Thanks. This approach looks promising.
From: Alex Glikson [mailto:glik...@il.ibm.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2013 2:18 AM
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net; ch...@christopherbartels.com
Subject: Re: [Openstack] VM disk affinity during live migration
Right. A slightly different approach
ch...@christopherbartels.com,
> Cc:Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Date: 01/06/2013 07:39 AM
> Subject:Re: [Openstack] VM disk affinity during live migration
> --
>
>
>
> Hi Chris,
>
>
y
To: ch...@christopherbartels.com,
Cc: Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Date: 01/06/2013 07:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Openstack] VM disk affinity during live migration
Hi Chris,
I think that you are using live migration without specifying target host,
o:glik...@il.ibm.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, May 31, 2013 7:34 AM
> *To:* ch...@christopherbartels.com
> *Cc:* openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> *Subject:* Re: [Openstack] VM disk affinity during live migration
>
> ** **
>
> There is an ongoing work to refactor live migration
2013 7:34 AM
To: ch...@christopherbartels.com
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] VM disk affinity during live migration
There is an ongoing work to refactor live migration code, including use of
scheduler to find/validate placement. At the moment the admin would need to
make sure he/she is do
There is an ongoing work to refactor live migration code, including use of
scheduler to find/validate placement. At the moment the admin would need
to make sure he/she is doing the right thing.
Regards,
Alex
==
6 matches
Mail list logo
