Adam Young wrote:
> Can we get this on the Agenda for todays meeting, take an informal
> poll, and formalize it? If So, I'll write it up and post on the wiki.
Sorry, I missed the thread. Next time you can just add the topic
directly on the wiki @ http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/ProjectMeetin
Posted to
http://wiki.openstack.org/URLs
Since the vast majority of people seem to want the functionality in the
URL as opposed to the project name, I have converted to using that
scheme. Hence
https://hostname/identity/main.
Thanks
___
Maili
Can we get this on the Agenda for todays meeting, take an informal
poll, and formalize it? If So, I'll write it up and post on the wiki.
On 04/30/2012 05:29 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Apr 30, 2012, at 3:20 PM, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 01:58:24PM -0500, Dolph
For what it's worth I agree, in my experience internal project names do not
translate well to public API URIs. I have found that over spans of time as
components may be replaced, rewritten or sourced to other vendors, focusing
on naming over function simply causes issues.
Thanks,
~Matt Trefethen
My vote is for service/API names. This convention is what the documentation
uses whenever possible.
http://wiki.openstack.org/Documentation/Conventions
Thanks,
Anne
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Adam Young wrote:
> On 04/30/2012 02:58 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
>
> I very much like the idea t
On Apr 30, 2012, at 3:20 PM, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 01:58:24PM -0500, Dolph Mathews wrote:
>> I very much like the idea that we should have a well documented
>> recommendation on this topic.
>>
>> My only criticism is that the API/service names should be used in p
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Adam Young wrote:
> I think we can propose both, and let people weigh in. I'm of equal mind,
> to be honest, and could see and argument for Keystone versus Identity.
api.openstack.org lists an Identity API and a Compute API, etc. This
proposal is just mapping
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 01:58:24PM -0500, Dolph Mathews wrote:
> I very much like the idea that we should have a well documented
> recommendation on this topic.
>
> My only criticism is that the API/service names should be used in place of
> project names, e.g. https://hostname/identity, https://h
On 04/30/2012 02:58 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
I very much like the idea that we should have a well documented
recommendation on this topic.
My only criticism is that the API/service names should be used in
place of project names, e.g. https://hostname/identity,
https://hostname/compute, etc.
I very much like the idea that we should have a well documented
recommendation on this topic.
My only criticism is that the API/service names should be used in place of
project names, e.g. https://hostname/identity, https://hostname/compute,
etc.
-Dolph
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Adam You
10 matches
Mail list logo
