Hi,
I restarted proxyserver, and i checked to head the account by executing this
command :
curl -k -v -H 'X-Auth-Token: '
but I got the same error
This what i found in the syslog file:
Jan 20 09:43:34 node1 proxy-server - x.x.x.x 20/Jan/2012/08/43/34 GET
/auth/v1.0 HTTP/1.0 200 -
curl/7.21.
When I reboot my vm today(reboot works well before), it show :
*2012-01-20 16:55:19,112 WARNING nova.virt.libvirt_conn [-] Error from
libvirt during undefine of instance-0013. Code=42 Error=Domain not
found: no domain with matching uuid '60f24c80-aee7-8e21-a14f-0682b82b13e2'**
*
*2012-01-20 16
Hey,
In the months since the Diablo release, we have been busy selectively
back-porting bugfixes to the stable/diablo branches of Nova and Glance.
Well, those fixes are now available as 2011.3.1 releases!
These releases are bugfix updates to Diablo and are intended to be
relatively risk free wit
On Jan 19, 2012, at 6:03 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> I have two questions:
>
> 1) Has anyone optimized nova to work in a HPC environment like you describe?
> Such as an intelligent scheduler that will generate VMs that consume x
> percent of a physical machines resources (so you don'
b) If authentication is not in effect, should we chage to listing
everything, public and not? I can file a bug and see it implemented.
In case its useful, I think that currently (without authentication)
a command such as:
curl http://localhost:9292/v1/images?is_public=None
will list both p
Hi,
What is the content of your proxy-server.conf ? I would be interested
to know what is your auth server and can you reproduce this problem
with the tempauth auth server.
This could mean a lot of different problems, make sure of the basic
stuff lke file permissions on the storage nodes.
Chmoue
Hi,
This is the content of the proxy-server.conf
[DEFAULT]
cert_file = /etc/swift/cert.crt
key_file = /etc/swift/cert.key
bind_port = 8080
workers = 8
user = swift
[pipeline:main]
pipeline = healthcheck cache swift3 tempauth proxy-server
[app:proxy-server]
use = egg:swift#proxy
allow_account_ma
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Khaled Ben Bahri
wrote:
> user_system_root = testpass .admin* https://x.x.x.x:8080/v1/AUTH_system*
This doesn't seem right (the https URL at the end should not be there)
Chmouel.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/
I followed the example in this link :
http://swift.openstack.org/howto_installmultinode.html#config-proxy
Best regards
Khaled
From: chmo...@openstack.org
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:32:27 -0600
Subject: Re: [Openstack] (no subject)
To: khaled-...@hotmail.com
CC: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
On F
One can always learn, I never used that option (but I don't use much of the
tempauth server). You probably want to look over the logs of the storage
node see if there is any ERROR in the logs there.
Chmouel.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Khaled Ben Bahri wrote:
>
> I followed the example in t
I have os-create-server but nova-client management does not accept the "--nic"
option, as you said, Dan.
When I instantiate a vm, it is created but no IP is assigned to it, thus,
it does not change status to ACTIVE. Though I can't access the vm, I can
attach the vm vif to a network port (using bin
when I check log file on storage nodes,
i found that data4 is not mounted,
data4 is a shared folder that i mounted on storage nodes to have a bigger
storage space
Is it necessary that storage devices have to be mounted on /srv/node?? or i can
mount them on other directory
Can I use a list of
On Thursday, January 19, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jorge Luiz Correa wrote:
> I would like to know if it's possible to configure quota in each nova-compute
> node. For example, I set up a new hardware with 8 GB of memory and install
> the nova-compute, but I wish only 4 GB of memory are used (dedicate
Hi,
No one able to further clarify this?
Does swift offer there read-after-create consistence like
non-us-standard S3? What are the precise syntax and semantics of
X-Newest header?
Best,
Nikolaus
On 01/18/2012 10:15 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Michael Barton writes:
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at
The X-Newest header can be used by a GET Operation to ensure that all of the
Storage Nodes (3 by default) are queried for the latest copy of the Object.
The COPY Object operation already has this functionality.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No one able to furthe
Hi,
What happens if one of the nodes is down? Especially if that node holds
the newest copy?
Thanks,
Nikolaus
On 01/20/2012 12:33 PM, Stephen Broeker wrote:
> The X-Newest header can be used by a GET Operation to ensure that all of the
> Storage Nodes (3 by default) are queried for the latest co
Hi,
Can any one please tell me if we can mount and use for openstack swift a
mounted shared folder as a storage device
Is it necessary that storage devices have to be mounted on /srv/node??
Thanks in advance
Best regards
Khaled
___
If a node is down, then it is ignored.
That is the whole point about 3 replicas.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What happens if one of the nodes is down? Especially if that node holds
> the newest copy?
>
> Thanks,
> Nikolaus
>
> On 01/20/2012 12:33 PM, Stephen
Hi,
So if an object update has not yet been replicated on all nodes, and all
nodes that have been updated are offline, what will happen? Will swift
recognize this and give me an error, or will it silently return the
older version?
Thanks,
Nikolaus
On 01/20/2012 02:14 PM, Stephen Broeker wrote:
By default there are 3 replicas.
A PUT Object will return after 2 replicas are done.
So if all nodes are up then there are at least 2 replicas.
