anthony,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Anthony Young
wrote:
> Hey Tomoe,
>
>
>>
>> - a launched instance cannot go outside the world and failed
>>to get the cirros image with floating ip.
>>
>
> For this to work, the floating ip range defined by FLOATING_RANGE have to
> be configure
Sector?
On Feb 17, 2012, at 9:06 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2012, at 10:07 AM, Armando Migliaccio wrote:
>
>> I think you touched the crucial point here: what is exposed to the user and
>> what not. Reading:
>>
>> http://wiki.openstack.org/MultiClusterZones#Design
>>
>> one would think
Sectors remind me too much of disks.
How about? Layers, Slices, Fragments, Knots...
On Feb 18, 2012 1:57 PM, "Chris Behrens" wrote:
> Sector?
>
>
> On Feb 17, 2012, at 9:06 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
>
> > On Feb 15, 2012, at 10:07 AM, Armando Migliaccio wrote:
> >
> >> I think you touched the crucial
On Feb 18, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Nathanael Burton wrote:
> Sectors remind me too much of disks.
Right.. I mentioned it because I would think it'd be rather difficult to
confuse 'Nova sectors' with sectors on a disk.
>
> How about? Layers, Slices, Fragments, Knots...
Of those, I'd probably pref
> On Feb 17, 2012, at 9:06 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
>> The term "zone" was adopted at a time when we weren't really
>> focusing on mimicking the AWS Availability Zone concept, and in
>> hindsight, it was a poor choice. So we should learn from that mistake
>> and make sure we don't choose a replace
On Feb 18, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Nathanael Burton wrote:
> Sectors remind me too much of disks.
Agreed.
> How about? Layers, Slices, Fragments, Knots...
Remember that for many deployments, the entire system will be a single
"zone", so whatever term is used should make sense in a si
On Feb 18, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> I still prefer 'cell'. The parallel to single celled / multi-cellular
> life forms makes sense, and there is really no overloading of the word in the
> world of computers.
I like 'cell' too. It makes sense.
But "'cell' reminds me too much
+1 to cell.
On Feb 18, 2012 9:41 AM, "Dean Troyer" wrote:
> > On Feb 17, 2012, at 9:06 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> >> The term "zone" was adopted at a time when we weren't really
> >> focusing on mimicking the AWS Availability Zone concept, and in
> >> hindsight, it was a poor choice. So we shoul
Clump?
-B
On Feb 18, 2012, at 12:24 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
> +1 to cell.
>
> On Feb 18, 2012 9:41 AM, "Dean Troyer" wrote:
> > On Feb 17, 2012, at 9:06 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> >> The term "zone" was adopted at a time when we weren't really
> >> focusing on mimicking the AWS Availabi
Hi,
2012/02/18 0:36 "Chmouel Boudjnah" :
> On 17 Feb 2012, at 06:12, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>
> - A S3Token middleware which is based on Akira version with some fixes.
>
> Yeah, that looks beautiful... Unfortunately the back-end
> inherits the old problem: it authorizes against EC2 credentials
> ins
10 matches
Mail list logo