Re: [Openstack] GlusterFS project proposal online

Shehjar, While I'll be able to provide more detailed feedback on the proposal itself after I've had a chance to digest it, can I please ask that you relocate it on the wiki? The Governance/Proposed section is for proposals for policy to be reviewed by the PPB, and not intended for blueprints.

[Openstack] Problems with re-bundle

Hi Openstack gurus, We have recently shifted from eucalyptus to openstack and so far, finding it quite stable. However, we are having terrible time re-bundling an existing image. The re-bundled image is able to complete the boot process upto mountall: but the cloud-init never fires up. Here

Re: [Openstack] GlusterFS project proposal online

Hi Joshua, this in fact is a proposal albeit not a policy proposal but a project proposal(not a blueprint either, which is WIP). Is there a more appropriate place for project proposals? Regards -Shehjar Joshua McKenty wrote: Shehjar, While I'll be able to provide more detailed feedback on th

Re: [Openstack] GlusterFS project proposal online

If it's a proposal for work to be done within an existing openstack project (e.g., nova-volume), then it would be a blueprint regardless. If it's actually a proposal for a new openstack subproject, then this would be the appropriate spot, but I would ask that you use the http://wiki.openstack.o

Re: [Openstack] Problems with re-bundle

Muhammad Atif wrote: > 1- Downloaded the ubuntu1010 image from openstack site as follows: > > wget > http://c0179148.cdn1.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/ubuntu1010-UEC-localuser-image.tar.gz Any chance you could reproduce with an official Ubuntu image (downloaded from http://uec-images.ubunt

Re: [Openstack] GlusterFS project proposal online

On initial reading this is great stuff. As Josh McKenty pointed out you should relocate the wiki page and then create a blueprint so we can track the project. I will have some specific responses and a couple of questions after spending some time grokking the proposal. John (johnpur) -Origina

[Openstack] Coalescing and Coordinating Continuous Integration, Developer Tools, Function and Smoke Testings Efforts

Hey all! It's time to both expand and contract some things around automation and testing. Thusfar all of the work on Jenkins and Tarmac and other 'official' build and testing automation has been done exclusively by Soren and me, In the mean team, several people have been hacking on projects that r

Re: [Openstack] Coalescing and Coordinating Continuous Integration, Developer Tools, Function and Smoke Testings Efforts

Monty, this is great stuff, glad to see significant movement on the CI/testing front. The OpenStack PPB has claimed the hour prior to the OpenStack weekly meeting, can you go 2 hours earlier? Thanks, John -Original Message- From: openstack-bounces+john=openstack@lists.launchpad.net

[Openstack] Overview of CI/Testing

Hey everybody, Here's a quick write up on what we have at the moment and what the plan is moving forward, as it stands today. In case you weren't aware, the Jenkins instance sits at: http://jenkins.openstack.org If you think you want to help administer/hack on our Jenkins, that is managed throug

Re: [Openstack] Coalescing and Coordinating Continuous Integration, Developer Tools, Function and Smoke Testings Efforts

It has been pointed out that the hour before the openstack meeting belongs to PPB - so let's make that a proposal for 2 hours before #openstack-meeting. On 06/07/2011 10:44 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > Hey all! > > It's time to both expand and contract some things around automation and > testing. Th

Re: [Openstack] Coalescing and Coordinating Continuous Integration, Developer Tools, Function and Smoke Testings Efforts

Hey Monty, +1 to all of this. We appreciate all the work you guys have done keeping this stuff going. On Jun 7, 2011, at 8:44 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > Hey all! > > It's time to both expand and contract some things around automation and > testing. Thusfar all of the work on Jenkins and Tarm

Re: [Openstack] Coalescing and Coordinating Continuous Integration, Developer Tools, Function and Smoke Testings Efforts

+1 from me too, definitely a crucial behind-the-scenes job. I can haz automated doc builds now thanks to you and CI, and I do appreciate it. *Anne Gentle* a...@openstack.org my blog | my book| LinkedIn

Re: [Openstack] Coalescing and Coordinating Continuous Integration, Developer Tools, Function and Smoke Testings Efforts

love it! Im good with the updated proposed meeting time - will miss it this week, but am looking forward to jumping in. - joe On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > It has been pointed out that the hour before the openstack meeting > belongs to PPB - so let's make that a proposal f

[Openstack] OpenStack CLA Information

Developers: I want to make everyone aware of an email that is coming to many developers in the OpenStack community this afternoon. I am doing a review of the existing Individual and Corporate CLA agreements and have found 72 Corporate CLAs and 336 Individual CLAs. The OpenStack Wiki requests that

Re: [Openstack] Overview of CI/Testing

Hi Monty, I spent a few moments to put together some more detailed notes on SmokeStack: http://wiki.openstack.org/smokestack Screenshots and a link to the live server are on that wiki page. At this point the ability to specify custom nova and glance branches is supported. Each job runs a set