If all replica nodes are down, then the GET Object will fail.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So if an object update ha
Hi,
Sorry for being so persistent, but I'm still not sure what happens if
the 2 servers that carry the new replica are down, but the 1 server that
has the old replica is up. Will GET fail or return the old replica?
Best,
Niko
On 01/20/2012 02:52 PM, Stephen Broeker wrote:
> By default there are
On Friday, January 20, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Khaled Ben Bahri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can any one please tell me if we can mount and use for openstack swift a
> mounted shared folder as a storage device
Do you mean use shared storage as the storage backend for swift? Or do you
wish to mount a shared fold
In this case, I believe that the GET will succeed.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for being so persistent, but I'm still not sure what happens if
> the 2 servers that carry the new replica are down, but the 1 server that
> has the old replica is up. Will G
As Stephen mentionned if there is only one replica left Swift would not
serve it.
Chmouel.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for being so persistent, but I'm still not sure what happens if
> the 2 servers that carry the new replica are down, but the 1 server
Hi,
Thanks! So there is no way to reliably get the most-recent version of an
object under all conditions.
Does the same apply to object listings? I.e., when a PUT of a new object
returns, can I construct a situation where a subsequent listing of the
container contents will not include the new obj
Hmm, but if there are e.g. 4 replicas, two of which are up-to-date but
offline, and two available but online, swift would serve the old version?
-Niko
On 01/20/2012 03:06 PM, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> As Stephen mentionned if there is only one replica left Swift would not
> serve it.
>
> Chmoue
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Florian Hines wrote:
> Is it necessary that storage devices have to be mounted on /srv/node??
>
> You can change where you mount devices with the "devices" config option in
> the default section of your config.
>
Note that there is a few places in the code that re
Actually I got that wrong for GET swift would try to serve the object even
if there is only one replica left for PUT it would need to have at least 2
successful write to succeed assuming you have a 3 replicas cluster.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> As Stephen mentionne
I'm finding this thread a bit confusing. You're comparing offered SERVICES
to Software. While some of the details of the software will dictate what's
possible, some are heavily dependent on how you deploy the swift software,
and what kind of deployment decisions you (or your service provider) make.
Some general notes for consistency and swift (all of the below assumes
3 replicas):
Objects:
When swift PUTs an object, it attempts to write to all 3 replicas
and only returns success if 2 or more replicas were written
successfully. When a new object is created, it has a fairly strong
consiste
A new put can only succeed if it has successfully updated a full majority of
the replicas (typically 2 out of 3).
Therefore two different updates cannot concurrently succeed, one of them has to
know that it is the later transaction.
If you aren't forcing a Get to reference all servers, using the
Hi Andi,
My perspective is that I'm working on an application that should work
with arbitrary service providers using swift. Therefore, I'm interested
in the minimal set of guarantees that I can always rely on, no matter
how the service provider has configured his particular swift instance.
Best,
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:17:32 -0500
Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Thanks! So there is no way to reliably get the most-recent version of an
> object under all conditions.
If you bend the conditions hard enough to hit the CAP theorem, you do.
-- Pete
___
Maili
On 01/20/2012 06:35 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:17:32 -0500
> Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>
>> Thanks! So there is no way to reliably get the most-recent version of an
>> object under all conditions.
>
> If you bend the conditions hard enough to hit the CAP theorem, you do.
From w
nice reply ;)
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:17:32 -0500
> Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>
> > Thanks! So there is no way to reliably get the most-recent version of an
> > object under all conditions.
>
> If you bend the conditions hard enough to hit the CA
You would need to have the following occur, to make your scenario plausible:
* you write the object, which places it on a majority of the replica nodes
(i.e. 2 out of 3)
* replication is slowly churning away, but doesn't quite catch up
* both the nodes that have the updated data fail simultaneousl
On 01/20/2012 05:08 PM, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
> If you aren’t forcing a Get to reference all servers, using the option
> Stephen mentioned, then you MAY get an
> old version before the replication process is complete. That is what is
> meant by “eventual consistency”.
Well, but apparently this ma
Hi Chuck,
Thanks for the detailed explanation! That pretty much answers all of my
questions. I think this can (and should) placed as-is somewhere in the
Swift Dokumentation and/or the Wiki.
Best,
Nikolaus
On 01/20/2012 04:58 PM, Chuck Thier wrote:
> Some general notes for consistency and swift (
For those that want to try it glance should be working!
Since glance has dependencies on keystone, and the database both of these will
be installed and started automatically (uninstall and starting and such should
work!)
How to accomplish this can be seen at the github page readme.
https://github
Sweet. Will do next week.
~sean
On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:25 PM, "Joshua Harlow"
mailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com>> wrote:
For those that want to try it glance should be working!
Since glance has dependencies on keystone, and the database both of these will
be installed and started automatically (uni
Note rhel6 isn't fully there yet. But in progress ;)
On 1/20/12 7:33 PM, "Sean Roberts" wrote:
Sweet. Will do next week.
~sean
On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:25 PM, "Joshua Harlow" wrote:
Re: [Openstack] Proposal for new devstack (v2?) For those that want to try it
glance should be working!
Since gl
Hi,
I have spent quite some time making sure that we have nice tags for
Openstack in Debian, making it easier to find each of our daemons and
programs. I have also pushed for a new tag called "Suite::openstack", so
that it's easy now to find absolutely all packages related to openstack
with a very
42 matches
Mail list logo
