Hi Thierry
Thanks for the response.
>So in summary... yes this is currently harder than it should be and I'd
>like to fix that. Yes you're welcome to edit [1] so that it's made more
>current. If you think it has value I can retroactively mention past
>OSSAs in [2]. And you should have a look at [
Jolyon Brown wrote:
> In my (day) job (not Limilo!) we're currently evaluating an IBM product
> which is underpinned by OpenStack. During review our InfoSec people
> claimed many (22) open CVE vulnerabilities for the underlying version of
> OpenStack used (Folsom). I don't believe this to be the ca
2 matches
Mail list logo
