need these thing:1) QOS control2) VLan3) netflow monitoring4) link up
>> mulitple vswitch to form a bigger network
Really not sure the quantum API can do that or not.
Thanks for you reply, Peter !!!
Thanks
from Peter
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 11:14:38 +0100
Subject: Re: [Openstack] openv
gins (which implement a control plane
too), and you're positive that they cannot satisfy your requirements, so
you need to write something new?
[1] http://networkheresy.com/tag/ovsdb/
[2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pfaff-ovsdb-proto-02
> Thanks
> from Peter
>
>
> --
Comments inline.
Salvatore
On 22 June 2013 14:09, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 22.06.2013 12:14, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
>
>> Yes, it is a very common use case.
>> Nowadays, everybody who deploys Xen, KVM, or LXC without a Cloud
>> Management System is actually using Open vSwitch.
>> In t
On 22.06.2013 12:14, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
Yes, it is a very common use case.
Nowadays, everybody who deploys Xen, KVM, or LXC without a Cloud
Management System is actually using Open vSwitch.
In that case you can program Open vSwitch using its own interface to
provide virtual networks.
Cita
eline then
parse the output. But this is not a good practice.3) i want to do
live-migration with auto network transfer in pandora. So i need to control a
vswitch.
Thanksfrom Peter
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 11:14:38 +0100
Subject: Re: [Openstack] openvswitch instead of quantum
From: sorla...@nic
Yes, it is a very common use case.
Nowadays, everybody who deploys Xen, KVM, or LXC without a Cloud Management
System is actually using Open vSwitch.
In that case you can program Open vSwitch using its own interface to
provide virtual networks.
When deploying Openstack, you can use Open vSwitch wi
6 matches
Mail list logo
