On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:23 AM, andi abes wrote:
>> late to the party... but I'll dabble.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
>>> * rob_hirschf...@dell.com (rob_hirschf...@dell.com) wrote:
We've been discussing u
* Dan Wendlandt (d...@nicira.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:23 AM, andi abes wrote:
> > late to the party... but I'll dabble.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> >> * rob_hirschf...@dell.com (rob_hirschf...@dell.com) wrote:
> >>> We've been discussing using Ope
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:23 AM, andi abes wrote:
> late to the party... but I'll dabble.
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
>> * rob_hirschf...@dell.com (rob_hirschf...@dell.com) wrote:
>>> We've been discussing using Open vSwitch as the basis for non-Quantum Nova
>>> Netw
t is my two cents.
>>> Thanks
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Once of the things that I believe could help migration is getting
>>>> Quantum API integrates into abstractions like Fog. In fact, I've proposed
>>>> a
>>>> Summit topi
;>> Quantum API integrates into abstractions like Fog. In fact, I've proposed
>>> a Summit topic about exactly that.
>>>
>>
>> This sounds interesting. It seems that there is also some overlapping -
>> for example the address management and DHCP handi
late to the party... but I'll dabble.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> * rob_hirschf...@dell.com (rob_hirschf...@dell.com) wrote:
>> We've been discussing using Open vSwitch as the basis for non-Quantum Nova
>> Networking deployments in Folsom. While not Quantum, it feels
oposed a Summit
>> topic about exactly that.
>>
>
> This sounds interesting. It seems that there is also some overlapping -
> for example the address management and DHCP handing by Quantum and FOG
>
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> -----Original Message--
s.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Quantum vs. Nova-network in Folsom
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 12:39 PM, wrote:
Stackers,
I think this is a reasonable approach and appreciate the clarification of
use-cases.
We've been discussing using Open vSwitch as the basis for non-Quantum Nova
Ne
-Original Message-
From: Dan Wendlandt [mailto:d...@nicira.com]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 12:57 PM
To: Hirschfeld, Rob
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net; openstack-...@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Quantum vs. Nova-network in Folsom
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 12:39 PM, wr
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 12:39 PM, wrote:
> Stackers,
>
> I think this is a reasonable approach and appreciate the clarification of
> use-cases.
>
> We've been discussing using Open vSwitch as the basis for non-Quantum Nova
> Networking deployments in Folsom. While not Quantum, it feels like we
* rob_hirschf...@dell.com (rob_hirschf...@dell.com) wrote:
> We've been discussing using Open vSwitch as the basis for non-Quantum Nova
> Networking deployments in Folsom. While not Quantum, it feels like we're
> bringing Nova Networking a step closer to some of the core technologies that
> Qua
Stackers,
I think this is a reasonable approach and appreciate the clarification of
use-cases.
We've been discussing using Open vSwitch as the basis for non-Quantum Nova
Networking deployments in Folsom. While not Quantum, it feels like we're
bringing Nova Networking a step closer to some of
12 matches
Mail list logo