Re: [Openstack] Overview of CI/Testing

Thanks for the update Monty :) > That's just testing API in a VM though, and doesn't get us to testing > actual bare-metal deployment or integration testing. At Rackspace, we > have some machines set aside at the moment, and have had others offer > chunks of machines to test various combinations

Re: [Openstack] Overview of CI/Testing

On 06/07/2011 02:36 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > Hi Monty, > > I spent a few moments to put together some more detailed notes on > SmokeStack: > > http://wiki.openstack.org/smokestack > > Screenshots and a link to the live server are on that wiki page. > > At this point the ability to specify cust

Re: [Openstack] Overview of CI/Testing

+1 for chef over debs! On Jun 7, 2011, at 12:38 PM, Andy Smith wrote: > Thanks for the update Monty :) > > That's just testing API in a VM though, and doesn't get us to testing > actual bare-metal deployment or integration testing. At Rackspace, we > have some machines set aside at the moment

Re: [Openstack] Coalescing and Coordinating Continuous Integration, Developer Tools, Function and Smoke Testings Efforts

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > Hey all! > > It's time to both expand and contract some things around automation and > testing. Thusfar all of the work on Jenkins and Tarmac and other > 'official' build and testing automation has been done exclusively by > Soren and me, In t

Re: [Openstack] Overview of CI/Testing

On 06/07/2011 02:38 PM, Andy Smith wrote: > Thanks for the update Monty :) My pleasure as always. :) > That's just testing API in a VM though, and doesn't get us to testing > actual bare-metal deployment or integration testing. At Rackspace, we > have some machines set aside at the m

Re: [Openstack] Overview of CI/Testing

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 06/07/2011 02:38 PM, Andy Smith wrote: > > Thanks for the update Monty :) > > My pleasure as always. :) > > > That's just testing API in a VM though, and doesn't get us to > testing > > actual bare-metal deployment or integration

Re: [Openstack] Coalescing and Coordinating Continuous Integration, Developer Tools, Function and Smoke Testings Efforts

On 06/07/2011 02:52 PM, Andy Smith wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Monty Taylor > wrote: > > Hey all! > > It's time to both expand and contract some things around automation and > testing. Thusfar all of the work on Jenkins and Tarmac and o

Re: [Openstack] Overview of CI/Testing

On 06/07/2011 03:03 PM, Andy Smith wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Monty Taylor > wrote: > > On 06/07/2011 02:38 PM, Andy Smith wrote: > > Thanks for the update Monty :) > > My pleasure as always. :) > > > That's just testing A

Re: [Openstack] Overview of CI/Testing

I'd like to propose that you two agree that you've agreed to agree on agreeing. All in agreement? -jay On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > > On 06/07/2011 03:03 PM, Andy Smith wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Monty Taylor > > wrot

Re: [Openstack] Overview of CI/Testing

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > I'd like to propose that you two agree that you've agreed to agree on > agreeing. > > All in agreement? > NO. P.S. Maybe? > > -jay > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > > > > > On 06/07/2011 03:03 PM, Andy Smith wrote:

Re: [Openstack] Overview of CI/Testing

Matt Ray and I have extended/modified some of the Anso-based chef scripts to configure the debs on systems. I think Matt's focused on getting a systems built from bare metal using his spiceweasel tool and mine are focused on inclusion in crowbar that includes the pxe/install environment for bar

Re: [Openstack] Overview of CI/Testing

2011/6/7 Andy Smith : > At the moment the two closest things to being "official" installations for > us (me? are the chef recipes and the nova.sh script (the nova.sh script > obviously being only targeted at testing and dev though), those are what we > use to verify that the system is functional an

Re: [Openstack] [SPAM] Re: Coalescing and Coordinating Continuous Integration, Developer Tools, Function and Smoke Testings Efforts

John Purrier wrote: > Correct, testing/CI is at 12:00 PDT, PPB meeting is at 1:00 PDT, and the > weekly OpenStack meeting is at 2:00 PDT on Tuesdays. All set on the common meetings one: https://www.google.com/calendar/ical/bj05mroquq28jhud58esggqmh4%40group.calendar.google.com/public/basic.ics (

Re: [Openstack] Overview of CI/Testing

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Soren Hansen wrote: > 2011/6/7 Andy Smith : > > At the moment the two closest things to being "official" installations > for > > us (me? are the chef recipes and the nova.sh script (the nova.sh script > > obviously being only targeted at testing and dev though), th

Re: [Openstack] GlusterFS project proposal online

Proposal looks great! I'm wondering if you are aware of Redhat's CloudFS project. It adds namespace isolation, ID isolation, storage encryption and network encryption to Gluster. Having these kind of features takes a step towards addressing cloud computing privacy issues. I'm not sure it's in t

Re: [Openstack] suggestion for data backup/recovery in swift

> What if a container could be marked as "versioning enabled" > and therefore the proxy server would rewrite uploads to > distinct versioned objects and translate plain gets to the latest version? > > Example: > > Upload sample.txt, becomes sample.txt-1306882418.68949 > Upload sample.txt again, b