+1
BTW, the where are the backports committed? In the stable/diablo branch in
github?
Enviado desde mi iPad
El 30/10/2011, a las 22:21, Leandro Reox escribió:
> Thanks a lot Ziad, will be cool to ge it in the back ports.
>
> Regards
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Ziad Sawalha
> wrot
Where can I find the spec for Swift blueprint, ring builder web service. In
particular, I am looking for the definitions of new Swift RESTful API used by
the web UI to perform "listing, addition, deletion, modification, and
rebalancing of the devices in the ring." And if the ring builder web
Cool, will this patch be available off stable/Diablo eventually, or would it be
in Essex only?
Thanks,
Liem
From: Akira Yoshiyama [mailto:akirayoshiy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 6:43 PM
To: Vishvananda Ishaya
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net; Joseph Heck; Nguyen, Liem Manh
Subj
What makes keystone assume that all types of services will have " [public_url]
[admin_url] [internal_url] "?
Marcelo Martins
Openstack-swift
btorch...@zeroaccess.org
“Knowledge is the wings on which our aspirations take flight and soar. When it
comes to surfing and life if you know what to
Well, If you need to specify a "type" when adding an endpointTemplate, then
keystone should be smart enough to identify the type given and only accept the
number of URLs needed for such type of service.
Marcelo Martins
Openstack-swift
btorch...@zeroaccess.org
“Knowledge is the wings on wh
That's just what it sees today - the only one of the service endpoints that
uses all three (right now anyway) is Keystone itself. Can you share a different
pattern that you're interested in seeing supported?
-joe
On Oct 31, 2011, at 9:46 AM, Marcelo Martins wrote:
> What makes keystone assume t
Hi Folks,
We've been looking into a problem which looks a lot like:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/855660
2011-10-21 14:13:31,035 ERROR nova.api [5bd52130-d46f-4702-b06b-9ca5045473d7
smokeuser smokeproject] Unexpected error raised: Parent instance is not bound to a Session; lazy load o
It should require/accept the number of URLs that is required by the type of
service one is adding. For example, swift only has public and localnet storage
URLs. No admin URL.
So, regardless if one is using keystone-manage or not (not sure what else one
can use, Rest calls maybe ? ), it should
Can you provide an example?
I think you're asserting that you'd like the keystone-manage command to not
require 3 different URLs when they don't exist separately, is that correct?
-joe
On Oct 31, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Marcelo Martins wrote:
> Well, If you need to specify a "type" when adding an en
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Day, Phil wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> We’ve been looking into a problem which looks a lot like:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/855660
>
> 2011-10-21 14:13:31,035 ERROR nova.api [5bd52130-d46f-4702-b06b-9ca5045473d7
> smokeuser smokeproject] Unexpected error ra
All of the workers are single-threaded, so I'm not sure that scoped sessions
are really necessary.
We did however decide that objects from the db layer are supposed to be simple
dictionaries. We currently allow nested dictionaries to optimize joined
objects. Unfortunately we never switched to
Hi all,
I was wondering if there is any plans in essex to standardize either using
gflags or using configuration files for these types of settings.
One of the complaints that I receive a lot with gflags is that by including a
python file, u automatically inject all of its flags (even if they are
Hi!
GFlags has now been removed, AFAIK. The flags module has an
optparse-based emulator for GFlags to ease transition for Nova joining
the rest of the OpenStack core project implementations' use of
standard config files/Paste.Deploy.
Cheers,
-jay
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Joshua Harlow w
The list of URLs comes from what we have historically done at Rackspace and the
conversations had in OpenStack about a management/admin API.
I agree that not all services need those three. And some may want to create
additional ones. You mention "type" below. Not to be confused with the
service
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Yoshisato Ushio wrote:
> Hello Folks,
> I am interested in the use of OpenFlow technology with OpenStack. But
> honestly speaking, I have no deep expertise in OpenStack.Then let me ask
> questions.
>
> Q1) In order to use openflow features with OpenStack, such as
Hi all,
Just a thank you to all the folks that have provided feedback on the
proposed OpenStack Images API 2.0 proposal:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/16QmRFzKyyphhI20muxpx7sNhUUHpzbQ7XEUMVTYbmRw/edit
I've addressed the feedback up until now and invite previous reviewers
and everyone else t
Great.
Thx!
On 10/31/11 2:42 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote:
Hi!
GFlags has now been removed, AFAIK. The flags module has an
optparse-based emulator for GFlags to ease transition for Nova joining
the rest of the OpenStack core project implementations' use of
standard config files/Paste.Deploy.
Cheers,
Hi,
2011/11/01 1:07 "Nguyen, Liem Manh" :
>
> Cool, will this patch be available off stable/Diablo eventually, or would
it be in Essex only?
I hope it will be a part of Diablo stable updates and Essex.
Regards,
Akira Yoshiyama
NEC Corp.
___
Mailing lis
Yoshisato,
My team has been looking at this problem as well. As you would expect,
Dan's explanation is right on target here. Its relatively straightforward
to write a Quantum plugin that implements the python API and speaks to some
other component (which can vary quite a bit in complexity) that
Hi Ziad,
Sorry, that was my mistake. I meant to have "case service.name:" on that
pseudocode and not type. I wasn't proposing any EndpointType and don't see how
that would help.
The way that I was thinking was, you can either have the "services" table
pre-populated during keystone install/s
20 matches
Mail list logo